Educational Research and Reviews
Subscribe to ERR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 2C68E8362276

Vol.12(1), pp. 36-44 , January 2017
ISSN: 1990-3839

 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

The effects of family leadership orientation on social entrepreneurship, generativity and academic success of college students

Nuri Baloglu
  • Nuri Baloglu
  • Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Education, Kirsehir, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar

 Received: 31 October 2016  Accepted: 28 December 2016  Published: 10 January 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

In this study, the effects of family leadership orientation on social entrepreneurship, generativity and academic education success were examined with the views of college students. The study was conducted at a state university in Central Anatolia in Turkey. 402 college students who attending at three different colleges voluntarily participated in this study. Data were collected by the utilization of Family Leadership Orientation Scale, Social Entrepreneurship Scale, Generativity Scale and Grade Points of Average (GPA) of the students. Data were analyzed by quantitative analysis techniques. The findings showed that college students were pretty under the influence of economic family leadership with 4.52 average score. Social entrepreneurship (3.71), generativity (3.61) and academic achievement (3.03) were evaluated by the students as good level.  There were statistically significant differences in terms of gender and academic achievement for economic and social family leadership orientation. The results of regression analyses showed that the family leadership orientation explains 27% of social entrepreneurship; 16% of generativity and 5% of academic achievement. The family leadership perception, which constitutes three dimensions, namely social, cultural and economic, affects the students’ social entrepreneurship and this consequently influences their generativity and academic achievement. This theory was verified by means of structured equation model test. Model fit indices were CMIN/df = 1.60; NFI = 0.99; RFI = 0.95; IFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.98; CFI = 0.99 and RMSEA = 0.04. The findings were discussed on the basis of relevant literature.

Key words: Family leadership, social entrepreneurship, generativity, academic success.

Austin JE, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J (2006). Social entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 30(1).


Avolio BJ (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. Am. Psychol. 62:25-33


Avolio BJ,Walumbwa FO, Weber TJ (2009) Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions, Annu. Rev. Psychol. Contents 60:421-451.


Baloğlu N, Bulut MB (2015). Aile Liderliği. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6(18):185-197.


Baloğlu N, Bulut MB (2016). Aile Liderlik Yönelimi Ölçeği (ALYÖ): Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. J. Int. Soc. Res. 9(42).


Bass BM (1990). Bass and Stogdill's transformational leadership handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial application (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.


Bateman TS, Crant JM (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. J. Organ. Behav. 14(2):103-118.


Bhutiani D, Flicker K, Nair P, Groen A (2012). Is social entrepreneurship transformational leadership in action. Patterns in Social Entrepr. Res. 110 p.


Biggs JB, Collis KF (2014). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.


Brown TA (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guillford.


Bulut MB, Baloğlu N (2016). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Aile Liderlik Yönelimleri ile Bazı Demografik Değişkenler Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. J. Kirsehir Educ. Faculty 17(2).


Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application, and programming. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.


Carmeli A, Jones CD, Binyamin G (2016). The power of caring and generativity in building strategic adaptability. J. Occupational and Organ. Psychol. 89(1):46-72.


Clay MM (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Heinemann, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.


Davis D (2000). Supporting parent, family, and community involvement in your school. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory pp. 1-38.


Dees JG (1998) 'The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship', 



Dennis JM, Phinney JS, Chuateco LI (2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. J. College Student Dev. 46(3):223-236.


Drucker P (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.


Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and academic achievement test scores. J. Educ. Psychol. 98(1):198-208.


Dyer WG, Handler W (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 19:71-71.


Erikson EH (1963). Childhood and society (2nd rev. ed). New York: Norton (Original work published 1950).


Eyal O, Kark R (2004). How do transformational leaders transform organizations? A study of the relationship between leadership and entrepreneurship. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3):211-235.


Galbraith Kevin A (2000). "Family Leadership: Constructing and Testing a Theoretical Model of Family Well-Being" All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2810.


Güler A (2008). Türk toplumunda korku kültürü. Ankara: Punto Tasarım.


Harackiewicz JM, Barron KE, Tauer JM, Carter SM, Elliot AJ (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. J. Educ. Psychol. 92(2):316.


Hamby SL, Thomas LA, Banyard VL, de St Aubin E, Grych J (2015). Generative roles: Assessing sustained involvement in generativity. American Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences.


Hart HM (2001) Generativity and Social Involvement among African Americans and White Adults. J. Res. Pers. 35:208-230.


Helgesen S (2005). Why mattering matters. 


Hofer J, Busch H, Chasiotis A, Kärtner J, Campos D (2008). Concern for Generativity and Its Relation to Implicit Pro‐Social Power Motivation, Generative Goals, and Satisfaction with Life: A Cross‐Cultural Investigation. J. Pers. 76(1):1-30.


Huta V, Zuroff DC (2007). Examining mediators of the link between generativity and well-being. J. Adult Devel. 14(1-2):47-52.


Jensen SM, Luthans F (2006). Relationship between entrepreneurs' psychological capital and their authentic leadership. J. Managerial Issues, 254-273.


Juliet R, George C (2005). Leadership, learning and human resource management the meanings of social entrepreneurship today.


Karacan E (2007). Effects of parenting on adult development and generativity (Doctoral dissertation, Mıddle East Technıcal Unıversıty).


Kern RM, Peluso PR (1999). Using individual psychology concepts to compare family systems processes and organizational behavior. Family J. 7(3):236-244.


Keyes CLM, Ryff CD (1998). Generativity in adult lives: Social structural contours and quality of life consequences.


Kırılmaz S (2012) Study of success factors of social entrepreneurship in terms of entrepreneurial individuality and transformational, Doctoral dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.


Kümbül GB (2008). Sosyal girişimciliği etkileyen faktörlerin analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri, Doktora Tezi.


Mair J, Marti I (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J. World Bus. 41(1):36-44.


Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K (Eds.). (2006). Social entrepreneurship (p. 3). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.


Mair J, Noboa E (2006) Social Entrepreneurship: How Intentions to Create a Social Venture are Formed.


McAdams, DP (2003). Identity and the life story. In: R. Fivush & C. A. Haden (Eds.), Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self: Developmental and cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 187-207.


McAdams DP, de St Aubin ED (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 62(6):1003.


McDonald RP, Moon-Ho RH (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol. Methods 7(1):64-82.


Onyx J, Bullen P (2000). Sources of social capital. Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, pp. 105-134.


Peterson BE, Stewart AJ (1993). Generativity and social motives in young adults. J. Personalit Soc. Psychol. 65(1):186.


Peterson BE, Klohnen EC (1995). Realization of generativity in two samples of women at midlife. Psychol. Aging 10:20-29.


Peterson BE, Smirles KA, Wentworth PA (1997). Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 72:1202-1216.


Pratt MW, Norris JE, Arnold ML, Filyer R (1999). Generativity and moral development as predictors of value-socialization narratives for young persons across the adult life span: From lessons learned to stories told. Psychol. Aging 14: 414-426.


Pratt MW, Arnold ML, Pratt MW, Arnold ML (2006). Growing into Generativity: Adolescent Roots of a Generative Self in Emerging Adulthood. In Notre Dame Symposium on Personality and Moral Character, Centre of Ethical Education.


Schuyt T, Bekkers R, Smit J (2010). The Philanthropy Scale: A sociological perspective in measuring new forms of pro social behaviour. Soc. Work Society, 8(1):121-135.


Schwer RK, Yucelt U (1984). A study of risk-taking propensities among small business entrepreneurs and managers: An empirical evaluation. Am. J. Small Bus. 8(3):31-40.


Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Res. Online, 8(2):23-74.


Schlenker BR (1980). Impression management: The self-conept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.


Schumpeter J (1934). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.


Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001). Using multivariate statistics. MA: Allyn & Bacon.


Topor DR, Keane SP, Shelton TL, Calkins SD (2010). Parent involvement and student academic performance: A multiple mediational analysis. J. Prevention Intervention Community 38(3):183-197.


Walker TD (2009) Parents as leaders: a trans relational approach to intentional family leadership and poverty intervention. (Doctoral Dissertation. Seattle University).


Yukl GA (2006). Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. 542 p.


APA Baloglu, N. (2017). The effects of family leadership orientation on social entrepreneurship, generativity and academic success of college students. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(1), 36-44.
Chicago Nuri Baloglu. "The effects of family leadership orientation on social entrepreneurship, generativity and academic success of college students." Educational Research and Reviews 12, no. 1 (2017): 36-44.
MLA Nuri Baloglu. "The effects of family leadership orientation on social entrepreneurship, generativity and academic success of college students." Educational Research and Reviews 12.1 (2017): 36-44.

Subscription Form