International NGO Journal
Subscribe to INGOJ
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - E33ED7558222


Vol.11(1), pp. 1-11 , March 2016
DOI: 10.5897/INGOJ2016.0302
ISSN: 1993-8225



Article

Determinants of internal organizational governance practices: Evidence from civil society organizations in Thailand



Dipendra K. C.
  • Dipendra K. C.
  • Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 15 March 2016  Accepted: 17 March 2016  Published: 31 March 2016

Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


In the literature of civil society organizations (CSOs), concept of “governance” has two broad research fields: one focuses on “external governance” and seeks to identify how CSOs are contributing to make the state mechanisms accountable, while the second one deals with “internal” governance of the CSOs and focuses more on the role of the board in achieving the internal governance. Following the research question: what internal and external factors influence the internal governance of CSOs? this cross-sectional survey study of 54 CSOs from Thailand identifies the determinant internal and external enabling factors of good organizational governance practices. The multiple logistic regression showed that the size of the board (OR=31.46, CI: 2.16-458.3), CSOs’ engagement with the government (OR=0.05, CI: 0.03-0.87) and the organizations’ perception on whether the current legislation is clear or not (OR=198.58, CI: 2.09 – 18855) are the factors that influence the internal governance of the civil society organizations in Thailand.

Key words: Civil society organizations, internal governance, Thailand.

Axelrod NR (2011). Board Leadership and Development. In: R. D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Block SR (1998). Perfect nonprofit boards: Myths, paradoxes, and paradigms: Simon & Schuster Custom Pub.

 
 

Bozzini E, Enjolras B (2012). Governing Ambiguities: New Forms of Local Governance and Civil Society: Nomos.

 
 

Burger R, Owens T (2010). Promoting Transparency in the NGO Sector: Examining the Availability and Reliability of Self-Reported Data. World Dev. 38(9):1263-1277.
Crossref

 
 

Carman JG (2008). Nonprofits, funders, and evaluation: Accountability in action. The American Review of Public Administration.

 
 

Carman JG, Fredericks KA (2010). Evaluation Capacity and Nonprofit Organizations Is the Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full? Am. J. Eval. 31(1):84-104.
Crossref

 
 

Carver J (2011). Boards that make a difference: A new design for leadership in nonprofit and public organizations (Vol. 6): John Wiley & Sons.

 
 

Chong T, Elies S (2011). An ASEAN Community for All: Exploring the Scope for Civil Society Engagement.

 
 

Civicus. (2015). State of Civil Society Report.

 
 

DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147-160.
Crossref

 
 

Elinoff E (2014). Unmaking Civil Society: Activist Schisms and Autonomous Politics in Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia: J. Int. Strategic Affairs, 36(3):356-385. 

 
 

Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. J. Law and Econ. 26(2):301-325.

 
 

Houle CO (1989). Governing Boards: Their Nature and Nurture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

 
 

Hwang H, Powell WW (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Adm. Sci. Q. 54(2):268-298.
Crossref

 
 

Ingram RT (2008). Ten basic responsibilities of nonprofit boards. Washington, DC: BoardSource, Inc.

 
 

Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Finan. Econ. 3(4):305-360. 
Crossref

 
 

Kaldor M (2003). Civil Society and Accountability. J. Hum. Dev. 4(1):5-27.
Crossref

 
 

Loderer C, Waelchli U (2011). Firm age and governance. Working Paper. 
Crossref

 
 

Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83(2):340-363.

 
 

Miller-Millesen JL (2003). Understanding the Behavior of Nonprofit Boards of Directors: A Theory-Based Approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Q. 32(4):521-547.
Crossref

 
 

Muhangi D (2004). Mapping of civil society organizations in Uganda.

 
 

National Cultural Act, 59 1744-1749 (1942 29 September B.E. 2485).

 
 

Ogeh Fiador V (2013). Determinants of financial governance practices: evidence from NGOs in Ghana. Int. J. Sociol. Social Policy, 33(1/2):114-130.
Crossref

 
 

Pearce J (2000). Development, NGOs, and civil society: the debate and its future. Development, NGOs, and civil society, pp. 15-43.
Crossref

 
 

Phongpaichit P (2000). Development, Civil Society, and NGOs. A lecture delivered to Thai Government Officials. Chulalongkorn University.

 
 

Piewitt M, Rodekamp M, Steffek J (2010). Civil Society in World Politics: How accountable are transnational CSOs? J. Civil Soc. 6(3):237-258.
Crossref

 
 

Pongsapich A, Kataleeradabhan N (1994). Philanthropy, NGO Activities, and Corporate Funding in Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Social Research Institute.

 
 

Rhodes RAW (1997). Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability: Open University Press.

 
 

Roberts SM, Jones JP, Fröhling O (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Dev. 33(11):1845-1864.
Crossref

 
 

Salamon LM, Anheier HK (1997). The third world's third sector in comparative perspective.

 
 

Steen-Johnsen K, Eynaud P, Wijkström F (2011). On Civil Society Governance: An Emergent Research Field. Voluntas: Int. J. Voluntary Nonprofit Organ. 22(4):555-565.
Crossref

 
 

Stone MM, Ostrower F (2007). Acting in the Public Interest? Another Look at Research on Nonprofit Governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Q. 36(3):416-438.
Crossref

 
 

Thabchumpon N (1998). Grassroot NGOs and political reform in Thailand: democracy behind civil society. The Copenhagen J. Asian Stud. 13(1):31.

 

 


APA Dipendra, K. C. (2016). Determinants of internal organizational governance practices: Evidence from civil society organizations in Thailand. International NGO Journal, 11(1), 1-11.
Chicago Dipendra K. C.. "Determinants of internal organizational governance practices: Evidence from civil society organizations in Thailand." International NGO Journal 11, no. 1 (2016): 1-11.
MLA Dipendra K. C.. "Determinants of internal organizational governance practices: Evidence from civil society organizations in Thailand." International NGO Journal 11.1 (2016): 1-11.
   
DOI 10.5897/INGOJ2016.0302
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/INGOJ/article-abstract/E33ED7558222

Subscription Form