African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6638

Full Length Research Paper

Agronomic performance of provitamin A-rich banana cultivars in Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo

Kamira Muller
  • Kamira Muller
  • Bioversity International, P. O. Box 1222 Bukavu, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
  • Google Scholar
Simbare Alice
  • Simbare Alice
  • Bioversity International, P. O. Box 1893, Avenue du Japon N055, Bujumbura, Burundi.
  • Google Scholar
Sivirihauma Charles
  • Sivirihauma Charles
  • Department of Crop production, Faculty of Agriculture, Catholic University of Graben, P.O. Box 29, Butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo.
  • Google Scholar
Mpoki Shimwela
  • Mpoki Shimwela
  • Agricultural Research Institute-Maruku, P. O. Box 127, Bukoba, Tanzania.
  • Google Scholar
Nabuuma Deborah
  • Nabuuma Deborah
  • Bioversity International, P. O. Box 24384, Plot 106, Katalima Road, Naguru, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar
Ekesa Beatrice
  • Ekesa Beatrice
  • Bioversity International, P. O. Box 24384, Plot 106, Katalima Road, Naguru, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Google Scholar

  •  Received: 06 June 2021
  •  Accepted: 22 July 2021
  •  Published: 30 September 2021


Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is a major global health issue, contributing to morbidity and mortality. East and Central Africa face VAD prevalence that exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) threshold of 15%. In Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), VAD prevalence is greater than 43% in rural communities. Promoting vitamin A-rich foods (including banana) is an effective and sustainable strategy to address VAD in poor rural communities. Supported principally by HarvestPlus over more than a decade, banana researchers have been evaluating the performance of high provitaminA banana cultivars to address this challenge. This study evaluated the agronomic performance of six provitamin A-rich banana cultivars originally from outside Burundi and Eastern DRC. Growth and yield parameters were collected for the first, second and third crop cycles. Results revealed that growth and yield parameters were significantly affected by the interaction between sites and cultivars (P<0.05). Banana cultivar yield was also influenced by the combined effect of bunch weight and crop cycle duration. The most promising cultivars in terms of yield were ‘Apantu-AAB’, ‘Lahi-AAB’, ‘Lai- AA’, ‘Bira-AAB’ and ‘Pelipita-ABB’ across all sites and crop cycles. This indicates that although ecological factors could have influenced their performances over sites, genotype could be the most important influencing factor. These evaluations provide hard evidence of the high potential for adoption of the most promising cultivars by the local community members to boost (pro) vitamin A consumption and effectively eliminate VAD.

Key words: Agronomic performance, vitamin A rich banana, crop cycle, Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo.


Hidden hunger, caused by low intake and absorption of micronutrients especially iron, vitamin A, iodine and  zinc, is a form of under-nutrition affecting over 2 billion people worldwide  (Ekholuenetale et al., 2020). It has far-reaching effects such as poor health, mental and physical impairment, low human productivity and even death (Kennedy et al., 2003). Lack of diet diversification, diseases, and increased micronutrient needs during infancy, pregnancy, and lactation are some of the factors that contribute to hidden hunger in many developing countries (Frison et al., 2011; Thompson and Cohen, 2012). Among these, is vitamin A deficiency (VAD) which significantly affects children under five and women of reproductive age with a prevalence for children of 48% in sub-Saharan Africa, 43% in Burundi and 42% in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (Stevens et al., 2015).

To address this, supplementation, fortification, bio-fortification, dietary diversification and public health and disease-control measures have been implemented (Greiner, 2013; Kennedy et al., 2003; Ruel and Levin, 2001; Thompson and Amoroso, 2014). Food-based approaches that promote production and consumption of vitamin A-rich foods were noted to be sustainable particularly among rural poor communities (Greiner, 2013; Thompson and Amoroso, 2014). The common foods that have been promoted as good sources of vitamin A (pro-vitamin A carotenoids (pVACs)) have been dark green leafy vegetables, red palm oil, yellow and orange fruits, and orange-fleshed sweet potatoes (Greiner, 2013; Uusiku et al., 2010). There is currently an increasing interest in using potential staple foods like bananas, maize, cassava, rice, and potatoes that have higher than average levels of pVACs; (Greiner, 2013; Tang et al., 2009). Among the staple foods, bananas are exceptional because the carotenoids in bananas have higher bio-accessibility compared to roots, tubers and some vegetables (Ekesa et al., 2012; Failla et al., 2009).

Over 17 million tonnes of bananas are annually produced in East and Central Africa, mostly being East African Highland cooking bananas consumed as a staple (Mbwika, 2009; Ordonez et al., 2015; Tripathi et al., 2009). Regionally, bananas are a major source of livelihood for over 20 million people and play a significant role in households’ and pre-school children’s diets (Ekesa et al., 2013; Karamura and Gold, 2000). In addition, there are banana cultivars around the world that contain high pVACs levels (up to 61.10 μg) (Davey et al., 2009; Ekesa et al., 2013 ; Englberger et al., 2003; Fungo and Pillay, 2011). Some banana cultivars have been estimated to meet over 50% of the Vitamin A requirements of women when 3-5 fingers are consumed daily (Ekesa et al., 2015; Englberger et al., 2006). These banana cultivars with higher pVACs levels could help address and prevent VAD in East and Central Africa. However, acceptance and adoption of introduced banana cultivars do not rely solely on nutritional  importance  and  familiarity  with  the crop, but is also greatly influenced by the production characteristics like yield, bunch weight, finger size, disease and pest resistance and sensory attributes (Akankwasa et al., 2013; Barekye et al., 2013; Kikulwe et al., 2011). This study therefore evaluated the agronomic performance of selected pVAC-rich banana cultivars originally from outside the Eastern Africa region to establish their potential for inclusion in the farming systems of Burundi and Eastern DRC.


Six sites, one in Burundi, and five in DRC, were purposively selected for the study based on different agroecological zoning with contrasting altitudes, rainfall and soil characteristics. These sites were Cibitoke (Burundi), Butembo, Maboya and Mavivi (North Kivu-DRC), Mulungu and Mushweshwe (South Kivu-DRC) (Table 1).

Six pVAC-rich banana cultivars namely ‘Apantu’-AAB African plantain originally from Ghana, ‘Bira’-AAB Pacific plantain from Papua New Guinea, ‘Pelipita’-ABB plantain from the Philippines, ‘Lahi’-AAB Pacific plantain from Hawaii, ‘Lai’-AAA Dessert banana from Thailand and ‘To’o’- AA Dessert banana from Papua New Guinea with Provitamin A carotenoids (pVAC) retinol activity equivalents >333μg/100gdw were selected for fast-tracking. The six cultivars were ordered from Bioversity International’s International Transit Centre (ITC) in Leuven, Belgium and sent to Burundi’s tissue culture (TC) laboratory, Phytolab for planting material multiplication. The hardening of TC plantlets was done in Phytolab for the Burundi site, at the Catholic University of Graben Butembo for the North Kivu sites, and at the National Institute of Agronomic Studies and Research (INERA) Mulungu for the South Kivu sites. At three months, fifteen plants of each cultivar (in three replicates of five plants) were planted at each experimental site for agronomic evaluation. Plants were spaced at 3x2 m, providing a density of 1,667 plants/ha. The size of the planting hole was 60 x 60 x 60 cm and 10 kg of rotted cow manure was applied toeach planting hole during planting. Weeding was carried out at three-monthly intervals, while de-suckering and de-leafing of dead leaves were conducted as needed. Three stems were kept per mat (mother plant, first sucker and second sucker) except for the third cropping cycle of ‘Lahi’ in Burundi which was missing due to its genetic degeneration. Mulching was carried out at the beginning of each dry season (once a year). Where necessary, forked wooden sticks were used to support mature plants bearing heavy bunches to prevent toppling.

Agronomic data were collected on banana growth at the flowering stage and yield at harvest over the three cropping cycles (C1: mother plant, C2: first sucker and C3: second sucker). Data collected on banana growth included the height of pseudostem (cm), girth of pseudostem at 1m from the base and the number of functional leaves. Banana height and girth are important traits that indicate the potential of resistance of the plant to strong wind (lodging-resistance), whereas functional leaves contribute to the photosynthesis process of the plant for optimal growth and productivity. Plant height was measured from soil level to the point where the leaf petioles of the youngest two leaves intersect, while the total number of functional leaves was determined by counting all the existing green leaves on a plant that had at least 50% green leaf lamina surface area. Data collected on banana yield at harvest were the weight of bunch (kg), number of hands in a bunch, number of fruits in lower row of second lowest hand, and total number of fruits in the bunch. Mature bunches were harvested when the fingers of the second lowest hand had attained a round shape (Ndayitegeye et al., 2017). Bunch weight was measured with a spring balance.

Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistics Analysis System (SAS Institute Inc., 2008) (Shim et al., 2014). The General Linear Model procedure was used to analyze the data and Tukey’s student range test was used for multiple comparisons. The average annual yield was calculated using the formula: “Bunch weight/number of days to harvest x 365 x plant density ha-1”where 365 are the number of days in a year (Gaidashova et al., 2010). Averages for various growth and yield traits were computed across the three cropping cycles and compared between the three regions.


Overall cultivars’ growth performance at flowering across sites

Within cultivars and across sites, the growth performance differed significantly (P<0.05) (Table 2). The tallest cultivar was ‘Pelipita’ with a height of 346 cm recorded in the Burundi site which had the lowest altitude; followed by ‘Lai’ in Burundi and in South Kivu, with the heights of 342 cm and 341 cm, respectively. The most robust plant girths at 1 m level were generally recorded in the mid-altitude sites (1431 m.a.s.l) of North Kivu, with 71, 66, 65 and 64 cm, for Lai, ‘Lahi’, ‘Pelipita’ and ‘Bira’ respectively (Table 2). In addition, it was noticed that ‘Lai’ produced plants with bigger girth than other cultivars across sites with averages of between 60 and 71 cm across sites (Table 2).

The shortest plants were produced by ‘Lahi’ in Burundi (925 m.a.s.l), with height averaging 175 cm; whereas ‘To’o’ generally produced the shortest plants across sites, with 273, 242 and 237 cm in South Kivu, North  Kivu  and Burundi sites respectively. Furthermore, ‘To’o’ recorded the least robust plant with a girth averaging 37 to 49 cm across sites (Table 2). The cultivar with the highest number of leaves at flowering stage was ‘Lahi’ in South Kivu, producing an average of 11 leaves, followed by ‘Pelipita’ in South Kivu and in Burundi. The lowest number of functional leaves was produced by ‘To’o’ and ‘Apantu’ in North Kivu (Table 2). 

Cultivars’ growth performance at flowering within cropping cycles

Within crop cycles, the height of the evaluated cultivars differed significantly (P<0.05) (Table 3). In Burundi in cycle 1, the tallest cultivars were ‘Bira’ (291 cm), ‘Lai’ (289 cm) and ‘Pelipita’ (290 cm). ‘Lai’ was recorded as the tallest cultivar in each of the three crop cycles in Burundi. Pelipita was also identified as one of the tallest cultivars in the 2nd and 3rd cycles (364 - 386 cm), while the shortest cultivar was ‘To’o’ in all three cycles. In North Kivu, the tallest cultivars were ‘Lai’ in cycle 1, ‘Bira’ and ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 2 and cycle 3. In cycle 2, the height of ‘Lai’ was not significantly different from the heights of ‘Bira’ and ‘Pelipita’ while in cycle 3, ‘Lahi’ had almost the same height as ‘Pelipita’. The shortest cultivar was ‘To’o’ in all cycles with the height ranging between 229 cm and 258 cm. In South Kivu, ‘Lai’ and ‘To’o’ were recorded to be the tallest and the shortest cultivars for all three crop cycles respectively. There was no significant difference between the height at flowering of ‘Lai’, ‘Bira’, ‘Lahi’, and ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 3; and between ‘Apantu’ and ‘To’o’ in cycle 2 in South Kivu (Table 3).

In Burundi, the cultivars with the largest girth (56-69 cm) were ‘Lai’ in all cycles and ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 1. In North  Kivu,  the cultivars with the largest girth (68-75 cm) were ‘Lai’ in cycle 1 and cycle 2 and ‘Lahi’ in cycle 3. There were no significant differences between ‘Apantu’, ‘Bira’, ‘Lahi’, ‘Lai’ and ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 2; between ‘Bira’, ‘Lai’, ‘Lahi’ and ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 3. In South Kivu, the cultivars with the largest girth (60-68 cm) were ‘Lai’ in cycle 1 and cycle 3 and ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 2. ‘To’o’ had the thinnest girth in all three cycles in all sites. No significant variations were observed in terms of the number of functional leaves amongst cultivars within crop cycles (at P<0.05) (Table 3).

Overall cultivars’ yield performance at harvesting across sites

Yield performance of cultivars was assessed in terms of number of hands, number of fingers on the second hand, length of finger, total number of fingers on a bunch, bunch weight and production (tons. ha-1 per year) and showed significant differences (at P<0.05) (Table 4). Sites and cycles combined, the highest average number of hands (7) was recorded for ‘Lahi’. Other cultivars had 6 hands (‘Apantu’, ‘Bira’ and ‘Pelipita’), 5 hands (‘Lai’) and 4 hands (‘To’o’). The average number of fingers on a hand ranged between 12 for ‘Apantu’, ‘Bira’ and ‘Lai, and 11 for ‘Lahi’, ‘Pelipita’ and ‘To’o’. ‘Apantu’ (22cm) had the longest  fingers  while  the  shortest  (17-18 cm)  were  for ‘Bira’, ‘Lai’ and ‘Lahi’ (Table 4). Fingers of ‘Pelipita’ and ‘To’o’ had a medium length (19 cm). The highest average total number of fingers on a bunch was recorded for ‘Lahi’ (81) followed by ‘Lai’ (66), ‘Bira’ (63), ‘Apantu’ (60) and ‘Pelipita’ (50). The highest average bunch weight was recorded for ‘Apantu’ and ‘Lahi’ (16kg) followed by ‘Lai’ and ‘Pelipita’ (14 kg) and ‘Bira’ (12 kg) while ‘To’o’ produced the smallest bunches (4 kg). The production expressed in tons per hectare and per year was highest for ‘Apantu’ and ‘Lahi’ (12 t.ha-1) followed by ‘Pelipita’ (10 t.ha-1), ‘Lai’ and ‘Bira’ (9 t. ha-1). The lowest yield was recorded on ‘To’o’ (412 t.ha-1) (Table 4).

Yield performance of cultivars within crop cycles and sites

Across cultivars and sites, yield performance differed significantly with cropping cycles (P<0.05) (Table 5). Cultivars with the highest yield performance over crop cycles were ‘Lahi’, ‘Apantu’, ‘Lai’ and ‘Bira’. ‘Lahi’ had the highest number of hands (6-9) on the bunch in all sites. The same cultivar ‘Lahi’ had the highest total number of fingers (111-113), bunch weight (17-20 kg) and yield (15-23 t/ha/year) in South Kivu and Burundi sites only. ‘Apantu’ recorded the longest fingers averaging 22 cm in all  sites  whereas  the  highest  number  of fingers on the second hand (12), the highest bunch weight (15 kg) and the highest yield (11t/ha/ year) were only recorded in North Kivu site. ‘Lai’ produced the highest number of fingers on a hand (13-14) in Burundi and South Kivu whereas ‘Bira’ recorded the highest total number of fingers (60) in North Kivu.

Agronomic results across the three cropping cycles showed that the highest yield of 23.5 t/ha/year was for ‘Lahi’ and recorded in the  lowest altitude in Burundi (cycles 1 and 2). The yield of the same cultivar in the highest altitude was acceptable but 11.5 t/ha/year less compared with that recorded in the lowest altitude. The other cultivars with an acceptable yield of more than10 t/ha/year were ‘Apantu’ (14-19 kg) in all sites (cycle 1); ‘Pelipita’ in Burundi (all cycles) and in DRC (cycle 1); ‘Bira’ in Burundi (cycle 1), North Kivu (cycles 1 and 2) and Lai in all sites (cycle 1) (Table 5).

The highest average number of fingers on a bunch (55-58) in North Kivu was recorded from ‘Bira’ (cycles 1 and 3) and ‘Lahi’ (cycle 2) and was almost half of the number recorded from the other sites. The least number of fingers on a bunch (22-28) were recorded from ‘To’o’ in the highest altitude sites of South Kivu (cycles 1 and 2) and mid-altitude sites of North Kivu (cycles 2 and 3). The cultivar with the heaviest bunch (15-20 kg) was ‘Apantu’ in DRC sites (all cycles) and in


Burundi (cycles 1 and 3). Another cultivar producing the heaviest bunches was ‘Lahi’ recorded from Burundi (cycles 1 and 2), South Kivu (all cycles) and North Kivu sites (cycle 1). ‘Pelipita’ also produced the largest bunches at each crop cycle in Burundi, in North Kivu (cycle 2) and South Kivu (cycles 2 and 3) (Table 5).

Within sites, yields of cultivars differed significantly (P<0.05) (Table 5). In Burundi, ‘Lahi’ recorded the highest number of hands (9), the highest total number of fingers (112-119), the highest bunch weight (17-18 kg)  and  the  highest yield (23-24 t/ha/year) in comparison to other cultivars. ‘Apantu’ produced the longest fingers (20-24 cm) in all three cycles and the highest bunch weight (15 kg) in cycle 3; ‘Lai’ was recorded with the highest number of fingers on a hand (14-15) in all the three cycles and highest total number of fingers recorded in cycle 3 (86). ‘Bira’ showed the highest number of hands (7) in cycle 3 whereas in the same cycle ‘Pelipita’ also recorded the highest number of hands (7), as well as the highest yield (11 t/ha/year).

In North Kivu, ‘Bira’ recorded the highest number of hands (6-7) and the highest total number of fingers (53-72) in all cycles while it produced a higher yield in cycle 2 (11t/ha/year). ‘Apantu’ recorded the highest number of fingers on a hand (12), the highest bunch weight (14-16 kg) and the highest yield (9-14t/ha/year) in the three cycles. ‘Lahi’ had the equal-highest number of fingers on a hand (12) in cycle1. In South Kivu, ‘Lahi’ had the highest number of fingers on a hand (8-10), the highest total number of fingers (101-129), the highest bunch weight (17-23 kg) and the highest  yield (11-17 t/ha/year) in the three cycles.

‘Apantu’ had the longest fingers (21-24 cm) in all cycles and the highest number of hands (8) in cycle 1. The highest number of fingers on a hand (13-15) was observed for ‘To’o’ (cycle 1 and 3) and ‘Bira’ and ‘Lahi’ (cycle 2).

Cultivars’ crop-cycle duration

Cultivars’ crop cycle duration was assessed in terms of the number of days from planting to flowering and from planting to  harvest. Significant variations (P<0.05) were observed amongst cultivars across sites and within crop cycles (Table 6). In Burundi, the cultivars that took the longest time from planting to flowering and from planting to harvest were ‘Lai’ in cycle1 (474 and 608 days respectively) and in cycle 2 and ‘Apantu’ (cycle 3), while ‘Bira’ took the shortest one in cycle 1 (339 days and 410 days) and cycle 3) and ‘Lahi’ (cycle 2). This indicated that Lai took 135 days and 198 days more compared to Bira in cycle 1. In North Kivu, ‘Lai’ took the longest time in all cycles with 660 days (flowering) and 780 days (harvest) in cycle 1 whereas ‘To’o’ (cycle 1 and cycle 2) and Lahi (cycle 3) took the shortest time from planting to flowering and from planting to harvest with 402 days and 485 days for To’oin cycle 1. In South Kivu, the cultivars that took the longest time from planting to harvest were ‘Pelipita’ in the number of days from planting to flowering and from planting to harvest. Significant variations (P<0.05) were observed amongst cultivars across sites and within crop cycles (Table 6). In Burundi, the cultivars that took the longest time from planting to flowering and from planting to harvest were ‘Lai’ in cycle1 (474 and 608 days respectively) and in cycle 2 and ‘Apantu’ (cycle 3), while ‘Bira’ took the shortest one in cycle 1 (339 days and 410 days) and cycle 3) and ‘Lahi’ (cycle 2). This indicated that Lai took 135 days and 198 days more compared to Bira in cycle 1. In North Kivu, ‘Lai’ took the longest time in all cycles with 660 days (flowering) and 780 days (harvest) in cycle 1 whereas ‘To’o’ (cycle 1 and cycle 2) and Lahi (cycle 3) took the shortest time from planting to flowering and from planting to harvest with 402 days and 485 days for To’oin cycle 1. In South Kivu, the cultivars that took  the  longest time from planting to harvest were ‘Pelipita’ in cycle 1 with 575 days and 701 days, Lai (cycle 2 and cycle 3) and ‘Lahi’ (cycle 3). Similar to other sites, To’o (cycle 1 and cycle 3) and ‘Bira’ (cycles 1 and 2) took the shortest time. The assessment on crop cycle duration indicated that the average time taken by cultivars to flower and to yield bunch over the three cycles was generally lower in Burundi (the lowest altitude site) than in DRC sites (medium- and highest altitude sites) (Table 6).

Correlation between altitude and different cultivars’ growth and yield attributes

A significant relationship was observed between altitude and different growth and yield attributes (P<0.05) (Table 7). It was observed that plant height generally increased with increasing altitude across all the cultivars evaluated except for ‘Pelipita’ (R2= -0.15) which showed a significant decrease of plant height with increasing altitude. Generally, cultivar crop-cycle duration also significantly increased with altitude. Cultivars took significantly longer to mature at the high-altitude sites. It was also noted that production (Ton.ha-1 per year) declined with increasing altitude. In addition, the bunch weight of ‘Lai’ (R2= 0.33) was most strongly correlated with altitude while ‘Bira’ (R2= -0.17), ‘Pelipita’ (R2= -0.24) and ‘To’o’ (R2= -0.13) were negatively correlated with altitude; whereas the other cultivars showed no linear association with altitude (Table 7).  


All cultivars except To’o had promising agronomic results. Growth characteristics and crop cycle duration were correlated with altitude. Based on the growth performance, the evaluated cultivars could be categorized in groups of i) tallest and robust cultivars (‘Lai’ and ‘Pelipita’), ii) cultivars with medium height and girth (‘Apantu’, ‘Bira’ and ‘Lahi’), and iii) smallest and thinnest cultivars (‘To’o’). However, the growth of these cultivars differed across sites and cycles. Some cultivars grew very well with consistent height and girth in all sites (‘Bira’ and Lai), at higher altitudes (‘Lahi’, ‘Apantu’, and ‘To’o’) and lower altitude (‘Pelipita’). In addition, it was observed that some cultivars could degenerate rapidly in unsuitable altitudes. The examples are ‘‘Lahi’’ that had only 2 cycles in the lower altitude while it had all 3 cycles in the higher altitude; ‘Lai’ that decreased in growth at higher altitudes just after the first cycle while it continued growing in the lower altitude. These findings on the growth performance of these cultivars in different agroecological zones could orient researchers or extension-agents to disseminate these cultivars in their favorable areas.

The height and girth of some of the assessed banana cultivars such as ‘Pelipita’ and ‘Lai’ could be of concern, given the existing crop management and farming systems. Very tall cultivars such as ‘Pelipita’ (346 cm of height) could be challenging for removing the male bud, a practice recommended to prevent insect vector transmission of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt (BXW) disease in typical regions according to the observed incidence of BXW.

 Furthermore, taller bananas may be less resistant to strong winds which may cause their toppling. In addition, very  robust  plants  such  as  ‘Lai’  (71cm  of  girth),  may occupy a large area, reducing space for other crops. This is a concern because it is common for smallholders in the East African region to intercrop bananas with different crops (Ouma, 2009).

To address these issues, farmers could install shelter-belts such as agroforestry tree species around the banana fields to alleviate the impact of strong winds and use appropriate banana plants spacing to maximize the use of land while intercropping bananas with other crops like legumes, cereals and multipurpose trees (Ouma, 2009). Over the study areas, bananas are generally intercropped with annual crops and there has been an increase in the grower interest in using intercropping, growing two or more crops simultaneously on the same land. For male-bud removal, farmers can use forked sticks long enough to reach the male bud (Ocimati et al., 2013). In the areas where this may not apply, areas that experience strong winds, the alternative could be to promote only short or medium-high cultivars such as ‘Bira’ and ‘Apantu’ and promote thinner cultivars in areas where farmers have less land. These alternatives could increase the rate of adoption of the different pVAC-rich cultivars by farmers in the study areas.

Yield differed with cultivars and growth performance. All cultivars except ‘To’o’ produced big bunches (15-20kg) and had good yields (10-23 t/ha/year) with differences in performance most likely due to altitude, in conformity with Turner et al., (2016) who observed altitude having a negative association with bunch weight, particularly when nitrogen, phosphate, potassium (NPK) and organic matter (OM) concentrations are low. ‘Apantu’, ‘Lahi’ and ‘Pelipita’ produced good bunch sizes in all sites while ‘Bira’ and Lai got bunches of similar sizes only in the medium  and highest  altitude sites in DRC.

Higher yields were observed in the lower altitude sites of Burundi compared to the medium and highest altitude sites. For example, ‘Lahi’ in the lowest altitude produced almost twice the yield compared to when it was grown at the highest altitude. In addition, a decrease in yield across cycles was been observed within sites with a higher yield in the first cycle compared to the 2 other cycles. The influence of plant growth on yield was observed also by Woomer et al., (1999) who noticed a highly significant relationship between plant mass and production expressed in terms of bunch weight across a range of management practices. In addition to plant growth, altitude significantly affected plant production. The yield of all cultivars except ‘Lai’ was higher at lower altitudes (Burundi) compared to medium altitudes. This association was also observed in previous findings (Sikyolo et al., 2013; Sivirihauma et al., 2016; Soares, 2012) which concluded that most assimilates could go towards sucker development at high altitude, where a higher frequency of sucker production is observed for most cultivars.

Cultivars with the highest and medium growth also produced big bunches and had higher yields compared to the shortest ones. This has been observed for ‘Lai’, ‘Lahi’ and ‘Pelipita’ which had an average of 65cm height, 18 cm girth and each producing 10kg bunches. The yield of these cultivars in different sites was significantly higher than the yield of existing local cultivars. In Burundi, the average annual yield of the 5 cultivars (9 to 23 t/ha) was much higher than the estimated national annual banana yield (7.9t/ha) (FAOSTAT, 2018).

This can be further illustrated by the dessert cultivar ‘Lai’ which produced a 12kg bunch and an average yield of 9 t/ha in comparison with the common local dessert cultivars ‘Ikigurube’ and ‘Kamaramasenge’ grown in Burundi which produce bunches of 9.5 kg and 8.0 kg and a yield of 8.1 t/ha and 8.0 t/ha, respectively (Kamira et al., 2013). A similar observation was made in DRC, where the cultivars ‘Bira’, ‘Lahi’, ‘Lai’ and ‘Pelipita’ generated annual yields (7-15 t/ha) higher than the overall national annual yield of bananas (4.6 t/ha) (Dowiya et al., 2009). In addition, the pVAC-rich dessert cultivar ‘‘Lai’’ with an average bunch weight of 17kg in South Kivu, though lower than local cultivar ‘Gros Michel’ with 32kg, has the potential to increase as seen by the maximum bunch weight of 22kg that was noted in a banana germplasm evaluation study (Kamira et al., 2016).

The observed yields and high to medium growth confirmed the previous findings stipulating that larger girths and greater pseudostem strength are important characteristics thatcould positively influence banana bunch weight (Donato et al., 2006; Nyombi et al., 2009). A significant positive relationship between bunch weight and number of fruits per bunch has been previously reported (Soares, 2012). It has been confirmed in this study with ‘Lahi’ which had the highest bunch weight and yield at the same the highest overall number of hands and fingers on a bunch; likewise, this was observed for Apantu and Pelipita which ranked amongst the high performing cultivars in terms of bunch weight and yield. However, even though bunch weight and number of fingers, can be used to directly express banana productivity, they cannot be considered in isolation when choosing a cultivar (Silva et al., 2002). Therefore, it is vital that the best/ recommended agronomic practices are used in the management of the cultivars to enable them to achieve their optimal production potential.

‘To’o’, the cultivar with the lowest growth performance also produced the smallest bunch among the studied cultivars and when compared to the local cultivars. This could negatively impact the acceptance of that cultivar within the local communities. However, given the high pVAC level (Ekesa et al., 2015), that cultivar could be used in the improvement of pVACs of existing banana varieties.

In addition, across cultivars, it was generally noted that crop cycle duration increased with altitude in conformity with the observation of Sivirihuma et al., (2016) that high altitude and corresponding low temperatures significantly increased crop-cycle duration of banana cultivars.The increase in crop-cycle duration with increasing altitude could be explained by lower temperature characterizing the higher altitude that contributed to lengthen the crop cycle. This conforms with Sikyoloet al.(2013) who assessed an increase in banana crop cycles with altitude. Farmers can be sensitized to adopt the banana cultivars with short and long cycles to enhance food security as reported for rice (Sall et al., 2000). Growing cultivars with both short and long cycles will increase and sustain the availability of pVAC-rich bananas.

In addition to good agronomic performance and high pVAC content, the cultivars selected for promotion should be acceptable to the target communities (Dowiya et al., 2009; Nowakunda and Tushemereirwe, 2004). A series of sensory evaluation exercises conducted within the project sites in Burundi, North Kivu and South Kivu showed that ‘Apantu’, ‘Bira’ and ‘Lahi’ were acceptable especially when boiled, roasted without peel or pan-fried in Burundi and North Kivu, and when roasted with or without peel or pan-fried in South Kivu (Ekesa et al., 2017). Recipes that incorporate the pVAC-rich banana cultivars such as those developed for South Kivu (Nabuuma et al., 2020) and value-added products also have the potential to increase adoption and create demand for these cultivars.


We conclude that ‘Apantu’, ‘Lahi’, ‘Bira’, ‘Lai’, and ‘Pelipita’ are the most promising pVAC-rich banana cultivars with agronomic performance that shows good potential for adoption by farmers in the study areas. Promotion of these cultivars through multiplication, dissemination of planting material in banana-dependent communities across Burundi and Eastern DRC should consider the influence of altitude as shown by the results of the study. They should also be accompanied by promoting recommended agronomic practices to achieve good yield, and by supplying  information  on  appropriate storage and cooking methods to maintain the pVAC content and improve nutrient quality. Further investigations on the susceptibility of these cultivars to the prevailing banana diseases within the study areas and evaluation of cultivar performance in farmers’ fields are recommended.


The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.


Akankwasa K, Ortman GF, Wale E, Tushemereirwe WK (2013). Determinants of consumers willingness to purchase East African Highland cooking banana hybrids in Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8(9):780-791.


Nabuuma D, Kamira M, Simbare A, Ekesa B (2020). Recipes for vitamin A-rich bananas: developed for South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.



Barekye A, Tongoona P, Derera J, Laing MD, Tushemereirwe WK (2013). Analysis of farmer-preferred traits as a basis for participatory improvement of East African highland bananas in Uganda., In: Blomme, G., Asten, P. van, Vanlauwe, B. (Eds.), Banana Systems in the Humid Highlands of Sub-Saharan Africa: Enhancing Resilience and Productivity. CABI, Wallingford pp. 30-36. 


Davey MW, Bergh IVD, Markham R, Swennen R, Keulemans J (2009). Genetic variability in Musa fruit provitamin A carotenoids, lutein and mineral micronutrient contents. Food Chemistry 115(3):806-813. 


Donato SLR, Silva SDOE, Lucca Filho, OA, Lima MB, Domingues H, Alves JDS (2006). Correlations among characters of the plant and of the bunch in banana (Musa spp.). Ciência e Agrotecnologia 30(1):21-30. 


Dowiya NB, Rweyemamu CL, Maerere AP (2009). Banana (Musa spp. Colla) cropping systems, production constraints and cultivar preferences in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 4(2):341-356.


Ekesa B, Kimiywe J, Davey M, Dhuique-Mayer C, Bergh, IVD, Blomme G (2013). Contribution of bananas and plantains to the diet and nutrition of Musa-dependent households with preschoolers in Beni and Bukavu territories, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo., in: Blomme, G., Asten, P. van, Vanlauwe, B. (Eds.), Banana Systems in the Humid Highlands of Sub-Saharan Africa: Enhancing Resilience and Productivity. CABI, Wallingford pp. 202-209. 


Ekesa B, Nabuuma D, Blomme G, Bergh IVD (2015). Provitamin A carotenoid content of unripe and ripe banana cultivars for potential adoption in eastern Africa. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 43:1-6. 


Ekesa B, Nabuuma D, Kennedy G, Bergh IVD (2017). Sensory evaluation of provitamin A carotenoid-rich banana cultivars on trial for potential adoption in Burundi and Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Fruits 72(5):261-272. 


Ekesa B, Poulaert M, Davey MW, Kimiywe J, Bergh IVD, Blomme G, Dhuique-Mayer C (2012). Bioaccessibility of provitamin A carotenoids in bananas (Musa spp.) and derived dishes in African countries. Food Chemistry 133(4):1471-1477. 


Ekholuenetale M, Tudeme G, Onikan A, Ekholuenetale CE (2020). Socioeconomic inequalities in hidden hunger, undernutrition, and overweight among under-five children in 35 sub-Saharan Africa countries. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association 95(1):1-15.


Englberger L, Darnton-Hill I, Coyne T, Fitzgerald MH, Marks GC (2003). Carotenoid-Rich Bananas: A Potential Food Source for Alleviating Vitamin A Deficiency. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 24(4):303-318. 


Englberger L, Wills RBH, Blades B, Dufficy L, Daniells JW, Coyne T (2006). Carotenoid Content and Flesh Color of Selected Banana Cultivars Growing in Australia. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 27(4):281-291. 


Failla ML, Thakkar SK, Kim JY (2009). In Vitro Bioaccessibility of β-Carotene in Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas, Lam.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57(22):10922-10927. 


FAOSTAT (2018). Burundian Annual Banana Yield of 2018 [WWW Document]. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) URL



Frison EA, Cherfas J, Hodgkin T (2011). Agricultural Biodiversity Is Essential for a Sustainable Improvement in Food and Nutrition Security. Sustainability 3(1):238-253. 


Fungo R, Pillay M (2011). β-Carotene content of selected banana genotypes from Uganda. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(28):5423-5430.


Gaidashova S, Karemera F, Karamura E (2010). Agronomic performance of introduced banana varieties in lowlands of Rwanda. African Crop Science Journal 16(1):9-16. 


Greiner T (2013). Vitamin A: Moving the food-based approach forward. Presented at the Second International Conference on Nutrition, FAO and WHO P 69.



Kamira M, Crichton RJ, Kanyaruguru JP, Van Asten PJA, Blomme G, Lorenzen J, Njukwe E, Bergh IVD, Ouma E, Muchunguzi P (2013). Agronomic evaluation of common and improved dessert banana cultivars at different altitudes across Burundi., In: Blomme, G., Asten, P. van, Vanlauwe, B. (Eds.), Banana Systems in the Humid Highlands of Sub-Saharan Africa: Enhancing Resilience and Productivity. CABI, Wallingford, pp. 37-47. 


Kamira M, Ntamwira J, Sivirihauma C, Ocimati W, Van AP, Vutseme L, Blomme G (2016). Agronomic performance of local and introduced plantains, dessert, cooking and beer bananas (Musa spp.) across different altitude and soil conditions in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11(43):4313-4332. 


Karamura EB, Gold CS (2000). The elusive banana weevil cosmopolites sordidus germar. Acta Horticulturae 540:471-485. 


Kennedy G, Nantel G, Shetty P (2003). The scourge of" hidden hunger": global dimensions of micronutrient deficiencies. Food, Nutrition and Agriculture pp. 8-16.



Kikulwe EM, Birol E, Wesseler J, Falck-Zepeda J (2011). A latent class approach to investigating demand for genetically modified banana in Uganda. Agricultural Economics 42(5):547-560. h


Mbwika JM (2009). Feasibility study on technologies for improving banana for resistance against bacterial wilt in sub-Saharan Africa. African Agricultural Technology Foundation. 92 p.



Ndayitegeye O, Blomme G, Ocimati W, Crichton R, Ntamwira J, Muchunguzi P, Van AP, Bahati, L, Gaidashova S (2017). Multi-locational evaluation of cooking banana cultivars NARITA 4 hybrid and Mpologoma in Rwanda. African Journal of. Agricultural Research 12(14):3068-3071. 


Nowakunda K, Tushemereirwe W (2004). Farmer acceptance of introduced banana genotypes in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal 12(1):1-6. 


Nyombi K, Van AP, Leffelaar PA, Corbeels M, Kaizzi CK, Giller KE (2009). Allometric growth relationships of East Africa highland bananas (Musa AAA-EAHB) cv. Kisansa and Mbwazirume. Annals of Applied Biology 155:403-418. 


Ocimati W, Karamura D, Rutikanga A, Sivirihauma C, Ndungo V, Ntamwira J, Kamira M, Kanyaruguru JP, Blomme G (2013). Agronomic practices for Musa across different agro-ecological zones in Burundi, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda., in: Blomme, G., Asten, P. van, Vanlauwe, B. (Eds.), Banana Systems in the Humid Highlands of Sub-Saharan Africa: Enhancing Resilience and Productivity. CABI, Wallingford pp. 175-190. 


Ordonez N, Seidl MF, Waalwijk C, Drenth A, Kilian A, Thomma BPHJ, Ploetz RC, Kema GHJ (2015). Worse Comes to Worst: Bananas and Panama Disease-When Plant and Pathogen Clones Meet. PLOS Pathog. 11:e1005197. 


Ouma G (2009). Intercropping and its application to banana production in East Africa: A review. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 1(2):013-015. 


Ruel MT, Levin CE (2001). Assessing the Potential for Food-based Strategies to Reduce Vitamin A and Iron Deficiencies. FCND briefs 92, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 


Sall S, Norman D, Featherstone AM (2000). Quantitative assessment of improved rice variety adoption: the farmer's perspective. Agricultural systems 66(2):129-144.


Shim MY, Billard L, Pesti GM (2014). Experimental Design and Analysis with Emphasis on Communicating What Has Been Done: I. A Comparison of Statistical Models Using General Linear Model Procedure of SAS. International Journal of Poultry Science 13(2):76-87. 


Sikyolo I, Sivirihauma C, Ndungo V, Langhe ED, Ocimati W, Blomme G (2013). Growth and yield of plantain cultivars at four sites of differing altitude in North Kivu, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo., in: Blomme, G., Asten, P. van, Vanlauwe, B. (Eds.), Banana Systems in the Humid Highlands of Sub-Saharan Africa: Enhancing Resilience and Productivity. CABI, Wallingford, pp. 48-57. 


Silva SDOE, Flores JCDOO, Lima Neto FP (2002). Avaliação de cultivares e híbridos de bananeira em quatro ciclos de produção. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37(11):1567-1574. 


Sivirihauma C, Blomme G, Ocimati W, Vutseme L, Sikyolo I, Valimuzigha K, De Langhe E, Turner DW (2016). Altitude effect on plantain growth and yield during four production cycles in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Acta Horticulturae 1114:139-148. 


Soares JDR, Pasqual M, Rodrigues FA, Willian SL, Donato SJR, Silva SO, Paixão CA (2012). Correlation between morphological characters and estimated bunch weight of the Tropical banana cultivar. African Journal of Biotechnology 4(47):10682-10687. 


Stevens GA, Bennett JE, Hennocq Q, Lu Y, De-Regil LM, Rogers L, Danaei G, Li G, White RA, Flaxman SR, Oehrle SP, Finucane MM, Guerrero R, Bhutta ZA, Then-Paulino A, Fawzi W, Black RE, Ezzati


M (2015). Trends and mortality effects of vitamin A deficiency in children in 138 low-income and middle-income countries between 1991 and 2013: a pooled analysis of population-based surveys. Lancet Global Health 3(9):e528-e536. 


Tang G, Qin J, Dolnikowski GG, Russell RM, Grusak MA (2009). Golden Rice is an effective source of vitamin A. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89(6):1776-1783. 


Thompson B, Amoroso L (2014). Improving diets and nutrition: food-based approaches. CABI, Wallingford.


Thompson B, Cohen MJ (2012). The Impact of Climate Change and Bioenergy on Nutrition. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.




Tripathi L, Mwangi M, Abele S, Aritua V, Tushemereirwe WK, Bandyopadhyay R (2009). Xanthomonas Wilt: A Threat to Banana Production in East and Central Africa. Plant Disease 93(5):440-451. 


Uusiku NP, Oelofse A, Duodu KG, Bester MJ, Faber M (2010). Nutritional value of leafy vegetables of sub-Saharan Africa and their potential contribution to human health: A review. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 23(6)l499-509.