International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology
Subscribe to IJSA
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 70F5F3361026

Vol.8(7), pp. 59-64 , October 2016
ISSN: 2006-988X

 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?

Pat Mahon-Daly
  • Pat Mahon-Daly
  • Buckinghamshire New University, United Kingdom.
  • Google Scholar

 Received: 27 April 2016  Accepted: 23 September 2016  Published: 31 October 2016

Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

This paper examines the changes in relationship between the body, society and donated blood.  Studies in this area (Waldby 2004; Tutton 2002; Scully et al., 2006; Shaw, 2010) have focused on the moral or ethical issues related to blood donation rather than corporeal and cultural issues. This paper deconstructs the impact of developments in bio-technology and commodification of blood with regard to the self, blood donation and blood products and analyses the way in which donors understand bloods’ commodification has altered meanings attached to blood and of impact of corporeal connectedness on the self as Donor.  Using data from a qualitative ethnographic study, this paper concludes that the Donor Self has become formed into a hierarchy of parts, to manage the moral and ethical demands on the person when donating, as a result of the medical need for all body parts. Increasingly, blood donors feel they ‘have to give something of themselves’, it introduces the unique concepts of differing selves: the Inner Self, the Liquid and Solid Self relating this to the work of Goffman, as donors seek to rationalize what being a blood donor means for them and their blood.


Key words: Body, donated blood, spare parts, gift exchange, self, hierarchy, corporeality.          

Appadurai A (1988). Putting hierarchy in its place. Cult. Anthropol. 3:36-49.


Busby H (2004). 'Blood Donation for Genetic Research: What Can We Learn from Donors' Narratives?', in Richard Tutton and Oonagh Corrigan (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA, London: Routledge. pp. 39-56


Busby H (2006). Bio banks, Bioethics and Concepts of Donated Blood in the UK. Sociol. Health Illness 28(6):850-865.


Busby H (2010). The Meanings of Consent to the Donation of Cord Blood Stem Cells: Perspectives from an Interview Based Study of a Public Cord Blood Bank in England. Clin. Ethics 5:22:27.


Busby H, Kent J, Farrell AM (2014). Revaluing donor recipient bodies in the Global blood economy: Transitions in Public Policy on Blood Safety in the United Kingdom. Health 18(1):79-94.


Cohen JL (1999). Changing paradigms of citizenship and the exclusiveness of the demos. Int. Sociol. 14(3):245-268. Cited in Scheper-Hughes N. & Waquant L. (2006). Commodifying Bodies London: Sage ISBN: 9780761940340.


Copeman J (2005). Veinglory: Exploring Process of Blood Transfer between Persons. J. R. Anthropol. Institute. 11(3):465-485.


Cregan K (2012). Key Concepts in Body and Society, Sage, UK. . ISBN: 9781847875440.


Dickenson D (2008). Body Shopping: The Economy Fuelled by Flesh and Blood Oxford: One World ISBN: 9781851685912 hbk.


Goffman E (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice Hall. ISBN: 8601400224502


Goffman E (1972). Relations in Public: Microstudies of Public Order Cited from Howson A. (2004) The Body in Society Cambridge: Polity Press ISBN-13: 978-0745625386


Goffman E (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life London: Penguin ISBN-10: 0140135715.


Haraway D (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-1853431395.


Howson A (2004). The Body in Society Cambridge: Polity Press . ISBN-13: 978-0745625386


Lock M (2001). The Alienation of Body Tissue and the Biopolitics of Immortalised Cell lines Body Soc. 7(2-3):63-91.


Lock M (2002). Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley University of California Press. ISBN-13: 978-0520228146.


Lupton D, Tulloch J (2002). Risk is Part of Your Life: Risk Epistemologies Amongst a Group of Australians. Sociology 36(2):317-334.


Mauss M (1990). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange Archaic Societies London: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-1614270188.


Moore, Casper (2015). The Body Social & Cultural Dissections Routledge: Taylor & Fransis Group" London and New York. . ISBN-13: 978-0415821964.


Sanner M (2001). Exchanging Spare Parts or Becoming a New Person? People's Attitudes toward Receiving and Donating Organs. Social Sci. Med. 52:1491-1499.


Scheper-Hughes N, Waquant L (2006). Commodifying Bodies London: Sage ISBN: 9780761940340.


Scully J, Shakespeare T, Banks S (2006). Gift not Commodity? Lay People Deliberating Social Sex Selection. Sociol. Health Illness 28(6):747-767.


Sharp L (1994). Organ Transplant as a Transformative Experience: Anthropological Insights into Restructuring of the Self Medical Anthropology Quarterly (N.S.) 3:357-389.


Sharp L (2000). The Commodification of the Body and its Parts Annual Review of Anthropology.29:.2287-328.


Sharp L (2007). Bodies, Commodities and Bio Technologies: Death Mourning and Scientific Desire in the Realm of Human Organ Transfer New York: Columbia University Press.


Snelling PC (2014). Challenging the moral status of blood donation . Health Care Anal. 22:340-365.


Shaw R (2010) Deliberating and Doing Ethics in Body Gifting Practices Curr. Sociol. 58:443.


Synnott A (1993). The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society New York: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-0415103596.


Titmuss RM (1970). The Gift Relationship from Human Blood to Social Policy London: London School of Economics and Political Science ISBN-13: 978-1565844032.


Turner B (2003). Social Fluids: Metaphor and Meanings of Society Body & Society 9(1):1-10 ISBN 1357–034X(200303).


Tutton R (2002). Gift Relationships in Genetics Research. Sci. Culture 11(4):523-542.


Waldby C (2002). Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue Health. An Interdiscipl. J. Soc. Study Health Illness Med. 6(3):305-323.


Waldby C (2002). Biomedicine, Tissue Transfer and Intercorporeality. Feminist Theory 3(3):239-254.


Waldby C, Rosengarten M, Treloar C, Fraser S (2004). Blood and bioidentity: ideas about self, boundaries and risk among blood donors and people living with hepatitis C. Soc. Sci. Med. 69:461-1471.


Waldby C, Mitchell R (2007). Tissue Economy: Blood Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism London: Duke University Press ISBN-13: 978-0822337706.


Weiss G (1999). Body Images Embodiment as Intercorporeality London: Routledge ISBN: 9780415918039


Weiner AB (1992). Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving Berkeley: University of California Press ISBN: 9780520076044.



APA Mahon-Daly, P. (2016). Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 8(7), 59-64.
Chicago Pat Mahon-Daly. "Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?." International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 8, no. 7 (2016): 59-64.
MLA Pat Mahon-Daly. "Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?." International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 8.7 (2016): 59-64.

Subscription Form