Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research
Subscribe to JCBBR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - FF035ED9875


Vol.5(2), pp. 23-43 , July 2013
DOI: 10.5897/JCBBR10.011
ISSN: 2141-2227



Full Length Research Paper

Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study


Subinoy Biswas and Sudip Kundu*




Department of Biophysics, Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 009, India.


Email: skbmbg@caluniv.ac.in






 Accepted: 07 February 2013  Published: 31 July 2013

Copyright © 2013 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Protein-protein interactions are playing a fundamental role in different cellular activities.  Although the coevolution of interacting protein pairs has been established by several groups, whether a protein having multiple interacting partners coevolves with all of its interacting partners or not have not been studied, so far. Here, the coevolution of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) with their multiple interacting protein partners was studied. The ‘mirror tree’ method was used to predict the signature of coevolution of the interacting pairs.  The results show that PCNA, which interacts with a larger number of proteins, does not coevolve with each of its partners. Rather, the degree of coevolution varies in a statistically significant wider range. The nature of coevolution of these interacting pairs in two different lineages (archaea and eukarya) has been further investigated separately. Results show that the coordinated evolutions of some of the interacting pairs are different for two different lineages. The possible reasons (percentage of disorder region of partner proteins, synonymous to non-synonymous ratio, cascade interactions, etc.) of the variations have also been discussed.

 

Key words: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), coevolution, protein-protein interaction.

 

Altschuh D, Lesk AM, Bloomer AC, Klug A (1987). Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mol. Biol. 193:693-707.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(87)90352-4
 
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Mayers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
PMid:2231712
 
Argos P (1988). An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. Protein Eng. 2:101-113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/2.2.101
PMid:3244692
 
Atwell S, Ultsch M, Vos DMA, Wells AJ (1997). Structural plasticity in a remodeled protein-protein interface. Science 278:1125-1128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5340.1125
PMid:9353194
 
Bork P, Jensen LJ, Mering CV, Ramani AK, Lee I, Marcotte EM (2004). Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14:292-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2004.05.003
PMid:15193308
 
Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradović Z(2002).Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41:6573-6582.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi012159+
PMid:12022860
 
Felsenstein J (2002). PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package, version 3.6, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
 
Giovanni M, Ulrich H (2003). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. Cell Sci. 116:3051-3060.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00653
PMid:12829735
 
Goh CS, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M, Walther D, Cohen FE (2000). Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299:283-293.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.3732
PMid:10860738
 
Goh CS, Cohen FE (2002). Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 324:177-192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01038-0
 
Grigoriev A (2003). On the number of protein-protein interactions in the yeast proteome. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:4157-4161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg466
PMid:12853633 PMCid:PMC165980
 
Higgins D, Thompson J, Gibson T, Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
PMid:7984417 PMCid:PMC308517
 
Hoskins J, Lovell S, Blundell TL (2006) An algorithm for predicting protein-protein interaction sites: Abnormally exposed amino acid residues and secondary structure elements. Protein Sci. 15:1017-1029.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.051589106
PMid:16641487 PMCid:PMC2242518
 
Janin J, Miller S, Chothia C (1988) Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 204:155-164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(88)90606-7
 
Jespers L, Lijnen HR, Vanwetswinkel S, Hoef VB, Brepoels K, Cohen D, Maeyer DM (1999) Guiding a docking mode by phage display: selection of correlated mutations at the staphylokinase-plasmin interface. J. Mol. Biol. 290:471-479.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2887
PMid:10390345
 
Jones S, Thornton JM (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.1.13
PMid:8552589 PMCid:PMC40170
 
Jonsson ZO, Hubscher U (1997). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen:more than a clamp for DNA polymerases. Bioessays 19:967-975.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.950191106
PMid:9394619
 
Kim WK, Bolser DM, Park JH (2004). Large-scale co-evolution analysis of protein structural interlogues using the global protein structural interactome map (PSIMAP). Bioinformatics 20:1138-1150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth053
PMid:14764552
 
Mintseris J, Weng Z (2005) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:10930-10935.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502667102
PMid:16043700 PMCid:PMC1182425
 
Moyle WR, Campbell RK, Myers RV, Bernard MP, Han Y, Wang X (1994). Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature 368:251-255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/368251a0
PMid:8145825
 
Ohta T (1995). Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes and the nearly neutral theory. J. Mol. Evol. 40:56-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00166595
PMid:7714912
 
Pal C, Papp B, Lercher MJ (2006). An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:337-348.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1838
PMid:16619049
 
Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 271:511-523.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1198
PMid:9281423
 
Pazos F, Juan D, Izarzugaza JM, Leon E, Valencia A (2008) Prediction of protein interaction based on similarity of phylogenetic trees. Methods Mol. Biol. 484:523-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-398-1_31
PMid:18592199
 
Pazos F, Ranea JA, Juan D, Sternberg MJ (2005) Assessing Protein Co-evolution in the Context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome. J. Mol. Biol. 30; 1002-1015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.005
PMid:16139301
 
Pazos F, Valencia A (2001) Similarity of Phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 14:609-614.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/14.9.609
PMid:11707606
 
Pazos F, Valencia A (2008). Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. EMBO J. 27:2648-2655.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.189
PMid:18818697 PMCid:PMC2556093
 
Pereira-Leal JB, Levy ED, Teichmann SA (2006) The origins and evolution of functional modules: lessons from protein complexes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 361:507-517.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1807
PMid:16524839 PMCid:PMC1609335
 
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992). Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 
Ramani AK, Marcotte EM (2003). Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 327:273-284.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00114-1
 
Sato T, Yamanishi Y, Kanehisa M, Toh H (2005). The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Bioinformatics 21:3482-3489.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti564
PMid:15994190
 
Spiegel RM (1972) Theory and Problems of Statistics in Si units, 1st edition, McGraw-Hill International Book Company, New York. pp. 264.
 
Tan SH, Zhang Z, Ng SK (2004) ADVICE: Automated Detection and Validation of Interaction by Co-Evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W69-W72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh471
PMid:15215353 PMCid:PMC441609
 
Warbrick E (2000). The puzzle of PCNA's many partners. Bioessays 22:997-1006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-1878(200011)22:11<997::AID-BIES6>3.3.CO;2-R
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-1878(200011)22:11<997::AID-BIES6>3.0.CO;2-#

 


APA (2013). Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study. Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research, 5(2), 23-43.
Chicago Subinoy Biswas and Sudip Kundu. "Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study." Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research 5, no. 2 (2013): 23-43.
MLA Subinoy Biswas and Sudip Kundu. "Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study." Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research 5.2 (2013): 23-43.
   
DOI 10.5897/JCBBR10.011
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JCBBR/article-abstract/FF035ED9875

Subscription Form