African Journal of
Biotechnology

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Biotechnol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1684-5315
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJB
  • Start Year: 2002
  • Published Articles: 12479

Review

Trichoderma as biological control weapon against soil borne plant pathogens

Khalid S. Abdel-lateif
  • Khalid S. Abdel-lateif
  • Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Menoufia University, Egypt.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 04 October 2017
  •  Accepted: 14 November 2017
  •  Published: 13 December 2017

 ABSTRACT

The genus of Trichoderma is widely applied for the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi in agriculture sector. Moreover, Trichoderma species are also excessively exploited in different industrial purposes due to their production of important lytic enzymes such as chitinases, glucanases and proteases. Several genetic improvement trials are carried out for maximizing the role of Trichoderma as biological control agents via mutation, protoplast fusion, and genetic transformation. This review highlights the mode of action of Trichoderma against pathogenic fungi, potential applications in different fields of life, and the recent genetic improvement trials for increasing the antagonistic abilities of this fungus as biological control agent.
 
Key words: Trichoderma, antagonism, lytic enzymes, genetic improvement.


 INTRODUCTION

Farmers around the world need the chemical pesticides to control the plant disease pathogens in order to maintain the quality and redundancy of agricultural products (Junaid et al., 2013). It was estimated that 37% of crop loss is due to pests, of which 12% is due to pathogens (Sharma et al., 2012). On the contrast, the excessive and the misuse of pesticides over the past decades caused environmental pollution and several health problems in addition to their expensive costs for developing countries. Moreover, the long term use of chemical pesticides can lead to development of certain resistant organisms (Naher et al., 2014). Recently, the world attention resort to find sustainable, safe and ecofriendly alternatives. Biological control agents (BCA) refer to the utilization of some living microorganisms to suppress the growth of plant pathogens (Pal and Gardener, 2006).
 
In other words, biological control means the use of beneficial organisms, their genes, and/or products to reduce or suppress the negative effects of plant pathogens (Junaid et al., 2013). Currently, several biocontrol agents have been recognized and are available as bacterial agents for example Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Agrobacterinum and as fungal agents such as Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Gliocladium, Ampelomyces, Candida, and Coniothyrium (Naher et al., 2014). Trichoderma is one of the famous filamentous fungi widely distributed in the soil, plant material, decaying vegetation, and wood (Gajera et al., 2013). The Trichoderma genus are related to the order of Hypocreales, family of Hypocreaceae and the genus have more than 100 phylogenetically defined species (Kumar, 2013). Among the common species of Trichoderma are Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma koningii, Trichoderma longibrachiatum, Trichoderma pseudokoningii, Trichoderma viren, and Trichoderma viride.
 
Trichoderma is considered an excellent biocontrol agent model due its high ability to multiply, spread, easy to isolate and culture (Pandya et al., 2011). Trichoderma strains can act as biocontrol agents against fungal phytopathogens such as Phythium, Phytophthora, Botrytis, Rhizoctonia, and Fusarium through several mechanisms including competition for nutrients and space, antibiosis and induction of plant defensive mechanisms and mycoparasitism (Benítez et al., 2004). It was shown that Trichoderma can use one or more of these mechanisms according to type of fungus and the environmental conditions such as temperature, pH, and nutrient concentrations (Gajera et al., 2013). Recently, the number of products based on Trichoderma found in the international market is increasing with more than 250 products (Woo et al., 2014). This review highlights the different mechanisms of Trichoderma as biological control agents and the genetic tools to improve these activities.
 
HISTORY OF TRICHODERMA
 
The first description of Trichoderma as a fungus was by Persoon in 1794 who described this fungus as appearing like mealy powder enclosed by a hairy covering. It was reported that the genus of Trichoderma contain only one species, namely T. viride (Bisby, 1939). Then Rifai (1969) distinguished nine species using the analysis of morphological characteristics: T. harzianum Rifai, T. viride, Trichoderma hamatum (Bonord.) Bainier, T. koningii (Oudem.) Duché & R. Heim, Trichoderma polysporum (Link) Rifai, Trichoderma piluliferum J. Webster & Rifai, Trichoderma aureoviride Rifai, T. longibrachiatum Rifai, and Trichoderma pseudokoningii Rifai (BÅ‚aszczyk et al., 2014). Recently, 104 species of Trichoderma have been registered internationally (Pandya, 2011). It must be mentioned that Weindling (1932) referred for the first time the importance of Trichoderma as bioagents.
 
TRICHODERMA BIOCONTROL MECHANISMS
 
Competition
 
Since Trichoderma strains grow rapidly in the soil due to their natural resistance to many toxic compounds, including herbicides, fungicides, and pesticides; this gave it a superior ability to colonize, take up soil nutrients, and therefore starvation of other organisms from nutrition (Chet et al., 1997; Benítez et al., 2004). Competition for space and for nutrients such as carbon and nitrogen is an important feature of Trichoderma antagonism (Vinale et al., 2008). Sivan and Chet (1989) demonstrated that competition for nutrients is the major mechanism used by T. harzianum to control Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis. It is well known that iron uptake is essential factor for viability of pathogen in soil, so that some Trichoderma strains produce highly efficient siderophores to chelate iron and stop the growth of other fungi (Chet and Inbar, 1994). Furthermore, the ability of Trichoderma to obtain ATP from the metabolism of several substrates such as cellulose and glucan give it a competitive advantage than the other pathogens. Ferre and Santamarina (2010) showed that colonies of T. harzianum inhibited the growth of Fusarium culmorum strains in different environmental conditions and the macroscopic analysis of the petri plates revealed that T. harzianum competed F. culmorum for space and nutrients.
 
Mycoparasitism
 
Mycoparasitism is a very complex process in which Trichoderma recognizes signals from the host fungus, coils around host hyphae and host penetration. The lytic enzymes of Trichoderma such as chitinases, glucanases and proteases degrade the host cell wall and kill them (Sharma et al., 2012). It well known that the cell wall of Pythium species is composed of cellulose (Figure 1), while chitin is the main structural component of Rhizoctonia solani cell walls (Bartinicki-Garcia, 1968; Farkas, 1990; Sivan and Chet, 1989). Moreover, Trichoderma are good producer of chitinases that hydrolyze the glycosidic bonds between the N-acetyl glucosamine residues of chitin (Agrawal and Kotasthane, 2012); also, cellulases which hydrolyse β-1,4 glucans (Nevalainen and Penttilä, 1995) and these enzymes are among the most effective weapons for plant diseases biological control. It was shown that Trichoderma species are the most common mycoparasitic and saprophytic fungi that have high ability for colonization and attack a great variety of phytopathogenic fungi respon­sible for important diseases of major economic crops worldwide (El-Hassan et al., 2012). Howell (2003) obtained transformants of T. harzianum T3 that produce a variety of cellulases, which make this isolate very effective in the control of Pythium ultimum on cucumber seedling than the wild type. Furthermore, Limon et al. (1999) obtained transformants of T. harzianum strain CECT 2413 that overexpressed chitinase (chit33) and these transformants were more effective in inhibiting the growth of R. solani as compared to the wild type.
 
 
Antibiosis
 
Trichoderma can produce low molecular weight diffusible compounds or antibiotics that inhibit the growth of other microorganisms. There are several metabolites or antibiotics secreted from Trichoderma against their pathogens such as: harzianic acid, tricholin, peptaibols, 6-penthyl-α-pyrone, viridin, gliovirin, glisoprenins, and heptelidic acid (Gajera et al., 2013). Peptaibols are a large family of antibiotic peptides and Trichoderma can synthesize more than 190 of these compounds. Trichokonin VI (TK VI) of T. pseudokoningii is one of the peptaibols that can induce an extensive apoptotic programmed cell death in plant fungal pathogens such as F. oxysporum (Shi et al., 2012). Sadykova et al. (2015) tested the antibiotic activity in 42 strains of 8 species of the Trichoderma genus (Trichoderma asperellum, T. viride, T. hamatum, T. koningii, T. atroviride, T. harzianum, T. Citrinoviride, and T. longibrachiatum) isolated from Siberian. It was shown that these species differ in the degree of their antibacterial and antifungal activity and the strain T. citrinoviride TV41, exhibited high activity and a wide range of actions against the pathogenic fungi of the Aspergillus and Candida albicans genus and bacteria, including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
 
The authors expected that peptaibols are probably the most active compounds in the strain culture extracts according to mass and IR spectrometry data. Vinale et al. (2014) showed that the pyrone 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one is a metabolite purified from the culture filtrate of different Trichoderma spp. (T. viride, T. atroviride, T. harzianum and T. koningii) and has shown both in vivo and in vitro antifungal activities towards several plant pathogenic fungi. In addition, Ghisalberti et al. (1990) demonstrated that the biocontrol efficacy of T. harzianum isolates against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici is related to the production of pyrone-like antibiotics. Furthermore, Howell (1999) reported that strains of Trichoderma virens (P group) produce the antibiotic gliovirin which is very active against P. ultimum, while the Q group of these strains can produce gliotoxin, which is very active against R. solani.
 
Induction of plant growth and defense
 
Trichoderma spp. are well-known for their ability to promote plant growth and defense. Trichoderma can increase root development, shoot length, leaf area and therefore crop yield via colonization of plant roots, proliferation of secondary roots and solubilizing several nutrients as P and Fe to plants (Hermosa et al., 2012). The previous studies showed that Trichoderma can produce gluconic and citric acids that decrease the soil pH, enhance the solubilization of phosphates, micronutrients, and mineral components such as iron, magnesium, and manganese (Benitez et al., 2004; Harman et al., 2004b; Vinale et al., 2008). It was noted that the bean plants treated with T. harzianum T019 always had an increased size respect to control. In addition, this strain induced the expression of plant defense-related genes and produced a higher level of ergosterol, indicating its positive effects on plant growth and defense in the presence of the pathogen (Mayo et al., 2015).
 
 
Moreover, the roots of maize plants treated with T. harzianum strain T-22 were about twice as long compared to untreated plants after several months from treatment (Harman, 2004a). Saravanakumar et al. (2016) showed that Trichoderma cellulase complexes trigger the induced systematic resistance (ISR) against Curvularia leaf spot in maize by increasing the expression of genes related to the jasmonate/ethylene signaling pathways. Furthermore, Rao et al. (2015) suggested that treatment of legume seeds (Cajanus cajan, Vigna radiate and Vigna mungo) with T. viride induces systemic resistance by reprogramming defense mechanisms in these legumes. Reprogramming alleviated the levels of defense enzymes (PO, PPO and PAL), ROS (O2•-, H2O2, OH•), antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD), scavenging activity of antioxidant enzymes in response to oxidative stress induced by F. oxysporum and Alternaria alternata. This mechanism helps in developing resistance in plants and therefore protect from pathogens. Trichoderma metabolites may also increase disease resistance by triggering systemic plant defence activity and/or enhance root and shoot growth (Vinale et al., 2014).
 


 OTHER APPLICATIONS OF TRICHODERMA

In addition to their important roles as biocontrol agents, plant growth promoter and defense, there are some other applications for Trichoderma in different fields as shown in Figure 2.

 

 

Bioremediation of contaminated soils
 
Trichoderma strains play an important role in the bioremediation of soil contaminated with pesticides and herbicides as consequence of their high abilities to degrade a wide range of insecticides: organochlorines, organophosphates, and carbonates (Kumar, 2013). Moreover, since Trichoderma is a potent producer of hydrolytic and industrially important enzymes, like cellulases and chitinases, this make Trichoderma spp. highly resistant to a wide range of toxicants, heavy metals, tannery effluents, and harmful chemicals like cyanide (Hasan, 2016). The above advantages make them an ideal fungal genus in bioremediation of toxic pollutants. Previous studies showed that Trichoderma spp. can remove and accumulate the various heavy metals such as copper, zinc, cadmium, and arsenic through sorption and biovolatilization (Yazdani et al., 2009; Srivastava et al., 2011; Zeng et al., 2010).
 
Teng et al. (2015) showed that T. reesei FS10-C enhances the phytoremediation ability of Cd-contaminated soil by the hyper accumulator Sedum plumbizincicola and also increases soil fertility. Moreover, it was reported that each T. virens PDR-28 and T. pseudokoningii increased the dry biomass and Cd accumulation of maize and pearl millet, respectively as compared to the control (Babu et al., 2014; Bareen et al., 2012). Furthermore, Arfarita et al. (2013) reported that the isolate of T. viride strain FRP3 was able to grow in culture medium containing the herbicide glyphosate as the sole phosphorus source. This was coupled with a decrease in the total phosphorus concentration, indicating that the strain may perhaps possess mechanisms for degradation of glyphosate.
 
Foods and textiles industries
 
The Trichoderma lytic enzymes such as cellulases, hemicellulases, and pectinases are used as food additives in the production of fruit and vegetable juices and also to improve wine flavor and enhance fermentation, filtration, and quality of beer (BÅ‚aszczyk et al., 2014). Cellulases produced by Trichoderma are applied also in the textile industry to soften and condition the textiles as well as to produce high quality washing powders. In addition, these enzymes are used in the pulp and paper industry to modify fiber properties and to reduce lignin contents. In parallel, cellulases and hemicellulases produced by T. reesei are used in the production of bioethanol from farm wastes via degradation of substrates to simple sugars and then converted them to chemical intermediates such as ethanol (BÅ‚aszczyk et al., 2014). It must be mentioned that production of xylanase, cellulase and pectinases of Trichoderma account for 20% of the world enzyme market (Polizeli et al., 2005). In the food industry, xylanase enzymes help to break down polysaccharides in the dough of cookies, cakes, and aids in the digestibility of wheat by poultry by decreasing the viscosity of the feed (Harris and Ramalingam, 2010).
 
Trichoderma genes as source of plant resistance
 
Trichoderma genes involved in pathogen cell wall degradation, such as chitinases and glucanases can be excellent sources for improving plant resistance against fungal pathogens. lorito et al. (1998) transferred the gene encoding a strongly antifungal endochitinase from the mycoparasitic fungus T. harzianum to tobacco and potato. High expression levels of the fungal gene were obtained in different plant tissues and this was linked with high resistance to the foliar pathogens Alternaria alternata, A. solani, Botrytis cinerea, and R. solani. Similarly, a chi gene from T. asperellum, designated Tachi, was cloned and transferred to soybean. Transgenic soybean plants with constitutive expression of Tachi showed increased resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum compared to wild type plants. The overexpression of Tachi in soybean increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) level and each of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (SOD) activities.
 
These results suggest that Tachi can improve disease resistance in plants by enhancing ROS accumulation and induction activities of ROS scavenging enzymes (Zhang et al., 2016). Moreover, Dana et al. (2006) generated transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) lines that overexpress the endochitinases CHIT33 and CHIT42 from the mycoparasitic fungus T. harzianum and evaluated their tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. The transformed plants with CHIT33 and CHIT42 exhibited broad resistance to fungal and bacterial pathogens, salinity, and heavy metals with no obvious effects on their growth. Furthermore, the endochitinase gene (Chit33-cDNA) of T. atroviride was overexpressed under the CaMV35S constitutive promoter in canola via Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation. It was reported that lesion sizes of transgenic canola caused by S. sclerotiorum were significantly retarded when compared with non-transgenic canola plants (Solgi et al., 2015).


 TOOLS FOR GENETIC IMPROVEMENT OF TRICHODERMA

Several genetic improvement trials are carried for maximizing the benefits of Trichoderma as biological control agents and in different industrial purposes. Recently, the genetic improvement of Trichoderma genus has entered a new era with the sequencing of T. reesei, T. atroviride, and T. virens genomes (Seidl and Seiboth, 2010; Mukherjee, 2011). The results indicated that the smallest genome size (34 Mb) was found in T. reesei, while the largest genome (38.8 Mb) was recorded for T. virens (Mukherjee, 2011). Here, some of the genetic tools used for improving the biocontrol activity of Trichoderma against soil borne pathogens were highlighted.
 
Mutation
 
Mutagenesis is an excellent tools for developing Trichoderma mutants with enhanced secreted enzymes yields as compared to the parent strains (Seidl and Seiboth, 2010; Singh et al., 2016). Khandoker et al. (2013) employed ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and Ethidium bromide (EtBr) treatments to improve the production of cellulases from T. viride. The mutants of T. viride treated with UV and EtBr gave the highest cellulase activity with 11.28 and 14.61 U/ml, respectively as compared to 5.52 U/ml for the parent strain. In addition, Abbasi et al. (2014) used gamma rays for obtaining mutants of T. harzianum with maximum growth inhibition against Macrophomina phaseolina. It was found that the charcoal rot disease of melon reduced with 28% in the treated plants with Trichoderma mutants as compared to control. Moreover, N_methyl-N_nitro-N_guanidine (NTG) was used as mutagen for enhancing the antagonistic abilities of T. harzianum-1432 and T. atroviride against Sclerotium rolfsii, the causal agent of chickpea collar rot (Rashmi et al., 2016). The antagonistic capability of T. harzianum against M. phaseolina, A. flavus and A. parasiticus as pathogens was improved after exposure to UV-irradiation. Some mutants of T. harzianum released higher level of lytic enzymes, chitinases and cellulases (Singh et al., 2010; Patil and lunge, 2012; Walunj and John, 2015). Finally, γ-radiation induced mutants of T. viride with high ability to restrict M. phaseolina (Baharvand et al., 2014).
 
Protoplast fusion
 
Protoplast fusion is an important improvement tool for developing hybrid strains and improving the biocontrol potential of Trichoderma where the sexual cycle is difficult (Kowsari et al., 2014). Kowsari et al. (2014a) obtained some of T. harizianum fusants that expressed 1.5 fold of chit42 transcript and exhibited a higher growth inhibition rate against R. solani than the parent strain. Moreover, Balasubramanian et al. (2012) carried out protoplast fusion between T. harzianum and T. viride. The Trichoderma HF9 fusant exhibited 3, 2.5 and 1.5-fold increase of total chitinase, specific chitinase and protein, respectively as compared with parent strains. Similarly, Mohamed and Haggag (2010) obtained fusants between T. koningii and T. reesei and most of these fusants showed superiority in their antagonistic activity against fungal pathogens which cause root-rot and damping-off diseases than their parental strains. Furthermore,Prabavathy et al. (2006) carried out self-fusion of T. harzianum strain PTh18 protoplasts and among the fusants, the strain SFTh8 produced maximum chitinase with a two-fold increase as compared to the parent strain. All the self-fusants exhibited high antagonistic activity against R. solani than the parent.
 
Genetic engineering
 
The huge progress in DNA sequencing techniques and comparative genomics analysis of different organisms has provided large lists of genes and their functions. Modification of Trichoderma genome by directly manipulating the DNA sequence of specific genes is considered modern and efficient tool to obtain strains with desired traits. Giczey et al. (1998) cloned a 42-kDa endochitinase encoding gene, Tham-ch from T. hamatum strain Tam-61. The Tham-ch with its own regulatory sequences was reintroduced into the host strain. Most of the transformants expressed higher levels of chitinase activity with 5-fold in comparison with the wild-type recipient strain. Moreover, Mendoza et al. (2003) cloned a mitogen-activated protein kinase encoding gene, tvk1, from T. virens and examined its role during the mycoparasitism, conidiation, and biocontrol in tvk1 null mutants.
 
The null mutants displayed an increased protein secretion of lytic enzymes in culture supernatant compared to the wild type. Consistently, biocontrol assays demonstrated that the null mutants were considerably more effective in disease control than the wild-type strain or a chemical fungicide. These data suggest that Tvk1 acts as a negative modulator during host sensing and sporulation in T. virens. A chimeric chitinase with improved enzyme activity was produced by fusing a ChBD from T. atroviride chitinase 18 to 10 with Chit42 (Kowsari et al., 2014b). The Chit42-ChBD transformants showed higher antifungal activity towards seven phytopathogenic fungal species suggesting that ChBD provides a strong binding capacity to insoluble chitin. In parallel, T. atroviride was transformed with Aspergillus niger glucose oxidase-encoding gene, goxA, under a homologous chitinase (nag1) promoter (Brunner et al., 2005). The transgenic strain was more quickly overgrown and lysed the plant pathogens R. solani and P. ultimum than control.


 CONCLUSION

The genus of Trichoderma are widely used in agriculture and industry sectors due to its production of important lytic enzymes such as chitinases, glucanases, and proteases. Several genetic improvement trials are carried out for maximizing the role of Trichoderma as biological control agents via mutation, protoplast fusion and genetic transformation. Additional efforts must be done for isolation of new strains with high antagonistic abilities and more violent against soil borne plant pathogens as a safe alternative than pesticides. 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The author has not declared any conflict of interest.



 REFERENCES

Abbasi S, Safaie N, Shamsbakhsh M (2014). Evaluation of gamma-induced mutants of Trichoderma harzianum for biological control of charcoal rot of melon (Macrophomina phaseolina) in laboratory and greenhouse conditions. J. Crop. Prot. 3 (4):509-521.
 

Agrawal T, Kotasthane AS (2012). Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. Springerplus. 1:73.
Crossref

  
 

Arfarita N, Imai T, Kanno A, Yarimizu T, Xiaofeng S, Jie W, et al (2013). The Potential use of Trichoderma Viride Strain FRP3 in Biodegradation of the Herbicid Glyphosate. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 27:3518-3521.
Crossref

  
 

Babu AG, Shim J, Bang KS, Shea PJ, Oh BT (2014). Trichoderma virens PDR-28: a heavy metal-tolerant and plant growth- promoting fungus for remediation and bioenergy crop production on mine tailing soil. J. Environ. Manage. 132:129-134.
Crossref

  
 

Baharvand A, Shahbazi S, Afsharmanesh H, Ebrahimi MA, Askari H (2014). Investigation of gamma irradiation on morphological characteristics and antagonist potential of Trichoderma viride against M.phaseolina. Intl. J. Farm. Alli. Sci. 3(11):1157-1164.

  
 

Balasubramanian N, Priya VT, Gomathinayagam S, Lalithakumari D (2012). Fusant Trichoderma HF9 with Enhanced Extracellular Chitinase and Protein Content. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 48:409-415.
Crossref

  
 

Bareen FE, Shafiq M, Jamil S (2012). Role of plant growth regulators and a saprobic fungus in enhancement of metal phytoextraction potential and stress alleviation in pearl millet. J. Hazard. Mater. 237-238:186-193.
Crossref

  
 

Bartinicki-Garcia S (1968). Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis and taxonomy of fungi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 22:87-109.
Crossref

  
 

Benítez T, Rincón AM, Limón MC, Codón AC (2004). Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol. 7:249-260

  
 

Bisby GR (1939). Trichoderma viride Pers. ex Fries and notes on Hypocrea. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 23(2):149-168.
Crossref

  
 

Błaszczyk L, Siwulski M, Sobieralski K, Lisiecka J, Jędryczka M (2014). Trichoderma spp. application and prospects for use in organic farming and industry. J. Plant. Protect. Res. 54(4).
Crossref

  
 

Brunner K, Zeilinger S, Ciliento R, Woo SL, Lorito M, Kubicek CP, et al. (2005). Improvement of the Fungal Biocontrol Agent Trichoderma atroviride To Enhance both Antagonism and Induction of Plant Systemic Disease Resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:3959-3965.
Crossref

  
 

Chet I, Inbar J (1994). Biological control of fungal pathogens. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 48:37-43.
Crossref

  
 

Chet I, Inbar J, Hadar I (1997). Fungal antagonists and mycoparasites. In: Wicklow DT, Söderström B (eds) The Mycota IV: Environmental and microbial relationships. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 165-184.

  
 

Dana MM, Pintor-Toro JA, Cubero B (2006). Transgenic Tobacco Plants Overexpressing Chitinases of Fungal Origin Show Enhanced Resistance to Biotic and Abiotic Stress Agents. Plant. Physiol. 142:722-730.
Crossref

  
 

El-Hassan SA, Gowen SR, Barbara Pembroke (2013). Use of Trichoderma hamatum for biocontrol of lentil vascular wilt disease: efficacy, mechanisms of interaction and future prospects. J. Plant. Prot. Res. 53(1).
Crossref

  
 

Farkas V (1990). Fungal cell walls: their structure, biosynthsis and biotechnological aspects . Acta. Biotechnol. 10:225-238.
Crossref

  
 

Ferre FS, MP Santamarina (2010). Efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum in suppression of Fusarium culmorum. Ann. Microbiol. 60:335-340.
Crossref

  
 

Gajera H, Domadiya R, Patel S, Kapopara M, Golakiya B (2013). Molecular mechanism of Trichoderma as bio-control agents against phytopathogen system. Curr. Res. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1(4):133-142

  
 

Ghisalberti EL, Narbey MJ, Dewan MM, Sivasithamparam K (1990). Variability among strains of Trichoderma harzianum in their ability to reduce take-all and to produce pyrones. Plant. Soil. 121:287-291.
Crossref

  
 

Giczey G, KereËnyi Z, Dallmann G, ËHornok L (1998). Homologous transformation of Trichoderma hamatum with an endochitinase encoding gene, resulting in increased levels of chitinase activity. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 165:247-252.
Crossref

  
 

Harmam GE, Petzoldt R, Comis A, Chen J (2004a). Interactions Between Trichoderma harzianum Strain T22 and Maize Inbred Line Mo17 and Effects of These Interactions on Diseases Caused by Pythium ultimum and Colletotrichum graminicola. Phytopathology 94:147-153.
Crossref

  
 

Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M (2004b). Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2(1):43-56.
Crossref

  
 

Harris AD, Ramalingam C (2010). Xylanases and its Application in Food Industry. J. Exp. Sci. 1(7):01-11.

  
 

Hasan S (2016). Potential of Trichoderma sp. In Bioremediation: A Review. J. Basic. Appl. Eng. Res. 776-779.

  
 

Hermosa R, Viterbo A, Chet I, Monte E (2012). Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 158:17-25.
Crossref

  
 

Howell CR (1999). Selective isolation from soil and separation in vitro of P and Q strains of Trichoderma virens with differential media. Mycologia 91:930-4.
Crossref

  
 

Howell CR (2003). Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts. Plant. Dis. 87:4-10.
Crossref

  
 

Junaid JM, Dar NA, Bhat TA, Bhat AH, Bhat MA (2013). Commercial Biocontrol Agents and Their Mechanism of Action in the Management of Plant Pathogens. Int. J. Mod. Plant. Anim. Sci. 1(2):39-57.

  
 

Khandoker N, Al Mamun A, Nafiz TN, Khan SN, Hoq MM (2013). Strain Improvement of Trichoderma Viride through Mutation for Enhanced Production of Cellulase. Bangladesh. J. Microbiol. 30:43-47.
Crossref

  
 

Kowsari M, Motallebi M, Zamani RM (2014a). Construction of new GFP-tagged fusants for Trichoderma harzianum with enhanced biocontrol activit. J. Plant. Protect. Res. 54(2).
Crossref

  
 

Kowsari M, Motallebi M, Zamani M (2014b). Protein Engineering of Chit42 Towards Improvement of Chitinase and Antifungal Activities. Curr. Microbiol. 68:495-502.
Crossref

  
 

Kumar S (2013). Trichoderma: a biological weapon for managing plant diseases and promoting sustainability. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. 106-121.

  
 

Limon MC, Pintor-Toro JA, Benítez T (1999). Increased antifungal activity of Trichoderma harzianum transformants that overexpress a 33- kDa chitinase, Phytopathology 89:254-261.
Crossref

  
 

Lorito M, Woo SL, Fernandez IG, Coluccii G, Harman GE, Pintor-toro JA, Filipponei E, Muccifora S, Lawrence CB, et al. (1998). Genes from mycoparasitic fungi as a source for improving plant resistance to fungal pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95:7860-7865.
Crossref

  
 

Mayo S, Gutiérrez S, Malmierca MG, Lorenzana A, Campelo MP, Hermosa R, et al (2015) Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 6:685.
Crossref

  
 

Mendoza-Mendoza A, Pozo MJ, Grzegorski D, Martınez P, Garcıa JM, Olmedo-Monfil V, Cortes C, Kenerley C, Herrera-Estrella A (2003) Enhanced biocontrol activity of Trichoderma through inactivation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase. PNAS. 100(26):15965-15970.
Crossref

  
 

Mohamed HAA, Haggag WM (2010). Mutagenesis and inter-specific protoplast fusion between Trichoderma koningii and Trichoderma reesei for biocontrol improvement. Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1(3):504-515.
Crossref

  
 

Mukherjee PK (2011) Genomics of biological control – whole genome sequencing of two mycoparasitic Trichoderma spp. Curr. Sci. 101(3):268

  
 

Naher L, Yusuf U, Ismail A, Hossain k (2014). Trichoderma SPP: A biocontrol agent for sustainable management of plant diseases. Pak. J. Bot. 46(4):1489-1493.

  
 

Nevalainen H, Penttilä M (1995). Molecular biology of cellulolytic fungi. In: The Mycota II. Genetics and Biotechnolog. Edt. U. Kuck. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 303-319.
Crossref

  
 

Pal KK, Gardener BM (2006). Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. The Plant Health Instructor, Pandya JR, Sabalpara AN, Chawda SK (2011). Trichoderma: a particular weapon for biological control of Phytopathogens. J. Agric. Technol. 7(5):1187-1191.

  
 

Patil AS, Lunge AG (2012). Strain improvement of Trichoderma

  
 

harzianum by UV mutagenesis for enhancing its biocontrol potential against aflotoxigenic Aspergillus species. Experiment 4:228-242.

  
 

Persoon CH(1794). Neuer Veersuch einer systematischen Eintheilung der Schwamme. Neues Magazin für die Botanik. 1:63-128.

  
 

Polizeli MLTM, Rizzatti ACS, Monti R, Terenzi HF, Jorge JA, Amorim DS (2005). Xylanases from fungi: properties and industrial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 67:577-591.
Crossref

  
 

Prabavathy VR, Mathivanan N, Sagadevan E, Murugesan K, Lalithakumari D (2006). Self-fusion of protoplasts enhances chitinase production and biocontrol activity in Trichoderma harzianum. Bioresour. Technol. 97:2330-2334.
Crossref

  
 

Rashmi S, Maurya S, Upadhyay RS (2016). The improvement of competitive saprophytic capabilities of Trichoderma species through the use of chemical mutagens. Braz. J. Microbiol. 47(1):10-17.
Crossref

  
 

Rao GS, Reddy NNR, Surekha C (2015). Induction of plant systemic resistance in legumes Cajanus cajan, Vignaradiata, Vigna mungo against plant pathogens Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria alternata - a Trichoderma viride mediated reprogramming of plant defense mechanism. Int. J. Rec. Sci. Res.6:4270-428.

  
 

Rifai MA (1969) A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycol. Pap. 116:1-56.

  
 

Sadykova VS, Kurakov AV, Kuvarina AE, Rogozhin EA (2015). Antimicrobial Activity of Fungi Strains of Trichoderma from Middle Siberia. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 51:355-361.
Crossref

  
 

Saravanakumar K, Fan L, Fu K, Yu C, Wang M, Xia H, Sun J, Li Y, Chen J (2016). Cellulase from Trichoderma harzianum interacts with roots and triggers induced systemic resistance to foliar disease in maize. Sci. Rep. 6:35543.
Crossref

  
 

Seidl V, Seiboth B (2010). Trichoderma reesei: genetic approaches to improving strain efficiency. Biofuels 1(2):343-354.
Crossref

  
 

Sharma RA (2012). brief review on mechanism of Trichoderma fungus use as biological control agents. Int. J. Innov. Bio-Sci. 2: 200-210.

  
 

Shi M, Chen L, Wang XW, Zhang T, Zhao PB, Song XY, Sun CY, Chen XL, Zhou BC, Zhang YZ. (2012). Antimicrobial peptaibols from Trichoderma pseudokoningii induce programmed cell death in plant fungal pathogens. Microbiology 158:166-175.
Crossref

  
 

Singh R, Maurya S, Upadhyay RS (2016). The improvement Of competitive saprophytic capabilities of Trichoderma species through the use of chemical mutagens. Braz. J. Microbial. 47:10-17.
Crossref

  
 

Singh R, Maurya S, Upadhyay RS (2010). Improvement of antagonistic capability of Trichoderma harzianum by UV irradiation for management of Macrophomina phaseolina. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant. Prot. 43:1579-1588.
Crossref01

  
 

Sivan A, Chet I (1989). Biological control of Fusarium spp. in cotton, wheat and muskmelon by Trichoderma harzianum. J. Phytopathol. 116:39-47.
Crossref

  
 

Solgi T, Moradyar M, Zamani MR, Motallebi M (2015). Transformation of canola by chit33 gene towards improving resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant. Protect. Sci. 51:6-12.
Crossref

  
 

Srivastava PK, Vaish A, Dwivedi S, Chakrabarty D, Singh N, Tripathi RD (2011). Biological removal of arsenic pollution by soil fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 409(12):2430-2442
Crossref

  
 

Teng Y, Luo Y, Ma W, Zhu L, Ren W, Luo Y, et al (2015). Trichoderma reesei FS10-C enhances phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil by Sedum plumbizincicola and associated soil microbial activities. Front. Plant Sci. 6:438.
Crossref

  
 

Vinale F, Sivasithamparamb K, Ghisalbertic EL, Marraa R, Woo SL, Loritoa M (2008). Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 40:1-10.
Crossref

  
 

Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Woo SL, Nigro M, Marra R, et al (2014). Trichoderma Secondary Metabolites Active on Plants and Fungal Pathogens. Mycol. J. 8:127-139.
Crossref

  
 

Walunj AA, John P (2015). Adaptability of UV Irradiated mutant of Trichoderma harizianum to carbendazim. The Bioscan 10(4):1869-1871.

  
 

Weindling R (1932). Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other fungi. Phytopathology 22:837.

  
 

Woo SL, Ruocco M, Vinale F, Nigro M, Marra R, Lombardi N, et al (2014). Trichoderma-based Products and their Widespread Use in Agriculture. The Open Mycol. J. (Suppl-1, M4):71-126 71.

  
 

Yazdani M, Yap CK, Abdullah F, Tan SG (2009) Trichoderma atroviride as a bioremediator of Cu pollution: an in vitro study. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 91(7):1305-1314.
Crossref

  
 

Zeng X, Su S, Jiang X, Li L, Bai L, Zhang Y (2010). Capability of pentavalent and Biovolatilization of Three Fungal Strains under Laboratory Conditions. Clean. Soil. Air. Water. 38: 238-241.
Crossref

  
 

Zhang F, Ruan X, Wang X, Liu Z, Hu L, Li C (2016). Overexpression of a Chitinase Gene from Trichoderma Asperellum Increases Disease Resistance in Transgenic Soybean. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 180:1542-1558.
Crossref

  

 




Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Back to Vol. 16 No. 50
Back to articles
SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
CONFERENCES
          */?>