International Journal of Livestock Production
Subscribe to IJLP
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 4A5AFDE48019


Vol.5(10), pp. 173-180 , October 2014
DOI: 10.5897/IJLP2014.0217
ISSN: 2141-2448



Full Length Research Paper

Creating animal welfare assessment method for backyard goat production in the Philippines using stockmanship competence as proxy indicator



M. J. Alcedo
  • M. J. Alcedo
  • Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
  • Google Scholar
K. Ito
  • K. Ito
  • International Cooperation Center for Agricultural Education, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
  • Google Scholar
K. Maeda
  • K. Maeda
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 01 May 2014  Accepted: 17 September 2014  Published: 09 October 2014

Copyright © 2014 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Measuring animal welfare is a newly emerging area of research and it requires multi-disciplinary approach to achieve it. Due to the diversity of what constitute the definition of animal welfare, different methods and models have been suggested, and were mostly implemented in semi-intensive and commercial farms in developed countries. There are hardly any studies on animal welfare assessment conducted in backyard livestock operations in developing countries. Recognizing that majority of livestock operations in the Philippines are categorized as backyard, it is crucial to come up with parameters that can assess the welfare of the animal at the backyard level. The current research  used  stockmanship competence as a proxy indicator in assessing animal welfare. Stockmanship competence in this study refers to the capacity of the animal owner to ensure the welfare of their animal by providing their needs for growth and reproduction. The Philippine recommendations on goat production, tips on goat raising and goat scientific literatures were used as the basis of identifying indicators known to be important in meeting the needs of the animal and ensuring its welfare. Scores from -1 to +2 were assigned depending on how close it is of satisfying the needs of the animal. It is hoped that this assessment method would contribute to the growing body of knowledge on animal welfare and could be utilized as a logical and scientific framework in assessing welfare not just in backyard goat operation but in semi-intensive and commercial goat operations. It is suggested that further studies be done to identify other factors and standardize indicators that would reflect a comprehensive outline for goat welfare.

 

Key words: Backyard goat production, stockmanship competence, animal welfare, Philippines.

Albright J (1987). Human-farm animal relationship. Advances in animal welfare science, 3:51-66.
 

Alo A, Saithanoo S (2006). Beyond worm control in small ruminants: A cross-country assessment of impact of ILRI-IFAD TAG 443 in Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.

View

 
Animal Welfare Reaction Group (2012).
 
Ayoub AA, Saleh MA (1998). A comparative physiological study between camels and goats during water deprevation. Emirates Journal Agricultural Science, 10(2):44-60.
 
Bartussek H (1999). A review of the animal needs index for the assessment of animals' wellbeing in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Prod. Sci. 61:179-192.
Crossref
 
 

Bartussek H, Leeb C, Held S (2000). Animal needs index for cattle . Federal Research Institute for Agriculture in Alpine Regions BAL Gumpenstein, A8952 Irdning.

View

 

Brown J, Seddon Y (2014). Sow housing: Good welfare depends on good stockmanship. Pig Progress.

View

 
Bureau of Agriculture Statistics (2010). Annual Report.
 

Central Luzon State University (2013). The goat industry in the Philippines.

View

 
Collar C, Foley L, Glenn J, Hullinger P, Reed B, Rowe J, Stull C (2000). Animal Care Series: Goat care practices. University of California, Davis; First Edition.
 
De Jonge FHMC, Steuten CM, GoewieAArta EA (2000). Strategies to improve animal welfare through "good" stockmanship. The 4rth NAHWOA Workshop, Clemont-Ferrand, pp. 38-42.
 

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2013). Farm animal welfare committee (FAWC). Animal welfare assessment.

View

 

DEFRA, Farm Animal Welfare Committee (2013). Five freedoms.

View

 

Department of Environment and Primary Industries (DEPI) (2001). Code of accepted farming practices for the welfare of goats. Bureau of Animal Welfare.

View

 

FAO (2012).

View

 
FAO (1988). Farm structures in tropical climates: A textbook for structural engineering and design. Agriculture and consumer protection, Rome. 
 

FAWC (2012). Five freedoms.

View

 
Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN (1997). A scienfific concept of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6:187-205.
 
Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (1998). Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively farmed animals. CAB International, New York, NY, USA.
 

Hibbard W (2013). Defining stockmanship. Stockmanship Journal.

View

 
Horning B (2001). The assessment of housing conditions of dairy cows in littered loose housing system using scoring methods. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A - Animal Science Supplement, 30:42-47.
Crossref
 
Hutchings MR, Gordon IJ, Robertson E, Kyriazakis I, Jackson F (2000). Effects of parasitic status and level of feeding motivation on the diet selected by sheep grazing grass/cover swards. Journal of Agricultural Science, 135:65-75.
Crossref
 
Johnsen PE, Johnnesson T, Sandoe P (2001). Assessment of Farm Animal Welfare at herd Level: Many Goals, Many Methods. Acta Agriculture Scaninavica Animal Science Supplement, 30:26-33.
Crossref
 
Lensink BJ, Veissier I, Florand L (2001a). The farmer's influence on calves' behaviour, health and production of a veal unit. Animal Science., in press.
 
Livestock Development Council (LDC) (2012). Tips on goat raising. 
 

Matias J (2014). Animal Welfare and Behaviour: Issues and initiatives in the Philippines. Paper presented in the course ANSC 430A/530A, Graduate Seminar in Animal Welfare. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

View

 
Network for Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture (NAHWOA) (2000). Human-animal relationship: Stockmanship and housing in organic livestock systems. Proceedings of the 3rd NAHWOA workshop. 
 

Organicvet UK (2007). Animal Welfare Assessment.

View

 
Park M, Singer P (2012). The globalization of animal welfare. Foreign Affairs 91(2):122-133.
 
Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research and Development (PCCARD) (2005). Philippine recommends for goat production.
 

Rassu SPG, Enne G, Ligios S, Molle G (2004). Nutrition and Reproduction In: G. Pulina (ed). Dairy Sheep Nutrition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, U.K, pp.109-128.

View

 
Rushen J, Passille A (2010). The Importance of good stockmanship and its benefits for the animals. Improving Animal Welfare: A practical approach, pp. 50-65.  
 
Sevi A, Massa S, Annichiarico G, Dell'Aquila S, Muscio A (1999a). Effects of stocking density on ewes milk and incidence of subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Res., 66: 489-499.
Crossref
 
Scott EM, Nolan AM, Fitzpatrick L (2001). Conceptual and methodological issues related to welfare assessment framework for measurement. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Animal Science Supplement, 30:5-10.
 
Smart M (2010) 2nd Edition. Goat production manual: A practical guide. iUniverse, Inc., New York Bloomington.
 
Sorensen J, Sandoe P (2001). Preface. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Anim. Sci. Supplement 30:3-4.
 
Wemelsfelder F (2000). Qualitative welfare assessment: Reading the behavioural expressions of pigs. 4th NAHWOA Workshop, Clemont-Ferrand, pp. 20-30.
 
Zulkifli I (2013). Review of human-animal interactions and their impact on animal productivity and welfare. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 4:25.
Crossref

 


APA Alcedo, M. J., Ito, K., & Maeda, K. (2014). Creating animal welfare assessment method for backyard goat production in the Philippines using stockmanship competence as proxy indicator. International Journal of Livestock Production, 5(10), 173-180.
Chicago M. J. Alcedo, K. Ito and K. Maeda. "Creating animal welfare assessment method for backyard goat production in the Philippines using stockmanship competence as proxy indicator." International Journal of Livestock Production 5, no. 10 (2014): 173-180.
MLA M. J. Alcedo, K. Ito and K. Maeda. "Creating animal welfare assessment method for backyard goat production in the Philippines using stockmanship competence as proxy indicator." International Journal of Livestock Production 5.10 (2014): 173-180.
   
DOI 10.5897/IJLP2014.0217
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/IJLP/article-abstract/4A5AFDE48019

Subscription Form