Journal of Geography and Regional Planning
Subscribe to JGRP
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 0B97C9A63848


Vol.10(5), pp. 110-118 , May 2017
DOI: 10.5897/JGRP2017.0626
ISSN: 2070-1845



Full Length Research Paper

The evaluation of land tenancy contracts using the analytical hierarchy process in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan



Majid Khan
  • Majid Khan
  • Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki Japan
  • Google Scholar
Puangkaew Lurhathaiopath
  • Puangkaew Lurhathaiopath
  • Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki Japan
  • Google Scholar
Shusuke Matsushita
  • Shusuke Matsushita
  • Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki Japan
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 06 February 2017  Accepted: 24 February 2017  Published: 31 May 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


New approaches and tools are needed to enable land tenancy arrangements in the developing countries to specify the landlord-tenant relationship in general and particularly in the targeted study area Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. So this research work applied a multi-criteria decision making approach (MCDM) to investigate the important factors which greatly impact on initial signing process of land tenancy contracts between landlords and tenants by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a tool. This qualitative decision making technique has not been used extensively in the country especially in the landlord tenant relations. For the purpose field survey was conducted in August 2015 and interviewed 10 respondents (landlords and tenants) in a hypothetical situation from the baseline survey through a well-developed questionnaire by using Tones method in AHP. However, AHP is a methodology that facilitates respondents to trade off nonmarket factors of land tenancy contracts. Thus, the information was collected for the important factors (criterion) which has great effect in the initial contract agreement in the landlord-tenant relationship in our research area within each tenancy contract (alternative), then the important factors were incorporated in the AHP framework and subjected to the landlord-tenant judgments for each tenancy contract. The finalized factors were character, financial position, men power, experience, reference, land condition and house availability. The results of the AHP application to data collected from six different villages found that landlords’ preferences are strongest for character, men power in share cropping, distance, financial position in fixed contract, experience and men power in owner cultivation and the tenant’s partialities are strongest for house availability, financial position in share contract, land condition, reference in lease contract and in owner cultivation nothing found important. In overall, it was  found that the dominant choice in the tenancy contract for landlords are share contract 45.7%, followed by rent contract 30.9% and less important owner cultivation 22.3% and in case of tenants it was found that the most preferable land tenancy contract is sharecropping 51.7% and fixed contract 41.7%, less effective 6.25% owner cultivation in the selected study villages. This study recommends that the agriculture and extension services departments of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province to apply AHP as tool in the wide range of multi sector in agriculture decisions, such as to determine best allocation for farm production, adaptation of latest technological tools and choices among different food and cash crop.

 

Key words: Analytical hierarchy process, Pakistan.

Alexander M (2012). Decision-Making using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and SAS/IML®. Available from (Last checked 28th July 2014).

 

Bayazit O (2005). Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems. J. Manufact. Technol. Manage. 16(7):808-819.
Crossref

 
 

Bell C (1989). The choice of tenancy contract. In The balance between industry and agriculture in economic development (pp. 161-178). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Crossref

 
 

Bell C, Zusman P (1979). New approaches to the theory of rental contracts in agriculture. Development Research Centre, World Bank, Washington DC, USA (mimeo).

 
 

Bender A, Din A, Hoesli M, Brocher S (2000). Environmental preferences of homeowners: further evidence using the AHP method. J. Prop. Invest. Financ. 18(4):445-455.
Crossref

 
 

Bhatta GD, Doppler W (2010). Farming differentiation in the rural-urban interface of the middle mountains, Nepal: Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) modeling. J. Agric. Sci. 2(4):37.
Crossref

 
 

Bliss CJ, Stern NH (1982). Palanpur: The economy of an Indian village.OUP Catalogue.

 
 

Bull C (1987). The existence of self-enforcing implicit contracts. Q. J. Econ. 147-159.
Crossref

 
 

Chan N (2002). Stigma assessment: a multi-criteria decision-making approach. Pacific Rim Property Res. J. 8(1):29-47.
Crossref

 
 

Chauhan KA, Shah NC, Rao RV (2008). The analytic hierarchy process as a decision-support system in the housing sector: a case study. World Appl. Sci. J. 3(4):609-613.

 
 

Eagan P, Weinberg L (1999). Application of analytic hierarchy process techniques to streamlined life-cycle analysis of two anodizing processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33(9):1495-1500.
Crossref

 
 

Eswaran M, Kotwal A (1985). A theory of contractual structure in agriculture. Am. Econ. Rev. 75(3):352-367.

 
 

Herring RJ (1983). Land to the tiller: The political economy of agrarian reform in South Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.

 
 

Holmstrom B (1983). Equilibrium long-term labor contracts. Q. J. Econ. 23-54.
Crossref

 
 

Oni AO (2010). Harnessing Real Estate Investment through Decision Process for Selecting Tenants in Nigeria.

 
 

Otsuka K, Chuma H, Hayami Y (1992). Land and labor contracts in agrarian economies: theories and facts. J. Econ. Lit. 30(4):1965-2018.

 
 

Pant C (1983). Tenancy and family resources: A model and some empirical analysis. J. Dev. Econ. 12(1-2):27-39.
Crossref

 
 

Reid JD (1976). Sharecropping and agricultural uncertainty. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change, 24(3):549-576.
Crossref

 
 

Saaty TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.

 
 

Saaty TL (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Operational Res. 48(1):9-26.
Crossref

 
 

Saaty TL (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. (1):83-98.
Crossref

 
 

Safian M, Ezwan E, Nawawi AH (2011). The evolution of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a decision making tool in property sectors.

 
 

Sato Y (2005). Questionnaire design for survey research: Employing weighting method. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

 
 

Shetty S (1988). Limited liability, wealth differences and tenancy contracts in agrarian economies. J. Dev. Econ. 29(1):1-22.
Crossref

 
 

Srinivasan VC (1994). Using the analytic hierarchy process in house selection. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 9(1):69-85.
Crossref

 
 

Zahedi F (1986). The analytic hierarchy process-a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 16(4):96-108.
Crossref

 

 


APA Khan, M., Lurhathaiopath, P. & Matsushita, S. (2017). The evaluation of land tenancy contracts using the analytical hierarchy process in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 10(5), 110-118.
Chicago Majid Khan, Puangkaew Lurhathaiopath and Shusuke Matsushita. "The evaluation of land tenancy contracts using the analytical hierarchy process in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan." Journal of Geography and Regional Planning 10, no. 5 (2017): 110-118.
MLA Majid Khan, Puangkaew Lurhathaiopath and Shusuke Matsushita. "The evaluation of land tenancy contracts using the analytical hierarchy process in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan." Journal of Geography and Regional Planning 10.5 (2017): 110-118.
   
DOI 10.5897/JGRP2017.0626
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JGRP/article-abstract/0B97C9A63848

Subscription Form