Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development
Subscribe to JAERD
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - C4AA18266403


Vol.9(11), pp. 247-254 , November 2017
DOI: 10.5897/JAERD2017.0885
ISSN: 2141-2170



Review

Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms



Willy Turyahikayo
  • Willy Turyahikayo
  • Department of Economics, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Frank B. Matsiko
  • Frank B. Matsiko
  • Department of Extension and Innovation Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
John J. Okiror
  • John J. Okiror
  • Department of Extension and Innovation Studies, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Moses Buregyeya
  • Moses Buregyeya
  • Specialist National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Uganda.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 12 May 2017  Accepted: 03 August 2017  Published: 30 November 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Innovation platforms are increasingly being used as a means of operationalizing innovation systems thinking. Agricultural innovation platforms are intended to bring together a number of stakeholders to promote an identified agricultural innovation. This is done through exchange of knowledge and other valuable resources to solve common problems. However, given the relatively new nature of innovation platforms, there is still limited conceptual knowledge on the mechanism within the platforms that leads to the implementation of innovations by different stakeholders who often have conflicting interests. This conceptual paper intended to review and unearth the intermediate processes that influence the actor innovation behavior by using the network governance theory. The review shows that the generation and implementation of ideas in an innovation platform is a process that involves structural, relational and social mechanisms. This review provides a foundation for future empirical studies in innovation platforms and particularly how they influence actor innovation behavior.

Key words: Innovation platform, innovation behavior, network governance, agricultural innovation platforms.

Borgatti SP, Everett MG (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Soc. networks 19(3):243-269.
Crossref

 

Burt RS (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 
 

Cadilhon JJ (2013). A conceptual framework to evaluate the impact of innovation platforms on agrifood value chains development. Paper read at 138th EAAE Seminar on Pro-poor Innovations in Food Supply Chains, 11–13 September, Ghent, Belgium.

 
 

Coleman JS (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:95-120.
Crossref

 
 

Coleman JS (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 
 

Considine M, Lewis JM (2003). Bureaucracy, network, or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Admin. Rev. 63(2):131-140.

 
 

Consoli D, Patrucco PP (2011). Complexity and the coordination of technological knowledge: the case of innovation platforms. Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change 201p.
Crossref

 
 

Cullen B, Josephine T, Katherine S, Zelalem L, Alan D (2014). An analysis of power dynamics within innovation platforms for natural resource management. Innov. Dev. 4(2):259-275.
Crossref

 
 

Damanpour F (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manag. J. 34(3):555-590.
Crossref

 
 

De Jong J, Den Hartog D (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity Innov. Manag. 19(1):23-36.
Crossref

 
 

De Jong JPJ (2007). Individual innovation. The connection between leadership and employees' innovative work behavior. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. The Netherlands.

 
 

DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147-160.
Crossref

 
 

Donaldson L (1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge University Press Vol. 25.

 
 

Dougherty D, Hardy C (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Manag. J. 39:1120-1153.
Crossref

 
 

Dubini P, Aldrich H (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. J. Bus. Venturing 6(5):305-313.
Crossref

 
 

Edmunds D, Wollenberg E (2002). Disadvantaged groups in multistakeholder negotiations. CIFOR Programme Report.

 
 

Faulkner RR, Anderson AB (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. Am. J. Sociol. 92(4):879-909.
Crossref

 
 

Faysse N (2006). Troubles on the way: An analysis of the challenges faced by multi‐stakeholder platforms. In Natural Resources Forum Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 30(3):219-229.

 
 

Fombrun C, Shanley M (1990). What is in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Acad. Manag. J. 33:229-244.
Crossref

 
 

Gerlach ML (1992). The Japanese corporate network: A block model analysis. Admin. Sci. Q. 37:105-139.
Crossref

 
 

Giedraitis VR, Rasteniene A, Notten T (2009). Business Clusters and the Potential of the Biotechnology Sector in Lithuania. Ekonomika 81-89.

 
 

Gigone D, Hastie R (1997). The impact of information on small group choice. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 72(1):132.
Crossref

 
 

Granovetter M (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embedded-ness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481-510.
Crossref

 
 

Granovetter M (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N Nohria & RG Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action 25-56. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

 
 

Granovetter MS (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360-1380.
Crossref

 
 

Gulati R (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Manag. J. 19(4):293-317.
Crossref

 
 

Hanf KI, Toonen TA (Eds.) (2012). Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems: questions of analysis and design (Vol. 23). Springer Science & Business Media.

 
 

Hay C, Richards D (2000). The tangled webs of Westminster and Whitehall: The discourse, strategy and practice of networking within the British core executive. Public Admin. 78(1):1-28.
Crossref

 
 

Helfat CE, Teece DE (1987). Vertical integration and risk reduction. J. Law Econ. Organization 3(1):47-67.

 
 

Hermans F, Sartas M, van Schagen B, van Asten P, Schut M (2017). Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. PLoS ONE 12(2).
Crossref

 
 

Hesterly WS, Zenger TR (1993). The myth of a monolithic economics: Fundamental assumptions and the use of economic models in policy and strategy research. Organization Sci. 4:496-510.
Crossref

 
 

Homann-Kee TS, Adekunle A, Lundy M, Tucker J, Birachi E, Schut M, Mundy P (2013). What are innovation platforms? Innovation platforms practice brief 1. Innov. Platforms Practice Brief 1:1-7.

 
 

Janssen O (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. J. Occupational Organizational Psychol. 73(3):287-302.
Crossref

 
 

Johnson BL (1998). Resource dependence theory: A political economy model of organizations. In J. Shafritz (Ed., Vol. 4), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration. New York: Henry Holt. pp. 1969-1974.

 
 

Jones C, Hesterly WS (1993). Network organization: An alternative governance form or a glorified market? Academy of Management Meetings, Atlanta, Georgia.

 
 

Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4):911-945.

 
 

Kilduff M, Krackhardt D (1994). Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 37:87-108.
Crossref

 
 

Kilelu CW, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C, Hall A (2011). Beyond knowledge brokering: an exploratory study on innovation intermediaries in an evolving smallholder agricultural system in Kenya. Knowledge Manag. Dev. J. 7(1):84-108.
Crossref

 
 

Killing JP (1988). Understanding alliances: The role of task and organizational complexity. In Contractor F, Lorange P, Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

 
 

Kim J (2006). Networks, network governance, and networked networks. Int. Rev. Public Admin. 11(1):19-34.
Crossref

 
 

Kleysen R, Street C (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behaviour. J. intellectual Capital 2(3):284-296.
Crossref

 
 

Kooiman J (1993). Findings, Speculations and Recommendations. In Modern Governance, edited by J. Kooiman. London: Sage.

 
 

Kreiner K, Schultz M (1993). Informal collaboration in R & D: The formation of networks across organizations. Organization Stud. 14:189-209.
Crossref

 
 

Larson A (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Q. 37:76-104.
Crossref

 
 

Leeuwis C, Aarts N (2011). Rethinking communication in innovation processes: creating space for change in complex systems. J. Agric. Edu. Ext. 17(1):21-36.
Crossref

 
 

Li W, Veliyath R, Tan J (2013). Network characteristics and firm performance: An examination of the relationships in the context of a cluster. J. Small Bus. Manag. 51(1):1-22.
Crossref

 
 

Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Sci. 7(4):428-443.
Crossref

 
 

Lowndes V, Skelcher C (1998). The dynamics of multi‐organizational partnerships: an analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Admin. 76(2):313-333.
Crossref

 
 

Lynn LE Jr., Carolyn JH, Carolyn JH (2001). Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

 
 

Messely L, Rogge E, Dessein J (2013). Using the rural web in dialogue with regional stakeholders. J. Rural Stud. 32:400-410.
Crossref

 
 

Messmann G, Mulder RH (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocat. Learn. 4(1):63-84.
Crossref

 
 

Mumford MD (2000). Managing creative people: strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resour. Manag. Rev. 10(3):313-351.
Crossref

 
 

Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 242-266.

 
 

Nederlof ES, Pyburn R (2012). One finger cannot lift a rock. Facilitating innovation platforms to trigger institutional change in West-Africa. Amsterdam: KIT-Royal Tropical Institute.

 
 

Nederlof ES, Wongtschowski M (2011). Putting heads together: agricultural innovation platforms in practice. F. van der Lee (Ed.). KIT Publishers, KIT Development, Policy & Practice.

 
 

Nelson R, Winter S (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change, Production Sets and Organizational Capabilities. Belknap/Harward. pp. 59-65.

 
 

Nelson R, Winter S (1992). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Harvard.

 
 

Nienhüser W (2008). Resource dependence theory: how well does it explain behavior of organizations? Manag. Rev. 19(1/2):9-32.

 
 

Nooteboom B, Gilsing VA (2004). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: A competence and governance view.

 
 

Peters BG, Pierre J (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. J. public admin. Res. theory 8(2):223-243.

 
 

Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978). The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

 
 

Powell WW (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizing. IN B. Staw & LL Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: 295-336. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

 
 

Provan KG, Kenis P (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. J. Public Admin. Res. theory 18(2):229-252.

 
 

Rhodes RA (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.

 
 

Rogers EM (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

 
 

Rutten RPJH, Boekema FWM (2007). Regional social capital: Embeddedness, innovation networks and regional economic development. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 74(9):1834-1846.
Crossref

 
 

Schut M, Rodenburg J, Klerkx L, van Ast A, Bastiaans L (2014). Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review. Crop Prot. 56:98-108.
Crossref

 
 

Scott S, Bruce R (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad. Manag. J. 37(3):580-607.
Crossref

 
 

Simsek Z, Lubatkin MH, Floyd SW (2003). Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial X: A structural embeddedness perspective. J. Manag. pp. 427-442.
Crossref

 
 

Sivadas E, Dwyer FR (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. J. Market. 64(1):31-49.
Crossref

 
 

Subramaniam M, Youndt MA (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Manag. J. 48:450-463.
Crossref

 
 

Sumberg J, Heirman J, Raboanarielina C, Kaboré A (2013). From Agricultural Research to 'Product Development' What Role for User Feedback and Feedback Loops?. Outlook Agric. 42(4):233-242.
Crossref

 
 

Swaans K, Puskur R, Taye H, Haile AG (2013). A monitoring and evaluation framework to assess the performance of innovation platforms in the context of livestock value chains. ILRI Discussion Paper 24. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute.

 
 

Tsai W (2002). Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization sci. 13(2):179-190.
Crossref

 
 

Uzzi B (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Am. Social. Rev. 674-698.
Crossref

 
 

Uzzi B (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Q. 35-67.
Crossref

 
 

Williamson OE (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

 
 

Williamson OE (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets and relational contracting. New York: Free Press.

 
 

Williamson OE (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization 1:135-182.
Crossref

 
 

Williamson OE (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Q. 36(2):269-296.
Crossref

 
 

Williamson OE (1994). Transaction cost economics and organization theory. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology: 77-107. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

 
 

Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18(2):293-321.

 

 


APA Turyahikayo, W., Matsiko, F. B., Okiror, J. J., & Buregyeya, M. (2017). Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 9(11), 247-254.
Chicago Willy Turyahikayo, Frank B. Matsiko, John J. Okiror and Moses Buregyeya. "Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms." Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 9, no. 11 (2017): 247-254.
MLA Willy Turyahikayo, et al. "Understanding actor innovation behavior: The application of network governance theory in agricultural innovation platforms." Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 9.11 (2017): 247-254.
   
DOI 10.5897/JAERD2017.0885
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JAERD/article-abstract/C4AA18266403

Subscription Form