Department of Language, Linguistics and Philosophy, University of the West Indies, Jamaica
This paper outlines within the framework of action research, the process of implementing a communication across the curriculum (CAC) programme in the Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences. It highlights the link between institutional context and the dialectical implications of merging the skills, agenda and focus of multidisciplinary teams while maintaining a balance of power. It is suggested that these challenges may be met by forging effective alliances with those who are intrinsically motivated to achieve a common goal, adopting a context driven rather than a norm driven approach and applying creativity and resourcefulness within this context. Guidance for similar undertakings is offered and the direction of future work is outlined. “I soon realized that no journey carries one far, unless, as it extends into the world around us, it goes an equal distance into the world within”-Lillian Smith
Key words: Communication across the curriculum (CAC), writing fellow (WF), writing across the curriculum (WAC), inter-disciplinary
Bangert-Drowns RL, Hurley ML, Wilkinson B (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res., 74, 29-58.
|Bean JC (2001).Engaging Ideas: The professors' guide to integrating critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.|
|Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R (2001). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, (Eds.) Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. intensive courses, possible criteria, national patterns, and resources", Technical Report Series, 9,1994, retrieved February, 12, 2010 http://writing.umn.edu/docs/publications/Bridwell_Bowles94.pdf Byrne S Literacy: Why the writing is on the wall. Retrieved February 2, 2010 from http://www.independent.ie/other/literacy-why-the-writing-is-on-the-wall-686534.html, 2007.|
|Cornell C, Klooster DJ (1990). Writing Across the Curriculum: Transforming the academy?. WPA: Writ. Program Adm., 14(1-2): 7-16.|
|Dunn PA (2001). Talking, sketching, moving: Multiple literacies in the teaching of writing. N H: Heinemann.|
Emerson L, MacKay B, MacKay M, Funnell M (2006). A Team of equals: Teaching writing in the sciences. Educ. Action Res., 1: 65-81.
Emig J (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composit. Commun., 28: 122-128.
|Forsyth P (2004).Writing to inform---and to impress. J. Accounting Educ., 17: 221-254.|
|Ganobcsik-Williams L (2006). Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: Theories, practices and mode. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.|
Gardener H (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, NY: Basic Books.
|Grasha C (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburg: Alliance Publishers.|
|Jerde L, Taper ML (2004). Preparing undergraduates for professional writing: evidence supporting the benefits of scientific writing within the biology curriculum. J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 33: 2004, 34-37.|
|Hart E, Bond M (1995) Action-Research for Health and Social Care: A Guide to Practice.UK: Open University Press.|
Kelly, GJ, Chen C (1991). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 36(8): 883–915.
|Langer JA, Applebee AN (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning, NCTE Research Report No. 22.|
|Lather P (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educ. Rev., 56(3): 257-77.|
Lillis T, Turner J (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teach. Higher Educ., 6(1): 57-68.
|Moore R Writing to learn biology. (1994). J. College Sci. Teach., 23(2), 292-293.|
|Morley D (1991). Resource analysis as action research. In Resource Analysis Research in Developing Countries. Eds. Paul F. Wilkinson and William C. Found. Toronto: York University, pp. 1-16.|
Ochsner R, Fowler J (2004). Playing devil's advocate: Evaluating the literature of the WAC/WID movement. Rev. Educ. Res., 74(2): 117-140.
|O'Brien R (2001). An overview of the methodological approach of action research. In Roberto Richardson (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Action Research] http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html (Accessed 27/9/2010)|
|Paul R, L Elder (2005). Critical thinking and the art of substantive writing, Part I. J. Dev. Educ., 29 (1), 40-41.|
|Pemberton MA (1995). Rethinking the WAC/writing center connection. Writing Center J., 15(2): 116–133.|
|Penrose AM, Sitko BM (Eds.) (1993).Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom, NY: Oxford University Press,|
Samsa G, Oddone EZ (1994). Integrating scientific writing into a statistics curriculum: A course in statistically based scientific writing. Am. Stat., 48(2): 117-119.
Shuman LJ, Besterfield-Sacre M, McGourty J (2005). The ABET 'professional skills': Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?. J. Eng. Educ., 94 (1): 41-55.
|Steglich CS (2000). A writing assignment that changes attitudes in biology classes. Am. Biol., 60(2): 98-101.|
Stowers RH, Barker RT (2003). Improved student writing in business communication classes: Strategies for teaching and evaluation. J. Tech. Writ. Commun., 33(4): 337-348.
|Wiley M, Gleason B, Wetherbee Phelps L (1996). Composition in four keys. Mayfield Publishing Company, California.|
|APA||(2010). Another country not my own: Crossing disciplinary borders, forging alliances within the framework of a (communication across the curriculum) CAC initiative in the sciences. International Journal of English and Literature, 1(2), 10-15.|
|Chicago||Ingrid McLaren. "Another country not my own: Crossing disciplinary borders, forging alliances within the framework of a (communication across the curriculum) CAC initiative in the sciences." International Journal of English and Literature 1, no. 2 (2010): 10-15.|
|MLA||Ingrid McLaren. "Another country not my own: Crossing disciplinary borders, forging alliances within the framework of a (communication across the curriculum) CAC initiative in the sciences." International Journal of English and Literature 1.2 (2010): 10-15.|