African Journal of Political Science and International Relations
Subscribe to AJPSIR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - EA2069655609


Vol.12(1), pp. 1-9 , January 2018
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0920
ISSN: 1996-0832


 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

The Beijing consensus versus the Washington consensus: The dilemma of Chinese engagement in Africa



Jarso Galchu
  • Jarso Galchu
  • Department of Civics and Ethical Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Bule Hora University, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 07 July 2016  Accepted: 01 September 2016  Published: 31 January 2018

Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


This study discusses the reason behind the Chinese hastened engagement in Africa. The study particularly emphasizes debates surrounding such massive involvements from the African, European and Chinese point of view focusing on the main tenets of Washington and Beijing consensuses. The study shows that Beijing consensus has been perceived cynically by traditional western power contending that Chinese involvement in Africa has been built on china’s narrow, and parochial interest of grabbing African’s resources on one hand, and reversing of democratization and human rights improvements taking shape on the continent. The pro- Chinese narratives, on the other hand, argue that Chinese involvement in Africa has been built on the continent’s historical relations with China when fighting colonial imperialism and apartheid system. In addition, it is their shared experiences of humiliation and subjugation at the hand of western imperialist colonial power that coach China and Africa to free their relationship from western style of involvements in one another’s domestic affairs. Africans view Chinese engagement in Africa optimistically as a relief from century-old “civilizing mission” of the former colonial powers. This article argues that besides Chinese soft and non-conditional loans and aids and its commitment to neutrality in its relation to African countries’ domestic affairs, the historical legacies of western influence on Africa, their post-colonial military presences on the continent and their cultural imperialism through imposition of western values and norms has been increasing Africa’s discontent with the western approach. These phenomena have been contributing enormously to Chinese engagement in Africa.

Key words: China, Africa, Washington consensus, Sino-phobia, Beijing consensus.

Aydin, Tekin (2015). China-Africa Relations: An Effectiveness of Chinese Existence in Africa, Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi (32):1-17.

 

Condon M (2012). China in Africa: What the Policy of Non intervention Adds to the western Development Dilemma. PRAXIS. Fletcher J. Human Security 5(27):5-25.

 
 

Eneji A, Onyinye J (2012). Impact of foreign trade and investment on Nigeria's textile industry: The case of China. J. Afr. Stud. Dev. 4(5):130-141. and Financ. Rev. 48(2):59-89.

 
 

Edinger H, Sandrey R (2013). Is China bad for Africa's industrialisation? In Bridges Africa: Is China holding back Africa's industrialisation? International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Geneva, Switzerland 2(6).

 
 

Eichengreen B (2000). Hegemonic Stability Theories of the International Monetary System. In Frieden, J and. Lake, D. International Political Economy Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, Fourth Edition, London: Copyright © 2000 by Bedford/St. Martin's, Routledge. pp. 220-244.

 
 

Fantu C, Obi C (2011). De-coding China-Africa Relations: Partnership for development or '(neo) colonialism by invitation'? The World Financial Review; September -October 2011.

 
 

FOCA (2016). Johannesburg action Plan, 2016-2018, Action Plan and Plan for the Future. African Union Directorate of Information and Communication; Press Release Nº268/2016.p, 20-24).

 
 

Gilpin R, Jean MG (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton university press.

 
 

Huang Y (2011). Rethinking the Beijing Consensus, special essay Asian policy no. 11:1-26.

 
 

Ismi A (2004). Impoverishing a Continent: The World Bank and the IMF in Africa Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

 
 

Kennedy S (2010). The Myth of the Beijing Consensus Journal of Contemporary China. Routlegde Taylor and Francis group. 19(65):461-477.

 
 

Kolodko GW (1998). Equity Issues in Policymaking in Transition Economies. 

 
 

Mehari T (2013). China-Africa Relations: Democracy and Delivery, Report, Aljazeera center for studies.

 
 

Mahuku N, Mbanje C (2013:2). Economic Structural Adjustment Programmes (ESAP) and Multi Party Politics: A New Threat to African Nationalist Parties in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Afr. J. Soc. Sci. 3(1):1-19.

 
 

Manrique G (2015). Something new out of Africa? Chinese, US and EU strategies for the continent. Policy Department. Directorate General for External Policies: European Union.

 
 

Robel M (2010). Why the Beijing Consensus is a Non-Consensus: Implications for Contemporary China-Africa Relations. Culture Mandala: Bull Centre East-West Cult. Econ. Stud. 9(1):7-20.

 
 

Roy S (2014). China and India, "raising power" of African Development: Challenges and Opportunities. Occasional Paper, the Nordic African Institute: Uppsala, Sweden.

 
 

Sanusi L (2012). Neither the Washington nor Beijing Consensus – developmental models to fit African realities and cultures. Speech by Mr Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, at the Eirenicon Africa Public Lecture Series (EAPLS), held at The Royal School of Medicine, London, 27 March 2012.

 
 

Shelton J, Kebemba C (2012). WIN-WIN PARTNERSHIP? China, South Africa and the Extractive Industries. Johannesburg, South Africa: Southern Africa Resource Watch, publisher.

 
 

Stiglitz J (2004). The Post Washington Consensus Consensus, the Initiative for Policy Dialogue. A slight revision of a paper presented at a conference sponsored by Foundation CIDOB and the Initiative for Policy Dialogue held in Barcelona in September 2004, "From the Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance."

 
 

Schiere R, Ndikumana L, Walkenhorst P (2011). China and Africa: An Emerging Partnership for Development? (eds.). African Development Bank Group.

 
 

Tull M (2008). China in Africa: European perception and Responses to the Chinese Challenges. SAIS working papers in African Studies 02-08. German institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin. African Studies Program. The John Hopkins University. Washington Dc.

 
 

Uchehara KE (2009). China-Africa Relations in the 21st Century: Engagement, Compromise and Controversy, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6(23):95-111.

 
 

Williamson J (1999). What Should the Bank Think About the Washington Consensus, Background Paper to the World Bank's World Development Report 2000, July 1999.

 
 

Williamson J (1993). Beijing Consensus versus Washington Consensus. A paper prepared for the Handbook of Emerging Economies, edited by Robert Looney.

 
 

Xuejun T (2016). Ambitious Goals and Bright Prospects, Era for China-Africa Relations, The thinker, shutter stock volume 68.

 

 


APA Galchu, J. (2018). The Beijing consensus versus the Washington consensus: The dilemma of Chinese engagement in Africa. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12(1), 1-9.
Chicago Jarso Galchu. "The Beijing consensus versus the Washington consensus: The dilemma of Chinese engagement in Africa." African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 12, no. 1 (2018): 1-9.
MLA Jarso Galchu. "The Beijing consensus versus the Washington consensus: The dilemma of Chinese engagement in Africa." African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 12.1 (2018): 1-9.
   
DOI https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPSIR2016.0920
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJPSIR/article-abstract/EA2069655609

Subscription Form