International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology
Subscribe to IJSA
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 70F5F3361026


Vol.8(7), pp. 59-64 , October 2016
DOI: 10.5897/IJSA2016.0663
ISSN: 2006-988X



Full Length Research Paper

Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?



Pat Mahon-Daly
  • Pat Mahon-Daly
  • Buckinghamshire New University, United Kingdom.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 27 April 2016  Accepted: 23 September 2016  Published: 31 October 2016

Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


This paper examines the changes in relationship between the body, society and donated blood.  Studies in this area (Waldby 2004; Tutton 2002; Scully et al., 2006; Shaw, 2010) have focused on the moral or ethical issues related to blood donation rather than corporeal and cultural issues. This paper deconstructs the impact of developments in bio-technology and commodification of blood with regard to the self, blood donation and blood products and analyses the way in which donors understand bloods’ commodification has altered meanings attached to blood and of impact of corporeal connectedness on the self as Donor.  Using data from a qualitative ethnographic study, this paper concludes that the Donor Self has become formed into a hierarchy of parts, to manage the moral and ethical demands on the person when donating, as a result of the medical need for all body parts. Increasingly, blood donors feel they ‘have to give something of themselves’, it introduces the unique concepts of differing selves: the Inner Self, the Liquid and Solid Self relating this to the work of Goffman, as donors seek to rationalize what being a blood donor means for them and their blood.

 

Key words: Body, donated blood, spare parts, gift exchange, self, hierarchy, corporeality.          

Appadurai A (1988). Putting hierarchy in its place. Cult. Anthropol. 3:36-49.
Crossref

 

Busby H (2004). 'Blood Donation for Genetic Research: What Can We Learn from Donors' Narratives?', in Richard Tutton and Oonagh Corrigan (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA, London: Routledge. pp. 39-56

 
 

Busby H (2006). Bio banks, Bioethics and Concepts of Donated Blood in the UK. Sociol. Health Illness 28(6):850-865.
Crossref

 
 

Busby H (2010). The Meanings of Consent to the Donation of Cord Blood Stem Cells: Perspectives from an Interview Based Study of a Public Cord Blood Bank in England. Clin. Ethics 5:22:27.

 
 

Busby H, Kent J, Farrell AM (2014). Revaluing donor recipient bodies in the Global blood economy: Transitions in Public Policy on Blood Safety in the United Kingdom. Health 18(1):79-94.
Crossref

 
 

Cohen JL (1999). Changing paradigms of citizenship and the exclusiveness of the demos. Int. Sociol. 14(3):245-268. Cited in Scheper-Hughes N. & Waquant L. (2006). Commodifying Bodies London: Sage ISBN: 9780761940340.

 
 

Copeman J (2005). Veinglory: Exploring Process of Blood Transfer between Persons. J. R. Anthropol. Institute. 11(3):465-485.
Crossref

 
 

Cregan K (2012). Key Concepts in Body and Society, Sage, UK. . ISBN: 9781847875440.
Crossref

 
 

Dickenson D (2008). Body Shopping: The Economy Fuelled by Flesh and Blood Oxford: One World ISBN: 9781851685912 hbk.

 
 

Goffman E (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice Hall. ISBN: 8601400224502

 
 

Goffman E (1972). Relations in Public: Microstudies of Public Order Cited from Howson A. (2004) The Body in Society Cambridge: Polity Press ISBN-13: 978-0745625386

 
 

Goffman E (1990). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life London: Penguin ISBN-10: 0140135715.

 
 

Haraway D (1991). Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-1853431395.

 
 

Howson A (2004). The Body in Society Cambridge: Polity Press . ISBN-13: 978-0745625386

 
 

Lock M (2001). The Alienation of Body Tissue and the Biopolitics of Immortalised Cell lines Body Soc. 7(2-3):63-91.
Crossref

 
 

Lock M (2002). Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley University of California Press. ISBN-13: 978-0520228146.

 
 

Lupton D, Tulloch J (2002). Risk is Part of Your Life: Risk Epistemologies Amongst a Group of Australians. Sociology 36(2):317-334.
Crossref

 
 

Mauss M (1990). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange Archaic Societies London: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-1614270188.

 
 

Moore, Casper (2015). The Body Social & Cultural Dissections Routledge: Taylor & Fransis Group" London and New York. . ISBN-13: 978-0415821964.

 
 

Sanner M (2001). Exchanging Spare Parts or Becoming a New Person? People's Attitudes toward Receiving and Donating Organs. Social Sci. Med. 52:1491-1499.
Crossref

 
 

Scheper-Hughes N, Waquant L (2006). Commodifying Bodies London: Sage ISBN: 9780761940340.

 
 

Scully J, Shakespeare T, Banks S (2006). Gift not Commodity? Lay People Deliberating Social Sex Selection. Sociol. Health Illness 28(6):747-767.
Crossref

 
 

Sharp L (1994). Organ Transplant as a Transformative Experience: Anthropological Insights into Restructuring of the Self Medical Anthropology Quarterly (N.S.) 3:357-389.

 
 

Sharp L (2000). The Commodification of the Body and its Parts Annual Review of Anthropology.29:.2287-328.

 
 

Sharp L (2007). Bodies, Commodities and Bio Technologies: Death Mourning and Scientific Desire in the Realm of Human Organ Transfer New York: Columbia University Press.

 
 

Snelling PC (2014). Challenging the moral status of blood donation . Health Care Anal. 22:340-365.
Crossref

 
 

Shaw R (2010) Deliberating and Doing Ethics in Body Gifting Practices Curr. Sociol. 58:443.

 
 

Synnott A (1993). The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society New York: Routledge ISBN-13: 978-0415103596.
Crossref

 
 

Titmuss RM (1970). The Gift Relationship from Human Blood to Social Policy London: London School of Economics and Political Science ISBN-13: 978-1565844032.

 
 

Turner B (2003). Social Fluids: Metaphor and Meanings of Society Body & Society 9(1):1-10 ISBN 1357–034X(200303).

 
 

Tutton R (2002). Gift Relationships in Genetics Research. Sci. Culture 11(4):523-542.
Crossref

 
 

Waldby C (2002). Stem Cells, Tissue Cultures and the Production of Biovalue Health. An Interdiscipl. J. Soc. Study Health Illness Med. 6(3):305-323.

 
 

Waldby C (2002). Biomedicine, Tissue Transfer and Intercorporeality. Feminist Theory 3(3):239-254.
Crossref

 
 

Waldby C, Rosengarten M, Treloar C, Fraser S (2004). Blood and bioidentity: ideas about self, boundaries and risk among blood donors and people living with hepatitis C. Soc. Sci. Med. 69:461-1471.
Crossref

 
 

Waldby C, Mitchell R (2007). Tissue Economy: Blood Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism London: Duke University Press ISBN-13: 978-0822337706.

 
 

Weiss G (1999). Body Images Embodiment as Intercorporeality London: Routledge ISBN: 9780415918039

 
 

Weiner AB (1992). Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping While Giving Berkeley: University of California Press ISBN: 9780520076044.
Crossref

 

 


APA Mahon-Daly, P. (2016). Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 8(7), 59-64.
Chicago Pat Mahon-Daly. "Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?." International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 8, no. 7 (2016): 59-64.
MLA Pat Mahon-Daly. "Donated Blood, the Body and the Self: Towards a Hierarchy of the Self?." International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 8.7 (2016): 59-64.
   
DOI 10.5897/IJSA2016.0663
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/IJSA/article-abstract/70F5F3361026

Subscription Form