International Journal of Peace and Development Studies
Subscribe to IJPDS
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 51539FA66755


Vol.8(5), pp. 64-68 , November 2017
DOI: 10.5897/IJPDS2016.0277
ISSN: 2141-6621



Review

Changes and continuity in the conceptualization of development: A review



Jarso Galchu
  • Jarso Galchu
  • Department of Civics and Ethical Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Bule Hora University, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 10 May 2017  Accepted: 16 September 2017  Published: 30 November 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Development has been among the most contested terminologies in the field of politics, sociology and economics over the last two to three centuries. Development is a concept with diverse view across the world and among different scholars, mainly because of its widely changing conceptualization and lack of unified and internationally accepted standards used to measure development across countries and organizations. From the early 18th to the middle of the 20th centuries, conceptualization of development was in line with the colonial objective of the north during which development was believed to be a social shift that dictate the people of the south to abandon their ancestral culture, norms and values to accept the Eurocentric one to gain the status of developed or developing. In the middle of 20th century, the concept was further sophisticated by the emergence of development theory which put a ladder for every country to climb to reach the level of development required by the European power. This paper attempts to outshine the changing and widening conceptualization of development concepts over the centuries, particularly paying close attention to social and cultural aspects of development. And how these changes affected the economic and social recovery of African society after the continent secured the political liberation in the second half of the 20th century. In addition, this article indicated that development has lost its traditional Eurocentric conceptualisation over the last three centuries, and more focused on the need of the people receiving development goal.

Key words: Development, change and continuity, social, cultural, Africa.

Boateng R, Heeks R, Molla A, Hinson R (2008). E-commerce and Socio-Economic Development: Conceptualizing the Link. Internet Res. 18(5):562-592.
Crossref
 
Escobar A (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 
Grincheva N (2014). Cultural Dimension of Sustainable Development: Insights in to Current Practices of "Measuring" results of Cultural Projects. Canada: A publication of Coalition for Cultural Diversity.
 
Hettne B (1995) Development Theory and the Three Worlds, 2nd edition, Harlow: Longman.
 
Johnson S (1998). Cultural Dimension of Sustainable Development, CIDA's Orientation and Initiatives. Canadian International Development Agency.
 
Joshi U, Bendre S (2010). Dimension of Development Practice. New Delhi, India: Authors press.
 
Marana M (2010). Culture and Development Evaluation and prospect, UNESCO Etxea. Working paper No.1.
 
Polanyi K (1957). The Great Transformation: The political economic origins of our time, Boston: Beacon Press.
 
Preston PW (1996). Development Theory: An Introduction, Blackwell: Oxford.
 
Sakamota K (2003). Social Development, Culture and Participation: Toward theorizing endogenous development in Tanzania, PhD thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Asia-Pacific Studies, Waseda University (GSAPS).
 
Sachs W (2010). The development Dictionary, A Guide to the Knowledge as power, Second edition. Zed Books, London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, a division of St Martin's Press.
 
Schalkwyk J (2000) Culture, Gender Equality and Development Cooperation, Prepared for the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).
 
Sen A (1999). Development as a freedom. United State of America, NewYork: Anchor Books, A Davison of Random House Inc.
 
Seers D (1969). The Meaning of Development, IDS communication Serious No. 44. Institute of Development Studies library.
 
Rostow WW (1960). Stages of Economic Growth: A Non- Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
 
Willis K (2005). Theories and Practices of Development. London and New York: Routlegde.
 
World Bank (1997). Social Development and Results on the Ground: Task Group Report, paper presented to Executive Directors of the World Bank in November 1996, No.22 Washington, USA.

 


APA Galchu, J. (2017). Changes and continuity in the conceptualization of development: A review. International Journal of Peace and Development Studies, 8(5), 64-68.
Chicago Jarso Galchu. "Changes and continuity in the conceptualization of development: A review." International Journal of Peace and Development Studies 8, no. 5 (2017): 64-68.
MLA Jarso Galchu. "Changes and continuity in the conceptualization of development: A review." International Journal of Peace and Development Studies 8.5 (2017): 64-68.
   
DOI 10.5897/IJPDS2016.0277
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/IJPDS/article-abstract/51539FA66755

Subscription Form