Full Length Research Paper
A study was conducted in Hai and Lushoto districts, Northern Tanzania to establish the farmers’ perception of soil fertility problems and their attitudes towards integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) for coffee, thereby identifying the appropriate intervention strategies. The study was based on a structured questionnaire involving 126 respondents. Both farmers’ awareness of the problem and their attitudes were highly significant (at p<0.01). Age, household size, and adoption of improved coffee varieties, affected farmers’ awareness significantly (p<0.05). As for farmers’ attitudes, six of the eight predictors were significant (p<0.05). Age, household size, adoption of new varieties and total farm income were highly significant (p<0.01). Age, total land under coffee and total off-farm income negatively affected farmers’ attitudes. As farmers get older, they tend to refrain from innovation. Larger farms are likely to exert more pressure on the available organic resources. With multiple farms, distant farms are likely to receive less attention. When off-farm income was considered, multiple ventures compete for the farmers’ time, resources and attention. For the two districts, ISFM interventions will make a better impact to younger and more energetic farmers with sufficient lands for commercial coffee production and to farmers who depend largely on this resource for their livelihood.
Key words: Soil fertility, farmers’ perception, integrated soil fertility management (ISFM), coffee, Tanzania.
|Adolwa IS, Esilaba AO, Okoth PO, Mulwa MR (2010). Factors influencing uptake of integrated soil fertility management knowledge among smallholder farmers in Western Kenya. Proc. KARI Biennial Scientific Conference. P. 9.|
|Ani AO, Ogunnika O, Ifah SS (2004). Relationship between socio-economic characteristics of rural women farmers and their adoption of farm technologies in Southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6(5):802-805.|
|Anonymous (2007). The National Economic Situation. Ministry of Planning, Economy and Empowerment. United Republic of Tanzania (URT) Topcom Printers, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. P. 217.|
|Baffes J (2003). Tanzania's Coffee Sector: Constraints and Challenges in a Global|
|Environment.http://www.aec.msu.edu/fs2/inputuseworkshop/Baffes_Tanzania_Coffee.pdf. Site visited on 30th June 2007.|
|Barungi M, Maonga BB (2011). Adoption of soil management technologies by smallholder farmers in Central and Southern Malawi. J. Sustain. Dev. Afr. 13(3): 28-38.|
|Carr MKV, Stephens W, Van der Vossen HAM, Nyanga A (2003). Tanzania Coffee Research Institute Strategic Action Plan 2003-2008: Contributing towards a profitable and sustainable coffee industry in Tanzania. Report to TaCRI, ICPS, Cranfield University, Silsoe, UK. P. 161.http://www.dev.tacri.org/uploads/media/TaCRI_Strategic_Action_Plan_2003-2008_01.pdf visited 21 February 2012|
|Condliffe K, Kabuchi W, Love C, Ruparell R (2008). Kenya coffee: A cluster analysis. Harvard Business School. P. 34. http://www.isc.hbs.edu/pdf/Student_Projects/Kenya_Coffee_2008.pdf visited 22 February, 2012.|
D'Emden FH, Llewellyn RS, Burton MP (2005). Adoption of conservation tillage in Australian cropping regions: An application of duration analysis. Elsevier Sci. Direct, Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change. 73:630-647.
|Doss CR (2003). Understanding Farm Level Technology Adoption: Lessons Learned from CIMMYT's Micro Surveys in Eastern Africa. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 03-07. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.|
Douthwaite B, Manyong VM, Keatinge JDH, Chianu J (2002). The adoption of alley farming and mucuna: Lessons for research, development and extension. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Agroforest. Syst. 56:193-202.
|Envirocare (2004). A study on the importance of coffee industry in Kilimanjaro region. A NORAD Project, Moshi, Tanzania. P. 33.|
|Gumbo D (2006). Integrated soil fertility management. Technical Brief, Practical Action Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe. P. 5.|
|Hella JP, Mdoe NS, Lugole JS (2005). Coffee baseline report for Tanzania Coffee Research Institute. Bureau for Agricultural Consultancy and Advisory Service, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. P. 40.|
|ICO (International Coffee Organization) (2011). Coffee export statistics by country of origin. http://www.ico.org/historical/2000+/PDF/EXPORTS.pdf (visited 30 January, 2012)|
|Ikerra ST, Semu E, Mrema JP (2007). Combining Tithonia diversifolia and Minjingu Phosphate Rock for improvement of P availability and maize grain yields on a Chromic Acrisol in Morogoro, Tanzania. In: A. Batiano et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer. pp. 333-344|
|ILFS (Integrated Labour Force Survey) (2001). Household analysis in Tanzania. Chapter 10: 123-128. http://www.tanzania.go.tz/ilfs%5CChapter%2010.doc visited 21 February, 2012.|
|Jamala GY, Shehu HE, Garba AT (2011). Evaluation of factors influencing farmers' adoption of irrigated rice production in Fadama soil of North Eastern Nigeria. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 3(2):75-79.|
|Kaizzi CK, Ssali H, Nansamba A, Vlek PLG (2007). The potential benefits of Azolla, velvet bean and N fertilizers in rice production under contrasting systems in Eastern Uganda. In: A. Batiano et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer. pp. 423-433.|
|Kamuzora CL (2001). Poverty and family size patterns: Comparison across African countries. Research Report No. 01.3, REPOA: 44 pp. http://www.repoa.or.tz/documents/01.3_Poverty_and_Family_Kamuzora_fin_17-04.pdf visited 21 February, 2012|
|Karki LB, Bauer S (2004). Technology adoption and household food security. Analyzing factors determining technology adoption and impact of project intervention: A case of smallholder peasants in Nepal. Proceedings of Deutscher Tropentag Workshop, 5-7 October, 2004, Humboldt University, Berlin. pp. 1-8.|
|Kimani SK, Esilaba AO, Odera MM, Kimenye L, Vanlauwe B, Bationo A (2007). Effects of organic and mineral sources of nutrients on maize yields in three districts of Central Kenya. In: A. Batiano et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer. pp. 353-357.|
|Kimiti JM, Esilaba AO, Vanlauwe B, Batiano A (2007). Participatory diagnosis in the Eastern Drylands of Kenya: Are farmers aware of their soil fertility status? In: A. Batiano et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer. pp. 961-967.|
|Maro GP, Kitalyi A, Nyabenge M, Teri JM (2010). Assessing the impact of land degradation on coffee sustainability in Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ASIC Conference, 3 -8 October, 2010, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. pp. 607-614.|
Mateos-Planas X (2003). Technology adoption with finite horizons. Elsevier Science-Direct. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 28:2129-2154
Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology. 53(2):375-403.
Moshi MJ, Kagashe GAB, Mbwambo ZH (2005). Plants used to treat epilepsy by Tanzanian traditional healers. J. Ethnopharmacol. 97:327-336.
|Nkamleu GB (2007). Modelling farmers' decisions in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multinomial logit analysis in Cameroon. In: Batiano, A. et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. TSBF-CIAT, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 891-903.|
|Nzomoi JN, Byaruhanga JK, Maritim HK, Omboto PI (2007). Determinants of technology adoption in the production of horticultural export produce in Kenya. J. Bus. Manage. 1(5):129-135.|
|Okalebo JR, Othieno CO, Woomer PL, Karanja NK, Semoka JMR, Bekunda MA, Mugendi DN, Muasya RM, Bationo A, Mukhwana EJ (2007). Available technologies to replenish soil fertility in East Africa. In: Batiano, A. et al (eds). Advances in ISFM in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. TSBF-CIAT, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 45-62.|
|Ono Y (2006). Technology adoption in a community of heterogeneous education level: Who are your good neighbours? Econ. Bull. 15(8):1-11.|
|Raab RT (2002). Fundamentals of Integrated Soil Fertility Management. IFDC Training materials for the "Training Program on Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) in the Tropics", Lome, Togo. P. 10.|
|Stocking M, Murnaghan N (2000). Land degradation: Guidelines for field assessment. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. P. 120.|
|Tanzania Coffee Board (TCB) (2009). Way forward in the Tanzanian coffee sector. Proceedings of the first Coffee Stakeholders' Conference, Arusha, Tanzania. P. 39.|
|Tiamiyu SA, Akintola JO, Rahji MAY (2009). Technology adoption and productivity difference among growers of new rice for Africa in savanna zone of Nigeria. Tropicultura. 27(4):193-197.|
|Truong TNC, Yamada R (2002). Factors affecting farmers' adoption of technologies in farming system: A case study in O'Mon district, Can Tho province, Mekong Delta. Omorice 10:94-100.|
Vanlauwe B, Giller KE (2006). Popular myths around soil fertility management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116:34-46.
|Vanlauwe B, Zingore S (2011). Integrated soil fertility management: An operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Better Crops. 95(3):4-7.|
Zhou S, Herzfeld T, Glauben T, Zhang Y, Hu B (2008). Factors affecting Chinese farmers' decisions to adopt a water saving technology. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 56:51-61.
|APA||(2013). Farmers’ perception of soil fertility problems and their attitudes towards integrated soil fertility management for coffee in Northern Tanzania. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, 4(5), 93-99.|
|Chicago||Godsteven P. Maro, Jerome P. Mrema, Balthazar M. Msanya and James M. Teri. "Farmers’ perception of soil fertility problems and their attitudes towards integrated soil fertility management for coffee in Northern Tanzania." Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 4, no. 5 (2013): 93-99.|
|MLA||Godsteven P. Maro, et al. "Farmers’ perception of soil fertility problems and their attitudes towards integrated soil fertility management for coffee in Northern Tanzania." Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 4.5 (2013): 93-99.|