African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6688

Full Length Research Paper

Multivariate analysis of phenotypic variability in Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] genotypes from Ethiopia

Thomas Tsige
  • Thomas Tsige
  • Holetta Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 31, Holetta, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Andagrachew Gedebo
  • Andagrachew Gedebo
  • School of Plant and Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, P. O. Box 05, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Kebebew Assefa
  • Kebebew Assefa
  • Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, P. O. Box 32, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 07 March 2018
  •  Accepted: 26 March 2018
  •  Published: 23 August 2018

 ABSTRACT

Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] is an important food crop in Ethiopia. The present research was conducted to characterize the phenotypic variability of 68 tef genotypes collected from Ethiopia. Where a Bi-replicated 7×10 alpha lattice design was used to evaluate the 70 tef genotypes at Holetta and Debre Zeit Research Centers during 2015. Based on the results of cluster analysis (CA), genotypes were grouped into twelve clusters and twenty nine genotypes formed a single cluster; whereas, nine clusters comprised of five or few genotypes. The first five principal components (PC) with eigenvalue greater than one accounted for 80% of the total genetic variation, height related traits, the diameters of the two basal culm internodes, and number of spikletes and primary branches per main panicle were traits that chiefly contribute for the total variance accounted for by the first PC. The second PC gross variation originated due mainly to variations in yield and yield related traits like grain yield, total biomass, straw yield and harvest index. In addition, genetic distances (D2) which ranged from 326.22 to 25.07 were measured among the 12 clusters. Thus, indicates their chance of giving better genetic recombination and segregation of progenies.

Key words: Cluster analysis, genetic distance, multivariate, principal component, Tef.

 


 INTRODUCTION

Tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) is traditionally grown as a staple cereal crop in Ethiopia and it is produced by more than 6.5 million small scale farmers (CSA, 2015). The grain is ground into flour, which is used to make a pancake-like local bread called "injera" (Ketema, 1997).

The grain is also used to make a local drink. In addition, tef has been used as a forage or pasture crop for cattle in some parts of the world (Assefa et al., 2009). The straw also serves  as  bedding  material,  mulch  and domestic fuel source (Assefa et al., 2001b). Tef is better adapted to excessive or low soil moisture conditions than other cereals and often sown as a rescue crop (Tefera and Ketema, 2001).

Therefore, tef is considered an important food security crop. In Ethiopia, tef shows low productivity, because of the lack of lodging resistant varieties, low yielding varieties under a wide range of cultivation, pest problem, drought and labor intensive  nature  of  cultivation (Assefa et al., 2013). The development of improved tef varieties had been successful (Assefa et al., 2013; MoARD, 2016). The existence of genetic variability is an important factor in the development and selection of improved varieties. Therefore, estimating the genetic variation among landraces will enhance breeding activities (Assefa et al., 2015; Kefyalew et al., 2000). Tef is an ancient crop in Ethiopia and cultivated across a wide range of environments, which can contribute to greater genetic variation. The Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute (EBI) currently holds 6000 tef landraces mostly from altitudes ranging from 800 to 3200 m.a.s.l. (Tesema, 2013). Hence, multivariate analysis is a useful tool for characterization and classification of plant genetic resources evaluated for several pheno-morphic and agronomic traits (Assefa et al., 2003). The present study was conducted to study variability of newly collected local tef genotypes.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was planted during 2015 growing season at Holetta (9°.03’N and 38°30’E) and Debre Zeit (8°44’N and 38°58’ E). Sixty-eight locally collected genotypes along with two checks   genotypes were evaluated in a 7×10 alpha lattice designs with two replications (Table 1). Tef accessions were initially (each contain 50-100 panicles selected from individual plants) collected from farmers’ field within 15 km interval and also sown in separate rows for purification at Debre Zite Agricultural Research Center during the 2013 and 2014 main-cropping seasons and the 2015 off-season.

Genotypes were planted in a plot area of 1 m2 (1 m × 1 m). A spacing of 0.2, 0.5 and 1.5 m were used between rows, plots and replications, respectively. For the seven month (from June to December) growing season, average rainfall, minimum and maximum temperatures of Holetta and Debre Zeit were: 710 mm, 5.6°C, 19.5°C and 73 mm, 18.8°C, 24.9°C, respectively.

 

 

Data collections were made on eighteen traits. Days to heading, days to maturity, days to grain  filling period, lodging index, total biomass (g), grain yield (g), straw yield (g), thousand seed weight (g), and harvest index (HI) where taken on plot base. In contrast, plant height (cm), panicle length (cm), culm length (cm), number of total tillers per plant, number of fertile tillers per plant, number of spikelets per panicle, number of primary branches per main panicle, first basal culm internode diameter (mm), and second basal culm internode diameter (mm) were recorded on five random sample individual plants.

For multivariate analysis, the mean data of the 70 test genotypes for each of the traits were the first pre-standardized to mean zero and variance unity to avoid bias due to differences in measurement scales.

Multivariate statistical analysis methods included cluster analysis (CA) and principal component analysis (PCA) using the MINITAB statistical computer package, version 14.00 (MINITAB, 2003). Points where local peaks of the pseudo F statistic join with small values of the pseudo t2 statistic followed by a larger pseudo t2 for the next cluster fusion were observed to decide the number of clusters (SAS Institute, 2002).

Genetic distance between clusters was computed using the generalized Mahalanobis's D2 statistics formula as suggested in Singh and Chaudhary (1996) and distance analysis was computed using the SAS computer software (SAS Institute, 2002). It was also made based on the mean values for the 18 quantitative traits and 70 tef genotypes over the two locations.

D2p = (Xi-Xj)’ S-1 (Xi-Xj).

where D2p= total generalized distance based on p characters, Xi and Xj are the p mean vectors of 70 test genotypes I and j, respectively, S-1=pooled error variance and co-variance matrix.

The D2 value obtained for pairs of clusters was considered as the calculated value of Chi-square and was tested for significance at 5 and 1% levels of probability against the tabulated values of X2 at ‘q’ degrees of freedom, where q represents the number of traits studied (Fikreselassie, 2012).

 

 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cluster analysis

Using a 73% similarity level, the genotypes formed 12 clusters (C). The number of genotypes in each cluster ranged from 1 to 29 (Figure 1 and Table 2). The largest cluster (C-3) contains different tef germplasm collected from all zones, while C-6 was the second largest cluster and it comprised 14 germplasm accessions of which 13 were from Jimma and Horo Gudru Zones of Oromya, while the remaining tef germplasm lines were from North Wello Zone of Amhara Region. The third big cluster (C-5) constituted the improved variety Quncho (DZ-Cr-387) and other 8 local germplasm accessions of which two (Oro-ACC#8-L13 and Oro-ACC#9-L45) were from Jimma zone and the remaining 6 were equally distributed between North Wello and West Shewa zones of Amhara and Oromya, respectively. Beside those major clusters, each of clusters 7 and 2 comprised 5 and 3 tef germplasm lines, respectively. Regarding their origin, cluster 7 comprised of tef germplasm entirely collected from North Wello and North Shewa Zones of Amhara Region, while those in cluster 2 originated from North Wello Zone of Amhara. In addition, clusters 1, 4 and 9 each comprised two germpalsm accessions, with the former two containing types from North Wello of Amhara and West Shewa of Oromya Region, while the latter one contained accessions collected from Jimma Zone of Oromya. Four of the twelve clusters comprising single genotype including the germplasm accessions Oro-ACC#8-L30 (C- 8), Oro-ACC#4-L18(C-10), Oro-ACC#4-L25) (C-11), and the released variety "Tseday" (C-12). Those unclear patterns of genotypes grouping in respect to their origin could be a result of free exchange of genotypes and the expansion of improved tef varieties.  

In line with the present results, Assefa et al. (1999) categorized 320 tef lines into 14 major complexes consisting of 1 to 183 tef lines. Previous cluster analyses with different sets of tef materials have also demonstrated variable groupings of tef genotypes based on similarity (Assefa et al., 2000, 2001a, 2003).

 

 

 

The cluster mean comparison for the 18 traits evaluated depicted that the first cluster consisted of tef germplasm lines with early panicle emergence and maturity, short grain filling period, thin first and second basal   culm  internodes.  In  contrast,   this   cluster    is characterized by tef materials having high harvest index, lodging index and grain yield. On the other hand, except relatively high values of tiller number (total and fertile) and harvest index, the remaining characters of the genotypes included in the second cluster scored small values (Tables 3 and 4).

 

 

 

However, most quantitative traits of tef germplasm lines measured within C-3, 5, 6 and 10 showed relatively high values. Unlike their common characters, C-3, 5 and 6 contained the largest number tef germplasm lines, while C-10 contained a locally collected single tef germplasm line (Oro-ACC#4-L18). In addition, both C-5 and C-6 showed lower tiller numbers (total and fertile) and lodging index values. On top of this, relatively lower values of harvest index were exhibited by cluster 10. Days to maturity and grain filling period showed the highest mean value in C-7, but the lowest cluster mean values of total biomass and grain yield, lower value of straw yield, lodging index, number of fertile and total tillers were noted for this cluster. Cluster 4 is characterized by tef germplasm lines which have relatively small number of primary panicle branches, high total tiller number, longer grain filling period, late maturity, and high values of total biomass, grain yield and straw yield. The lowest cluster mean values of most traits were noted for C-8, which contained the single tef germplasm line (Oro-ACC#8-L30)  exhibiting the lowest value of height related traits (plant height, panicle length and culm length), basal culm diameters,  number  of  total  tillers,  and   lower   number spikletes per main panicle and number of fertile tillers. On the other hand, these traits scored similarly low values in C-9. Contrary to this, the  highest  mean  grain  yield  and higher total biomass and straw yield means were noted for C-8. Similarly, C-9 holds tef materials which passed higher lodging index but lower total biomass and straw yield mean values.

Cluster 11 which comprised the solitary tef germplasm line Oro-ACC#4-L25, scored the lowest number of primary branches per main panicle and harvest index (Tables 3 and 4). Additionally, this cluster is characterized by tef genotype which had high mean value for height related traits, longer grain filling period and low grain yield. The last cluster (C-12) which contained only the single released variety "Tseday", scored the lowest values in phenological traits (days to maturity and grain filling period) and the highest value in total and fertile tiller numbers. Similarly, higher harvest index value, earliness in panicle emergence, lower total biomass, and straw yield were the characteristics features of this cluster. In addition, this specific character of the tef variety "Tseday" is in agreement with the inherent nature of the variety, because this variety is manly released for use in low moisture stress areas, and it possesses characteristics of earliness in phenological traits to escape terminal drought. Finally, most of tef germplasm lines which included in the two big clusters (3 and 5) had best performance with respect to most important traits under consideration. Those genotypes, therefore, can be recommended for further evaluation.

Inter cluster distances (D2)

Most inter cluster distances showed highly significant (P<0.01) differences, while there were no significant inter-cluster distances between C-3 and C-5 and C-3 and C-6 (Table 5). In addition, the shortest (D2=25.07) inter-cluster D2 values were estimated between C-3 and C-5, while the largest (D2=326.22) was estimated between C-8 and C-10, each of which contain one local tef germplasm line Oro-ACC#8-L3 and Oro-ACC#4-L18, respectively. Similarly, C-8 and C-11 comprised the second most divergent (D2=275.22) groups and in this case Oro- ACC#8-L30 formed far inter-cluster distance with Oro-ACC#4-L25. In addition, the other clusters (C 8 and C 12) which in that order contain the solitary local tef  germplam lines Oro-ACC#8-L30 and the released tef variety "Tseday" constituted the third most divergent (D2=273.28) group, while the fourth most divergent (D2 = 250.08) groups  were  cluster  C-6   which  constituted   local   tef germplasm lines mostly collected from Jimma and Horo Gudru Zones of Oromya region and C-12 containing the released variety "Tseday".

 

 

Overall, the released variety "Tseday" and the locally collected tef germplasm line (Oro-ACC#8-L30) had large genetic distance with most of the other clusters in this experiment. On top of this, the high inter-cluster distances noted among different clusters may result from locations in which those tef germplasms were collected and different genetic background of those tef materials (released vs. local tef germplasm lines). Generally, a wide generalized squared distance (D2) serves as a better indicator for selecting crossing materials. Consequently, most divergent clusters noted in this study are expected to give maximum genetic recombination and genetic variation in the subsequent segregating generations.

Principal components analysis

The first five principal components (PCs) having a minimum eigenvalue of one accounting for 80% of the total variability observed among the 70 tef test genotypes (Table 6). Of these, the first PC alone explained about 40% of the total variance mainly due to the variations in height related traits (that is, plant height, panicle length, and culm length), first and second basal culm internode diameters, and number of spiklets and  primary  branches per main panicle. On the other hand, even if relatively lower percent variation was explained by PC 1 in the studies of Assefa et al. (1999, 2000, 2001a, b), most of the traits responsible for variation in PC 1 showed similarity with the current study. In addition, another experiment of Assefa et al. (2003) with seventeen traits of 60 tef germplasm population showed similarity in both percent variation explained, and the traits contributing to the variation in PC 1. However, the first PC in the studies of Adnew et al. (2005) and Jifar et al. (2015) explained relatively high proportion of the variation than that in this study.

Unlike, the first PC, most yield related traits like grain yield, total biomass, straw yield, harvest index and lodging index contributed to about 16% of the gross variation accounted for by the second PC (Table 6). This is line with results of the second PC of Assefa et al. (2000). However, slightly larger variability was reported by Assefa (1999, 2001b, 2003) in other studies, whereas Assefa et al. (2001a) and Adnew et al. (2005) reported that the second PC, respectively explained 7.1% more and 5.6% less variability than that in the current study. Furthermore, about 9, 8 and 6% of the total genotype variance was explained on the basis of the third, fourth and fifth PCs, respectively (Table 6). The former was largely due to the variations in phenological traits (that is, days to maturity and grain filling period), lodging index and number of primary panicle branches, whereas, number  of  total  and   fertile   tillers   were   the   primary contributors to the variation explained by PC4. Likewise, the contribution of PC5 resulted chiefly from variations in characters like thousand seed weight, days to heading, harvest index, lodging index, and straw yield.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 CONCLUSION

The grouping of tef genotypes into twelve clusters at 73% similarity level confirmed the existence of important trait variability among tef genotypes that could be recommended for further evaluation and regarding conservation of the indigenous tef genetic resources in Ethiopia, unclear patterns of genotypes grouping in respect to their origin in this experiment showed the importance to address each tef growing zones of the country. Height related traits (that is plant height, panicle length and culm length), first and second basal culm internode diameters and number of spiklets and primary branches per main panicle contributed more for the 40% variation explained by the first PC. In addition, most of tef germplasm lines which were included in the two big clusters (3 and 5) had best performance with regard to most important traits under consideration. Moreover, the higher mean values of most yield related traits of Oro-ACC#8-L30 (C-8) and earliness in maturity, higher tiller number and harvest index of "Tseday"(C-12), in line with their large genetic distance with most of the other clusters could make them source of elite materials for future use.

 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.

 


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research for financing the study. Secondly, their deepest appreciation goes to tef research staffs of Holetta and Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center for technical assistance.

 



 REFERENCES

Adnew T, Ketema S, Tefera H, Sridhara H (2005). Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostistef (Zucc.) Trotter] germplasm Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52:891-902.
Crossref

 

Assefa K, Tefera H, Merker A, Kefyalew T, Hundera F (2001a). Quantitative trait diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] germplasm from Central and Northern Ethiopia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48:53-61.
Crossref

 

Assefa K, Belay G, Tefera H, Yu JK, Sorrells ME (2009). Breeding tef: conventional and molecular approaches. In: Tadele (ed.) 19-21 September 2007. New Approaches to Plant Breeding of Orphan Crops in Africa; Proceedings of an International Conference, Bern, Switzerland pp. 21-42.

 

Assefa K, Cannarozzi G, Girma D, Kamies R, Chanyalew S, Plaza-Wüthrich S, Blösch R, Rindisbacher A, Rafudeen S, Tadele Z (2015). Genetic diversity in tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter Frontiers in Plant Science, 6(177):1-13.
Crossref

 

Assefa K, Chanyalew S, Metaferia G (2013). Conventional and Molecular Tef Breeding, In: Assefa et al., (eds.) 7-9, November 2011. Achievements and Prospects of Tef Improvement; Proceedings of the Second International Workshop. Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, pp. 33-51.

 

Assefa K, Ketema S, Tefera H, Kefyalew T, Hundera F (2000). Trait diversity, heritability and genetic advance in selected germplasm lines of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Hereditas 133:29-37.
Crossref

 

Assefa K, Merker A, Tefera H (2003). Multivariate analysis of diversity of tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter) germplasm from western and southern Ethiopia. Hereditas 138:228-236.
Crossref

 

Assefa K, Tefera H, Merker A, Kefyalew T, Hundera F (2001b). Variability, heritability and genetic advance in pheno-morphic and agronomic traits of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] germplasm from eight regions of Ethiopia. Hereditas 134:103-113.
Crossref

 

Assefa K, Ketema S, Tefera H, Nguyen HT, Blum A, Ayele M, Bai G, Simane B, Kefyalew T (1999). Diversity among germplasm lines of the Ethiopian cereal tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Euphytica 106:87-97.
Crossref

 

Central Statistics Agency (CSA) (2015). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Agricultural Sample Survey 2015/16 (2008 E.C.). Report on Area and Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher season). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Statistical Bulletin 1:584.

 

Fikreselassie M (2012). Variability, heritability and association of some morpho-agronomic traits in field pea (Psium sativum L.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 15(8):358-366.
Crossref

 

Jifar H, Assefa K, Tadele Z (2015). Grain yield variation and association of major traits in brown-seeded genotypes of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Agriculture and Food Security 4(7):1-9.

 

Kefyalew T, Tefera H, Assefa K, Ayele M (2000). Phenotypic diversity for qualitative and phenologic characters in germplasm collections of tef (Eragrostistef). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47:73-80.
Crossref

 

Ketema S (1997). Tef Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilised and Neglected Crops. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben (International Plant Genetic Resources Institute), Rome, Italy P. 12.

 

MINITAB (2003). Minitab Statistical Software, Version 14 MINITAB Inc. 

View

 

MoARD (2016). Ministry of Agriculture, Plant Variety Release, Protection, and Seed Quality Control Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Crop Variety Register No.17.

 

SAS Institute (2002). Proprietary Software version 9.00, Cary, NC, USA.

 

Singh RK, Chaudhury BD (1996). Biometrical Method in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani, Ludhiana. 

View

 

Tefera H, Ketema S (2001). Production and importance of tef in Ethiopian agriculture. In: Tefera et al., (eds.) 16-19 October 2000. Narrowing the Rift: Tef Research and Development; Proceedings of the International Workshop on Tef Genetics and Improvement, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia pp. 3-7.

 

Tesema A (2013). Genetic Resources of Tef in Ethiopia, In: Assefa et (eds.) 7-9 November 2011. Achievements and Prospects of Tef Improvement; Proceedings of the Second International Workshop, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia pp. 15-20.

 




          */?>