Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research
Subscribe to JCBBR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - FF035ED9875

Vol.5(2), pp. 23-43 , July 2013
ISSN: 2141-2227

 Total Views: 0
 Downloaded: 0

Full Length Research Paper

Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study

Subinoy Biswas and Sudip Kundu*

Department of Biophysics, Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 009, India.

Email: [email protected]

 Accepted: 07 February 2013  Published: 31 July 2013

Copyright © 2013 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Protein-protein interactions are playing a fundamental role in different cellular activities.  Although the coevolution of interacting protein pairs has been established by several groups, whether a protein having multiple interacting partners coevolves with all of its interacting partners or not have not been studied, so far. Here, the coevolution of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) with their multiple interacting protein partners was studied. The ‘mirror tree’ method was used to predict the signature of coevolution of the interacting pairs.  The results show that PCNA, which interacts with a larger number of proteins, does not coevolve with each of its partners. Rather, the degree of coevolution varies in a statistically significant wider range. The nature of coevolution of these interacting pairs in two different lineages (archaea and eukarya) has been further investigated separately. Results show that the coordinated evolutions of some of the interacting pairs are different for two different lineages. The possible reasons (percentage of disorder region of partner proteins, synonymous to non-synonymous ratio, cascade interactions, etc.) of the variations have also been discussed.


Key words: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), coevolution, protein-protein interaction.


Altschuh D, Lesk AM, Bloomer AC, Klug A (1987). Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mol. Biol. 193:693-707.
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Mayers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.
Argos P (1988). An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. Protein Eng. 2:101-113.
Atwell S, Ultsch M, Vos DMA, Wells AJ (1997). Structural plasticity in a remodeled protein-protein interface. Science 278:1125-1128.
Bork P, Jensen LJ, Mering CV, Ramani AK, Lee I, Marcotte EM (2004). Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14:292-299.
Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradović Z(2002).Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41:6573-6582.
Felsenstein J (2002). PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package, version 3.6, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Giovanni M, Ulrich H (2003). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. Cell Sci. 116:3051-3060.
Goh CS, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M, Walther D, Cohen FE (2000). Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299:283-293.
Goh CS, Cohen FE (2002). Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 324:177-192.
Grigoriev A (2003). On the number of protein-protein interactions in the yeast proteome. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:4157-4161.
PMid:12853633 PMCid:PMC165980
Higgins D, Thompson J, Gibson T, Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994). CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
PMid:7984417 PMCid:PMC308517
Hoskins J, Lovell S, Blundell TL (2006) An algorithm for predicting protein-protein interaction sites: Abnormally exposed amino acid residues and secondary structure elements. Protein Sci. 15:1017-1029.
PMid:16641487 PMCid:PMC2242518
Janin J, Miller S, Chothia C (1988) Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 204:155-164.
Jespers L, Lijnen HR, Vanwetswinkel S, Hoef VB, Brepoels K, Cohen D, Maeyer DM (1999) Guiding a docking mode by phage display: selection of correlated mutations at the staphylokinase-plasmin interface. J. Mol. Biol. 290:471-479.
Jones S, Thornton JM (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13-20.
PMid:8552589 PMCid:PMC40170
Jonsson ZO, Hubscher U (1997). Proliferating cell nuclear antigen:more than a clamp for DNA polymerases. Bioessays 19:967-975.
Kim WK, Bolser DM, Park JH (2004). Large-scale co-evolution analysis of protein structural interlogues using the global protein structural interactome map (PSIMAP). Bioinformatics 20:1138-1150.
Mintseris J, Weng Z (2005) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:10930-10935.
PMid:16043700 PMCid:PMC1182425
Moyle WR, Campbell RK, Myers RV, Bernard MP, Han Y, Wang X (1994). Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature 368:251-255.
Ohta T (1995). Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes and the nearly neutral theory. J. Mol. Evol. 40:56-63.
Pal C, Papp B, Lercher MJ (2006). An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:337-348.
Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 271:511-523.
Pazos F, Juan D, Izarzugaza JM, Leon E, Valencia A (2008) Prediction of protein interaction based on similarity of phylogenetic trees. Methods Mol. Biol. 484:523-35.
Pazos F, Ranea JA, Juan D, Sternberg MJ (2005) Assessing Protein Co-evolution in the Context of the tree of life assists in the prediction of the interactome. J. Mol. Biol. 30; 1002-1015.
Pazos F, Valencia A (2001) Similarity of Phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng. 14:609-614.
Pazos F, Valencia A (2008). Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. EMBO J. 27:2648-2655.
PMid:18818697 PMCid:PMC2556093
Pereira-Leal JB, Levy ED, Teichmann SA (2006) The origins and evolution of functional modules: lessons from protein complexes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 361:507-517.
PMid:16524839 PMCid:PMC1609335
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992). Numerical Recipes in C: the Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ramani AK, Marcotte EM (2003). Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 327:273-284.
Sato T, Yamanishi Y, Kanehisa M, Toh H (2005). The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Bioinformatics 21:3482-3489.
Spiegel RM (1972) Theory and Problems of Statistics in Si units, 1st edition, McGraw-Hill International Book Company, New York. pp. 264.
Tan SH, Zhang Z, Ng SK (2004) ADVICE: Automated Detection and Validation of Interaction by Co-Evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W69-W72.
PMid:15215353 PMCid:PMC441609
Warbrick E (2000). The puzzle of PCNA's many partners. Bioessays 22:997-1006.<997::AID-BIES6>3.3.CO;2-R<997::AID-BIES6>3.0.CO;2-#


APA (2013). Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study. Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research, 5(2), 23-43.
Chicago Subinoy Biswas and Sudip Kundu. "Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study." Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research 5, no. 2 (2013): 23-43.
MLA Subinoy Biswas and Sudip Kundu. "Does a protein coevolve with its multiple interacting partners? A case study." Journal of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Research 5.2 (2013): 23-43.

Subscription Form