Philosophical Papers and Review
Subscribe to PPR
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - 764B63056846


Vol.8(1), pp. 1-12 , January 2016
DOI: 10.5897/PPR2015.0132
ISSN: 2141-663X



Review

Hayek’s concept of orders in relation to technicism and neo-liberalism



Petrus Simons
  • Petrus Simons
  • School of Basic Sciences, North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, South Africa.
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 29 August 2015  Accepted: 21 October 2015  Published: 31 January 2016

Copyright © 2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Since the 1970s, neo-liberalism has become a key ideology driving the global economy. It originates in the liberalism of enlightenment thinkers, neo-classical economics (marginal utility) and a resistance to totalitarianism. In 1938 a colloquium of prominent economists/philosophers, discussed how 19th century liberalism could be renewed without a naturalistic ‘laissez-faire’ approach. From 1944, with the publication of “The road to serfdom” till almost the end of his life, Hayek expounded and developed key thoughts of the colloquium, such as the market economy or, in his words, catallaxy, a spontaneously evolving order, based on private property, subject to general rules of conduct, but not to state control. Its actors seek to maximise their income, albeit on the basis of fragmentary, dispersed, knowledge. Thus, Hayek’s thoughts have contributed to the emergence of neo-liberalism during the 1980s and following years as a set of policy prescriptions guiding international organisations such as the international monetary fund (IMF) etc. as well as many nations. Neo-liberalism should be seen in relationship with technicism, an ideology of progress through science and technology. Since the renaissance and the enlightenment, technicism has become a pervasive influence on the whole of Western culture to the extent that it is hardly noticed. Neo-liberal policies have been acting as a catalyst of technicism, especially through global free trade. This study aims at identifying three weaknesses in Hayek’s thinking, especially as expressed in his concept of three orders: catallaxi, taxes and cosmos: the theory of the catallaxi shows an imprint of technicism, especially in the form of an automatically working price mechanism and the construction of rules for the catallaxi; he has failed to appreciate problems such as the trend towards the formation of monopolies/oligopolies, based on expensive new technics, and its adverse environmental impacts. The latter cannot solely be solved through the price mechanism; the ordering of the market society by rules developed by experts might not be conducive to freedom. An alternative view of a free society is inspired by the order of taxes and the principle of sphere sovereignty developed by reformational philosophy.

Key words: Hayek, market society, price mechanism, neo-liberalism, orders, catallaxy, taxi, freedom.

Aristotle (1959). ed. and trans. by John Warrington. Aristotle's politics and the Athenian constitution. J.M.Dent, London.

 

Caldwell B (2004). Hayek's challenge; an intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

 

Dardot P, Laval C (2009). La nouvelle raison du monde; essaisur la sociéténéoliberale. La Découverte, Paris.

 

Douérin M (2002). Libéralismes; la route de la servitude volontaire. Les Éditions de la Passion, Paris.

 

Dufumier M (2004). Agricultures etpaysanneries des Tiers mondes. Karthala, Paris.

 

Ford M (2015). The rise of the robots; technology and the threat of mass unemployment. One World, London.

 

Hayek FA (1944). The road to serfdom. G. Routledge & Sons, London.

 

Hayek FA (1952a). The sensory order. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

 

Hayek FA (1952b). The counter-revolution of science. The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.

 

Hayek FA (1960). The constitution of liberty. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

 

Hayek FA (1973a), Economic freedom and representative government. Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

 

Hayek FA (1973b). Law, Legislation and Liberty; a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Vol. 1, rules and order. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

 

Hayek FA (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty; a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Vol. 2, the mirage of social justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

 

Hayek FA (1988). The fatal conceit; the errors of socialism W.W. Bartley (ed.) Routledge, London.

 

Kuyper A (1956). Souvereiniteit in eigenkring; essay in: Architectonischecritiek; fragmented uit de sociaal-politiekegeschriften van Dr. A. Kuyper. H.J. Paris, Amsterdam.

 

Laval C (2007). L'hommeéconomique; essaisur les raciness du néoliberalisme. Gallimard, Paris.

 

Sachsse H (1978). Anhropologie der Technik; einBeitragzurStellung des Menschen in der Welt. F. Vierweg, Braunschweig.

 

Schuurman E (2003). trans. by John Vriend. Faith and hope in technology. Clements Publishing, Toronto.

 

Schuurman E (2014). Tegendraadsnadenken over techniek. Eburon, Delft.

 

Stonier AW, Hague DC (1953). A textbook of economic theory.Longmans, London.

 

Vollenhoven DHT (2005). Isagogèphilosophiae; introduction to philosophy.

 

Ziegler J (2004). Portrait de groupe à la Banque. Manière de Voir 75, Juin-Juillet 2004. Le Monde Diplomatique, Paris.

 


APA Simons, P. (2016). Hayek’s concept of orders in relation to technicism and neo-liberalism. Philosophical Papers and Review, 8(1), 1-12.
Chicago Petrus Simons. "Hayek’s concept of orders in relation to technicism and neo-liberalism." Philosophical Papers and Review 8, no. 1 (2016): 1-12.
MLA Petrus Simons. "Hayek’s concept of orders in relation to technicism and neo-liberalism." Philosophical Papers and Review 8.1 (2016): 1-12.
   
DOI 10.5897/PPR2015.0132
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/PPR/article-abstract/764B63056846

Subscription Form