Journal of Cell and Animal Biology
Subscribe to JCAB
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 996818C14948


Vol.7(10), pp. 125-131 , October 2013
DOI: 10.5897/JCAB11.030
ISSN: 1996-0867



Full Length Research Paper

Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers’ management condition


Tesfa Geleta1*, Tegene Negesse2, Girma Abebe2 and Arth L. Goetsch3




1Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Research center P.O 35, Ziway, Ethiopia.

2Hawassa  University, Awassa College of Agriculture, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, P.O.Box 05, Awassa, Ethiopia.

3Langston University School of Agriculture and Applied Sciences P.O Box 1730 Langston, Oklahoma 73050, United States.


Email: ngtesfa@gmail.com






 Accepted: 18 September 2013  Published: 31 October 2013

Copyright © 2013 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Sheep fattening with Molasses-urea feed block (MUB) was undertaken in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District at Aneno and Arba villages for 87 days during both dry (from 22 March to 17 June) and during wet season (from 19 August to 10 November, 2009). A study was conducted to determine the performance and profitability obtained from MUB supplemented grazing sheep. Molasses, urea, wheat bran, finely ground haricot bean haulm, salt, and bindinder (cement and termite mould) were used as ingredients to produce three different MUBs; Treatment two (T2), Treatment three (T3) and Treatment four (T4) with 17.72, 20.96 and 24.6% CP, respectively. Six sheep were randomly allotted to each of T1, T2, T3 and T4 during both dry and wet seasons at each village. Sheep in T4 had higher overall average daily weight gain (ADWG) (74.8 ± 11.13 g/head/day followed by T2, T3 and T1 (72.88 ± 9.27, 58.5 ± 12.98 and 33.67 ± 3.03) g/head/day, respectively. Over all total body weight gain (TBWG) of T4 was higher (6.26 ± 0.53) kg, followed by T2, T3 and T1 (6.13 ± 0.46, 4.92 ± 0.64 and 2.83 ± 0.39) kg, respectively. Differences (P<0.05) between control (T1) and T4; between T3 and T4, between T1 and T2, between T3 and T2 in overall ADWG and TBWG were significant (P<0.05) but differences between T1 and T3, between T2 and T4; not significant (P>0.05). ADWG (67.96 ± 10.31) g/head/day and TBWG (5.91 ± 0.87) kg of sheep at Aneno village was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the ADWG (51.79 ± 9.41) g/head /day and TBWG (4.51 ± 0.75) kg of sheep at Arba village. Significant difference (P<0.05) in ADWG and TBWG was observed between seasons with the higher gain during wet season ( 67.33 ± 11.43) g/head/day growth rate and 5.86 ± 0.43 kg total weight gain as compared to dry season ( 52.07 ± 8.3) g/head/day growth rate and 4.53 ± 0.39 kg total weight gain. The interaction of season by village was not significantly influenced both ADWG and TBWG of sheep. Marginal rate of return of T2 is higher (123.46) followed by T3.77.16) and T4 (65.64). From the biological and economic data analysis, we can conclude and recommend that MUB with 17.72% CP could be used as supplement for sheep fattening in mid rift valley of Ethiopia.

 

Key words: Feed block, crude protein, weight gain, growth rate, return.

 

Adugna T (2007). Feed Resource for producing Export Quality meat and meat Livestock in Ethiopia. Examples from selected Woredas in Oromia and SNNP Regional states. December, 2007. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 46, 52, 75.
 
Adugna T, Roger M C, Arthur G L, Tilahun S, Tegene N (2000). Nutritional constraints and future prospective for Goat Production in East Africa. In: proceeding of the conference on opportunities and challenges of enhancing goat production in east Africa, November 2000, Langston University, Langston, USA and Debub University, Awassa, Ethiopia. pp. 1-21.
 
Aganga A A, Letata P, Tsiane M V (2005). Molasses urea block as supplementary feed resource for r uminant in Bostwana. J. Animal Vet. Adv. 4 (5); 524-528, 05. Web site: http://www.medwell journals. Com/ full text/ java/ 2005/524- 528. Pdf
 
Alemayehu M (2003). Country pasture/Forage Resource profiles.
 
Anindo D, Toe, Tembly F, Mukasa-Mugerwa S, Lahou -kassi EA, Sovani, S (1998). Effect of molasses urea block (MUB) on dry matter in take, growth, reproductive performance and control of gastro intestinal nematode infection of grazing ram lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 27, 63-71.
 
ATARC (Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center) (1998). Bulleting no.1. Oromiya Agricultural development Bureau Finfinne,Ethiopia. PP 20-22.
 
Bensalem H, Nefzaoui A, Makkar HPS (2007). Feed supplementation blocks for increased utilization of tanniniferous foliages by ruminants. pp. 185-205.
 
Besalem H, Nefzaoui A (2003). Feed blocks as alternative supplements for sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research. Volume 49, Issue 3, September. pp. 275-288.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00144-5
 
Chestworth J (1992). Feed blocks. Ruminant nutrition. CTA (Technical Center for Agriculture and rural cooperation), Wagening, the Netherland. p. 119.
 
CIMMT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An economics training manual. CIMMT, DF, Mexico.
 
Ehui S, Rey B (1992). Partial budget analysis for on station and on-farm small ruminant Production systems research method and data requirements. In: proceeding of the first Biennial conference of the Africa small ruminant Research net work. ILRAD, Nirobi, Kenya10-14 December, 1990.
 
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) (2007). Experiences with urea-molasses multinutrient blocks in buffalo production and reproduction in smallholder dairy farming, Punjab, India. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome. pp. 59-70.
 
Forsberg N E, Al-Maqbaly R A, Al-Halhali A, Ritchie, Srik, Akumar A (2002). Assessment of Molasses–Urea Blocks for Goat and Sheep Production in the Sultanate of Oman: Intake and Growth Studies. Tropical animal health Production, (34): 3: 231-239.
 
Gatenby M R (2002). Tropical Agriculturalist. 2th Ed.
 
Habib G (2007). Experience with development and feeding of multinutrient feed supplementation block in Pakistan. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2007. pp. 161-182.
 
Hamayun K M, Fida A, Riaz N, Gul Z, Rahimullah, Muhammad Z (2006). Relationship of body weight with linear body measurements in goats. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. Vol. 1 (No) 3.
 
Ibrahim H, Olaloku (2000). Partial budgeting as a tool for economic analysis in livestock production. Improving cattle for milk, meat and traction. ILRI working manual Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 49-53.
 
ILCA (International Livestock Center for Africa) (). Livestock systems research manual. Working paper 12. pp. 152.
 
Jian-Xin L, Ruijun L, Degang Z (2007). Feed supplementation blocks-experiences in China. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2007.
PMid:17504447 PMCid:PMC2517304
 
LPP (Livestock Production Program) (2005). Urea and urea-molasses block (UMB). Website: http://www.smallstock.info/credits/dfid.html
 
MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food) (1984). Energy allowance and feeding systems for ruminants. 2nd edition. Chalcombe publications,Marlow,UK. p. 85.
 
Michael A (2007). The technology used to make urea-molasses blocks. Feed supplementation Blocks. Urea-Molasses multinutrient blocks: Simple and effective feed supplement technology for ruminant agriculture. pp. 23-34.
 
Nagwa AT, Tawah CL (1992). Effect of legume crop residues and concentrate supplementation on voluntary intake and performance of Kirdi sheep fed a basal diet of rice straw. In: Proceeding of the joint feed resources networks workshop held in Gaborone, Botswana 4-8 March 1991. pp. 239-245.
 
Njwe RMM, Chifon K, Ntep R (1990). Potential of Rubber seed as protein concentrate supplement for dwarf sheep of Cameroon. In: Proceeding of the first joint workshop held in Lilongwe, Malawi 5-9 December 1988. pp. 488-500.
 
Richard O, Church DC (1998). Livestock feeds and feeding. 4th Ed. Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited, London.
 
Sansoucy R, Aarts G (2005). Animal Feed Resource Information System.
 
SAS (2001). SAS user`s Guide: statistics, Release 8.2.SAS Inst., carry. Nc.
 
Sena C, Ayla AO,Yuceyurt OR (2006). Effect of feed supplemented with urea molasses mineral blocks on activity of Serum ASt, ALT and Levels of Total protein, Glucose, Triglyceride, Total Lipid, Total Cholesterol in Lambs. Kafkas Univ. vet. Fak. deg. 2006. 12(2):137-140.
 
Smith OB (1991). Small ruminant feeding systems for small-scale farmers in humid West Africa. In: proceedings of the joint feed resources networks workshop held in Gaborone, Botswana.
 
Solomon G, Solomon A, Asfaw N (1991). Growth Responses of Horro sheep to different levels of Maize and Noug cake Supplements. In: proceeding of the Fourth national Livestock Improvement Con-ferences. 13-15 November 1991 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
 
Tayeb AEE, Mohammed TA, Homeieda AM, Mohammed AA (1991). Effect of supplementing low quality forage with concentrates on performance and sexual development of dairy heifers. In: Proceedings of the joint feed resources net works workshop held in Gaborone, Bostwana 4-8 March 1991. pp. 299-303.
 

 


APA (2013). Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers’ management condition. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology, 7(10), 125-131.
Chicago Tesfa Geleta, Tegene Negesse, Girma Abebe and Arth L. Goetsch. "Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers’ management condition." Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 7, no. 10 (2013): 125-131.
MLA Tesfa Geleta, et al. "Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers’ management condition." Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 7.10 (2013): 125-131.
   
DOI 10.5897/JCAB11.030
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JCAB/article-abstract/996818C14948

Subscription Form