Full Length Research Paper
ABSTRACT
With the purpose of identifying the parasitic hymenoptera species associated with the diversity of bruchidae over Fabaceae, in 2017 seeds of 25 plant species were collected from the municipalities of Ahome, El Fuerte, Choix and Guasave (Sinaloa, Mexico). From 68,344 seeds, 19,396 adult bruquids were obtained, distributed in nine species: Acanthoscelides desmanthi, Callosobruchus maculatus, Merobruchus insolitus, Mimosestes mimosae, Mimosestes nubigens, Microsternus ulkei, Stator limbatus, S. pruininus and Zabrotes subfaciatus. Of the bruchids emerged 4,775 parasitoids, grouped in families Eulophidae (3,159), Braconidae (692), Pteromalidae (443), Eurytomidae (304), Bethylidae (134), Eupelmidae (40), and Trichogrammatidae (3), in 17 species; out of them, Horismenus depressus, Triaspis sp. and Eurytoma sp. had a presence in the four municipalities; 77.84% of the parasitoids was associated with M. mimosae (1,352), A. desmanthi (898), M. ulkei (753), and M. insolitus (714). The predominant species was H. depressus, with 60.63% of the population. In Ahome the highest parasitism was obtained (40.14%).
Key words: Bruchidae, Fabaceae, biological control, parasitism, horismenus depressus.
INTRODUCTION
The diversity of plant species included in the Fabaceae family are important as timber resources, coal production and human and animal feed; besides that species like Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. 1825, with drought resistance, prevents soil erosion (Aguado and Suarez, 2006).
In countries such as the United States of North America, native legumes are a desirable component as plant cover, although seed predation by insects can substantially reduce the cultivation of these species (Boe and Johnson, 2017). Of little known biology, the insects known as brúquidos, weevils or seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) represent one of the main regulatory factors of the fabaceae populations (Yus-Ramos et al., 2008). These insects feed mainly on seeds (Johnson, 1989; Luna-Cozar et al., 2002; Romero and Johnson, 2004), where they pass their pupa state; and once they emerge as adults, oviposit various plant seeds belonging to 33 botanical families, with preference over Fabaceae and Convolvulaceae (Luna-Cozar et al., 2002). Oviposition occurs in the remaining pods of the previous season, which have not fallen. This results in high levels of brúquidos during the following season (Saiz, 1993). These insects, considered as important pests in beans under field and storage conditions (Aebi et al., 2008), are distributed in most continents, for which case, most species are found in tropical regions of Asia, Africa, Central and South America (Ramírez et al., 2013). At present, there are about 1,700 species of turquids reported. They are distributed in 66 genera, of which, of the 20 genera and 324 species present in Mexico, 90 species correspond to the state of Sinaloa (Lugo-García et al., 2015). Due to their sperm eating habits (Romero, 2002), these insects play an important role in the population regulation of wild plants, with damage to seeds that range between 50 and 100% (Romero and Johnson, 2000). In the particular case of beans, estimated damages have been attributed to 35% in Mexico and Central America, 13% in Brazil and 7.4% in Colombia (Van Schoonhoven and Cardona, 1986). The biological control of pests is related to the use of natural enemies, parasitoids and predators to combat pest insects, which, although not as effective and spectacular as chemical control, is very effective when used opportunely (Gómez and Vargas, 2014), with parasitoids and predators determining the regulation of their host populations in natural ecosystems (Hastings and Godfray, 1999). In the last decade, several successful biological control programs based on parasitoids on noctuid larvae, diamond back palomilla, among others (Godfray, 1994) have been documented. Although this information is relevant, this group of hymenoptera, as well as their biological and economic importance, has been little studied in Northern Sinaloa, with little information on the diversity of families in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Therefore, the objective is to identify the parasitic Hymenoptera species associated with the diversity of Bruchidae over fabaceae in four municipalities in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the study, the diversity of natural vegetation of fabáceas established in the north of Sinaloa was considered, with thorny scrub and coastal dunes over the municipalities of Ahome (located between the geographical coordinates of 26°02´00´´ N and 109°01´00´´ W) and Guasave (25° 45´27´´ N and 108° 49´17´´ W); as well as spiny forest in the municipalities of El Fuerte (26°27´00.5´´ N and 108°35´20.1´´ W) and Choix (26°53´10.5´´ N and 108°23´13.8´´ W) (Figure 1). The locations considered in the study have altitudes ranging from 0 to 115 m, with slopes that vary from slight to steep. The climate is very dry (BW) and dry (BS), with rainfall between 326-607 mm annually; the average temperatures range between 23.5 and 25.6°C, and has monthly extremes of 4.0 and 40.7°C.
In order to obtain bruquids associated with Fabaceae, in accordance with the phenological stage of fruiting of the diversity of plant species, nuts (pods) from the diversity of established plant species were collected during the months of February to December 2017 in the four municipalities. The fruits were deposited in Kraft paper bags model S-13236, individually labeled with data such as location, date, species of fabaceous, etc. The collected material was transferred and conserved in the laboratory of the Entomological Collection of the Valle del Fuerte, of the Autonomous University of Sinaloa (CEVF-UAS). Here after the seeds were separated and deposited in plastic containers of 16.5 × 13 cm, covered with thin tulle cloth to allow air circulation and to prevent the escape of insects, maintained at temperatures of 23°C were checked every third day until adult emergencies were obtained. They were deposited in plastic bottles of 200 ml with 70% ethanol. For the morphological identification of the insects, the genitalia of the males were extracted, which were processed according to what was considered by authors such as Kingsolver (1970) and Kingsolver and Whitehead (1974). Also, the interpretation of genital structures was based on the nomenclature proposed by Romero and Johnson (1999). The material studied was deposited in the CEVF-UAS facilities.
To identify the emerging parasitoids, they were separated and placed in 5 ml polypropylene tubes with 70% ethanol; they were dehydrated with ethanol at different doses of purity (80, 90 and 100%, respectively) for a period 30 min. A subsequent treatment with amyl acetate was carried out to clean and accommodate its wings, antennae and legs for assembly. When the insects were quantified, representative samples of similar morphological characteristics were mounted on entomological pins and were morphologically identified with the help of a stereoscopic microscope, using identification keys of various authors, with corroboration of some species by specialists.
RESULTS
In the period 68,344 seeds were collected (Ahome 20,708, El Fuerte 24,346, Choix 9,860 and Guasave 13,430), from 25 species of Fabaceae. From these seeds emerged 19,396 specimens of adult weevils (Table 1). The relative dominance of emergencies by municipality corresponded to Ahome (7,789), Guasave (6,531), Ahome (2,630) and Choix (2,446), equivalent to 40.16, 33.67, 13.55 and 12.51%, respectively. On a monthly level, the period between the months of July to October represented 63.51% of emergencies.
In relation to the emergencies of parasitoids from the brúquidos present in the seeds collected in each of the municipalities (Table 2), the dominance in municipalities regarding the number of specimens corresponded to Ahome, El Fuerte, Guasave and Choix, with 36.94, 27.16, 20.19 and 15.71%, respectively. In turn, the highest amount of parasitoids obtained on a monthly level corresponded to the period from May to November, with 4,182 emergencies, equivalent to 87.58% of the population. All parasitic hymenoptera specimens were grouped into two superfamilies: 1. Ichnemunoidea, represented by the Braconidae family (692 specimens: 14.49%) and 2. Chalcidoidea, for the families Eulophidae, Pteromalidae, Eurytomidae, Bethylidae, Eupelmidae and Trichogrammatidae, with 3,159, 443, 304, 134, 40 and 3 emergencies, corresponding to 66.16, 9.27, 6.37, 2.81, 0.84 and 0.06%, respectively (Figure 2).
The emerged parasitoids were obtained from nine species of Bruchidae as prey: Acanthoscelides desmanthi Johnson, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius), Merobruchus insolitus (Sharp), Mimosestes mimosae (Fabricius, 1781), M. nubigens (Motschulsky, 1874), M. ulkei (Horn, 1873), Stator limbatus (Horn, 1873), S. pruininus (Horn, 1873) and Zabrotes subfaciatus (Boheman, 1833) (Table 3). The greatest parasitoid emergencies were obtained from the M. mimosae (1,352), A. desmanthi (898), M. ulkei (753) and M. insolitus (714) bruquids, equivalent to 77.84% of the population. From the diversity of Hymenoptera, Horismenus depressus (Eulophidae) and Bruchophagus mexicanus (Eurytomidae) were identified at the species level, at the genus level at Heterosphilus sp. (two species) (Braconidae), Triaspis sp. (Braconidae), Eurytoma sp. (Eurytomidae), and at the family level four species of Braconidae, three of Pteromalidae, two of Bethylidae, one of Eupelmidae and one of Trichogrammatidae, for a total of 17 species. The species H. depressus, Triaspis sp. and Eurytoma sp. were distributed in the four municipalities. Also, the species with the greatest diversity of Bruchidae species attacked were H. depressus (8) and Eurytoma sp. (5). Finally, the predominant species in the study was H. depressus with 2,895 specimens, equivalent to 60.63% of emergencies.
DISCUSSION
Boe and Johnson (2017) reported the presence Acanthoscelides fraterculus and Bruchophagus mexicanus living together in mature pods of Astralagus plattensis in northwestern Dakota, USA, with destruction of 44% of the seeds obtained in a sample of 10 pods, by these insects. Aebi et al. (2008) point to weevils of the genus Zabrotes as responsible for large economic losses on beans in the field and storage in Mexico and Central America.
Noyes (2013) indicates the presence of 62 Horismenus species parasitizing larvae belonging to the orders Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera, considered primary and secondary hosts. They are distributed in 14 countries of the neotropical region over 10 angiosperm families. Hansson et al. (2004) identified 131 specimens of four Horismenus species: H. butcheri Hansson Aebi & Benrey, H. depressus Gahan, H. missouriensis (Ashmead) and H. productus, attacking the bruquids Acanthoscelides obtectus and A. obvelatus Bridwell associated with Phaseolus coccineus subsp. coccineus and P. vulgaris var. mexicanus Delgado. Likewise, these authors indicate an emergency of 59.1% of parasitoids (Horismenus spp.) from P. coccineus seeds infested with Acanthoscelides sp. and Zabrotes sp. This situation is similar to that obtained in this study, with 57.97% of H. depressus emergencies on the A. desmanthi and Z. subfaciatus in Ahome, El Fuerte and Choix.
In this study, there was a low level of parasitism by braconids on A. desmanthi and C. maculatus (Ahome and El Fuerte); it was significant on M. mimosae (Ahome and Choix) and low on S. pruininus (Ahome). In this regard, Campan et al. (2005) studied the influence of three populations of the braconid Stenocorse bruchivora (Crawford) on Z. subfasciatus in wild and cultivated seeds of P. vulgaris of the states of Puebla, Estado de Mexico and Morelos. They did not find any differences between populations and there was a greater parasitism (60%) in wild seeds than in the cultivated ones. This is attributed to both the quality of the host plant as the genetic variation between populations is the crucial factor that determines the nature and evolution of the interaction between parasitoids and their prey.
In Burkina Faso (USA), Sanon et al. (1998) recorded efficient control of C. maculatus, responsible for large losses in V. unguiculata, through flood releases of Dinarmus basalis (Pteromalidae). This is similar to what happened to species of this family in this study, by virtue of having obtained a 100% parasitism on the bruquid in the municipality of El Fuerte, as well as 97.79% parasitism on A. desmanthi in Choix; in Ahome and Guasave it registered 73.84 and 62.96% parasitism on M. nubigens.
Although in the study the presence of parasitoids belonging to Eupelmidae was only 40 specimens associated with the species of A. desmanthi, M. mimosae and S. pruininus, in the particular case of species of the genus Eupelmus in the Palearctic region, Noyes (2013) points to the orders Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera Lepidoptera and Orthoptera. Brúquidos on which they develop like primary or secondary ectoparasitoides of larvae or pupae inside protect habitats like buds, seeds, fruits or gills (Gibson, 1995).
The highest total parasitism percentage was presented by the municipality of Ahome (40.14%), followed by Choix (23.46%), El Fuerte (14.27%) and Guasave (12.86%). The high percentage of parasitism in the first three municipalities may have been due to its great richness in Fabaceae species. This is in line with Molina-Ochoa et al. (2004), who argue that the distribution and rates of natural parasitism may be related to the diversity of habitats with the proximity of forests. It is similar to that obtained in Guasave, by virtue of the fact that the sampled Fabaceae are located on the banks of agricultural plots. This could cause the parasitoid population to decrease due to the application of insecticides in agricultural crops. This also agrees with Hajek (2004), considering that insecticides significantly reduce the populations of existing natural enemies in crops.
CONCLUSION
From 68,344 seeds, 19,396 adult bruquids were obtained, and distributed in nine species: Acanthoscelides desmanthi, Callosobruchus maculatus, Merobruchus insolitus, Mimosestes mimosae, M. nubigens, M. ulkei, Stator limbatus, S. pruininus and Zabrotes subfaciatus. The 4,775 adult parasitoids obtained were grouped into seven families: Eulophidae (3,159), Braconidae (692), Pteromalidae (443), Eurytomidae (304), Bethylidae (134), Eupelmidae (40), and Trichogrammatidae (3), distributed in 17 species, of which, Horismenus depressus, Triaspis sp. and Eurytoma sp are present in the four municipalities. 77.84% of the population showed an association with bruquids M. mimosae (1,352), A. desmanthi (898), M. ulkei (753), and M. insolitus (714). The predominant species in the study was H. depressus (2,895 specimens: 60.63% of the population); also, with a general average parasitism of 19.75%, the greatest impacts corresponded to the municipalities of Ahome and Choix, with 40.14 and 23.46%, respectively.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors appreciate Dr. Beatriz Rodríguez Vélez, of the National Center for Biological Control Reference (CNRCB), under the National Service of Agrifood Health, Quality and Safety (SENASICA), for her contribution in the identification of some species of parasitoids.
REFERENCES
Aebi A, Shani T, Hansson C, Contreras-Garduno J, Mansion G, Benrey B (2008). The potential of native parasitoids for the control of Mexican bean beetles: A genetic and ecological approach. Biological Control 47:289-297. |
|
Aguado A, Suárez H (2006). Impacto del ataque de Algarobius riochama kingsolver (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) sobre Prosopis juliflora (SW) DC en la zona urbana de Santa Marta. Intropica 3(1):13-20. |
|
Boe A, Johnson PJ (2017). Fates of ovules in groundplum milk-vetch (Astragalus crassicarpus Nutt.) in South Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 96:121-129. |
|
Campan EDM, Callejas A, Rahier M, Benrey B (2005). Interpopulation Variation in a Larval Parasitoid of Bruchids, Stenocorse bruchivora (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Host Plant Effects. Environmental Entomology 34(2):457-465. |
|
Gibson GAP (1995). Parasitic wasps of the subfamily Eupelminae: classification and revision of world genera (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea, Eupelmidae). Memoirs on Entomology, International 5:421. |
|
Godfray H (1994). Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey 473 p. |
|
Gómez LA, Vargas G (2014). Los barrenadores de la caña de azúcar, Diatraea spp. en el Valle del Río Cauca: Investigación participativa con énfasis en el control biológico. Documento de trabajo 734. Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar de Colombia (CENICAÑA), Santiago de Cali, Colombia 133 p. |
|
Hajek A (2004). Natural enemies: an introduction to biological control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 378 p. ISBN: 0-521-65295-2. |
|
Hansson C, Aebi A, Benrey B (2004). Horismenus species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in a bruchid beetle parasitoid guild, including the description of a new species. Zootaxa 548:1-16. |
|
Hastings A, Godfray H (1999). Learning, Host Fidelity, and the Stability of Host Parasitoid Communities. The American Naturalist, Vol. 153. No. 3. The University of Chicago Press, pp. 295-301. |
|
Johnson CD (1989). Adaptive radiation of Acanthoscelides in seeds: Examples of legume-bruchid interactions. In. Stirton CH, Zarucchi JL (Eds.). Advances in Legume Biology.Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 29:747-779. |
|
Kingsolver JM (1970). A study of male genitalia in Bruchidae (Coleoptera). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 72:370-386. |
|
Kingsolver JM, Whitehead DR (1974). Biosystematics of Central American species of Ctenocolum, a new genus of seed beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 87:283-312. |
|
Lugo-García GA, López-Mora J, Romero-Nápoles J, Reyes-Olivas Á, Rodríguez F, Sánchez-Soto BH (2015). Gorgojos de la familia Bruchidae (Coleóptera) asociados a semillas de cultivos y flora adyacente del norte de Sinaloa, México. Entomología Mexicana 2:435-441. |
|
Luna-Cozar J, Romero-Nápoles J, Jones WR (2002). Lista de Bruchidae del estado de Queretaro, México (Insecta: Coleóptera). Acta Zoologica Mexicana 87:17-28. |
|
Molina-Ochoa J, Carpenter JE, Lezama-GutieÌrrez R, Foster JE, GonzaÌlez RM, Ángel SC, FariÌas LJ (2004). Natural distribution of hymenopteran parasitoids of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae in Mexico. Florida Entomologist 87(4):461-472. |
|
Noyes JS (2013). Universal Chalcidoidea Database. World Wide Web electronic publication. |
|
Ramírez SA, Romero GG, Romero NJ (2013). Brúquidos (Coleóptera: Bruchidae) asociados a la leguminosa Indigofera densiflora. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.), 29:346-362. |
|
Romero NJ (2002). Five new species of Meibomeus Bridwell from the New World with host records for them and six named species (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). The Coleopterist Bulletin 56(2):182-202. |
|
Romero NJ, Johnson CD (1999). Zabrotes sylvestris, a new species from the United States and Mexico related to Z. subfasciatus (Boheman) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Amblycerinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 53(1):87-98.Romero NJ, Johnson CD (2000). Revision of the genus Zabrotes Horn of México (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Amblycerinae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society126(2):221-274. |
|
Romero NJ, Johnson CD (2004). Sinopsis de los brúquidos de México (Insecta: Coleoptera). In. Morales-Moreno M, Ibarra-González M, Rivera-González AP, Stanford-Camargo S (Eds.). Entomología Mexicana, Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología 3:758-763. |
|
Saiz F (1993). Importancia de la persistencia, en el árbol, de frutos de Acacia caven en la infestación por Pseudopachymeria spinipes (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Revista Chilena de Entomología 20:31-34. |
|
Sanon A, Ouedraogo PA, Tricault Y, Credland P, Huignard J (1998). Biological control of bruchids in cowpea stores by release of Dinarmus basalis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) adults. Environmental Entomology 27:717-725. |
|
Van Schoonhoven A, Cardona C (1986). Main insect pest of stored beans and their control. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia 40 p. |
|
Yus-Ramos R, García-Becerra R, Ventura-Pérez D (2008). Nuevos datos sobre la biología de algunas especies de brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) de las Islas Canarias: fitohuéspedes y parasitoides. Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 42(1):355-35. |
Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0