International NGO Journal
Subscribe to INGOJ
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - F978C4159625


Vol.11(3), pp. 20-32 , July 2016
DOI: 10.5897/INGOJ2016.0309
ISSN: 1993-8225



Article

Impact of crisis on state-society relations: The case of a democratizing Taiwan



Herlin Chien
  • Herlin Chien
  • Department of International Affairs, Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 09 July 2016  Accepted: 11 July 2016  Published: 31 July 2016

Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


This study aims to explore the evolving relationship between the state and civil society from the perspective of crisis and its impact on governance type. Theoretically, the study adopts a dichotomous concept of crisis as either dissensus or consensus, and develops a typology of four governance modes that capture the dynamics of state-society relationships to facilitate empirical analysis: adversarial, managerial, network and collaborative governance. Empirically, Taiwan, a nascent democracy and developmental state, and, specifically, the Ministry of Labor are chosen as an instrumental case to demonstrate the historical impact of crises on governance style and the general quality of democracy.

Key words: Dissensus crisis, consensus crisis, governance, state-society relations, democratization.

Ansell C, Gash A (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice, J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18(4):543-571. 
Crossref

 

Argothy V (2003). Framing Volunteerism in a Consensus Crisis: Mass Media Coverage of Volunteers in the 9/11 Response.

 

Barber BR (1996). Three challenges to reinventing democracy, in: Hirst P. & Khilnan S. (Eds) Reinventing Democracy (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).

 

Barton AH (1969). Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations (Garden City, NY: Doubleday Publishing Group and Co., Inc).

 

Barton AH (1970). Communities in Disaster, 352 p (Garden City, NY: Anchor, Doubleday Publishing Group).

 

Bevir M, Rhodes RAW (2010). The State as Cultural Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Crossref

 

Birkland TA (1997). After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

 

Boin AT, Hart P, McConnell A (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. J. Eur. Public Policy, 16(1):81-106.
Crossref

 

Brown M, Goldin A (1973). Collective behavior: a review and reinterpretation of the literature, pp. 349 (Pacific Palisades, Calif: Goodyear)Chang T.-L. (1986). On the Performance of State-Owned Manufacturing Enterprises, Economic Papers, 95. Taipei, Taiwan: Chung-Hua Institute for Economic Research.

 

Chou Y, Nathan AJ (1987). Democratizing transition in Taiwan, Asian Survey, 27(3):277-299.
Crossref

 

Clark C, Lam D (1998). Beyond the Developmental State: East Asiaʾs Political Economies Reconsidered. (Palgrave Macmillan).

 

Clarke J, Newman J (1993). The right to manage: A second managerial revolution?, Cultural Stud. 7(3):427-441. 
Crossref

 

Cooper TL (1991). An Ethic of Citizenship for Public Administration (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).

 

Crane GT (1989). State-Owned Enterprises and the Oil Shocks in Taiwan: The Political Dynamics of Economic Adjustment. Stud. Comparative Int. Dev. 24(4):3-23.
Crossref

 

Davies JS (2011). Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony (Bristol: The Policy Press).

 

Earle TC, Cvetkovich GT (1995). Social Trust (Westport, CT: Praeger).

 

Eikenberry AM, Kluver JD (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk?, Public Admin. Rev. 64(2):132-140. 
Crossref

 

Evans PB (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

 

Frances J, Levaˇci’c R, Mitchell J, Thompson G (1991). Introduction, in: Thompson G., Frances J., Levaˇci’c R. & Mitchell J. (Eds) Markets, Hierarchies and Networks: the Coordination of Social Life, pp. 1-19 (London: Sage Publishing House).

 

Hall CM (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis, J. Sustainable Tour. 19(4-5):437-457. 
Crossref

 

Hansen K (2001). Local councillors: between Local 'government' and Local 'governance'., Public Admin. 79(1):105-142. 
Crossref

 

Ho MS (2003). Democratization and autonomous unionism in Taiwan: the case of petrochemical workers." Issue A (undated), Studies-English Eds, 39(3) :105-136.

 

Hsiao HM (1990). Emerging social movements and the rise of a demanding civil society in Taiwan, Austr. J. Chinese Affairs, pp. 163-180. 
Crossref

 

Huntington SP (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century: Vol. 4. (Norman) (Press: University of Oklahoma).

 

Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgati SP (1997). A General theory of network governance: exchange conditions and Social mechanisms, Acad. Manage. J. 22(9):11-45.

 

Kaika M (2003). The water framework directive: A new directive for a changing Social, political and economic European framework, Eur. Planning Stud. 11(3):299-316. 
Crossref

 

Keeler JTS (1993). Opening the window for reform: mandates, crises, and extraordinary policy-making, Comparative Political Stud. 25(4):433-486. 
Crossref

 

Kettl DF (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).

 

Klein N (2007). The Shock Doctrine: the Rise of Disaster Capitalism (New York: Metropolitan Books).

 

Kooiman J (Ed) (1993). Modern Governance: Government-Society Interactions (London: Sage Publishing House).

 

Kooiman J (2003). Governing as Governance (London: Sage Publishing House).

 

Levi-Faur D (Ed) (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Crossref

 

Liou KT (1992). Privatizing State-owned Enterprises: the Taiwan experience, Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 58(3):403-419. 
Crossref

 

Lomborg B (2004) Global Crises, Global Solutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Crossref

 

Lu A. Yl (1985). Future domestic developments in the Republic of China on Taiwan, Asian Survey 25(11):1075-1095.
Crossref

 

Marsh D (Ed) (1998). Comparing Policy Networks (Buckingham: Open University Press). Mileti & O'Brein, 1991

 

Myers RH (1987). Political theory and recent political developments in the Republic of China, Asian Survey, 27(9):1003-1022.
Crossref

 

Newman J (2004). Constructing accountability: Network Governance and Managerial Agency, Public Policy Admn. 19(4):17-33.
Crossref

 

Olsen JP (1991). Modernisation programmes in perspective, Governance 4:2.

 

Olsen JP, Peters BG (1996). Lessons from Experience (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press).

 

Öniş Z (1991). The logic of the developmental state, Comparative Politics, pp. 109-126.
Crossref

 

Pahl-Wostl C, Gupta J, Petry D (2008). Governance and the global water system: A theoretical exploration, Global Governance, 14(4):419-435.

 

Pierre J (Ed) (2000). Debating Governance: Authenticity, Steering and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

 

Pierre J, Peters BG (2000). Governance, Politics and the State (New York, NY: St. Martin's Press).

 

Pierre J, Peters BG (2005). Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
Crossref

 

Quarantelli EL (1970). in: Behavior (Ed) Human Nature and Collective T. Shi- butani, pp. 111-23. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 232 p.

 

Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan (2006). Investigation Report of Multi-Employment Promotion Program Controlled by Executive .

 

Rhodes RAW (1994). The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in Britain, Political Q. 65(2):138-151. 
Crossref

 

Rhodes RAW (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Buckingham: Open University Press).

 

Rhodes RAW (2000a). Governance and Public Administration, in: Pierre J. (Ed) Debating Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

 

Rhodes RAW (2000b). Transforming British Government, Vols. 1 and 2 (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
Crossref

 

Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technol. Hum. Values, 25(1):3-29.
Crossref

 

Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1982). Facts versus fears: understanding perceived risk, In: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
Crossref

 

Smith S (1993). Public Policy and Democracy, In: H. Ingram & S. R. Smith (Eds).Public Policy for Democracy, (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution).

 

Sonnenfeld DA, Mol APJ (2002). Globalization and the transformation of environmental governance, Am. Behav. Scientist, 45(9):1318-1339. 
Crossref

 

Sørensen E, Torfing J (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks, Scandinavian Political Stud. 28(3):195-218.
Crossref

 

Stallings RA (1973). The community con- text of crisis management, Am. Behav. Scientist, 16(3):312-325. 
Crossref

 

Stewart J, Stoker G (1995). Fifteen years of Local government restructuring 1979-1994: an evaluation, in: Stewart J. & Stoker G. (Eds) Local Government in the 1990s (London: MacMillan).
Crossref

 

Stivers C (1994). Citizenship ethics in Public Administration, in: Cooper T. (Ed) Handbook of Administrative Ethics, pp. 583-602 (New York: Marcel Dekker).

 

Stoker G (Ed) (2000). The New Politics of British Local Governance (London: MacMillan).

 

Stoker G (2011). Was Local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective, Public Admin. 89(1):15-31. 
Crossref

 

Terry LD (1998) Administrative leadership, Neo-managerialism, and the public management movement, Public Admin. Rev. 58(3):194-200. 
Crossref

 

Walder AG (1983). Organized dependency and cultures of authority in Chinese industries, J. Asian Stud. 43(1):51-76.
Crossref

 

Warheit GJ (1968). The impact of major emergencies on the functional integration of four American communities. PhD Thesis, Ohio State Univ. 270 p.

 

Waxman JJ (1973). An analysis of commercial broadcasting organizations during flood disasters. PhD Thesis Ohio State Univ.: Columbus. 225 p.

 

Wolensky RP (1979). Toward a broader conceptualization of volunteerism in disaster, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Q. 8(3-4):33-42. 
Crossref

 

Wright T (1999). Student mobilization in Taiwan: civil society and its discontents, Asian Survey, pp. 986-1008.
Crossref

 

Wu N (2005). Transition without justice, or justice without history: transitional justice in Taiwan Taiwan journal of democracy 1(1):77-102.

 

Wu YH (1996). Paixi/fenlei yu zhengzhi yundong:Taiwan shiyou gonghui wei ge'an de yanjiu, (Factions/classification and politics: The case of the Taiwan Petroleum Workers' Union) M.A. thesis, National Taiwan University, 1996.

 

Xu B (2014). Consensus crisis and civil society: the Sichuan earthquake response and state–society relations, China J. 71:91-108.
Crossref

 


APA Chien, H. (2016). Impact of crisis on state-society relations: The case of a democratizing Taiwan. International NGO Journal, 11(3), 20-32.
Chicago Herlin Chien. "Impact of crisis on state-society relations: The case of a democratizing Taiwan." International NGO Journal 11, no. 3 (2016): 20-32.
MLA Herlin Chien. "Impact of crisis on state-society relations: The case of a democratizing Taiwan." International NGO Journal 11.3 (2016): 20-32.
   
DOI 10.5897/INGOJ2016.0309
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/INGOJ/article-abstract/F978C4159625

Subscription Form