African Journal of Plant Science
Subscribe to AJPS
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 13A81E464269


Vol.11(6), pp. 229-239 , June 2017
DOI: 10.5897/AJPS2016.1502
ISSN: 1996-0824



Full Length Research Paper

Combining ability and heterotic orientation of mid-altitude sub-humid tropical maize inbred lines for grain yield and related traits



Tolera Keno
  • Tolera Keno
  • Ethiopian institute of Agricultural Research, P. O. Box 186, Bako, Ethiopia
  • Google Scholar
Mosisa Worku
  • Mosisa Worku
  • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Nairobi, Kenya
  • Google Scholar
Habtamu Zeleke
  • Habtamu Zeleke
  • Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 13 November 2016  Accepted: 07 May 2017  Published: 30 June 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Information on the combining ability and heterotic pattern of elite inbred lines is essential to maximize their use in hybrid maize development. This study was conducted to determine combining ability and heterotic pattern of locally developed maize inbred lines for grain yield and related traits. Seventeen inbred lines (10 female inbred lines and 7 tester inbred lines) were used to generate 70 single cross hybrids using line by tester crossing scheme. The resulting 70 cross progenies plus two standard checks arranged in 8×9 alpha lattice design replicated twice were planted at three mid-altitude sub-humid testing sites in Ethiopia (Bako, Hawassa and Pawe) in 2011 main cropping season. The combined analysis of variance for yield and other related traits showed highly significant differences among genotypes, crosses, female inbred lines (General combining ability, GCA), tester inbred lines (GCA), line x tester (Specific combining ability, SCA); and the interactions of these source of variation with the environment for all traits studied except for ear aspect (EA) and grain yield (GY) in female inbred lines (GCA), EA in inbred line testers (GCA) and for days to anthesis (AD) in line x tester (SCA) x environment. The significance of both GCA (lines and testers) and SCA of LxT for AD, days to silking (DS), plant height (PH), ear height (EH), EA and GY showed that both additive and non-additive gene actions are important in controlling these traits. Furthermore, the proportion of GCA sum of squares were greater than the SCA sum of squares for AD, DS, PH, EH, and EA indicating the predominance of additive gene actions in controlling these traits. For GY, the ratio of GCA to SCA sum of squares was near to unity indicating both additive and non-additive gene actions were equally important. This study identified inbred lines that can make good cross combination for more than one trait. L1 was found to be good combiner for lower values of AD, DS, PH and EH indicating that this line could be used in improving maize for earliness and short stature. L4 was ideal parent for reducing AD and DS. L3 was found to be good combiner for GY and other related traits. In addition, lines were grouped into heterotic group A, B or AB based on SCA. Based on its per se performance and combining ability, L3 was proposed to be used as a tester in heterotic group B. This study  also validated T5 remain to be used as a tester in heterotic group A. Based on the SCA of crosses, heterosis and per se performance of the parents,  five best cross combinations were identified for possible release or for use as parents of three way hybrids. Further verification of the stability of the selected hybrids and the new proposed tester across more locations needs to be done.

 

Key words: General combining ability, specific combining ability, heterotic pattern

Abate T, Shiferaw B, Menkir A, Wegary D, Kebede Y, Tesfaye K, Kassie M, Bogale G, Tadesse B, Keno T (2015). Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia. Food Secur. 7(5):965-981.
Crossref

 

Ahmad A, Saleem M (2003). Combining ability analysis in Zea mays L. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 5:239-244.

 
 

Alam A, Ahmed S, Begum M, Sultan M (2008). Heterosis and combining ability for grain yield and its contributing characters in maize. Bangladesh J. Agric. Res. 33(3):375-379.
Crossref

 
 

Asefa B (2004). Heterosis and combining ability of transitional highland maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. View

 
 

Asefa B, Mohammed H, Zelleke H (2008). Combining ability of transitional highland maize inbred lines. East Afr. J. Sci. 2(1):19-24.
Crossref

 
 

Bello O, Olaoye G (2009). Combining ability for maize grain yield and other agronomic characters in a typical southern guinea savanna ecology of Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8(11): 2518-2522.

 
 

Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957). Experimental designs. Published by John Wiley and Sons.

 
 

Dabholkar A (1999). Elements Of Bio Metrical Genetics (revised And Enlarged Edition). Concept Publishing Company.

 
 

Dagne W (2002). Combining ability analysis for traits of agronomic importance in maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines with different levels of resistance to grey leaf spot (Cercospora zea maydis). MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

 
 

Dagne W, Vivek B, Berhanu T, Koste A, Mosisa W, Legesse W (2010). Combining ability and heterotic relationships between CIMMYT and Ethiopian maize inbred lines. Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci. 20:82-93.

 
 

FAOSTAT F (2015). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. Rome: FAO.

 
 

Hadji T (2004). Combining ability analysis for yield and yield-related traits in quality protein maize (QPM) inbred lines. M. Sc. Thesis. School of graduate studies, Alemaya University, Ethiopia.

 
 

Hallauer AR, Miranda J (1958). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

 
 

Ji Q, Xu X, Wang K (2013). Genetic transformation of major cereal crops. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 57:495-508.
Crossref

 
 

Kanyamasoro MG, Karungi J, Asea G, Gibson P (2012). Determination of the heterotic groups of maize inbred lines and the inheritance of their resistance to the maize weevil. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 20(s1):99-104.

 
 

Kempthorne O (1957). An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

 
 

Legesse B, Pixley K, Botha A-M (2009). Combining ability and heterotic grouping of highland transition maize inbred lines. Maydica 54:1-9.

 
 

McCann J (2005). Maize and grace: Africa's encounter with a New World crop, 1500-2000. Harvard University Press.
Crossref

 
 

Meseka S, Menkir A, Ibrahim A, Ajala S (2006). Genetic analysis of performance of maize inbred lines selected for tolerance to drought under low nitrogen. Maydica 51(3-4):487.

 
 

Mosa H (2010). Estimation of combining ability of maize inbred lines using top cross mating design. J. Agric. Res. Kafer El-Sheikh Univ. 36:1-14.

 
 

Mosisa W, Legesse W, Berhanu T, Girma D, Girum A, Wende A, Tolera K, Gezahegn B, Dagne W, Solomon A (2011). Status and future direction of maize research and production in Ethiopia. In. Meeting the Challenges of Global Climate Change and Food Security through Innovative Maize Research. P 17.

 
 

Rahman H, Arifuddin Z, Shah S, Iqbal M, Khalil I (2010). Evaluation of maize S2 lines in testcross combinations I: flowering and morphological traits. Pak. J. Bot. 42:1619-1627.

 
 

SAS (2009). SAS software, version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.

 
 

Sharma JR (2003). Statistical and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. New Age International (P) Limited.

 
 

Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1979). Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi : Kalyani Publishers.

 
 

Tolesa B, Gobezayehu T, Worku M, Desalegne Y, Mulatu K, Bogale G (1993). Genetic improvement of maize in Ethiopia: A review. In: 1. National Maize Workshop of Ethiopia, Addis Abeba (Ethiopia), 5-7 May 1992, 1993. IAR.

 
 

Wegary D, Labuschagne M, Vivek B (2011). The Influence of Water Stress on Yield and Related Characteristics in Inbred Quality Protein Maize Lines and Their Hybrid Progeny. Water Stress 199.

 
 

Worku M, Abera W, Tadesse B, Wolde L, Wegary D, Azmach G (2009). Performance of variety cross hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.) in the mid-altitude and highland transition areas of Ethiopia. East Afr. J. Sci. 3(1):80-86.
Crossref

 
 

Worku M, Tuna H, Nigussie M, Deressa A, Tanner D, Twumasi-Afriyie S (2002). Maize production trends and research in Ethiopia. Mandefro, N Tanner, DG, Twumasi-Afriyie, S(eds). pp.10-14.

 
 

Xingming F, Bihua H, Feng L(2004). Analysis of combining ability and heterotic groups of yellow grain quality protein maize inbreds. In: Integrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, 5-11 February 2002, 2004. CIMMYT, P 143.

 
 

Yadessa A, Bekere D, Takele T, Emiru N, Degefe A (2005). Effects of Cajanus cajan biomass transfer and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of open pollinated maize variety on acidic nitosols of western Oromia, Ethiopia. In. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, pp. 1143-1148.

 
 

Zeleke H, Nepir G (2007). Heterosis and Combining Ability in Qpm Versions of Early Generation Highland Maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines. Haramaya University.

 

 


APA Keno, T., Worku, M., & Zeleke, H. (2017). Combining ability and heterotic orientation of mid-altitude sub-humid tropical maize inbred lines for grain yield and related traits. African Journal of Plant Science, 11(6), 229-239.
Chicago Tolera Keno, Mosisa Worku and Habtamu Zeleke. "Combining ability and heterotic orientation of mid-altitude sub-humid tropical maize inbred lines for grain yield and related traits." African Journal of Plant Science 11, no. 6 (2017): 229-239.
MLA Tolera Keno, Mosisa Worku and Habtamu Zeleke. "Combining ability and heterotic orientation of mid-altitude sub-humid tropical maize inbred lines for grain yield and related traits." African Journal of Plant Science 11.6 (2017): 229-239.
   
DOI 10.5897/AJPS2016.1502
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJPS/article-abstract/13A81E464269

Subscription Form