Full Length Research Paper
ABSTRACT
A simple efficient in vitro plant regeneration system was developed by indirect somatic embryogenesis of ‘Feizixiao’ litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Pollen in the anther of monocytes was used to induce callus. Two auxins (naphthalene acetic acid [NAA] and 2,4-dichloriphenoxyacetic acid [2,4-D]), and two cytokines (kinetin [KT] and 6-benzyladenine [BA]) were tested to explore their influence on callus induction. MS medium supplemented with 2.22 µM BA, 2.69 µM NAA, 13.57 µM 2,4-D, and 0.4 g/L LH (lactalbumin hydrolysate) showed the highest callus induction frequency. The callus obtained from anther was subcultured in MS medium containing 4.52 µM 2,4-D to obtain synchronized friable embryogenic callus. Different developmental stages of SEs were obtained from the callus on MS medium containing 6% (w/v) sucrose and different PGRs (plant growth regulators). On MS medium containing 6% (w/v) sucrose and supplemented with 0.54 µM NAA, 23.23 µM KT, 0.4 g/L LH, 0.56 µM inositol, and 10% (w/v) CW (coconut water), a higher number of SEs (globular, heart, torpedo and cotyledonary embryos) was achieved than on other media. Plantlets were established onto half-strength MS medium containing 1.44 µM GA3 (gibberellic acid) followed by successful acclimatization in the greenhouse. With flow cytometry and chromosome counting, ploidy analysis of regenerated plants revealed that the regenerated plantlets were all diploid. This study is the first report on somatic embryogenesis of ‘Feizixiao litchi’, providing an opportunity to improve the cultivar by biotechnology methods.
Key words: litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.), anther culture, callus, regeneration, somatic embryogenesis.
INTRODUCTION
Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.), known as “the queen of fruit” (Menzel and Waite, 2005), is an important fruit tree in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world (Menzel, 1983). Given its long reproductive cycle and highly heterozygous genetic background (Litz, 1988; Raharjo and Litz, 2005), new litchi cultivars are difficult to create via conventional breeding methods. Modern breeding techniques such as gene manipulation have the advantages of high efficiency and directional improvement of specific traits, providing a new way for the improvement of litchi cultivars (Das and Rahman, 2012). The establishment of a regeneration system invitro for litchi bioengineering breeding is vital. Many efforts have been made regarding the subject, but few successful results have been published. Fu and Tang (1983) reported that they obtained 24 plantlets via organogenesis from pollen callus. Subsequent reports were made on somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in litchi via the culture of anthers (Deng, 2005; Xie et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2013), immature embryos (Zhou et al., 1993, 1996; Kuang et al., 1997), or protoplasts (Yu et al., 1996). Das et al. (1999) reported a high proliferation rate from mature seeds using two kinds of methods. Yu et al. (2000) achieved somatic embryogenesis and plantlets from ‘Xiafanzhi’ litchi protoplasts isolated from embryogenic suspensions. Puchooa (2004) used young unvaccinated ‘Tai So’ leaves as explants to study various factors on the regeneration of the leaf blade and eventually obtained regenerated plants. By ‘Heli’ anther culture, Guo et al. (2014) obtained somatic embryos with root and no sprout. However, Huang and You (1990) and Yu (1991) and Guo et al. (2014) reported that the stem sprout buds, failed to produce (Huang and You, 1990; Yu, 1991). All the above results showed that the regeneration of different litchi varieties is inconsistent with their medium. The same culture medium plays different roles on the regeneration of different litchi varieties. Therefore, different genetic backgrounds of litchi varieties have a remarkable effect on in vitro regeneration ability. To date, only a few cultivars, such as ‘Nuomici’ (Kuang et al., 1997), ‘Xiafanzhi’ (Lai and Sang, 2003) and ‘Hushanjiaohe’ (Fu and Tang, 1983), have been successfully regenerated in vitro. ‘Feizixiao’ is an early maturity variety with a tender, juicy, sweet aril and high and stable yield. In vitro regeneration of ‘Feizixiao’ is potentially a valuable method for conservation, mass propagation, and genetic transformation of this species. Although ‘Feizixiao’ micropropagation has been described (Deng, 2005), no report exists regarding its in vitro plant regeneration by a somatic embryogenesis system.
This study aimed to develop a simple and efficient protocol for efficient plant regeneration rates via somatic embryogenesis from anther explants of ‘Feizixiao’, as well as to investigate the effects of plant growth regulators on the processes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials and callus induction
Branches with floral buds of 10-year-old ‘Feizixiao’ were collected from the base of Hainan Leihu Fruit Ltd. on March 12, 2011. Immature flowers were washed in running tap water to remove dust. They were then dipped into 70% (w/v) ethanol, and 0.1% (w/v) HgCl2, followed by three rinses in sterile distilled water under aseptic conditions. The anthers were separated from the flowers for callus induction.
The anthers were cultured on MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) solid (containing 0.7% (w/v) agar) medium with 0.4 g/L LH and 30 g/L sucrose. The medium was supplemented with different concentrations and combinations of plant growth regulators [PGRs: BA (0, 0.89, 2.22, and 4.44 µM), KT (0, 2.32, 4.65, and 9.29 µM), NAA (0, 1.07, 2.69, and 5.37 µM), 2,4-D (0, 4.52, 9.05, and 13.57 µM)] for callus induction. An orthogonal experimental design was used for these experiments with three repeats for each treatment, seven bottles per repeat, and 9 to 11 anthers per bottle. The callus was record after 8 weeks of culture. The callus obtained from anthers was subcultured in MS medium containing 4.52 µM 2,4-D to obtain synchronized friable embryogenic callus.
Somatic embryogenesis
The 18-day-old friable embryogenic calli (light, yellow, vigorous, fine-grained) were transferred to MS medium supplemented with 6% (w/v) sucrose, 0.4 g/L LH, 0.56 µM inositol, 10% (w/v) coconut water, and a combination of auxin NAA (0–0.54 µM) and cytokines KT (13.94, 23.23, and 32.53 µM), ZT (13.68, 22.81, and 31.93 µM), and TDZ (13.62, 22.71, and 31.79 µM). A completely randomized design with 10 replications (0.1 g of fresh callus per replicate) for each treatment was used for these experiments. Different developmental stages of SEs (>0.3 cm) were recorded after 7 weeks of culture.
Plant regeneration
Different developed stages of SEs (>0.8 cm) were transferred to different MS basal media (MS, 1/2 MS) supplemented with various concentrations of GA3 (0, 1.44, 2.89 and 5.77 µM) and 3% (w/v) sucrose for regeneration. A completely randomized design with 15 replications (4 to 6 explants per replicate) was used for these experiments. Regeneration was recorded after 9 weeks of culture. These explants were incubated under 16 h (lightness)/8 h (darkness) photoperiod (provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps at a photon flux of 27 µmol/m2s1) at 26±2°C.
All media were adjusted to pH 5.8 prior to autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min. All explants were incubated in the dark, unless stated otherwise.
Flow cytometry and chromosome counting
The ploidy level of regenerated plantlets was analyzed using flow cytometry. Root tips were chopped and measured using a Cell Lab Quanta SC (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). Nuclei obtained from the root tip of air layering seedlings were used as a diploid control. Histograms of DNA content were evaluated using Cell Lab Quanta SC MPL Analysis software (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA).
Chromosome counts were carried out on root tip cells of the plantlet pretreated for 3 h with a saturated solution of 1,4-dichlorobenzene. Roots were fixed in 3:1 ethanol-glacial acetic acid, hydrolyzed in 1 M hydrochloric acid, and rinsed three times with distilled water. Each rinsed root tip was placed on a glass slide. The root cap was removed, and the remaining root was stained with a carbol fuchsin solution. Each root tip was moderately squashed as the cover slip was applied to help spread the chromosomes. Micrographs were taken with an FSX-100 microscope camera system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Specimen preparation for light microscopy
According to the methods described by He (1989) and Lee and Mu (1966), sections of friable embryogenic callus, white opaque SEs, non-friable embryogenic callus, different abnormal SEs, and vitrified somatic embryos were fixed in FAA for 20 h. The specimens were then rinsed three times in 70% (w/v) ethanol. For staining, the specimens were stained in Ehrilich’s dyeing liquid. The specimens were dehydrated in a range of different concentrations of dimethylbenzene and embedded in different concentrations of paraffin. The specimen block was roughly trimmed to exclude excess plastic matrix and expose the surface of the specimen. The roughly trimmed block was mounted into a Reichert Ultracut microtome, and 5 to 6 µM sections were cut using glass knives.
Statistical analysis
Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and are presented as the mean ± standard error of all independent experiments. Treatment means were separated using Duncan’s multiple range test at the 5% probability level and analyzed using DPS (version 2.0, Tang, 2010).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Induction of embryogenic callus
Embryogenic calli were achieved from anther explants on MS medium, 3% (w/v) sucrose, and various PGRs in combination. One callus formed at the yellowish anthers after approximately 3 weeks of culture, other calli developed in all treatments, except the control, after 6 weeks (Figures 1a to c). The first callus was more light yellow in color, heavily watery, and non-granular (Figure 1d). The other was non-friable callus. Other calli emerged after 6 weeks. These calli were light yellow, compact, friable, tiny and/or nodular, and pre-embryogenic (Figures 1e to g). Amin and Razzaque (1995), Yu and Chen (1997), Puchooa (2004), Rahario and Litz (2007), Ma et al. (2009), Xu and Lai (2013), and Guo et al. (2014) also reported a similar type of callus development in other litchi cultivars. Similar phenomena were also found in longan (Lai et al., 1997), ‘Premier’ honey peach (Lai et al., 2008), Heavea (Tan et al., 2009), and Pinus koraiensis (Wang et al., 2015).
Different combinations of PGRs were used to test their effect on the induction of embryogenic callus. The experiment revealed significant differences in the number of callus produced among treatments, indicating that the combination and concentration of PGRs exerted a significant effect on callus induction (Table 1). LSD test revealed that a significantly higher number of callus was obtained when anthers were cultured in medium L9 (2.22 µM BA, 2.69 µM NAA, and 13.57 µM 2,4-D), followed by medium L8 (0.89 µM BA, 9.29 µM KT, 2.69 µM NAA, and 4.52 µM 2,4-D) and medium L3 (4.65 µM KT, 2.69 µM NAA, and 9.05 µM 2,4-D). No significant difference was observed among L4, L12, L14, and L15, which produced fewer FECs compared with the other media. Medium L1, which contained no added PGRs, produced no callus. Interestingly, medium L12, in which callus induction was low, produced callus similar to those in medium L9. These observations suggested that certain auxin-cytokinin ratios in medium may be necessary for callus induction from anther culture of litchi. In this study, R value revealed that 2,4-D was most effective in FEC induction, followed by NAA, BA, and KT. The effect of 2,4-D on FEC induction was also observed in other litchi species (Fu and Tang, 1983; Zhou et al., 1993). Yu and Chen (1997) reported that induction of embryogenic callus from immature embryos after NAA, instead of 2,4-D, was a failure. Su et al. (2004) showed that the callus in medium without 2,4-D did not survive the following experiment. Many species confirmed that FEC induction is influenced by 2,4-D, such as in pine (Yu et al., 2011), in longan (Lai et al., 1997), and Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg (Huang et al., 2014).
In the same medium, continuous EC subculture will lead to embryonic loss, thus, the addition of KT and AgNO3 in the medium synchronized embryogenesis (Lai et al., 1997). The regulated EC differentiated into somatic embryogenesis after 18 days of culture. In the present study, three different combinations of PGRs were used in SE formation.
Somatic embryo formation
Somatic embryogenesis was achieved from EC on MS medium, 6% (w/v) sucrose, and various PGRs alone or in combination. The response of SEs to three different media was extremely variable, especially at five weeks after culture initiation (Figures 1 and i). Simon et al. (2007) also reported a similar type of embryo development in ‘Brewster’. Duncan’s multiple range test indicated that the medium supplemented with KT and NAA produced a significantly higher number of SEs compared with the other two media; the average SE induction numbers were 489, 344 and 101 FW/g in medium supplemented with KT and NAA, ZT and NAA, and TDZ and NAA, respectively. In this study, SE shapes varied after 7 weeks in treatments (Table 2). The embryo development stages observed were double cotyledon, no cotyledon embryo, single cotyledon, multi-cotyledon embryo, flake embryo, conjoined embryo, goblet embryo, trumpet embryo, and mass embryo (Figure 2). Similar patterns of embryo development stages were reported for other plant species (Kuang et al., 1996; Tan et al., 2011).
These experiments resulted in significant differences in the number of SEs produced among treatments, indicating that the combination and concentration of PGRs had a significant effect on SE yield (Table 2). For double cotyledonary embryos, Duncan’s multiple range test revealed a significantly higher number of SEs when FECs were cultured in medium T3 (0.54 µM NAA and 23.23 µM KT), followed by medium T7 (0.54 µM NAA and 22.81 µM ZT) and medium T2 (0.54 µM NAA and 13.94 µM KT). No significant differences were observed among T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 media which produced fewer SEs compared with the other media. Interestingly T1 and T4, with only cytokinin (KT or ZT) and no auxin (NAA) added, produced smaller and fewer SEs but medium T9 displayed contrasting results. These observations suggested that certain auxin-cytokinin ratios in medium may be necessary for SE formation.
Plant regeneration
Successful plant regeneration on the plant induction medium was achieved from post-somatic embryogenetic developmental stages: Globular, heart, torpedo, cotyledonary, and plumule embryos. Most double cotyledonary and conjoined mature embryos germinated to produce complete plantlets after 4 weeks in culture. Most abnormal embryos failed to germinate on the entire medium.
Half-strength solid MS medium produced a higher frequency of rooting (23.67%) but a lower frequency of germinated plantlets, whereas MS medium produced a lower frequency of rooting (13.78%) and well-germinated plantlets (1.11%) (Table 3). The frequency of rooting in half-strength solid MS medium was higher than that in full-strength solid MS medium in Pyrus communis L. (Predieri et al., 1999). Different salt concentrations would change the osmotic pressure, thereby affecting nutrient absorption and release substances into the medium. Perhaps the decrease in the concentration of nitrogen in half-strength solid MS medium stimulates rooting.
Meanwhile 2.89 µM GA3 produced higher frequency of rooting (68.33%) but lower germination (1.33%) in half-strength solid MS medium, whereas full-strength solid MS medium produced lower frequency of rooting (19.67%) and well germinated plantlets (6.67%). The beneficial effect of gibberellins on somatic embryo germination has been reported in other plant species. For example, in Clematis, enhanced frequency of shoot development and greater internode elongation resulted from the influence of GA3 (Wang et al., 2014). Compared with other studies on shoot bud differentiation such as Quercus (Vengadesan and Pijut, 2009) and Ammopiltanthus mongolicus (Yang et al., 2014), in this paper, the tap root of litchi produced black spots (1.5 cm), which ultimately led to plant death. Thus, GA3 promoted rooting, inhibited root growth, and suppressed lateral root growth.
Successful germination and plant regeneration via SEs have been reported with combinations of KT and NAA in ginger and buffel grass (Lincy et al., 2009; Carloni et al., 2014). After germination, GA3 is required for plant development in buffel grass. Well-developed plantlets were separated (Figure 1l) and then transferred to plastic pots containing a 1:1:1 (v/v/v) vermiculite: sand: coconut chaff mixture. The plantlets were successfully acclimatized in a greenhouse (Figure 1m) with a 100% survival rate.
The present work is the first report on plant regeneration via indirect somatic embryogenesis from anther explants of ‘Feizixiao’ litchi. Promising plant regeneration from SEs via indirect somatic embryogenesis was remarkably influenced by PGRs. The system will be helpful for conservation, mass clone propagation, production of bioactive compounds, and genetic transformation studies.
Ploidy level of regenerated plant
All the plantlets were diploid. Ploidy levels of regenerated plants were determined by flow cytometry, and chromosome numbers were determined by chromosome counting (Figures 1n and o). ‘Feizixiao’ litchi has a chromosome numbers of 2n = 2x = 30. The same chromosome numbers were confirmed in the diploid plants.
Somatic embryogenesis
Histological observations via microscopy showed that different FECs exhibited various morphologies. In general, these FEC cell walls were thick and deeply dyed (Figure 3a). The FECs that were split vigorously contained more embryonic cells, which were small with high nuclear/cytoplasm ratios (Figure 3b). The NFEC cytoplasm was sparse and even disappeared, whereas the cell nucleus was relatively smaller (Figure 3c) compared with the control.
One embryonic cell divided several times to forming a multicellular proembryo. The development of multicellular proembryos was followed by proembryo formation of globular embryo, heart embryo, torpedo embryo, and cotyledon embryo (Figures 3d to j). The somatic embryogenesis of several species was similar to that of litchi; these species included Eucalyptus globules and E. saligna × E. maidenii (Corredoira et al., 2015), Hevea brasiliensis (Wang, 2004), and Liriodendron hybrids (Chen et al., 2012). Embryo development was similar to zygote embryo development. In this paper, the litchi embryonic cells initially appeared in the interior and then continue to develop somatic embryos (Figure 3d). Therefore, somatic embryogenesis was of similar origin and occurred for single cells. A similar method was also observed with other woody species, such as ‘Honghezi’ longan (Chen, 2001). However, this phenomenon was different from that in other species, such as Quercus variabilis (Zhang et al., 2007), oil palm (Kanchanapoom and Domyoas, 1999), and Quercus robur (Corredoira et al., 2006). Zeng et al. (2002) reported that embryogenic cell ‘Yuanhong’ litchi is of a different origin. Lai and Sang (2003) reported that litchi in low 2,4-D is of a different origin.
Normal somatic embryos are ivory, whereas treated somatic embryos are vitrified. Histological observations showed that the early normal somatic embryonic cells were of uniform size, compact, possessed thick and cell walls, and deep dyes; starch grains were evenly dispersed within the cell (Figures 3 and i). Moreover, the cambium was obvious. Starch grains accumulated near the earth in mature white cotyledon embryo cells, and bud primordial were obvious (Figure 3j). Vitrified somatic embryos exhibited different cell stages, and the cells were loosely arranged with thin cell walls. A small number of cell walls underwent autophagy and contained numerous brown tannins (Figure 3f).
Different developmental stages, either bud primordium or asymmetric leaf primordium, were lacking in deformed embryos. Moreover, abnormalities in the procambium prevented further development (Figures 3k and l).
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors hereby declare that no conflict of interest exists among them.
REFERENCES
Amin MN, Razzaque MA (1995). Induction of somatic embryogenesis in the cultures of zygotic embryos of lychee. Bangladesh J. Bot. 24(1):25-29. |
|
Carloni E, Ribotta A, Colomba EL, Griffa S, Quiroga M, Tommasino E, Grunberg K (2014). Somatic embryogenesis from in vitro anther culture of apomictic buffel grass genotypes and analysis of regenerated plants using flow cytometry. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 117(3):311-322. |
|
Chen CL (2001). A preliminary study on mechanism of somatic embryogenesis in Longan [Dimacarpus longan]. A master's paper of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China. |
|
Chen JH, Zhang YJ, Li TT, Wang PK, Wang GP, Shi JS (2012). Study on origin and development of somatic embryos of Liriodendron hybrids. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Natural Science Edition). 36(1):16-20. |
|
Corredoira E, Valladares S, Vieitez AM (2006). Morphohistological analysis of the origin and development of somatic embryos from leaves of mature Quercus robur. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Bio. Plant 42:525-533. |
|
Corredoira E, Ballester A, Ibarra M, Vieitez A.M (2015). Induction of somatic embryogenesis in explants of shoot cultures established from adult Eucalyptus globules and E. saligna×E. maidenii trees. Tree Physiol. 35(6):678-690. |
|
Das DK, Shiva Prakash N, Bhalla-Sarin NB (1999). Multiple shoot induction and plant regeneration in litchi (Litchi Chinensis Sonn.). Plant Cell Rep. 18:691-695. |
|
Das DK, Rahman A (2012). Expression of a rice chitinase gene enhances antifungal response in transgenic litchi (cv. Bedana). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 109:315-325. |
|
Deng CJ (2005). Studies on high frequency somatic embryogenesis and regeneration culture in litchi. Master's thesis of Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China. |
|
Fu L, Tang D (1983). Induction pollen plants of litchi tree (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Acta Genet. Sin. 10(5):369-374. |
|
Guo SY, Peng HX, He XH, Ding F, Li HL, Qin XQ, Xu N (2014). Callus induction from different explants of litchi. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 27(2):748-753. |
|
He CK, Zheng SK, Li JS (1989). The whole double-staining method in step for the paraffin section of plant. J. Fujian Agric. Coll. 18(4):565-560. |
|
Huang FX, Guan Y, Gui CM, Liang GP, Li L, Tian H, Wang Ya (2014). Study on the callus from the anther of Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg by Orthogonal Experiment. North. Hortic. 18:109-111. |
|
Huang ZZ, You KZ (1990). Primary study on the litchi shoots induction. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 3:27-29. |
|
Kanchanapoom K, Domyoas P (1999). The origin and development of embryoids in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) embryo culture. Sci. Asia 25:195-202. |
|
Kuang ZS, Zhou LN, Ma XJ, Chen JQ, Cai J (1997). Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in litchi. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 1:15-17. |
|
Kuang ZS, Zhou LN, Ma XJ, Chen JQ, Cai J (1996). Study on the types of embryoid in tissue culture on Litchi Chinensis Sonn. J. Fruit Sci. 13:25-28. |
|
Lai CC, Yu YB, Lai ZX, Xie HG, Wang Q, Chen Y (2008). Induction of the calli for the embryos of 'Premier' honey peach and their subculture and maintenance. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 24(11):54-59. |
|
Lai ZX, Pan LZ, Zhen ZG (1997). Establishment and maintenance of longan embryogenic cell lines. J. Fujian Agric. Univ. 26(2):160-167. |
|
Lai ZX, Sang QL (2003). Optimization of somatic embryogenesis system from embryogenic callus and plant regeneration from transformed hpt-resistant calli of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 9(2):131-136. |
|
Lee CL, Mu SK (1966). Comparative anatomy of resin canals of the needles of Picea grown in china. Acta Bot. Sin. 14(1):12-25. |
|
Lincy AK, Remashree AB, Sasikumar B (2009), Indirect and direct somatic embryogenesis from aerial stem explants of ginger (Zingiber officinate Rosc.). Acta. Bot. Croat. 68(1):93-103. |
|
Litz RE (1988). Somatic embryogenesis from cultured leaf explants of the tropical tree Euphoria longan stend. J. Plant Physiol. 132:190-193. |
|
Litz RE, Raharjo S (2005). Dimocarpus longan and litchi chinensis. In: Litz RE(ed) Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops, CABI, Wallingford, pp. 628-636. |
|
Ma XY, Yi GJ, Huang XL (2009). Leaf callus induction and suspension culture establishment in lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv.Huaizhi. Acta Physiol. Plant.31:401-405. |
|
Menzel CM (1983). The control of floral initiation of lychee: A review. Sci. Hortic. 21:201-215. |
|
Menzel CM, Waite GK (2005). Litchi and Longan: Botany, Production and Uses. CABI, Wallingford, UK, P 305. |
|
Murashige T, Skoog FA (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473-497. |
|
Predieri S, Drizzi G, Gatti E (1999). Effect of nitrogen supply on rooting of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cv. Conference microcuttings. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 13(2):68-70. |
|
Puchooa (2004). In vitro regeneration of lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 3(11):576-584. |
|
Raharjo SH, Litz R (2007). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of litchi(Litchi Chinensis Sonn.)from leaves of mature phase trees. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 89:113-119. |
|
Su MS, Lin SQ, Chen ZG, Yu CH, Lai ZX, Chen XJ (2004). Callus induction of litchi from flower. South China Fruit 33(6):62-63. |
|
Tan DG, Sun XP, Fu LL, Ma S, Zhang JM (2011). Classification and improved cultural conditions for the somatic embryogenesis of Hevea anther. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 32(7):1290-1295. |
|
Tan DG, Wang M, Sun XP, Zhang JM (2009). Morphogenesis and histology of calli derived from anthers of Rubber clone Reyan7-33-97 (Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg.).Chin. J. Trop. Crops 30(7):970-974. |
|
Tang QY (2010). Data Processing System-Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining (Second Edition). www.sciencep.com. |
|
Vengadesan G, Pijut PM (2009). In vitro propagation of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant. 45:474-482. |
|
Wang F, Wang JX, Li Q, He M (2014). Effects of GA3 and IAA on the germination of four species of Clematis seeds. Pratacultural Sci. 31(4):672-676. |
|
Wang G, Li HL, Wang JB (2013). Primary study on the callus induction from anther of two litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cultivars. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 34(4):669-674. |
|
Wang Y, Zhao TT, Yang W, Ma H, Ding LZ, Liang Y, Shen HL (2015). Proper condition for callus induction from mature zygotic embryo explants of Pinus koraiensis. For. Eng. 31(2):5-13. |
|
Wang YL (2004). Studies on the cytological and histological of somatic embryogenesis in Hevea Brasiliensis. A master's paper of South China University of Tropical Agricultural, Hainan, China. |
|
Xie YM, Yi GJ, Zhang QM, Zeng JW (2006). Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from anther of Feizixiao litchi. Chin. J. Trop. Crops 27(1):68-72. |
|
Xu SS, Lai ZX (2013). Induction and maintenance of the embryogenic callus in anther of some ancient litchi tree in Fuzhou City. Subtrop. Agric. Res. 9(2):123-126. |
|
Yang Y, Liu B, Jia Z, Han C (2014). GA3 effects on germination of Ammopiltanthus mongolicus seed. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 42(5):271-275. |
|
Yu CH, Chen ZG (1997). Induction of litchi embryogenic calli by immature embryos and anthers culture in vitro. J. Fujian Agric. Univ. 26(2):168-172. |
|
Yu CH, Chen ZG, Lu LX (1996). Regeneration of plantlets from protoplasts culture of litchi. J. Fujian Agric. Univ. 25(3):386. |
|
Yu CH, Chen ZG, Lu LX, Lin JW (2000). Somatic embryogenesis and plantlets from 'Xiafanzhi' litchi protoplasts isolated from embryogenic suspensions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 61:51-58. |
|
Yu DD, Xiao N, Wang QK, Wang S, Hu DM, Zhang JF (2011). Induction and proliferation of embryo callus from pinus. Yunnanensis Franch Acta Bot. Boreal-Occident. Sin. 31(10):2119-2123. |
|
Yu YB (1991). Study on some factors in tissue culture of lychee (Litchi chinensis). Fujian Agric. Sci. Technol. 5:17-18. |
|
Zeng LH, LV LX, Wang P, Lu BG (2002). Cytohistological observation of embryogenic callus of litchi and longan. J. Fujian Agric. Univ. (Natural Science). 31(3):331-333. |
|
Zhang CX, Yao ZY, Zhao Z (2007). Histological observation of somatic embryogenesis from cultured embryos of Quercus variabilis BI. J. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 33:33-38. |
|
Zhou LN, Kuang ZS, Ma XJ, Cheu JQ, Cao J (1996). The study of factors affecting somatic embryogenesis in young embryo culture of litchi chinensis. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 4(2):161-165. |
|
Zhou LN, Kuang ZS, Ma XJ, Cheu JQ, Cao J, Tang XJ, Ling X (1993). Preliminary studies on culture of immature embryos and embryogenesis of somatic cells of litchi(Litchi Chinensis Sonn. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 5:14-15. |
Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0