International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies
Subscribe to IJEAPS
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 249955363501

Vol.9(4), pp. 56-67 , April 2017
ISSN: 2141-6656

 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Relationship of the cognitive functions of prospective science teachers and their knowledge, knowledge levels, success and success levels

Yilmaz Ismail
  • Yilmaz Ismail
  • Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Sakarya University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar

 Received: 31 January 2017  Accepted: 13 March 2017  Published: 30 April 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

This study reveals the transformation of prospective science teachers into knowledgeable individuals through classical, combination, and information theories. It distinguishes between knowledge and success, and between knowledge levels and success levels calculated each through three theories. The relation between the knowledge of prospective teachers and their cognitive functions is defined through the results gained from three theories, and a case study that collected data through problem solving techniques in the procedural knowledge of electricity. The results reveal that prospective teachers have problems with such knowledge, which may explain why cognitive automatism is not used. Since processes of understanding are not used in cognitive automatism, it appears that prospective teachers are individuals that may differ in terms of their learning but do not use their cognitive functions. The study suggests that if the knowledge levels of independent variables are increased, cognitive functions may develop.

Key words: Classical calculation, cognitive automatism, cognitive functions, combination calculation, information calculation.

Bledowski C, Kaiser J, Rahm B (2010). Basic Operations in Working Memory: Contributions From Functional Imaging Studies. Behavioural Brain Res. 214(2):172-179. 


Cohen DK (1990). A Revolution in one Classroom: The Case of mrs. Oublier. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 12(3):311-329.


Desimone LM (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers' Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educ. Res. 38(3):181-199. 


Di Sessa AA (2014). The Construction of Causal Schemes: Learning Mechanisms at The Knowledge Level. Cognitive Sci. 38(5):795-850. 


Franke ML, Carpenter TP, Levi L, Fennema E (2001). Capturing Teachers' Generative Change: A Follow-Up Study of Teachers' Professional Development in Mathematics. Am. Educ. Res. J. 38(3):653-689. 


Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS (2001). What Makes PD Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. Am. Educ. Res. J. 38(4):915-945.


Gregory E, Hardiman M, Yarmolinskaya J, Rinne L, Limb C (2013). Building Creative Thinking in The Classroom: From Research to Practice. Int. J. Educ. Res. 62:43-50. 


Heller JI, Daehler KR, Wong N, Shinohara M, Miratrix LW (2012). Differential Effects of Three Professional Development Models on Teacher Knowledge and Student Achievement in Elementary Science. J. Res. Sci. Teaching 49(3):333-362. 


Hill HC, Ball DL, Schilling SG (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers' Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. J. Res. Mathe. Educ. 39(4):372-400.


Hill HC, Rowan B, Ball DL (2005). Effects of Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement. Am. Educ. Res. J. 42(2):371-406.


Kanter DE, Konstantopoulos S (2010). The Impact of a Project-Based Science Curriculum on Minority Student Achievement, Attitudes, and Careers: The Effects of Teacher Content and Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Inquiry-Based Practices. Sci. Educ. 94:855-887. 


McCutchen D, Abbott R D, Green LB, Beretvas S N, Cox S, Potter NS, Quiroga T, Gray AL (2002). Beginning Literacy: Links Among Teacher Knowledge, Teacher Practice, and Student Learning. J. Learning Disabilities 35(1):69-86.


Newell A (1982). The Knowledge Level. Artif. Intell. 18(1): 87-127. 


Newell A (1993). Reflections on The Knowledge Level. Artif. Intell. 59(1-2):31-38.


Oliver M (2011). Towards an Understanding of Neuroscience for Science Educators. Stud. Sci. Educ. 47(2):211-235. 


Özenli S (1999). İlmi Sohbetler[scientific discussions]. Adana, Turkey, Karakuşlar Otomotiv Tic. ve San. Ltd. Şti pp: A1-B2.


Roth KJ, Garnier HE, Chen C, Lemmens M, Schwille K, Wickler NI (2011). Video-Based Lesson Analysis: Effective Science PD for Teacher and Student Learning. J. Res. Sci. Teaching 48(2):117-148. 


Saxe GB, Gearhart M, Nasir N (2001). Enhancing Students' Understanding of Mathematics: A Study of Three Contrasting Approaches to Professional Support. J. Mathe. Teacher Educ. 4(1):55-79.


Scher L, O'Reilly F (2009). Professional Development for K-12 Math and Science Teachers: What do We Really Know?. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 2(3):209-249. 


Sencar S, Eryilmaz A (2004). Factors Mediating The Effect of Gender on Ninth-Grade Turkish Students' Misconceptions Concerning Electric Circuits. J. Res. Sci. Teaching 41(6):603-616. 


Stephens LM, Chen YF (1996). Principles for Organizing Semantic Relations in Large Knowledge Bases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 8(3): 492-496.


Wadouh J, Liu N, Sandmann A, Neuhaus BJ (2014). The Effect of Knowledge Linking Levels in Biology Lessons Upon Students' Knowledge Structure. Int. J. Sci. Mathe. Educ. 12(1):25-47. 


Wayne AJ, Yoon KS, Zhu P, Cronen S, Garet MS (2008). Experimenting with Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods. Educ. Res. 37(8):469-479. 


Wilson SM, Berne J (1999). Teacher Learning and The Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professional Development. Rev. Res. Educ. 24(1):173-209. 


Yılmaz İ (2011). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Newton'un Hareket Yasalarını Öğrenmelerinde Kurallı Bilgiden Açıklayıcı Bilgiye Geçişte Karşılaştıkları Problemlerin Incelenmesi [An Analysis of The Problems That Science Teacher Candidates Face in The Transition From Procedural to Declarative Knowledge While Learning Newton's Laws of Motion] (Unpublished Doctor's Thesis). Gazi Universitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Turkey, 414012. 


Yılmaz İ (2012). A Study on Prospective Science Teachers' Knowledge and Achievement Levels in Mathematical Logic in Electricity-Related Subjects. J. Int. Educ. Res. 8(4):415-424.


Yılmaz İ (2014). Identification of Prospective Science Teachers' Mathematical-Logical Structures in Reference to Magnetism. J. Int. Educ. Res. 10(2):121-130.


Yılmaz İ, Yalçın N (2011). Probability and Possibility Calculation Statistics for Data Variables (VDOIHI); Statistical Methods for Combined Stage Percentage Calculation. Int. Online J. Educ. Sci. 3(3):957-979.


Yılmaz İ, Yalçın N (2012a). The Relationship of Procedural and Declarative Knowledge of Science Teacher Candidates in Newton's Laws of Motion to Understanding. Am. Int. J. Contemporary Res. 2(3):50-56.


Yılmaz İ, Yalçın N (2012b). Mathematical Logic Knowledge of Science Teacher Candidates in Newton's Laws of Motion. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2(3):99-105.


Yılmaz İ, Yalçın N (2012c). Prospective Science Teachers' Procedural Knowledge About and Knowledge Control in Newton's Laws of Motion. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (SUJEF). 23:74-99.


APA Ismail, Y. (2017). Relationship of the cognitive functions of prospective science teachers and their knowledge, knowledge levels, success and success levels. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 9(4), 56-67.
Chicago Yilmaz Ismail . "Relationship of the cognitive functions of prospective science teachers and their knowledge, knowledge levels, success and success levels." International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies 9, no. 4 (2017): 56-67.
MLA Yilmaz Ismail . "Relationship of the cognitive functions of prospective science teachers and their knowledge, knowledge levels, success and success levels." International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies 9.4 (2017): 56-67.

Subscription Form