Full Length Research Paper
Hailay Gebremedhin*, Bizuayehu Tesfaye, Ali Mohammed and Dargie Tsegay
Debre Birhan University, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource Science, Department of Plant Science, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
The experiment was carried out to asses the influence of five preservative solutions (aluminium + ethanol, aluminium + sucrose, ethnol + sucrose, aluminium + ethanol + sucrose and water) and two rose cultivars (‘Red Sky’ and ‘Blizzard’). The scope of the study was to identify the best combination of preservative solutions on rose cultivars. The treatments were arranged in factorial combination in CRD with three replications. Ten (10) cut flowers of each treatment were pre-treated using prepared preservative solution for 24 h in cold room (3 ± 1°C) before storage. Interaction effects of Preservative solutions and cultivars were significant (P < 0.05) on solution uptake on day 16; petal fresh weight on day 4; total soluble solids (TSS) on day 4, 8 and 12 and on vase solution absorbance. Preservative solutions had significant effects on solution uptake on day 1, 4, 8 and 12; TSS on day 1 and 16; petal fresh weight on day 1, 8, 12, and 16. Flower longevity and maximum flower head diameter, relative fresh weight and petal fresh weight loss were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced. Cultivars had significant (P < 0.05) difference on solution uptake and TSS. Aluminium + ethanol + sucrose preservative solution treated cut flowers had shown longest vase life, flower opening, solution uptake, petal fresh weight and TSS on both cultivars; while the values were significantly higher in ‘Red Sky’ cultivar. The findings provide an alternative for extending the vase life of cut roses and thereby ensure the satisfaction of flower users and sustainability of cut rose flower production.
Key words: Aluminum sulphate, ethanol, preservative solution, quality, rose, sucrose, vase life.
|Asfanani M, Davarynejad G, Tehranifar A (2008). Effects of Pre-harvest Calcium Fertilization on Vase Life of Rose cut Flowers cv. Alexander, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.|
Bayleyegn A, Tesfaye B, Workneh TS (2012). Effects of pulsing solution, packaging material and passive refrigeration storage system on vase life and quality of cut rose flowers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11(16):3800-3809.
|Butt SJ (2005). Extending the vase life of roses (rosa hybrid L.) with different preservatives. Int. J. Agric. Biol. http://www.jircas.affrc.go.7(1):97-99.|
Capdeville GD, Maffia LA, Finger FL, Batista UG (2005). Pre-harvest calcium sulfate applications affect vase life and severity of gray mold in cut roses. Sci.Hort.103: pp. 329-338.
|Chamani AK, Joyce DC, Irvin DE, Zamani ZA, Mostofi Y, Kafi M (2005). Ethylene and anti-ethylene treatment effects on cut 'First Red' rose. J. Appl. Hort. 1:3-7.|
|Dineshbabu M, Jawaharlal M, Vijayakumar M (2002). Influence of holding solutions on the postharvest life of Dendrobium hybrid Sonia. South Ind. Hort. 50(4-6):451-457.|
Elgimabi EL (2011).Vase life Extension of rose cut flowers (Rose hybrida) as influenced by silver nitrate and sucrose pulsing. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci.6(1):128-133.
|Elgimabi EN, Sliai AM (2013). Effects of Preservative Solutions on Vase Life and Postharvest Qualities of Taif Rose Cut Flowers (Rosa damascene cv. Trigintipetala), Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 13(1):72-80.|
|Hajizadeh HS, Farokhzad A, Chelan GH (2012).Using of preservative solutions to improve postharvest life of Rosa Hybrid cv. Black magic. J. Agric.Technol. 8(5):1801-1810.|
|Ichimura K, Kawabata Y, Kishimito M, Goto R, Yamada K (2002). Variation with the cultivar in the vase life of cut rose flowers. Bull. Natl. Inst. Flor. Sci. 2:9-20.|
|Ichimura K, Kishimoto M, Ryo N, Yoshihiko K (2005). Soluble carbohydrates and variation in vase-life of cut rose cultivars 'Delilah' and 'Sonia'. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 80:280-286.|
Ichimura K, Taguch M, Norkoshi R (2006). Extension of the vase life in cut roses by treatment with glucose, isothiazolinonic germicide, citric. JARQ. 40:263-269.
Joyce DC, Jones PN (1992). Water balance of the foliage of cut Geraldton wax flower. J. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2:31-39.
Knee M (2000). Selection of biocides for use in floral Pulsing. J. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 18:227-234.
|Lacey L, McCarthy A, Foord G (2001). Maturity testing of citrus. Farmnote, Dep. Agri. West. Australia, 3:1-5.|
|Nair SA, Singh V, Sharma TV (2003). Effect of chemical preservatives on enhancing vase-life of gerbera flowers. J. Trop. Agric. 41(1,2):56-58.|
|Nigussie K (2005). Ornamental horticulture: A technical material. Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veternary medicine, Jimma Ethiopia.|
Nijsse J, Van der Heijden G, van Ieperen W, Keijzer C, Van Meeteren U (2001). Xylem hydraulic conductivity related to conduit dimensions along chrysanthemum stems. J. Exp. Bot. 52:319-327.
|Panhwar F (2006). Postharvest technology of fruits and vegetables. ECO Services International, Hyderabad Sindh, Pakistan.|
Pun UK, Ichimura K (2003). Role of sugars in senescence and biosynthesis of ethylene in cut flowers. J. ARQ, 4:219-224.
|APA||(2013). Influence of preservative solutions on vase life and postharvest characteristics of rose (Rosa hybrid) cut flowers. International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research, 4(8), 111-118.|
|Chicago||Hailay Gebremedhin, Bizuayehu Tesfaye, Ali Mohammed and Dargie Tsegay. "Influence of preservative solutions on vase life and postharvest characteristics of rose (Rosa hybrid) cut flowers." International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research 4, no. 8 (2013): 111-118.|
|MLA||Hailay Gebremedhin, et al. "Influence of preservative solutions on vase life and postharvest characteristics of rose (Rosa hybrid) cut flowers." International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research 4.8 (2013): 111-118.|