Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research
Subscribe to JPAPR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 2C571D361199


Vol.8(6), pp. 65-79 , October 2016
DOI: 10.5897/JPAPR2016.0358
ISSN: 2141-2480



Full Length Research Paper

Networks and coalitions in the implementation of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Uganda



Gloria Atieno Otieno
  • Gloria Atieno Otieno
  • Bioversity international, Via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 0054 Maccarese (Fiumicino), Italy.
  • Google Scholar
John Wasswa Mulumba
  • John Wasswa Mulumba
  • National Agricultural Research Organization, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, P. O. Box 7065, Kampala Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Aseffa Seyoum Wedajoo
  • Aseffa Seyoum Wedajoo
  • Department of Public Administration, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Urban Planning & Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago 412 South Peoria Street Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Myung Jae Lee
  • Myung Jae Lee
  • Department of Public Administration, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Urban Planning & Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago 412 South Peoria Street Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Catherine Kiwuka
  • Catherine Kiwuka
  • National Agricultural Research Organization, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, P. O. Box 7065, Kampala Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Richard Ogwal Omara
  • Richard Ogwal Omara
  • National Agricultural Research Organization, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, P. O. Box 7065, Kampala Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Joyce Adokorach
  • Joyce Adokorach
  • National Agricultural Research Organization, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, P. O. Box 7065, Kampala Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Eva Zaake
  • Eva Zaake
  • National Agricultural Research Organization, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kawanda, P. O. Box 7065, Kampala Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Michael Halewood
  • Michael Halewood
  • Bioversity international, Via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 0054 Maccarese (Fiumicino), Italy.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 28 March 2016  Accepted: 05 September 2016  Published: 31 October 2016

Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Uganda acceded to the International Treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGTFA) in the year 2003. Despite this, there are still gaps in implementation of the treaty in the country. The article provides insights into the systemic interactions and coalitions among actors in the implementation of the treaty and subsequent barriers to the implementation of the ITPGRFA. Using social network analysis, the interactions of 26 key policy actors are mapped for 4 main expertise networks that are important for implementation of the treaty; that is, the policy direction networks; scientific expertise; financial expertise; and legal networks in order to identify gaps for further action. Findings indicate that the linkages between actors are poor especially in the legal expertise and policy direction networks where the competent authority for the treaty does not have efficient connections with critical and non-critical actors. Many key actors are also excluded from the network leading poor information and resource flows among stakeholders implementing the treaty. In the interim, a memorandum of understanding has been signed by three major institutions that are key to establish clear processes for implementation of the treaty and establishing clear guidelines for access and benefit sharing and clear roles of institutions involved in the policy development and implementation. Key lessons learned from this research are that networks and coalitions are important for fostering information and exchange of expertise to enable effective implementation or domestication of the international treaty (IT). The structured engagement of other non-governmental stakeholders such as non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and international organizations that provide financial and technical support for various aspects of policy implementation is also important.

 

Key words: Policy implementation, policy networks, international treaty for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (ITPGRFA), Uganda.

Arnold G (2011). Cycles in Policy Network Structure and Policy Adoption-Implementation Processes: The Importance of Alignment, Working paper Series, presented at the 4th Annual conference on Policy networks, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

 

Carolan BV (2008). The structure of educational research: The role of multi-vocality in promoting cohesion in an article interlock network. Social Networks 30(1):69-82.
Crossref

 
 

Ferejohn J (2003). Why study institutions? Paper presented at Crafting and operating Institutions, held at Yale University, New Haven, April 11-13.

 
 

Goldsmith S, Eggers DW (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

 
 

Halewood M, Andrieux E, Crisson L (2013). 'Implementing 'Mutually Supportive' Access and Benefit Sharing Mechanisms Under the Plant Treaty, Convention on Biological Diversity, and Nagoya Protocol', 9/1

 
 

Law, Environment and Development Journal (2013), P 68, available at 

View

 
 

Hanneman R, Riddle M (2005). Introduction to social network methods.

 
 

Hoang LA, Castella JC, Novosad P (2006). Social networks and information access: implications for agricultural extension in a rice farming community in northern Vietnam. Agric. Hum. Values 23:513-527.
Crossref

 
 

Isaac ME (2012). Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: The effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity. Agricultural systems, 109:9-15.
Crossref

 
 

Kickert JMW, Klijn EK, Koppenjan JFM (1997). Managing complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. ISBN 0 7619 5547 X

 
 

O'Leary R (1994). The bureaucratic politics paradox: The case of wetlands legislation in Nevada. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 4(4):443-467.

 
 

Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M (2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 22:501-518.
Crossref

 
 

Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row, 2003.

 
 

Rogers EM (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, fifth ed. Free Press, New York.

 
 

Spielman DJ, Ekboir J, Davis K (2009). The art and science of innovation systems inquiry: applications to Sub-Saharan African agriculture. Technol. Soc. 31(4):399-405.
Crossref

 
 

Weiss K, Hamann M, Kinney M, Marsh H (2012). Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Global Environmental Change, 22(1):178-188.
Crossref

 

 


APA Otieno, G. A., Mulumba, J. W., Wedajoo, A. S., Lee, M. J., Kiwuka, C., Omara, R. O., Adokorach, J., Zaake, E., & Halewood, M. (2016). Networks and coalitions in the implementation of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Uganda. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 8(6), 65-79.
Chicago Gloria Atieno Otieno, John Wasswa Mulumba, Aseffa Seyoum Wedajoo, Myung Jae Lee, Catherine Kiwuka, Richard Ogwal Omara, Joyce Adokorach, Eva Zaake and Michael Halewood. "Networks and coalitions in the implementation of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Uganda." Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research 8, no. 6 (2016): 65-79.
MLA Gloria Atieno Otieno, et al. "Networks and coalitions in the implementation of the international treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Uganda." Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research 8.6 (2016): 65-79.
   
DOI 10.5897/JPAPR2016.0358
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/JPAPR/article-abstract/2C571D361199

Subscription Form