African Journal of Political Science and International Relations
Subscribe to AJPSIR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - BE7826D66516


Vol.11(11), pp. 317-338 , November 2017
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2017.1047
ISSN: 1996-0832


 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Barotseland and the advocacy for statehood: A case entailing the complexities of statehood and state recognition in public international law



Ancietos Mwansa
  • Ancietos Mwansa
  • Department of Politics and Administrative Studies, School of Social Sciences, Mulungushi University P. O. Box 80415. Great North Road Campus, Kabwe, Zambia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 20 July 2017  Accepted: 18 September 2017  Published: 30 November 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


This paper discussed the Barotseland claim for statehood from the republic of Zambia with respect to the Barotseland Agreement (1964) signed between the Northern Rhodesian government and the Barotse Royal Establishment (BRE) in April 1964.  In discussing the Barotseland question, using a qualitative approach, this paper considered the sentiments that fuel the reasons for seeking separate statehood by Barotseland pro-separatists. An analysis based on the criteria of 1933 Montevideo Convention on Statehood was made, and considerations were also made on the viability of these claims (for statehood) with respect to the possible ramifications of the grant for statehood. Self-determination of people is guaranteed and is a principle or right supported by the United Nations (UN) Charter within the rights of groups seeking self-determination. Ergo, statehood is a matter that requires the satisfaction of the criteria necessary for its pursuit. However, as this paper contended, the status of statehood is usually placed outside the domestic confines of where the claim is being made, and into the international realm. It is therefore imperative to consider these questions within the framework of Public International Law and Politics because ultimately, in a highly-globalized world, statehood or recognition of an entity as a state cannot be conferred without the involvement and resolutions of the international community through the auspices of the United Nations - in which case statehood is concretized as this gives a state legal personality. For comparative and illustrative purposes, the paper drew on some famous statehood questions from different parts of the world. This paper concludes that the Barotseland calls for statehood do not satisfy the 1933 Montevideo Convention and that the feasibility of a separate Barotseland is far from possible.

Key words: Barotseland, independence, secession, self-determination, sovereignty, statehood, state recognition, Zambia.

 

Akehurst M (1997). Modern introduction to International Law. New York: Routledge.

 

Berlin AH (2009). Recognition as sanction: Using international recognition of new states to deter, punish, and contain bad actors. Uni. Pennsylvania J. Int. Law. 31(2):531-591.

 
 

Brand RA (1995). The Role of International Law in the Twenty-First Century: External Sovereignty and International Law. Fordham Int. Law J. 18:5.

 
 

Brilmayer L (1991). Secession and self-determination. Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2434, Retrieved from: 

View

 
 

Brownlie I (1990). Principles of public international law 5th Edition.

 
 

Buchheit LC (1978). The legitimacy of self-determination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

 
 

Caplan G (1970). The elites of Barotseland 1878-1969. A political history of Zambia's Western Province. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

 
 

Chen FT (2001). The Meaning of "States" in the membership provisions of the United Nations Charter. Indiana Int. Comparative Law Revi. 25(12).

 
 

Christakis T (2012). Secession. 

 
 

Crawford J (1979). The creation of states in international law 1st Edition. Canada: Oxford University Press.

 
 

Crawford J (1988). Outside the Colonial Context, in W.J.A. Macartney

 
 

Crawford J (2006). The creation of states in international law 2nd Edition. Canada: Oxford University Press.

 
 

Delupis I (1974). International law and the independent state. New York: Crane Russak.

 
 

Deng FM (1973). Dynamics of identification: A basis for national integration in the Sudan. Khartoum: Khartoum University Press.

 
 

Deng FM (2004). Green is the colour of the masters: The legacy of slavery and the crisis of national identity in modern Sudan. Gilder Lehman Centre for the study of Slavery, Resistance and Abolition. New Haven Connecticut: Yale University.

 
 

Dimitrios L (2011). Between statehood and Somalia: reflections of Somaliland statehood. Washington University: Washington University. Global Stud. Law Rev. 10:789.

 
 

Distefano G, Heche A (2014). State succession. ed., Self-determination in the Commonwealth (1)17. Retrieved from: 

View

 
 

Eggers AK (2007). When is a State a State? The Case for Recognition of Somaliland. 30 B.C. Int. Comparative Law Rev. (211):214.

 
 

Englebert P, Katharine B (2008). The primacy of politics in separatist dynamics. African Perspective. Afr. Security Stud. 2:31-63.

 
 

Englebert P (2009). Africa: unity, sovereignty & sorrow. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

 
 

Evans G, Newnham J (1998). The Penguin dictionary of international relations. London: Penguin Books. pp. 235-236. Availabe at: 

View

 
 

Farley BR (2010). Calling a state, a state: Somaliland and international recognition. Emory Int. Law Rev. (24)2.

 
 

Franck T (1993). Postmodern tribalism and the right to secession.

 
 

Gluckman M (1965). The ideas of jurisprudence in Barotse jurisprudence. Manchester, Manchester University Press.

 
 

Gudeleviciute V (2005). Does the principle of self-determination prevail over the principle of territorial integrity? Vytautus Magnus University. Int. J. Baltic Law. 2(2).

 
 

Gunaratne R (2008). Who is a subject of international law? Retrieved from: 

View

 
 

Hadji PS (2009). The case for Kurdish statehood. Case Western J. Int. Law 41(2):513-547. Accessed from: 

View

 
 

Hechter M (1999). Internal colonialism: The Celtic fringe in British national development. Transaction Publishers.

 
 

Higgins N (2014). International Law and Wars of National Liberation. 

 
 

Kratochwil F (1995). Sovereignty as Dominium: Is There a Right of Humanitarian Intervention? In Gene Lyons and Michael Mastanduno, eds. Beyond Westphalia: State sovereignty and international intervention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, pp. 1-20.

 
 

Krippendorf K (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishing.

 
 

Lalos D (1979). The different types of armed conflicts according to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols' in Recueil des Cours, 163:116-163.

 
 

Lauterpacht H (1944). Recognition of states in International Law. Yale Law J. 53(3):385-458.
Crossref

 
 

Lakshman IK (2013). A sovereign state is a sovereign state. Daily News (Sri Lanka). 

View

 
 

Mainga M (2010). Bulozi under the Luyana kings: Political evolution and state formation in pre-colonial Zambia. African Books Collective Martin Monograph Series (2004). The approach of International Law to Wars of National liberation. Monograph 3, The Martin Institute: University of Idaho.

 
 

Mufalo M (2011). Re-Examining the argument for the restoration of the Barotseland Agreement. A paper presentation to the CPD National Conference on Traditional Authorities, Decentralisation and Rural Development. Lusaka: Zambia.

 
 

Namushi N (n/d). The Barotseland walk to freedom. Accessed from 

View

 
 

Noyoo N (2016). Barotseland's amalgamation with Zambia: A political conundrum. Pretoria: Kwarts Publishers

 
 

Peter W (2013). Secessionist wave sweeps through Africa: Democratic tide emboldens groups on the continent, raising hopes, tensions'. Retrieved from: 

View

 
 

Poore B (2007). Somaliland: Shackled to a Failed State. Stanford. J. Int. Law. (117):117.

 
 

Raic D (2002). Statehood and the law of self-determination. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

 
 

Schlindler D (2011). Between statehood and Somalia: reflections of Somaliland statehood. Washington University: Washington University. Global Stud. Law Rev. P 789.

 
 

Schoiswohl M (2004). Status and (human rights) obligations of non-recognized de facto regimes in international law: The case of 'Somaliland'.

 
 

Shaw M (2008). International Law 6th Edition. Cambridge University Press.
Crossref

 
 

Sikayile A (2014). The puzzle of state sovereignty: Discourses of contested statehood; the case of Barotseland in Zambia. Norway: Norwegian University of Life Science (NMBU).

 
 

Slaughter AS (1995). Liberal International Relations Theory and International Economic Law. U. J. Int. Law Policy. P 717.

 
 

Taylor CR (1997). A modest proposal: statehood and sovereignty in a global age. University of Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania. J. Int. Econ. Law. 18:3.

 
 

Uzor EK, Okeke GN (2013). The right of people to self-determination and the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of states. NALSAR law Rev. 7(1).

 
 

Worster W (2010). Sovereignty: Two competing theories of state recognition. Universities of Hague and Missouri-Kansas City.

 

 


APA Mwansa, A. (2017). Barotseland and the advocacy for statehood: A case entailing the complexities of statehood and state recognition in public international law. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(11), 317-338.
Chicago Ancietos Mwansa. "Barotseland and the advocacy for statehood: A case entailing the complexities of statehood and state recognition in public international law." African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 11, no. 11 (2017): 317-338.
MLA Ancietos Mwansa. "Barotseland and the advocacy for statehood: A case entailing the complexities of statehood and state recognition in public international law." African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 11.11 (2017): 317-338.
   
DOI https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2017.1047
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJPSIR/article-abstract/BE7826D66516

Subscription Form