Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution
Subscribe to JLCR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - DCFC77E54997


Vol.7(4), pp. 21 - 24 , August 2015
DOI: 10.5897/JLCR2015.0207
ISSN: 2006-9804



Review

Media censorship: Freedom versus responsibility



Irum Saeed Abbasi*
  • Irum Saeed Abbasi*
  • San Jose State University, California. USA.
  • Google Scholar
Laila Al-Sharqi
  • Laila Al-Sharqi
  • King Abdul Aziz University, Saudi Arabia.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 13 May 2015  Accepted: 29 July 2015  Published: 31 August 2015

Copyright © 2015 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Media censorship is a global phenomenon that has foreshadowed information outlets for centuries. A common ground for censorship is maintenance of an orderly state, whereas, the underlying motive is to keep public ignorant of the information that can potentially threaten authorities. The worldwide Internet connectivity in the contemporary era allows information to pass through within and beyond borders in minimal time; therefore, increasing number of media consumers depend on the Internet for a wide variety of information. Historically, the access to news has not been this easy; the press in most of Europe in the 18th century was under the draconian reins of censorship, which gradually abated by the 19th century due to public demand. However, autocratic and heavily centralized governments still openly or subtly employ censorship as a tool to silence government opposition. To combat information coup, tech savvy journalists and independent reporters channel information through social media, blogs, and news websites. The governments survive by using stringent Internet surveillance apparatus that effectively block websites and subtly filter information; hence only selective news is allowed to penetrate the firewall. The governments also hunt down citizens and journalists accessing disallowed websites to create a ubiquitous atmosphere of fear, harassment, and persecution. The role of media in a society is not limited to bringing information to public; therefore, it is crucial that media does not capitalize on selling meaningless sensation that can potentially harm people, sects, races, and religions. This paper will focus on information coup through media censorship and the responsibility media is laden with to cultivate tolerance and responsibility in the public at large.

Key words: First amendment, free media, internet surveillance, self-censorship.

Almasy S (2015, April 4). 'Revenge porn' operator gets 18 years in prison. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/03/us/califomia-revenge-porn-sentence/
 
Anti-Defamation League. (2014, May 21). ADL deplores Hitler imagery, anti-Muslim rhetoric in latest bus ads. Retrieved from http://dc.adl.org/news/adl-deplores-hitler-imagery-anti-muslim-rhetoric-in-latest-bus-ads/
 
Bennett P, Naim M (2015). 21st-century censorship. (cover story). Columbia Journalism Review, 53(5), 22. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/21st_century_censorship.php
 
Committee to Protect Journalists (2015). Retrieved from https://cpj.org/2015/04/10-most-censored-countries.php
 
Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the protection of human Rights and fundamental freedoms. Retrieved from http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
 
Day N (2001). Censorship or Freedom of Expression? Minneapolis, MN: Lerner Publication Group.
 
FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (2015). Children's Internet Protection Act. Retrieved from http://www.fcc.gov/guides/childrens-internet-protection-act
 
Herman (n.d.). Censorship - From Socrates and Copernicus to Galileo and the present. Retrieved from http://www.rense.com/general70/censorshipsocrates.htm
 
Jefferson T (1803-1807) (Federal Edition). In Ford, P. L. (1904-05) (Eds.), The works of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. 10). New York, NY: Putnam's Sons.
 
Kazemek FE (1995). Choice, reason, and censorship. Reading Today, pp. 2018.
 
Konvitz MR (2003). Religion, speech, press, assembly: Fundamental liberties of a free people. New Jersey, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
 
McGahan J (2014, October 21). She tweeted against the Mexican cartels, they tweeted her murder. Thedailybeast.com. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/21/she-tweeted-against-the-mexican-cartels-they-tweeted-her-murder.html
 
Mearsheimer J, Walt S (2006). The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Middle East Policy, 13 (3), 29-87. Retrieved from http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/IsraelLobby.pdf
Crossref
 
Newth M (2010). The long history of censorship. Retrieved from http://www.beaconforfreedom.org/liste.html?tid=415&art_id=475
 
Soengas X (2013). The role of the internet and social networks in the Arab uprisings – an alternative to official press censorship. Comunicar, 21(41), 147-155.doi:10.3916/C41-2013-14
Crossref
 
Sturges P (2015). Regulating the press: Ensuring responsibility, or road to censorship. Retrieved from http://www.beaconforfreedom.org/liste.html?tid=415&art_id=613
 
USA Today (2014, February 5). Top 10 Internet-censored countries. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/02/05/top-ten-internet-censors/5222385/

 


APA Abbasi, I. S. & Al-Sharqi, L. (2015). Media censorship: Freedom versus responsibility. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 7(4), 21 - 24.
Chicago Irum Saeed Abbasi and Laila Al-Sharqi. "Media censorship: Freedom versus responsibility." Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 7, no. 4 (2015): 21 - 24.
MLA Irum Saeed Abbasi and Laila Al-Sharqi. "Media censorship: Freedom versus responsibility." Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution 7.4 (2015): 21 - 24.
   
DOI 10.5897/JLCR2015.0207
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JLCR/article-abstract/DCFC77E54997

Subscription Form