African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6924

Full Length Research Paper

Prevalence, cultural and pathogenic characterization of Zymoseptoria tritici, agent of wheat septoria leaf blotch, in Algeria

Wahiba HARRAT
  • Wahiba HARRAT
  • Unité de Recherche de Constantine (URC), Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRAA), Algeria.
  • Google Scholar
Zouaoui BOUZNAD
  • Zouaoui BOUZNAD
  • Département de botanique, Laboratoire de Phytopathologie et Biologie moléculaire Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agronomie (ENSA), El-Harrach, Algeria.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 03 August 2018
  •  Accepted: 05 September 2018
  •  Published: 04 October 2018

 ABSTRACT

Wheat is the 2nd most important culture in the world.  Septoria leaf blotch is one of the most important wheat diseases. It is caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola (an: Zymoseptoria tritici). The aim of this study is to evaluate the presence and the importance of this disease in Algeria. A collection of 625 isolates was made through the years (2010, 2011, and 2013). Isolates were collected from the Algerian zones of cereal production. Phenotypic and genetic characterization via morphological, cultural and pathogenic analysis showed the presence of Septoria leaf blotch in 72 fields (from 122) in 20 departments (counties). In some fields the disease is highly frequent with an index of 99 according to double digit scale. Two main types of isolates were found; but the yeast-like form dominated with 94.08%. 26 isolates sampled from 25 fields were tested to evaluate isolates aggressiveness variability. Only 2 isolates from 26 inoculated were able to produce symptoms on three cereal species (triticale, durum and bread wheat).

Key words: Zymoseptoria tritici, diversity, prevalence, virulence, wheat.

 


 INTRODUCTION

Wheat is the one of the most important crops worldwide. The Septoria leaf blotch (SLB) is one of the most devastating diseases of this culture (Fones and Gurr, 2015). It is caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola (Fuckel) J. Schröt., in Cohn (anamorph Zymoseptoria tritici (Desm.) Quaedvlieg and Crous) (Quaedvlieg et al., 2011). It is a heterothallic pathogen of Dothideomycetes class. Serious epidemics can reduce the yields on wheat from 35  to  50%  in  particular  in  Mediterranean  regions (Ponomarenko et al., 2011).

In the northern half of Africa, the SLB is considered a serious threat on wheat; in Algeria it is widely present in all the northern region of the country (Sayoud et al., 1999; Zahri et al., 2013; Berraies, 2014; Teferi and Gebreslassie, 2015). Fungicides are widely used in intensive production systems. However, better yields are easily achieved by the combination of adequate cultural practices and the use of  resistant varieties in the disease  (Eyal, 1999). But the specificity of the M. graminicola–wheat pathosystem, frequently observed, can interfere with the use of resistant varieties (Saadaoui, 1987; Kema et al., 1996; Kema and van Silfhout, 1997; Kema et al., 2000; Brading et al., 2002; Grieger et al., 2005; Ware, 2006; Ronny et al., 2014). Several hypotheses were emitted on the gene for gene interaction between Z. tritici and wheat (Kema et al., 2000; Brading et al., 2002; Goodwin, 2007). Until now 18 Stb identified genes confer the resistance of cultivars to the pathogen (Arraiano et al., 2007; Goodwin, 2007; Chartrain et al., 2009; Tabib Ghaffary et al., 2011).

Recently, Allioui et al. (2014) and Ayad et al. (2014) demonstrated that both idiomorphs (MAT1-1 and MAT1-2) exist in Algeria and were scored at similar frequencies. Teleomorph has been identified in Algeria for the first time by Harrat et al. (2017). Other research works were made concerning the virulence, parasitic specialization and the heritability of wheat resistance to Z. tritici (Kema et al., 1996; Benkorteby, 2004; Allioui et al., 2014; Ayad et al. 2014). Of this fact, a preliminary knowledge of this disease, its distribution and diversity by a cultural and pathogenic characterization are essential to establish an adequate control approach of SLB. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate disease distribution and its importance in various cereal regions in Algeria, to realize cultural characterization and evaluate Z. tritici isolates aggressiveness, obtained from the Eastern regions of country, through a set of varieties constituted by wheat and triticale cultivated in Algeria.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study areas

Prospecting was realized during April–May of the years 2010, 2011 and 2013 in various wheat-producing areas of the country (Figure 1). In 2010, the survey took place on the West of the country and some localities of Eastern regions. In 2011, they were generalized in the Central region and some localities of the Western region. In 2013 the survey was particularly dedicated to the Eastern region. Surveys were realized between blooming and maturity stage of the wheat. The sampling was regularly made all 15 to 20 km through the cereal-producing regions. For every wheat field, the inspection was made according to the X-shaped method of Campbell and Madden (1990).

 

 

Diagnostic and disease assessment in the field

Diagnosis of the disease on wheat is based on the observation of the typical symptom caused by Z. tritici. The SLB was identified by lengthened necrosis and bounded by the nervures (Sayoud et al., 1999; Duncan and Howard, 2000). Necrosis is very often lengthened, strewed with many pycnidia (Rapilly et al., 1971). Where disease symptoms are detected, an assessment was realized on 10 plants according to double digit scale (00-99) described by Eyal et al. (1987); the first digit represents the vertical progress of the disease according to the scale 0-9 of Saari and Prescott (Eyal et al., 1987); the second digit indicates the severity of   the   disease   according    to  the  scale  0-9 which  every  digit corresponds to a percentage of foliar surfaces covered by the disease.

Morphological and cultural study in vitro

In laboratory, the diagnosis of the disease and the isolation of pathogen were realized from small fragments of limbs presenting characteristic pycnidia according to Eyal et al. (1987). The isolations were made only on 25 fields, from the year 2013, in East region of country (Annaba [01 field], Sétif [03 field], Constantine [18 field] and Mila [03 field]) (Table 1). Five infected leaves were randomly sampled from every field. From a lesion, five isolates were randomly retained after isolation (a lesion by leaf). In all, 625 isolates were retained for the morphologic and cultural characterizations; among them, 26 isolates were tested for the pathogenic characterization (Table 1). Morphological characterization of the Z. tritici isolates was realized according to tint scale described by Siah et al. (2008).

 

 

Evaluation of isolates aggressiveness variability

Pathogenicity test was led under greenhouse according to a plan in split plot with three repetitions. 26 isolates sampled from 25 fields (Table 2) were tested on a differential range of 16 varieties (five Bread wheat [Ain Abid, Arz, Anapo, Anforeta and HD1220], ten Durum wheat [Boussalem, Cirta, Colosseo, Cote, GTA-Dur, Ofanto, Simeto, Vitron, Waha et Wahebi] and one Triticale [Juanillo]) approved in Algeria.

 

 

Inoculum was prepared from 7 days old Z. tritici cultured in 18°C on YMA medium. The conidial suspension was adjusted to 108 spore ml-1, adding to it a droplet of Tween 20. The inoculation was executed by pulverizing the conidial suspension at seedling stage (3 leaves) and the humidity was maintained during 48 h according to the modified method described by Zuckerman et al. (1997). After  21 days, the number of infected leaves (NIL) was estimated on the first three leaves and the percentage of Z. tritici pycnidial covering (%PC) was estimated according to the scale described by Ziv and Eyal (1978). Statistical analyses were made by variance analysis (ANOVA) and hierarchical classification in dendrogram.

 

 

 

 

 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Prevalence of septoria leaf blotch in Algeria

Characteristic symptoms of SLB observed on fields were necrosis more or less lengthened, which can cover, in certain cases, the majority of the foliar surface and strewed with pycnidia, the percentage of covering was variable. During the 2010 campaign, 12 fields from 18 (66.67%) presented typical symptoms of the SLB. For 2011 and 2013 campaigns, in the 104 prospected fields, the disease was present in 60 fields (57.67%). On a total of 122 prospected fields, during three years, 72 fields present the SLB disease (Table 2 and Figure 1), where 59% of the prospected fields were infected. The SLB is present in the majority of wheat-producing areas.

It is admitted that the development of SLB diseases is bound to weather conditions, particularly, humidity and temperature. Disease severity in sub-humid regions was particularly observed. In the counties of Algiers, Annaba and Blida the severity of  the  disease  reached 98 and 99  according to "double digit" scale because of climatic conditions (according to data from ONM). For example, during 2010 the annual pluviometry in Annaba was 596 mm, and that for the first four months was 237 mm, which represent period for the disease development.

The year 2011 was characterized by a sum of 673 mm pluviometry in Algiers, 314 mm registered during the first four months (ONM source) and the average temperatures between 17 and 20°C; the meteorological conditions were favorable for the dissemination of SLB. However, we also noticed that in some Wilayate of the semi-arid regions, particularly, Constantine and Tiaret, where an important severity of the disease was observed. It can be explained by the special agricultural features of Algeria, where the cereals cultivation is in intense monoculture system in semi-arid regions rather than diversified as cultivated in the sub-humid regions.

In the regions where the drought caused damage during the 2011 campaign, the disease was observed only on the first leaves. Indeed, the results indicate that the severity of the disease does not exceed 11 according to the "double digit" scale. It was the case of Saïda and Mascara where the sum of precipitation of the first four months did not exceed 130 mm (ONM source). According to Danon et al. (1982) and Cowger et al. (2000), the  SLB engenders major losses of yields, in particular, when the spring rains persist, after the emergence of the flag leaf. These losses vary with weather conditions, cultivated varieties and precocity of attacks (Devale et al., 2000).

Morphologic and cultural characterizations

Phenotypic observations, of colonies stemming, from isolates of Z. tritici of 10 days on solid YMA (Yeast Malt Agar) medium show a big diversity of texture and color. The isolates of pinkish color have a creamy texture (Yeast Like), which can cover completely the culture medium or in the form of colonies which follow the lines of sowing. The isolates of dark color are solid and compact. It is noticed that the pink color is the most dominant (darkened 42.88%, clear 24.16% and very clear 27.04%), whereas the dark brown occupied 5.92% group cultures. These results corresponding  to those of Bentata et al. (2011) and Ayad et al. (2014) which realized a cultural characterization of the Moroccan and Algerian isolates of Z. tritici; also, those of Siah et al. (2008) on the distribution of “mating type” according to the colonies phenotype. According to Quaedvlieg et al., (2011) variants of Z. tritici can appear on culture medium.

Isolates aggressiveness and evaluation of the varietal assessment

Variance analysis of the infected leaves number (NIL) and of the pycnidial coverage percentage (%PC) of the 26 isolates tested on the differential set varieties shows a very highly significant difference for both parameters (Table 3). Five pathotypes were distinguished for NIL parameter. The most virulent isolates, according to this parameter, were ST9, ST17 and ST21. For the %PC, six pathotypes were detected. The most virulent isolates, according to this parameter, were ST4, ST17 and ST21 (Figure 2). We noticed that the area from where the isolates are sampled did not influence systematically the level of aggressiveness. Both isolates ST19 and ST20 arise from the same field and have a different behavior towards the studied wheat and triticale varieties. However, isolates ST17 and ST21 were obtained from two different fields and belong to the same pathotype. From 26, 10 isolates showed a physiological specificity for the Bread wheat or the  Durum  wheat,  only  ST9 and ST20 presented symptoms on three studied host species.

 

 

 

Statistical study of the 16 host varieties (Durum wheat, Bread wheat and Triticale) comportment (resistance or sensibility) towards the range of isolates showed a very highly significant difference. Four homogeneous groups for both parameters ILN and %PC are observed. The most sensitive varieties were HD1220 and Waha, whereas, the most resistant varieties, with no symptom were Ain Abid, Colosseo and Simeto (Figure 2; Table 4). A qualitative variation of M. graminicola virulence was indicated in certain studies (Eyal et al., 1973; Saadaoui, 1987; Kema et al., 1996). Brading et al. (2002) and Kema et al. (2000)’s works brought the proof of gene-for-gene relation between wheat and M. graminicola.

 

 

Medini and Hamza (2008) study showed that the Algerian isolates have more variability, with eight pathotypes, compared with the Tunisian and Canadian isolates. The strong variability of the Algerian isolates can be associated to the agricultural practices. Indeed, both wheat cultures are important, 24.3% for bread wheat and75.7% for durum wheat according to statistical data of Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries. Consequently, M. graminicolais is exposed to wide genotype groups having various sources of resistance genes. Kema et al. (1996) suggest the existence of two variants of M. graminicola, one adapted to the durum wheat and the other one to the bread wheat. The hypothesis of specificity existence in the pathosystem wheat – M. graminicola was emitted since the first report indicating a physiological specialization (Eyal et al., 1973).

According to several authors, the isolates of Z. tritici obtained from tetraploids wheat show a bigger virulence on wheat whether it was tetraploids or hexaploids (Kema et al., 1996; Van Ginkel and Scharen, 1988). It was the case of the ST21 of our study. Nevertheless, among the most virulent isolates of the tested range (ST17, ST9 and ST4) were obtained from durum wheat. Shaner and Finney (1982) identified the varietal resistance with Z. tritici. More than 12  main  genes  conferring  to  the  host high levels of resistance were identified. Most of them were mapped in wheat genome specific regions (McCartney et al., 2002; Adhikari et al., 2004; Chartrain et al., 2005; Arraiano et al., 2007).

 

 

 


 CONCLUSION

Wheat septoria leaf blotch caused by M. graminicola is a disease, present in all the country cereal zones, of both cultivated wheat species (Durum wheat and Bread wheat). According to the importance of attacks, this disease can engender considerable yield losses, in particular, when weather conditions were favorable for pathogen development. Severity of the SLB was more significant on the regions where weather conditions were favorable and the monoculture was widely practiced. Results indicate a big phenotypic variability of the obtained colonies. The  26 tested isolates, of East Algeria wheat-producing region, show a big variability towards the studied wheat and triticale varieties. Five pathotypes were distinguished for the infected leaves number parameter and six pathotypes for pycnidial coverage parameter. Some isolates have physiological speciali-zation towards hosts. It would be interesting to include the varieties, which have proved resistant characters to this disease, in future wheat improvement program. For a better knowledge of pathogen, it would be useful to study more isolates by molecular markers.

 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.

 



 REFERENCES

Adhikari TB, Cavaletto JR, Dubcovsky J, Gieco JO, Schlatter AR, Goodwin SB (2004). Molecular mapping of the Stb4 gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat. Phytopathology 94:1198-1206.
Crossref

 

Allioui N, Siah A, Brinis L, Reignault P, Halama P (2014). Mating type distribution provides evidence for sexual reproduction of Mycosphaerella graminicola in Algeria. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 36(4):475-481.
Crossref

 

Arraiano LS, Chartrain L, Bossolini E, Slatter HN, Keller B, Brown JKM (2007). A gene in European wheat cultivars for resistance to an African isolate of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Plant Pathology 56: 73-78.
Crossref

 

Ayad D, Sayoud R, Benbelkacem K, Bouznad (2014). La tache septorienne du blé : Première signalisation de la présence en Algérie des deux Mating types du téleomorphe Mycosphaerella graminicola (Fuckel) Schröter, (anamorphe : Septoria tritici Rob ex Desm.) et diversité phénotypique de l'agent pathogène. Nature et Technologie. B- Sciences Agronomiques et Biologiques 11:34-45.

 

Benkorteby H, Mekliche L, Bouznad Z (2004). Results of screening greenhouse and in vitro behaviour to evaluate some durum wheat varieties and their F5 descendents selected in Algeria for resistance to Septoria tritici. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences 69(4):403-836.

 

Bentata F, Labhilili M, Merrahi A, Gaboun F, Ibijbijen J, El Aissami A, Amiri S, Boulif M, Jliben M (2011). Determination of the genetic diversity of a population of Septoria tritici on broad wheat via cultural and pathogenic characterization. Revue Marocaine de Protection des Plantes 2:1-10.

 

Berraies S, Gharbi MS, Belzile F, Yahyaoui A, Hajlaou i MR, Trifi M, Jean M, Rezgui S (2013). High genetic diversity of Mycospaherella graminicola (Zymoseptoria tritici) from a single wheat field in Tunisia as revealed by SSR markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 12 (12):1344-1349.

 

Brading PA, Verstappen ECP, Kema GHJ, Brown JKM (2002). A gene-for-gene relationship between wheat and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the Septoria tritici blotch pathogen. Phytopathology 92:439-445.
Crossref

 

Campbell CL, Madden LV (1990). Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology. Wiley-Interscience, NY. 532 p.

 

Chartrain L, Joaquim P, Berry ST, Arraiano LS, Azanza F, Brown JKM (2005). Genetics of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in the Portuguese wheat breeding line TE 9111. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 110:1138-1144.
Crossref

 

Chartrain L, Sourdille P, Bernard M, Brown JKM (2009). Identification and location of Stb9, a gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat cultivars Courtot and Tonic. Plant Pathology 58:547-555.
Crossref

 

Cowger C, Hoffer ME, Mundt CC (2000). Specific adaptation by Mycosphaerella graminicola to a resistant wheat cultivar. Plant Pathology 49:445-451.
Crossref

 

Danon T, Sacks JM, Eyal Z (1982). The relationships among plant stature, maturity class and susceptibility to Septoria leaf blotch of wheat. Phytopathology 72:1037-1042.
Crossref

 

Devale R, Bastard L, Nussbaumer A (2000). Le blé a lui aussi son helminthosporiose. Phytoma 526:17-20.

 

Duncan K, Howard R (2000). Cytological analysis of wheat infection by the leaf blotch pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. Mycological Research 104 (9):1074-1082.
Crossref

 

Eyal Z (1999). The Septoria tritici and Sagonospora nodorum blotch diseases of wheat. European Journal Plant Pathology 105: 629-614.
Crossref

 

Eyal Z, Amiri Z, Wahl I (1973). Physiologic specialization of Septoria tritici. Phytopathology 63: 1087-1091.
Crossref

 

Eyal Z, Scharen AL, Prescott JM, Ginkel VM (1987). The septoria diseases of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. CIMMYT, Mexico. 52 p.

 

Fones H, Gurr S (2015). The impact of Septoria tritici Blotch disease on wheat: An EU perspective. Fungal Genetics and Biology 79: 3-7.
Crossref

 

Goodwin SB (2007). Back to basics and beyond: increasing the level of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat. Australasian Plant Pathology 36: 532-538.
Crossref

 

Grieger A, Lamari L, Brûlé-Babel A (2005). Physiologic variation in Mycosphaerella graminicola from western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 27:71-77.
Crossref

 

Harrat W, Meamiche Neddaf H, Keddad A, Bouznad Z (2017). First report of the Zymoseptoria tritici teleomorph stage causing septoria leaf blotch of wheat in Algeria. New Disease Reports 35:30.
Crossref

 

Kema GHJ, Sayoud R, Annone JG, van Silfhout CH (1996). Genetic variation for virulence and resistance in the wheat - Mycosphaerella graminicola pathosystem II. Analysis of interactions between pathogen isolates and host cultivars. Phytopathology 86: 213-220.
Crossref

 

Kema GHJ, Van Silfhout CH (1997). Genetic variation for virulence and resistance in the wheat - Mycosphaerella graminicola pathosystem III. Comparative seedling and adult plant experiments. Phytopathology 87:266-272.
Crossref

 

Kema GHJ, Verstappen ECP, Waalwijk C (2000). Avirulence in the wheat Septoria tritici leaf blotch fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola is controlled by a single locus. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions Journal 13:1375-1379.
Crossref

 

McCartney CA, Brule-Babel AL, Lamari L (2002). Inheritance ofrace-specific resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola in wheat. Phytopathology 92:138-144.
Crossref

 

Medini M, Hamza S (2008). Pathotype and molecular polymorphism of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Journal of plant pathology 90 (1): 65-73.

 

Ponomarenko A, Goodwinet SB, Kema GHJ (2011). Septoria tritici Blotch (STB) du blé. Plant health instructor.

 

Quaedvlieg W, Kema GHJ, Groenewald JZ, Verkley GJM, Seifbarghi S, Razavi M, Mirzadi Gohari A, Mehrabi R, Crous PW (2011). Zymoseptoria gen. nov.: a new genus to accommodate Septoria-like species occurring on graminicolous hosts. Persoonia 26:57-69.
Crossref

 

Rapilly F, Lemaire JM, Cassini R (1971). Les principales maladies cryptogamiques des céréales. Eds. I.N.R.A, Paris 310 p.

 

Ronny K, Amitava B, Stephan P, Tiffany YH, Rachel BB, Eva HS (2014). Expression Profiling of the Wheat Pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici Reveals Genomic Patterns of Transcription and Host-Specific Regulatory Programs. Genome Biology and Evolution 6 (6):1353-1365.
Crossref

 

Saadaoui EM (1987). Physiologic specialisation of Septoria tritici in Morocco. Plant Disease 71:153-155.
Crossref

 

Saari EE, Prescott JM (1975). A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Disease 59:377-380.

 

Sayoud R, Ezzahiri B, Bouznad Z (1999). Les maladies des céréales et des légumineuses alimentaires au Maghreb. Eds. I.T.G.C., Alger 64 p.

 

Shaner G, Finney RE (1982). Resistance in red soft winter wheat program for the simulation and analysis of diallel crosses. Agron to Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology 72:154-158
Crossref

 

Siah A, Tisserant B, El-Chartouni L, Duyme F, Deweer C, Fichter C, Sanssené J, Durand R, Reignault Ph, Halama P (2008). Frequencies and molecular polymorphism of mating type idiomorphs in a French population of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. 7th International Mycosphaerella and Stagonospora Symposium. Monte Veritá Conference Center, Ascona, Switzerland (August 18-22 2008).

 

Tabib Ghaffary SM, Robert O, Laurent V, Lonnet P, Margalé E, Van Der Lee TAJ, Visser RGF, Kema GHJ (2011). Genetic analysis of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in the French winter wheat cultivars Balance and Apache. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 123(5):741-754.
Crossref

 

Teferi TA, Gebreslassie ZS (2015). Occurrence and intensity of wheat Septoria tritici blotch and host response in Tigray, Ethiopia. Crop Protection 68:67-71.
Crossref

 

Van Ginkel M, Scharen AL (1988). Host-pathogen relationships ofwheat and Septoria tritici. Phytopathology 78:762-766.
Crossref

 

Ware SB (2006). Aspects of sexual reproduction in Mycosphaerella species on wheat and barley: genetic studies on specificity, mapping, and fungicide resistance. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands 190 p.

 

Zahri S, Farih A, Douira A (2013). Statut des principales maladies cryptogamiques foliaires du blé au Maroc en 2013. Journal of Applied Biosciences 77:6543-6549.
Crossref

 

Ziv O, Eyal Z (1978). Assessment of yield component losses caused in plants of spring wheat cultivars by selected isolates of Septaria tritici. Phytopathology 68:791-794.
Crossref

 

Zuckerman E, Eshel A, Eyal Z (1997). Physiological aspects related to tolerance of spring wheat cultivars to Septoria tritici blotch. Phytopathology 87:60-65.
Crossref

 




          */?>