Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews
Subscribe to BMBR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 1FF14DD10864


Vol.1(3), pp. 87-102 , September 2006

ISSN: 1538-2273



Review

Genetic engineering, ecosystem change, and agriculture: an update


Lawrence C. Davis




Department of Biochemistry,Kansas State University,141 Chalmers Hall,Manhattan, KS 66506








 Accepted: 14 August 2006  Published: 30 September 2006

Copyright © 2006 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), alternatively called biotech crops, dominate soybean and cotton production and are rapidly increasing their fraction of market share for maize and rice in the U.S.  Engineered canola is important in Canada, soybeans are dominant in Argentina and Brazil, and cotton is prominent in China and India.  Adoption is much slower elsewhere, in large part due to concerns for potential ecosystem effects that may occur through development of weedy plants, by selection of herbicide resistant weeds and by effects of insecticidal proteins on nontarget insects. The precautionary principle is invoked by critics concerned that one must know in advance the effects of GMOs before releasing them.  Alteration of weed species composition of agricultural fields is well documented to occur under herbicide selection pressure.  Gene flow to wild relatives of crop plants can be shown under herbicide selection, and one instance (sunflower) is provided for insect resistance transfer leading to increased seed production by a weedy relative.  Detailed stewardship programs have been developed by seed producers to minimize risks of gene flow. Although herbicides and insecticides are known to have major effects on agroecosystems, the ecosystem impacts of GMOs per se, thus far appear to be small.

 

Key words: gene-flow, herbicide-resistant weeds, genetically engineered crops, Bt maize, Roundup Ready soybeans


APA (2006). Genetic engineering, ecosystem change, and agriculture: an update. Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1(3), 87-102.
Chicago Lawrence C. Davis. "Genetic engineering, ecosystem change, and agriculture: an update." Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews 1, no. 3 (2006): 87-102.
MLA Lawrence C. Davis. "Genetic engineering, ecosystem change, and agriculture: an update." Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Reviews 1.3 (2006): 87-102.
   
DOI
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/BMBR/article-abstract/1FF14DD10864

Subscription Form