International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture
Subscribe to IJFA
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - BDF708466822


Vol.9(10), pp. 98-107 , November 2017
https://doi.org/10.5897/IJFA2017.0638
ISSN: 2006-9839


 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Physical losses of fish along the value chain in Zambia: A case study of Barotse Floodplain



Kefi A. S.
  • Kefi A. S.
  • Department of Fisheries, P. O. Box 350100, Chilanga, Zambia.
  • Google Scholar
Cole S. M.
  • Cole S. M.
  • World Fish, Unit D, Suite No.2, Counting House Square, Thabo Mbeki Road, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Google Scholar
Kaminski A. M.
  • Kaminski A. M.
  • World Fish, Unit D, Suite No.2, Counting House Square, Thabo Mbeki Road, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Google Scholar
Ward A.
  • Ward A.
  • Independent Consultant, 1 Coes Cottages, Beaneys Lane, Shottenden, Kent, CT4 8JA, United Kingdom.
  • Google Scholar
Mkandawire N. L.
  • Mkandawire N. L.
  • Department of Food Science and Technology University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 02 July 2017  Accepted: 29 August 2017  Published: 30 November 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


The study was conducted in three districts of Western Province of Zambia namely; Mongu, Nalolo and Senanga that lie along the Zambezi River in the Barotse Floodplain. The study employed two main data tools aimed at understanding the extent of post-harvest losses in the fishing, processing and trading nodes in the fish value chain study sites. The tools were the Exploratory Fish Loss Assessment Method (EFLAM) study and a Quantitative Loss Assessment Method (QLAM) survey. The study found that physical fish losses occur at three nodes in the value chain and differ significantly (P < 0.05) between the nodes. On average, the processors lose the largest volume of fish (7.42%) followed by the fish traders (2.9%). The fishers experience the least physical losses at 2% although, this is not significantly different (P > 0.05) from the fish lost at trading node. The major cause of physical loss was found to be breakages at processing and trading nodes. There is need to introduce improved processing technologies that can reduce breakages. Furthermore, economic and nutrient losses should also be profiled to fully understand the total losses that occur within the Barotse Floodplain fish value chain.

Key words: Fish, physical losses, fishing, processing, trading.

Akande GR, Diei-Ouadi Y (2010). Post-harvest losses in small-scale fisheries. Case studies in five sub-Saharan African countries. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 550. Rome, Italy.

 

Baidu-Forson JJ, Phiri N, Ngu'ni D, Mulele S, Simainga S, Situmo J, Ndiyoi M, Wahl C, Gambone F, Mulanda A, Syatwinda G (2014). Assessment of agrobiodiversity resources in the Borotse flood plain, Zambia. CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. Penang, Malaysia. Working Paper: AAS-2014-12.

 
 

Béné C (2011). CAADP and Fisheries Policy in Africa: are we aiming for the right reform? Policy Brief 40, Future Agriculture. Available at: 

view

 
 

Béné C, Barange M, Subasinghe R, Pinstrup-Andersen P, Merino G, Hemre GI, Williams M (2015). Feeding 9 billion by 2050 – Putting fish back on the menu. Food Secur. 7(2):261-274.
Crossref

 
 

Beveridge MC, Thilsted SH, Phillips MJ, Metian M, Troell M, Hall SJ (2013). Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor: The role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculture. J. Fish Biol. 83:1067-1084.
Crossref

 
 

Central Statistics Office (2014). Census of Population and Housing report, CSO, Lusaka, Zambia.

 
 

Cochran WG (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

 
 

De Lucia M, Assennato D (1994). Agricultural engineering in development: post-harvest operations and management of foodgrains. L'aprés-recolte des grains: organisation et techniques. La ingeniería agraria en el desarrollo: manejo y tratamiento de granos poscosecha; organización y técnicas (No. FAO ASB-93). FAO, Roma (Italia).

 
 

Diei-Ouadi Y, Mgawe YI (2011). Post-harvest fish loss assessment in small-scale fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations. FAO Fisheries and aquaculture technical Paper, Rome, Italy.

 
 

Department of Fisheries (2016). 2014 Annual Report for Department of Fisheries. Department of Fisheries, Chilanga, Zambia.

 
 

Department of Fisheries (2017). 2016 Annual Report for Department of Fisheries. Department of Fisheries, Chilanga, Zambia.

 
 

Department of Fisheries (2012). 2011 Annual Report for Department of Fisheries. Department of Fisheries, Chilanga, Zambia.

 
 

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1984). Prévention des pertes de poisson traité. FAO Doc. Techn. Pêches 219:84.

 
 

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1996). Rome Declaration on World Food Security and the World Food Summit Plan of Action. 

 
 

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2012). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, Rome, Italy.

 
 

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2016). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture, Rome, Italy. 

View. Retrieved on 18th August 2017.

 
 

Israel GD (2013). Determining Sample Size. Univ Florida IFAS Ext. 2013, 1-5. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

 
 

Longley C, Kruijssen F (2014). Fish Value Chains in the Barotse, Western Province Zambia. Program Technical Report, WorldFish, Penang.

 
 

Kawarazuka N (2010). The contribution of fish intake, aquaculture, and small-scale fisheries to improving nutrition: A literature review. The WorldFish Center Working Paper No.2106. The WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia.

 
 

Kefi AS, Mofya RM (2015). The fisheries sector in Zambia: status, management, and challenges. Technical Paper No. 3. IAPRI, Lusaka, Zambia.

 
 

McConnery KS (1994). Tackling the problem of post-harvest losses in the artisanal fishing. The Courier 147:95-98.

 
 

Moes JE (1980). Reduction of spoilage of fish caught in Lake Chad. Project report NIR/74/001/F/01/12.

 
 

Tweddle D (2010). Overview of the Zambezi River System: Its history, fish fauna, fisheries, and conservation. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag. 13:224-240.
Crossref

 
 

Tweddle D, Cowx IG, Peel RA, Weyl OLF (2015). Challenges in fisheries management in the Zambezi, one of the great rivers of Africa. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 22:99-111.
Crossref

 

 


APA Kefi, A. S., Cole, S. M., Kaminski, A. M., Ward, A., & Mkandawire, N. L. (2017). Physical losses of fish along the value chain in Zambia: A case study of Barotse Floodplain. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 9(10), 98-107.
Chicago Kefi A. S., Cole S. M., Kaminski A. M., Ward A. and Mkandawire N. L.. "Physical losses of fish along the value chain in Zambia: A case study of Barotse Floodplain." International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 9, no. 10 (2017): 98-107.
MLA Kefi A. S., et al. "Physical losses of fish along the value chain in Zambia: A case study of Barotse Floodplain." International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 9.10 (2017): 98-107.
   
DOI https://doi.org/10.5897/IJFA2017.0638
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/IJFA/article-abstract/BDF708466822

Subscription Form