Bulk shipping is a globalised industry, and market prices are entirely dependent on the world’s economic climate. The industries contractual arrangements are also rather flexible making it difficult for market participants to understand the trends and fluctuations of market prices and forcing market participants to face greater uncertainty and volatility. Oil and Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) act as suitable hedging instruments in bulk shipping markets, allowing market participants to hedge their risks in spot markets. This research predominantly applies the vector autoregressive moving-average model (VARMA) and uses variables from one year FFAs and the global oil index to analyse the relationships between the two instruments. This research believes the VARMA (1,3) is the most suitable model, because it demonstrates the existence of a stage one lag effect between Capesize FFAs and the global oil index. This model also has three error correction factors. By using VARMA (1,3) formulas, it is possible to discover the mutual effects of the relationship between the two hedge components. The research result aims to provide market participants with guidance for entering and exiting bulk shipping markets.
Key words: Forward freight agreement (FFAs), oil index, vector autoregressive moving-average model (VARMA).
Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0