African Journal of Food Science
Subscribe to AJFS
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - EB9DE0B55549


Vol.12(2), pp. 21-27 , February 2018
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2017.1568
ISSN: 1996-0794


 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Shelf life and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits as affected by different Packaging Materials



Ashenafi Haile
  • Ashenafi Haile
  • School of Plant and Horticultural Science, Hawassa University, P. O. Box 05, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Tura Safawo
  • Tura Safawo
  • College of Dry Land Agriculture, Samara University, P. O. Box 132, Samara, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 23 January 2017  Accepted: 23 June 2017  Published: 28 February 2018

Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is one of the most widely cultivated and extensively consumed horticultural crops in Ethiopia. Tomato has a limited shelf life at ambient conditions, is highly perishable fruit and it changes continuously after harvesting. There are many postharvest technologies that extend the marketable life of fruits and vegetables. The study was to evaluate the effect of packing materials on shelf-life and quality of tomato fruit at Samara, Northeastern rift valley of Ethiopia. Three types of packaging material were taken, that is, low density perforated and non-perforated polyethylene bag, carton and without packaging as a control. Physiological weight loss, decay percentage, color score, overall acceptability and percentage marketability were assessed for every three days of storage. The result revealed that packaging had a significant effect on physiological weight loss, decay percentage, color score, overall acceptability and marketability. The lowest physiological weight loss of 0.29 and 1.72% was recorded from non-perforated polyethylene bag at 3 and 6 days of storage, respectively; further increase in the storage period with the lowest physiological weight loss (24.57%) was recorded from perforate polyethylene bag. Moreover, the lowest (0.00%) decay percentage and the highest (60%) marketability were recorded from perforated polyethylene bag on day 9 of storage. Decay loss of tomato fruits at the end of storage was much (60%) higher on non-perforated polyethylene bag than the perforated and carton (0.00%). Color and overall acceptability score of tomato fruit was also maximum on perforated polyethylene bag and the lowest was obtained from control treatment at the end of storage. It can, thus, be concluded that packaging of tomato fruits in perforated polyethylene bags resulted in extending storage-life with better-quality of the produce in samara area.

 

Key words: Tomato fruit, packaging material, storage life, quality.

Anon (2004a). Fruit Ripening. 

 

Aramyan LH, van Gogh JB (2014). Reducing postharvest food losses in developing economies by using a network of excellence as an intervention tool. In: Proceedings of the IFAMA 2014 Symposium Proceedings' People Feed the World.

 
 

Aulakh J, Regm A, Fulton J, Alexander C (2013). Food losses: Developing a consistent global estimation framework.

 
 

Bachmann J, Earles R (2000). Post-harvest handling of fruits and vegetables. ATTRA Horticultural Technical Note. 19p.

 
 

Badshah N, Mohammad S, Qaim M, Ayaz S (1997). Shelf life study on tomato storage with different packing materials. Sarhad. J. Agric. 13(4):347-356.

 
 

Basel RM, Racicot K, Senecal AG (2002). Long shelf-life banana storage using MAP storage coupled with post-harvest MCP treatment. In: Annual Meeting and Food Expo-Anaheim, California, USA. pp. 15-19.

 
 

Ben-Yenonshuna S (1985). Individual seal packaging of fruits and vegetables in plastic film new postharvest technique. J. Hort. Sci. 20:32-37.

 
 

Chiesa A, Varela MS, Fraschina A (1998a). Acidity and pigment changes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit ripening. Acta Hort. (ISHS), 464:487-487.
Crossref

 
 

Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2015). Crop Production Forecast Sample Survey, 2013/14. Report on Area and Production for Major Crops (for Private Peasant Holdings "Meher" season). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

 
 

Dadzie BK, Orchard JE (1997). Routing postharvest screening of banana/plantain hybrids criteria and methods. International network for banana and plantain (Inibap), Technical Guidelines. Rome, Italy.

 
 

FAO (2013). The state of food and agriculture. Food systems for better nutrition, Rome.

 
 

FAOSTAT (2015). Available online: 

View  (accessed on 20 November 2015).

 
 

Giovannoni J (2001). Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52:725-749.
Crossref

 
 

González GA, Buta JG, Wang CY (2003). Methyl jasmonate and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) reduce decay and maintain postharvest quality of papaya "Sunrise". Post. Biol. Technol. 28: 361-370.
Crossref

 
 

Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, van Otterdijk R , Meybeck A (2011). Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent Causes and Prevention. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.

 
 

Kader AA, Rolle RS (2004). The role of postharvest management in assuring the quality and safety of horticultural produce. FAO Agricultural Support Systems Division, 152:1010-1365.

 
 

Kader AA (2005). Increasing food availability by reducing postharvest losses of fresh produce. In: International Postharvest Symposium 682:2169-2176.
Crossref

 
 

Kumar V, Shankar R, Kumar G (2015). Strategies used for reducing postharvest losses in fruits & vegetables. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 6:130-137.

 
 

Mersha A (2008). Effects of stage and intensity of truss pruning on fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Alemaya University pp. 10-16.

 
 

Mir N, Beaudry RM (2000). Modified Atmosphere Packaging. 213p.

 
 

Mohan V, Gupta S, Thomas S, Mickey H, Charakana C, Chauhan VS, Sharma K, Kumar R, Tyagi K, Sarma S (2016). Tomato fruits show wide phenomic diversity but fruit developmental genes show low genomic diversity.

 
 

Paull RE (1993). Pineapple, papaya. In: Symour GB, Taylor JE, Tucker GA (eds.). Biochemistry of fruit ripening. Chapman and Hall, New York, Tokyo. pp. 291-311.
Crossref

 
 

Perez K, Mercado J, Soto-Valdez H(2003).Effect of storage temperature on the shelf life of Hass avocado (Persea americana). Food Sci. Technol. Intern. 10:73-77.
Crossref

 
 

Proulx E, Nunes MCN, Emond JP, Brecht JK (2005). Quality attributes limiting papaya postharvest life at chilling and non-chilling temperatures. Proc. Flor. State Hort. Soc. 118:389-395.

 
 

Rosa S (2006). Postharvest management of fruit and vegetables in the Asia-Pacific region/Asian Productivity Organization. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO).

 
 

Sabir FK, Agar T (2011). Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene and modified atmosphere packing on postharvest life and quality in tomatoes. J. Food Qual. 34:111-118.
Crossref

 
 

Sabir MS, Shah SZA, Afzal A (2004). Effect of chemical treatment, wax coating, oil dipping and different wrapping materials on physio-chemical characteristics and storage behavior of apple (Malus domestica Borkh). Pak. J. Nutr. 3(2):122-127.
Crossref

 
 

Salunkhe DK, Desai BB (1984). Post-harvest biotechnology of vegetables. Vol. 1. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, US. pp. 55-82.

 
 

SAS Institute Inc (2002). Statistical Analysis Software Package, SAS/STAT user"s guide version 9. SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC, USA.

 
 

Thompson AK (2001). Controlled atmospheric storage of fruits and vegetables. International Printed in UK. Biddles Ltd, Guidford and Kings Lynn, UK. 278p.

 
 

Tilahun S, Kebede W (2004). Forced ventilation evaporative cooling: A case study on banana, papaya, orange, mandarin, and lemon. Trop. Agric. 81:1-6.

 
 

Ullah J (2009). Storage of fresh tomatoes to determine the level of (CaCl2) coating and optimum temperature for extended shelf life, Asian Institute of Technology Bangkok, Thailand.

 
 

Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn MS (2011). Influence of pre-harvest and postharvest treatments on stored tomato quality. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6(12):2725-2736.

 
 

Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn MS (2011b) Physiological and chemical quality of carrots subjected to pre- and post-harvest treatments. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6(12):2715-2724.

 
 

Zorya S, Morgan N, Diaz Rios L, Hodges R, Bennett B, Stathers T, Mwebaze P, Lamb J (2011). Missing food: the case of postharvest grain losses in sub-Saharan Africa.

 

 


APA Haile, A. (2018). Shelf life and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits as affected by different Packaging Materials. African Journal of Food Science, 12(2), 21-27.
Chicago Ashenafi Haile,. "Shelf life and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits as affected by different Packaging Materials." African Journal of Food Science 12, no. 2 (2018): 21-27.
MLA Ashenafi Haile,. "Shelf life and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits as affected by different Packaging Materials." African Journal of Food Science 12.2 (2018): 21-27.
   
DOI https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2017.1568
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJFS/article-abstract/EB9DE0B55549

Subscription Form