Journal of Languages and Culture
Subscribe to JLC
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - A5CE34264197


Vol.8(5), pp. 59-66 , May 2017
DOI: 10.5897/JLC2016.0385
ISSN: 2141-6540



Full Length Research Paper

Teachers’ practices and beliefs regarding peer assessment in L2 writing classrooms at Jimma town, South-Western Ethiopia



Haimanot Ayana
  • Haimanot Ayana
  • Department of English Language and Literature, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jimma University, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Getachew Seyoum
  • Getachew Seyoum
  • Department of English Language and Literature, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jimma University, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Teshome Egere
  • Teshome Egere
  • Department of English Language and Literature, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jimma University, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 29 April 2016  Accepted: 30 September 2016  Published: 31 May 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


This study aims at investigating practices and beliefs of teachers regarding the use of peer assessment in EFL writing in Jimma Seto Semro and Jiren preparatory and high schools in South Western Ethiopia. In this study, a descriptive survey based on both qualitative and quantitative data were used. To achieve the objective, all (13) EFL instructors in Seto Semro and Jiren high schools and participated in the study. Questionnaire consisting of closed and open-ended questions were utilized as a main data collection tool which was substantiated by an interview. The findings of the study showed that the majority of teachers are practising peer assessment in EFL writing. The findings of this study revealed that peer feedback was found to be beneficial, for it increased teachers’ positive beliefs and motivation in English writing class. Participants also liked peer review and the majority liked to carry out this peer assessment. Peer evaluation was helpful for improving students’ writing in lay out, content, organization, language use, spelling, capitalization, mechanics, grammar and vocabulary. Based on the findings, it was recommended that teachers of writing should use peer assessment to help students improve their writing in the areas of spelling, mechanics and grammar. It is further recommended, that there is a need to train EFL teachers to make them aware of the idea that peer assessment develops students’ writing skills.

 

Key words: Second language (L2) writing, peer feedback, teachers’ practices, teachers’ beliefs, benefits of peer assessment.

Brace I (2004). Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

 

Borg S (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36. 
Crossref

 
 

Brown D (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices: San Francisco: Pearson Longman.

 
 

de Guerrero M, Villamil O (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Mod. Lang. J. 84:51-68.
Crossref

 
 

Dornyei Z (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 
 

Hu GW (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Lang. Teaching Res. 9:321-342.
Crossref

 
 

Lee I (2008). Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. J. Second Language Writing, 17:69-85.
Crossref

 
 

Maarof N, Yamat H, Lili K (2011). Role of teacher, peer and teacher-peer feedback enhancing ESL students' writing. World Appl. Sci. J. 15:29-35. ISSN 1818-4952.

 
 

Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

 
 

Ofsted (2008). Assessment for learning: the impact of National Strategy support. Retrieved from 

View

 
 

Topping KJ, Smith EF, Swanson I, Elliot A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. As. Eval. Higher Educ. 25(2):149-169.
Crossref

 
 

Tsui ABM (2003). Understanding Expertise in Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref

 
 

Tsui ABM, Ng MMY (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? J. Second Lang. Writ. 9:147-170.
Crossref

 
 

Vygotsky LS (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

 
 

Walkabayashi R (2013). The effects of the peer feedback process on reviewer' own writing. English Lang. Teaching, 6(9):177-192.

 
 

Yang M, Badger R, Yu Z (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. J. Second Lang. Writing, 15(3):179-200.
Crossref

 
 

Zhao H (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15:3-17. 
Crossref

 
 

Zhu W, Mitchell D (2012). Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2):362-386. 
Crossref

 

 


APA Haimanot, A., Getachew, S., & Teshome, E. (2017). Teachers’ practices and beliefs regarding peer assessment in L2 writing classrooms at Jimma town, South-Western Ethiopia. Journal of Languages and Culture, 8(5), 59-66.
Chicago Haimanot Ayana, Getachew Seyoum and Teshome Egere. "Teachers’ practices and beliefs regarding peer assessment in L2 writing classrooms at Jimma town, South-Western Ethiopia." Journal of Languages and Culture 8, no. 5 (2017): 59-66.
MLA Haimanot Ayana, Getachew Seyoum and Teshome Egere. "Teachers’ practices and beliefs regarding peer assessment in L2 writing classrooms at Jimma town, South-Western Ethiopia." Journal of Languages and Culture 8.5 (2017): 59-66.
   
DOI 10.5897/JLC2016.0385
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JLC/article-abstract/A5CE34264197

Subscription Form