Educational Research and Reviews
Subscribe to ERR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 3094A9E55844


Vol.13(2), pp. 81-91 , January 2018
https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3429
ISSN: 1990-3839


 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Primary school students’ views about science, technology and engineering



Esin Pekmez
  • Esin Pekmez
  • Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Education, Ege University of Science and Education, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 04 October 2017  Accepted: 20 December 2017  Published: 23 January 2018

Copyright © 2018 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Some of the main goals of science education are to increase students’ knowledge about the technology and engineering design process, and to train students as scientifically and technologically literate individuals. The main purpose of this study is to find out primary students’ views about science, technology and engineering. For this aim and in order to increase students’ knowledge and understanding of science, technology and engineering, a module named “Engineering and Technology Lessons for Children” developed by the Museum of Science was applied to 88 students who were in 4, 5 and 6th grades. The science topic was ‘balance and forces’, and the engineering field was ‘civil engineering’. The module took five days and consisted of interactive teaching techniques such as experiments, science trips, observations, creative drama and designing. Out of these 88, 23 students took part in interviews to find out their views about science, technology, and engineering in detail. The students were attending a comprehensive primary school in an urban district of Izmir, which is the third biggest city in Turkey. Specifically, this school was chosen since it was a sister school to the university which means the university and the school had an agreement on benefiting from each other’s competences and facilities. Since the school was a sister school it was a convenience sample and this was the main reason for choosing these students. This study is a case study survey type of research and is also a simple descriptive design. As an instrument, a semi-structured interview was used. According to the results of the analysis of the data, after implementing the module, students’ awareness in terms of science, technology and engineering increased.

 

Key words: Engineering design process, understanding of science, understanding of technology, understanding of engineering.

 

Akgunduz D, Ertepinar H, Ger AM, Kaplan Sayi A, Turk Z (2015). The report of STEM education workshop: An assessment on STEM education in Turkey. Istanbul Aydın University: STEM Centre and Faculty of Education. 

 

Cohen L, Manion L (1994). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

 
 

Corlu MS (2013). Insights into STEM education praxis: An assessment scheme for course syllabi. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(4).

 
 

Corlu MS, Capraro RM, Capraro MM (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Educ. Sci. 39(171):74-85.

 
 

Creswell JW (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

 
 

Cunningham CM, Kelly GJ (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Sci. Educ. 101(3):486-505.
Crossref

 
 

Cunningham CM, Lachapelle CP (2010). The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students' attitudes toward engineering and science. Presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville.

 
 

Cunningham CM, Lachapelle CP (2016). Designing engineering experiences to engage all students. Educ. Designer. 3(9).

 
 

Cunningham CM, Lachapelle CP, Lindgren-Streicher A (2005). Assessing elementary school students' conceptions of engineering and technology. Presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland.

 
 

Cunningham CM, Lachapelle CP, Lindgren-Streicher A (2006). Elementary teachers' understandings of engineering and technology. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL: American Society for Engineering Education.

 
 

Dindar H, Taneri A (2011). MEB'in 1968, 1992, 2000 ve 2004 yıllarında geliştirdiği fen programlarının amaç, kavram ve etkinlik yönünden karşılaştırılması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 19(2):363-378.

 
 

Drever E (1995). Using Semi-Structured Interviews in Small-Scale Research: A Teacher's Guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Centre for Research in Education.

 
 

Hertel JD, Cunningham CM, Kelly GK (2017). The roles of engineering notebooks in shaping elementary engineering student discourse and practice. Int. J. Sci. Educ 39(9):1194-1217.
Crossref

 
 

Engineering is Elementary, Retrieved from

View, (10.11.2017).

 
 

Engineering is Elementary, Retrieved from

View, (10.11.2017).

 
 

Engineering is Elementary, Retrieved from

View, (10.11.2017).

 
 

Karahan E, Canbazoglu-Bilici S, Unal A (2015). Integration of media design processes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 60:221-240.
Crossref

 
 

Koyunlu Unlu Z, Dokme I, Unlu V (2016). Adaptation of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS) into Turkish. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 63:21-36.
Crossref

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Cunningham CM (2007). Engineering is Elementary: Children's Changing Understandings of Science and Engineering. Presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu.

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Cunningham CM, Jocz J, Kay AE, Phadnis P, Wertheimer J, Arteaga R (2011). Engineering is Elementary: An evaluation of years 4 through 6 field testing. Boston, MA: Museum of Science.

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Cunningham CM, Oware EA, Battu B (2008). Engineering is Elementary: An evaluation of student outcomes from the PCET program. Boston, MA: Museum of Science.

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Jocz J, Phadnis P (2011). An evaluation of the implementation of Engineering is Elementary in fourteen Minneapolis Public Schools. Boston, MA: Museum of Science.

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Hertel JD, Jocz J, Cunningham CM (2013). Measuring students' naïve conceptions about technology. Presented at the NARST Annual International Conference, Rio Grande.

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Oh Y, Cunningham CM (2017). Effectiveness of an engineering curriculum intervention for elementary school: Moderating roles of student background characteristics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.

 
 

Lachapelle CP, Phadnis P, Hertel J, Cunningham CM (2012). What is engineering? A survey of elementary students. Presented at the 2nd P-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit, Washington, D.C.

 
 

McKay M, Macalalag A, Shields C, Brockway D, McGrath E (2008). Partnership to improve student achievement through real world learning in engineering, science, mathematics and technology. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Pittsburgh.

 
 

Mertens DM (1998). Research methods in education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.

 
 

Millî Egitim Bakanligi (MEB) (2005). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı-National Ministry of Education, Turkey (MEB) (2005). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanligi, Ilkogretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. siniflar) ogretim programı. Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

 
 

Millî Egitim Bakanligi (MEB) (2006). Millî Egitim Bakanligi -National Ministry of Education, Turkey (MEB) (2006). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanligi, Ilkogretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6, 7 ve 8. siniflar) öğretim programı. (Translation: Science Curriculum, Grade: 6, 7 and 8). Ankara: Devlet Kitaplari Mudurlugu.

 
 

Millî Egitim Bakanligi (MEB) (2013). Millî Egitim Bakanligi -National Ministry of Education, Turkey (MEB) (2013). Fen Bilimleri Dersi (4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sinif) Ogretim Programi (Translation: Science Curriculum, Grade: 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). Ankara: National Ministry of Education.

 
 

Millî Egitim Bakanligi (MEB) (2017). Millî Egitim Bakanligi-National Ministry of Education, Turkey (MEB) (2017). Fen Bilimleri Dersi (4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sinif) Ogretim Programi (Translation: Science Curriculum, Grade: 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). Ankara: National Ministry of Education.

 
 

Mills AJ, Durepos G, Wiebe E (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. London: Sage.
Crossref

 
 

Museum of Science, View, (10.11.2017).

 
 

Roehrig GH, Moore TJ, Wang HH, Park MS (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Sci. Mathe. 112(1):31-44.
Crossref

 
 

Sahin A, Ayar MC, Adiguzel T (2014). Fen, teknoloji, muhendislik ve matematik icerikli okul sonrasi etkinlikler ve ogrenciler uzerindeki etkileri (Translation: The after school activities about science, technology, engineering and mathematics and the affect of them on students) . Educ. Sci. Theory Practice, 14(1).

 

 


APA Pekmez, E. (2018). Primary school students’ views about science, technology and engineering. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(2), 81-91.
Chicago Esin Pekmez  . "Primary school students’ views about science, technology and engineering." Educational Research and Reviews 13, no. 2 (2018): 81-91.
MLA Esin Pekmez  . "Primary school students’ views about science, technology and engineering." Educational Research and Reviews 13.2 (2018): 81-91.
   
DOI https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3429
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-abstract/3094A9E55844

Subscription Form