Beneficiaries ’ perception of selected rural women empowerment projects in Ogun State , Nigeria

Problems militating against women development in rural areas revolve round their inability to develop themselves in their chosen economic activities. This study examined the beneficiaries’ perception of selected agricultural empowerment projects components targeted at women in rural communities of Ogun State, Nigeria. The projects were Cassava: Adding Values Africa (C:AVA), Justice, Development and Peace Movement (JDPM) Micro finance (MICRO) and National Programme for Food Security (NPFS), implemented by Justice Development and Peace Movement (JDPM) and Ogun State Agricultural Development Programme (OGADEP). Interview guides were used to elicit information from 139 randomly selected members of 16 purposively selected groups beneficiaries of selected women empowerment in the study area. The study revealed that the rural women predominantly had have high perception about the effects of the projects on their livelihood as 58.27, 72.66, 82.01, 90.65, 61.15 and 56.83% of the women perceived that the projects had improved their product packaging, access to credit facilities, knowledge and skills, business expansion, balanced emotion and increased income respectively. The data was subjected to Chi -Square analysis and the result showed that there is a significant relationship between the nature of occupation the women engaged in and the effect of the projects ( =15.38, p<0.05), while other socio-economic characteristics were not significantly related

reported that the majority of the world's poor live in rural areas, and 70 percent of the rural poor are women, majority of whose principal resource is agriculture.A study by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), pointed out that if women farmers were given equal access to resources, developing countries would see significant increases in agricultural productivity.Women produce almost half the world's food, but they often work in difficult conditions, with low pay and inadequate access to land, capital, information and they are mainly into subsistence agriculture.Approximately 50% of these set of people are also subjected to a very low scale form of production, with little or no access to information, resources and social amenities that could improve their productivity (Iheduru, 2002).
Due to issues affecting the world in relation to women development, a lot of awareness project were directed at women empowerment by the African Governments and international organizations committed to implementing actions in the area of poverty reduction and the economic empowerment of women.Over the last 25 years, the role of women in agriculture has become a familiar and welldeveloped subject.This led to the establishment of gender equality around the world.United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) was established as a separate fund within the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) in 1984 with the aim of empowering women, bearing in mind the outcome of Beijing Conference.Hence, more than 100 countries announced new initiatives to improve the status of women.Furthermore, various countries showed their commitments by outlining modalities for implementation of these plans, thus an overwhelming majority of African Governments placed poverty reduction and empowerment of women among their top priorities for action (Perpetua, 1999).
Due to the recognition of the roles played by rural women in agricultural production, both governmental and non-governmental organization embarked on various projects, which further popularize and improved the living condition of the women.The current issue in rural women development is now tending towards, recognizing the possible ways of sustaining all developmental projects directed at women.According to Adisa and Okunade (2005), many rural development projects and programmes which are gender specific have been introduced to take care of women's needs in the rural areas of the country.These programmes and projects include Better Life Programme for Rural Women (BLPRW), Women-In Agriculture (WIA), the Family Support Programme (FSP), Fand those introduced by international agencies UNDP, UNICEF.All these aimed at achieving women empowerment.
In general the problem militating against women development in rural areas, revolve round their inability to develop themselves in the area of their chosen economic activities, because they are regarded as not the original owners or possession of land which they can use as collateral in securing funds to improve on their activities.Another challenge is the societal culture that regards women as minor in the society while they are deprived of access to information that could better the lives.
This study focuses to analyze the perception of beneficiaries of three selected rural women empowerment projects [Cassava: Adding Values for Africa (C: AVA), NATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR FOOD SECURITY (NPFS) and Microfinance in Ogun State, Nigeria with the following objectives to: i) Describe the socio-economic characteristics of rural women involved in the selected projects.ii) Assess the perception of rural women about the need for selected women empowerment project in Ogun State.iii) Determine the perception of the beneficiaries on the effect of the projects on their livelihoods.

Hypothesis of the study
It was hypothesized that there are no significant relationships between the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents and the perceived effect of the selected project on the livelihood of beneficiaries.

METHODOLOGY
The study was conducted in Ogun State, which is located in the southwestern part of Nigeria.It is situated within the tropics covering16, 409.29 square kilometers with a population of about 4, 054,272 (National population commission 2006).
Purposive selection of two senatorial districts out of the three existing senatorial districts, Ogun west and Ogun central Senatorial was chosen due to the existence of the selected projects.
From Ogun central senatorial district, two local governments area selected were Ifo and Ewekoro local governments and from Ogun west senatorial district Egbado south and Ado Odoota Local government area was chosen.
The selected organizations worked with women group of an average seventeen members therefore fifty percent (50%) of each beneficiary women group selected.Interview guide and with three key trained researchers assistant that are trained for a period of two days were employed in obtaining useful data from the respondents.
The consent of the group members was sought verbally and based on their agreement and ethical approval of the group members, the interview guide was administered during the meeting days of the selected women group.
The data were collected by the researcher and the research assistant who translated the interview guide to the illiterate respondents in their local language, while the literate respondents administered the interview guide on their own.The data obtained was statistically analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics appropriately.The hypothesis of the study was tested using chi-square analysis.A total of 143 respondents were selected for this study as shown in Table 1.women was 43.62 years with more than half (about 63%) of the women between the ages of 31 and 50 years, 22.02% above 50 years and 14% less than 30 years.It was revealed that very few (less than 25%) of the respondents had more than primary education, close to half (44.60%) had primary education while one out of every four women (27.34%) had no formal education at all, About two out of every three (68.35%) of the women were married, 15.83% were widow while the remaining (15.83%) are neither married nor separated.Majority (43.17%) of the women engage in food processing, 33.81% engage in trading while 20.14% and 2.88% of respondents are farmers and artisans respectively.More than half (55.40%) of the respondents have less than ten years of experience in their respective economic activities while 39.57% have above ten years of experience.Furthermore, a high percentage of (64.03%) were Christians while 34.53% were Muslims, only 5.76% of the respondents were Community Chiefs.Also, about half of the women (46.76%) are either executive members of their association or group leaders while 15.11% of the women respondents are non-members of social groups In general, 70.50% of respondents were natives of their various localities while 29.5 % were non-natives.

Socio-economic characteristics of the respondents
The result from Table 2 implies that respondents are within the economically active age group; and it is in support of Fakoya and Daramola (2005) who observed that respondents within this age bracket are more innovative, motivated and adaptable individuals who can cope with wisdom of challenges.This was also the opinion of FAO (1997), Yinusa (1999) and Ayinde et al. (2002).For educational status the women had a low level of formal education, this is in line with the findings of Longe (1988) which reiterated that women are generally not literate in the rural areas.Furthermore Sokoya (2003) observed that women are poorer than their male counterpart because they lack adequate access to educational opportunities.
With the majority of the women engagement in food processing is an indication that the food Processing is a popular enterprise among rural women.This finding is justified by Ogunlela and Adekanye(2009) who opined that women are known to be more active in agricultural activities in sub-saharan African countries.Afolabi ( 2004) also pointed out that women have virtually taken over the production and processing of staple food.
On religion basis, Christianity is a popular religion among the respondents.The result further showed the dichotomy in the religion spread in Nigeria that northern part is dominated by Muslims while the southern part has relatively more Christians as also reiterated by WHO (2001).
This result also showed that the women are active members of their various social groups.Group membership helps members to become better informed about the world and about new technologies, and groups may serve as a stepping stone to some higher gains or status and serious involvement in the group activities made them contribute meaningfully to their community development.This assertion is in agreement with Awotunde (1990) that regular participation of all members is a suitable indicator of success.
The fact that majority of the group members were natives would have a positive bearing on the sustainability of the project.This observation may be attributed to the geographical and occupational distribution as well as infrastructural provision of the respondent's household which favours farming (Fapojuwo, 2007).

Description of the perception of beneficiaries about the need for the projects
Respondents level of perception was measured by using a combination of adopted 22 indicatorson a five point likert scale.Results of analysis on the perception of beneficiaries about the need for the projects shows a low perception of less than mean score of 66, and above as having high perception about the need for the projects.The result showed that more than half of the respondents (53.24%) adjugded high perception while (46.76%) had low perception about the need for the projects (Table 3).
The distribution of the sampled beneficiaries while considering the projects individually indicated that across all the projects considered the respondents had high perception on the need for the projects except in JDPM C: AVA with low perception.However, the general breakdown of the perception statement result further indicated that individual responses was based on their expectations of what empowerment means to them, their local orientation, belief and knowledge about the goals of the organisation and how the projects affect their livelihood activities.

Perception of respondents on the effect of the projects on their livelihood
Table 4 showed that across all the projects, respondents had high perception for the types of effect the empowerment has on their livelihood.The result x-rayed that respondents had strongly agreed that the projects provided them with opportunities to develop in the area of product packaging (56.12%) and that their products' quality had increased (44.60%), 44.60 and 35.25% strongly disagreed that they had been able to reduce wastages from processing and had improved knowledge on modern tools usage respectively.About 40.29% of the rural women had witnessed increased customer patronage within and outside their communities.Higher proportions also strongly disagreed that their profit margin had not increased (40.29%) and that they would like to continue as the time spent on project meetings was commendable to achievements (37.41%).
The perception of respondents on the effect of the project on their livelihood implies that rural women had mixed feelings towards the projects as they had positive perception of the product packaging, business expansion ) Note: 1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=undecided, 4= disagree, 5= strongly disagree for positive statements Note: 5=strongly disagree, 4=disagree, 3=undecided, 4= agree, 5= strongly agree for negative statements Source: Field Survey (2012).expansion, improved knowledge and skills, increased income and balanced emotion while they had negative perception of the credit facilities.This assertion supports Sen (1993) that extension and projects directed at women change the quality of life of women through the vehicle of technology transfer; hence, it is necessary to improve their production potentials by treating them as economic factors, not as dependent members of the family.

Description of perception of project effect on livelihood
Table 5 presented the result for the respondent's perception from each perceived effect benefits derived from the projects.
It revealed that by individual projects, JDPM-C: AVA had high effect on access to credit facilities, improved knowledge and skills, business expansion and increased income; OGADEP-C: AVA had high effect on product packaging, access to credit facilities, business expansion, balanced balanced emotion and increased income; JDPM-MICRO had high effects on improved knowledge and skills, business expansion, balanced emotion and increased income; while OGADEP-NPFS had high effects on all except improved knowledge and skills and increase income.Further analysis indicated that OGADEP-C: AVA had more effects than other projects.

Result of tested hypothesis
There is no significant relationship between the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents and the effect of the selected project on the livelihood of beneficiaries.
The socio-economic characteristics considered were age, religion, marital status, educational level, social status and native status.To test for the relationship between the variables, Chi-square was used.The significance of the relationship was determined at 0.05 level of significance.
The result of the Chi -square analysis on Table 6 shows that, there is a significant relationship between the nature of occupation and effect of the Projects ( =15.38, p<0.05), therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected, while accepting the alternate.This means that the nature of occupation determines the effect of the selected projects on the livelihood of the beneficiaries.Therefore a respondent engaged in cassava flakes garri production might derive more benefit as a result of the nature of the project more than respondents that are involved in cassava flour or fufu production.This could be as a result of the sophisticated technological dimension introduced to garri production.This view supports Aworh (2008) that technology has improved livelihood through generation of employment in the rural areas, reduce post-harvest cassava losses and provide a good source of income to farmers and processors.

Table 2
revealed that the average age of sampled

Table 1 .
Ogun State Senatorial Districts (showing sampling procedures and sample size).

Table 2 .
Distribution of respondents by their socio-economic characteristics (n=139).

Table 3 .
Description of the perception beneficiaries about the need for the projects.

Table 4 .
Respondents perception on the of the project on their livelihood Source: Field survey (2012).

Table 5 .
Respondent's perception of effects of the projects on their livelihood activities.
Source: Field survey 2012

Table 6 .
Chi square analysis of respondents' socio-economic characteristics and the effect on the selected projects.

Coefficient df Contingency p-value Decision
df = Degree of freedom.Source: Field Survey (2012).