The impact of human resource ( HR ) performance management on project outcome

To ensure successful accomplishment of projects, quality performance of the project team is required to be maintained. The existing literature declares scope, time, cost and quality as quadruple constraints for project’s success while management of human resource (HR) communication, procurement and risk are declared support functions. Literature further acknowledges that HR management functions are dealt with low precedence in actual practices of project management as they are rendered secondary or support functions. In real practices the project manager is delegated certain HR functions like team formation, training and HR performance management. However, these HR functions are not considered the primary tasks of the project manager during the project’s life cycle as these are practiced for specific time period without regular iteration. From July 2007 to April 2009, this study discovered that in the Information Technology (IT) industry working in Islamabad, Pakistan, project managers were required to manage performance of their teams at least by monitoring their performance. It discovered that compromise in the quality of HR performance management affected the results of heterogeneous IT projects. The study therefore focused on HR performance management to identify its actual significance and precedence for the projects. It hypothesized that the outcome of project is associated with the quality of performance management of project team and is affected by it. Employing stratified sampling technique, 70 heterogeneous IT projects in 24 different software houses were identified and selected that were reported to have been affected by the quality of HR performance management. Using a reliable and valid instrument, data were collected in a cross sectional manner. Analyses of results were made using frequency distribution, Pearson correlation, and Partial Least Square (PLS) regression. The findings confirmed a correlation and dependency of project outcome on HR performance management by the project manager through quality of performance monitoring. The study concluded to consider HR management function performance management as one of the tools for ensuring project success giving its significant precedence. The study has contributed guidelines and templates to help project managers exercise 360 degree performance management where applicable.


INTRODUCTION
Organizations engaged in information technology (IT) projects encounter a dynamic market today.In order to strategically create and sustain a competitive advantage and improve business performance, organizations in IT business must recognize the importance of human resources as a major factor in their business performance.Therefore, it is rational that the outcome of IT projects and performance of HR comprising the project team are associated with each other.Human resource management (HRM) for IT projects refers to all activities associated with management of people in a project team (Boxall and Purcell, 2008).Performance management of the HR is a significant function of HRM that helps project managers in measuring and maintaining the performance of project team which is considered necessary for the project success.Existing literature is evident that a growing number of studies acknowledges a positive correlation between HRM and organizational performance (Toulson and Dewe, 2004;Combs et al., 2006;Kouhy et al., 2009).This study was initiated in the IT industry working within the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad in Pakistan from June 2005 to April 2009 to closely observe the practice of project managers undertaking heterogeneous IT projects.In 24 large and semi-large selected IT/Telecom organizations.The study discovered that 30% of the subjects in the selected sample of 70 heterogeneous IT projects were reported to have suffered due to inappropriate performance management measures by the project managers.
This empirical finding indicates that project outcome requires good quality performance management of the project team as the literature already guides.It is worth considering, why the project managers in the mentioned industry compromised on the quality of performance management of HR?At the same time the study observed that behind the success of 70% of the IT projects in the selected sample, good quality performance management of project team was reported to be frequently exercised.Therefore, it is significant to explore the project management guidelines in the literature to interpret the precedence of HR performance management for projects.
Effective project management is recommended to be an exercise of nine knowledge areas that mainly include management of project scope, time, cost, quality, HR, communication, procurement, risk and integration of all the areas mentioned throughout the project's life cycle (Schwalbe, 2010;Project Management Institute (PMI), 2008).The management of scope, time and cost are declared triplet constraints for project as these areas are declared primary functions of project management.The latest knowledge entertains the management of quality as a fourth constraint while practices of functions for HR, communication, procurement and risk are rated only supplementary or support functions for projects (PMI, 2008).The study learnt that for the guidelines mentioned in the literature in the IT industry of Pakistan, the role of the project manager was believed to concentrate on the primary functions of project management.Nevertheless, the literature emphasizes the practice of all the nine knowledge areas by a single project manager in order to ensure effective project management.Practices in the selected IT/Telecom organizations exhibited a different scenario, especially in projects that reportedly suffered failure ultimately.
It was empirically observed that compromises were made in ensuring quality of HR performance management throughout the project life cycle in the IT/Telecom organizations as this function was considered insignificant because literature declares HR functions supplementary for the project.Resultantly, 30% of the IT projects suffered from problems like cost overrun, time delays and customer's dissatisfaction.The empirical findings of this study triggered the need to concentrate on the specific HRM function, that is, performance management of HR during a project life cycle to rationally identify and define its precedence among all the functions recommended for a project manager.Literature acknowledges that improving the effectiveness of HRM functions in the organizations optimizes its worth and progress (Paauwe, 2004).On the contrary, literature on project management rates HRM functions only as support functions.In effect, practices in the IT industry considering HRM function performance management a secondary or support function for project managers had adverse effects on project outcomes.On the other hand, behind successful IT projects, HR functions were reported to have served the primary role.This apparent conflict in the theory of project management literature and its real applications demands an empirical study to identify the significance and actual precedence of HR performance management as it reportedly affects the project outcome in real practice, while literature on project management awards it secondary ranking.Further, literature of HRM does not conform to the literature on project management in terms of setting precedence for HRM functions in actual practices.In order to gain insight into how the HRM helps organizations gain value through performance management of HR, workforce scorecards are strongly recommended to be adopted, considering this exercise essential (Becker et al., 2001;Mayo, 2001;Phillips et al., 2001;Huselid et al., 2005).The study, therefore, aims to pursue an empirical research to reveal and define the exact precedence of HR performance management during the exercises of project management such that the project managers are appropriately guided to adopt and perform this function keeping it at its due significant level.

Theory and model development
Performance management is recommended to be the HR management function through which team motivation as well as performance can be addressed effectively.Shih et al. (2009) studied and presented a conceptual scheme concerning the core constituents of high performance work systems (HPWS) and examined their effects on organizational performance.Using structural equation model techniques, the study concluded that better performing firms were found to have invested in more sophisticated HRM practices mainly including employees' performance appraisals, which further enhanced organizational performance.The conclusion of Shih et al. (2009) reinforces the interpretation of this study that HR performance management is a significant function for organizational success.This study interprets that for a successful project outcome, the significance of HR performance management deserves a higher precedence than what the existing literature of performance management sets for it.Kouhy et al. (2009) examined the relationship between HR policies, management accounting and organization performance by using a cross case analysis.Seven main HR policies were analyzed and subsequently categorized as job for life policy which included recruitment, training, performance-related bonus scheme, teamwork, organizational culture and pensions.Important communication links between HR managers and management accountants are budgets, strategic plans, performance-related bonus scheme and decision making.Kouhy et al. (2009) found that all the selected functions had a significant impact on organizational performance.This study interprets that the performancerelated bonus scheme is a parameter in the contribution of Kouhy et al. (2009) that requires astute performance management for its processing.Therefore, the conclusion of Kouhy et al. (2009) strengthens the perception of this study that performance management of HR affects the organizational performance.
Recently, Chand and Katou (2007) investigated whether some HRM systems affect organizational performance in the Indian hotel industry.Conducting empirical research in 439 hotels ranging from three-star to five-star delux hotels, their study measured 27 HRM practices against five organizational performance variables entertaining ten demographic variables.Using factor analysis, one-way ANOVA and correlation analysis to test the relation between HRM systems and organizational performance, Chand and Katou (2007) concluded that the hotel performance was positively correlated to the HRM systems.These systems included recruitment and selection, manpower planning, job design, training and development, performance monitoring, quality circle and pay systems.This study interprets that performance monitoring of the HR is the dimension of performance management that along with all other necessary HRM functions helps organizations in boosting their performance.This indicates that performance management for projects requires consistent performance monitoring during the project life cycle.Thompson (2004) studied Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) and explored that BAM could bring significant business value in the world of technical data provided its justification is derived from business management improvements.The most important claim for BAM was that it could fundamentally alter the way businesses reacted to threats and opportunities.This study perceives that every project is a business activity.Therefore, what Thompson (2004) proved for BAM is equally applicable for projects.However, projects are evaluated by measuring the performance of the teams working on it.Advocating this reality, Jakovljevic (2003) concluded that a set of applications to manage customers' projects better required astutely allocated staff and monitoring their utilization for ensuring project or business success.Naqvi et al. 8493 This study interprets that the inference of Jakovljevic (2003) guides project managers to allocate and monitor their teams effectively and regularly during the course of project life.To perform it, project managers need to understand performance monitoring of HR.Monitoring is a process that assesses the quality of internal control performance of the resources involved in any task or project over time.Monitoring is the most feasible and pragmatic mechanism of ensuring effective performance by the HR or machine resources.A control system needs to be monitored to ensure that it continues to operate effectively as intended.Without continual and effective monitoring, a control process may fall into a state of despair or not be executed altogether (Strub and Lucas, 2003).This study perceives that monitoring the work of a project in a consistent and structured manner should bring value.Members of the teams working on projects must be aware that their efforts are being monitored consistently by their leader (project manager) not only for possible corrections at the nick of time when required, but also for recording performance that would be set as the basis for awarding the annual reward.Fairness in such monitoring shall certainly play as a cohesive force motivating team members towards the project's cause.Using software for monitoring project's work is further useful and strongly recommended (Cleland, 1999).This study, therefore, interprets that performance monitoring of HR is the recommended mechanism to conduct performance management for projects.Performance management is indeed broader in connotation and applications than just performance monitoring.However, considering the practices and workload of project managers in the IT industry of Pakistan, this study perceives that a project manager can manage performance monitoring dimension of performance management regularly.The study learnt that in the context of project management, the literature also emphasizes performance monitoring (PMI, 2008).Therefore, the study next focuses on the single aspect of performance management, that is, performance monitoring of HR as it covers the desired practices and HR functions.Wier (2001) emphasized a well scheduled, frequent and regular progress monitoring of the project work and resources.
An effective way to control a project is to continuously measure the progress of its work and the teams working on it; comparing that progress against the plan and then adjusting the development parameters to correct any deviation from the project plan.This study interprets that adopting the guidelines of Wier (2001), using appropriate software for monitoring HR and work progress shall be beneficial.The project manager is the right person for this job.However, depending on the size of the team and load of monitoring work, a separate unit to monitor the progress may also be established that reports to the project manager and helps him in maintaining consistent monitoring.This study interprets that the ultimate goal of monitoring performance should be identifying and triggering the required corrective actions and keeping the project team motivated instead of causing negative stress among team members.Based on literature and practices observed in the IT industry, the study understands that qualitative, as mentioned, and frequent performance monitoring is the key to effective performance management of HR to ensure the desired outcome of the project.It is logical that performance monitoring gives measure of management performance of HR for the project and these terms are reportedly associated with project outcome.However, it is true that project outcome is a concept that needs a rational understanding and a specific definition.Aaron et al. (2001) declared project success achievable by declaring project management a strategic, but complex activity.Traditionally, a project is perceived successful when it meets time, budget, and performance goals.However, project success is not just meeting time and budget.
The objective of their study was to develop a multidimensional framework for assessing project success, showing how different dimensions mean different things to different stakeholders at different times for different projects.Given the complexity of this question, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods and two data sets were used by Aaron et al. (2001).Their analysis identified four major distinct success dimensions for operationalizing the project outcome that were; (1) project efficiency, (2) impact on the customer, (3) direct business and organizational success, and (4) preparing for the future.The method of Aaron et al. (2001) seems more customer focused and futuristic to this study.It is rational as it targets reviewing what project has yielded consequently.This study finds determining the project's efficiency challenging as it requires a complete view of the entire life cycle of the project.Impact on the customer could be interpreted through feedback about the products or services that the project delivered.Direct business and organizational success could be measured in terms of the profit and relationships with clients that any organization earns after completing a project.Preparation for future could be measured through documentation of the project and lessons learnt by the team.The study, therefore, finds defining the concept of project outcome complex and critical.A relevant web based source of knowledge revealed that organizations adopting a, "formal project management methodology gives considerable competitive advantage", (2006) over those which do not follow a formal project management approach.
This study found the same true for the IT industry where it has been conducted.It shared the concept of project success in four dimensions, that are: (1) Reduced time-to-market and time-to-profitability, both key factors for any organization, develop products through their projects, (2) Ensure predictable schedules for profit and product delivery, (3) Offer more effective ways to prioritize, allocate and monitor resources and (4) Demonstrate a commitment to excellence to your customers, your employees and other stakeholders.This study finds the aforementioned guidelines for project management helpful for interpreting what the project success is.These guidelines indicate that project success could be a mix of the magnitude of the profitability and the times estimated for delivery of the products to the customers and return on investment.The study perceives that profitability may not be a primary concern for project managers who are not sponsoring the projects.However, meeting timelines should be a primary concern for project managers to avoid cost overrun.This study identifies timing and profitability as two parameters for measuring the project success out of which timing happens to be a major responsibility of the project managers in most of the cases and further a factor that could affect profitability.Standing et al. (2006) rendered project outcome as a measure of accomplishing the scope within the allocated budget, stipulated time, fulfilling and excelling the needs of the customers and other benefits to the organization undertaking projects.This study found that the IT industry used to measure the project success in similar terms.Indeed success is the target of every project.In the selected IT industry, the project success was viewed as the achievement of the intended outcomes in terms of specification, time and budget.However, success of a project is not limited to a single connotation.The study learnt that the IT professionals in the mentioned industry considered project success achieved when a project gets accomplished within the stipulated time and budget fulfilling the end user's requirements.

Theoretical framework
Based on the literature and findings from the IT industry of Pakistan, the study selected performance management of HR as the independent variable that reportedly affects the perceived dependent variable project outcome, while the confounder variables are declared out of the scope of this study.The study acknowledges that project outcome depends on various parameters as performance management of HR of projects singularly cannot ensure project success.However, in the selected scenario, the study intends to test the correlation between its two selected variables of interest and regression of the performance management of HR on the project outcome to identify its significance and due precedence in the role of project managers that the literature has yet to provide in conformance with what this study has observed in the real practices of project management in the IT industry of Rawalpindi -Islamabad, Pakistan.Pfeffer (1994) concluded that employee empowerment, employee participation, employee training and performance dependent reward system and extensive employee training are widely believed to improve the performance of the firm.Further, Huselid et al. (1997) found that the firm's effectiveness was associated with  (1994) and Huselid et al. (1997) acknowledge the significance of HR functions for organizations' success.
Performance monitoring is a function that is perceived to have an effect on the outcome of a project either adversely or positively depending on the quality with which it is exercised by the organization.Projects can be viewed as the objectives of organizations in routine scenarios with which their success is measured.Therefore, the results of Pfeffer (1994) and Huselid et al. (1997) reinforce the perceived theoretical framework of this study that it has depicted in Figure 1.The study intends to specifically identify the significance of HR performance monitoring on the result of the project to understand its significance and due precedence that the project manager should give to it during the practice of project management.Although, the study points towards and stresses on the amount of HR performance during the project's life cycle, strengthening the previous findings in the literature, it further acknowledges that the outcome of performance monitoring either causes motivation among the project team or it may lead to a decrease in employee morale.This is dependent on the style of the project manager.Crawford and Turner (2007) suggested that the project managers' competencies and project success are correlated and closely inter-related.They further mentioned that the competency of the project manager is a factor that determines the accomplishment of successful projects.

Hypotheses
Based on the aforementioned background and theoretical framework, the study adopted the following hypotheses: H 1 : The outcome of project is correlated with the independent variable quality of performance management of the human resources in the project team.H 2 : The frequency of performance management of human resources in project team affects the project outcome.

METHODOLOGY
This study was conducted in the IT industry working in Rawalpindi -Islamabad, Pakistan from June 2005 to April 2009.It collected empirical data for a stratified sample size of 70 heterogeneous IT projects from over 260 respondents out of the population size of 85 IT projects within the selected/agreed 24 large and semi-large IT/Telecom organizations.As the variability in the population was high within the selected area of Rawalpindi -Islamabad, Pakistan, this study selected the sample based on Stratified Area sampling.The study declared observation of practices as the secondary mode for data collection.Primarily, the study operationalized the independent variable Performance Management in terms of Performance Monitoring of HR using as its elements of quality and frequency.It rendered the Result of Project as the dependent variable using achievement of elements: scope, time, cost and other benefits using reliable and validated instrument formulated on 5 points interval scale.Table 5 at the end shows the measure of reliability of the instrument.The study conducted analysis of data employing analyses of frequency, descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations and PLS Regression using SPSS and Smart PLS software, respectively.

DATA ANALYSES AND FINDINGS
Table 1 reveals that out of the selected 70 IT projects of different types, 22.9% IT projects had substandard HR practices while 78.1% had good HR practices for the independent variable that is, Performance Monitoring.Value 3.0 is interpreted as satisfactory performance monitoring.As values depreciate below the threshold value of 3.0, it is defined as a decrease in the good practice of performance monitoring for projects, whereas values above 3.0 increasing towards 5.0 are depicted as an increase in performance monitoring.Table 1 indicates that overall, 22.9% of 70 projects remained deprived of satisfactory practice of performance monitoring.Table 2 reveals that of the selected 70 IT projects of different types, 34.3% IT projects suffered from substandard HR

Number of cases
Value of alpha 70 0.9539 projects in the selected sample of size 70.Table 3 at the end describes the descriptive statistics including maximum, minimum, means, standard deviations and variance obtained using 5 points interval-scaled independent and dependent variables.
In Table 3, variance of Performance Monitoring IV (1.040) is slightly higher than its standard deviation (1.0197) that indicates that most respondents did not remain close to the mean for this variable.The mean value is 3.4929.This implies that for the selected sample of 70 IT projects, the variable Performance Monitoring IV was performed with quality less than average rating (mean less than 3.5 with standard deviation > 1.0) (Sekeran, 2000;Cooper and Schindler, 2003).Hence project managers could have performed better monitoring in the industry for the projects.This gap in the performance monitoring indicates that project managers were not frequently reviewing the performance of the team members, thus compromising on quality.Table 4 provides the results of Pearson Correlation between the dependent variable that is, Project Result DV and independent variable that is, Performance Monitoring IV.It confirms that the result of project has a strong correlation with performance monitoring of HR which this study utilized to measure the quality of performance management of HR for the selected sample of 70 TI projects (Pearson Correlation > 0.7 and P <0.05).Figure 2 at the end presents the result of the PLS regression that has been applied to test the impact of Performance Monitoring (IV) on the Result of Project (DV).Results of PLS regression shown in Figure 2 prove that the elements Frequent Performance Monitoring (fpmv5) and Qualitative Performance Monitoring (qpmv5) that this study entertained to operationalize its variables constituted the independent variable Performance Monitoring (pmiv5) significantly (PLS R Square = 0.942, P < 0.05 and all relevant t values positive).Similarly, elements of the Result of the Project (DV) constituted it significant (PLS R Square = 0.942, P <0.05 and all relevant t values positive).Further, the Performance Monitoring of HR (IV) regressed the Result of Project significantly (PLS Regression = 0.843, P <0.05 and t value = 0.971).Based on the results in Table 1 to 4 and Figure 2, the study concludes that this study substantiates both its hypotheses H 1 and H 2 .

DISCUSSION
The conclusion and recommendation of this study are pragmatic as the existing literature of HR management already supports it.Without a continual and effective monitoring, a control process may fall into a state of despair or not be executed altogether (Strub and Lucas, 2003).This study shows that there needs to be an effective performance monitoring system in place and, more importantly, managers need to be aware of rational monitoring techniques.The study proposes that performance monitoring is a tool that is within the hands of the project manager.The project manager should utilize this tool constructively due to its effects on the project.It can potentially make or break the project.Therefore, it is recommended that the intentions of the project managers should be to exercise constructive performance monitoring which will motivate the team towards the accomplishment of the project in a timely fashion.The study further acknowledges that if the performance monitoring tool is misused it could have a de-motivating effect on the team leading to detrimental results.The latest knowledge on HR management recommends adopting the 360 degree performance management (Decenzo and Robbins, 2002).To help project managers this study contributes the Template for the 360 Degree Performance Measurement provided in Annexure 1.
This template is designed for structuring Performance Monitoring and Appraisal.The knowledge about the 360degree approach was made the foundation for designing it.It is understood that the 360-Degree approach for performance management may not be applicable to all the organizations and their projects.However, this study selected this approach as it enabled addressing all possible and desirable modes of performance management like the performance review by the immediate supervisor, by subordinates, by peers, by the end users for whom the project is being done and by the employee himself/herself.The study designed it in five segments titled Card # 1 to 5. A project manager has the autonomy to customize even one evaluation score card as he/she deem appropriate and necessary for his/her project to carry out a performance review.The study just declares it an example while project manager may append further Key Performance Indicators (KPI) as required by the project for the performance review.Recording the performance review of each team member at the end of the project is a desirable HR practice for which this template shall help project managers.

Future research opportunities
Further studies could be conducted on the level of the awareness of managers about proper performance monitoring techniques.Additionally, further research can be untaken within the realm of the HR functions that are incumbent on project managers to exercise effective project management.The impact of certain HR factors such as incentives, compensation and benefits, job satisfaction and others could be analyzed to see what impact each would have on the effectiveness of a project subsequently depicting the outcome of a project.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The study concluded that there is a strong correlation between performance monitoring of HR and the result of the project.The impact of this inference strengthens the importance of having an effective HR system in an organization that necessarily assigns the tasks of performance management at least up to performance monitoring of the project team to the project manager rendering it as one of the primary functions for effective project management.Therefore, the study recommends that HR management function of performance management at least up to the level of performance monitoring of HR for projects should not be considered supplementary or merely a support function as the existing literature of project management proclaims.Rather, HR management function performance monitoring should be declared as one of the driving forces in the hands of a project manager with which it makes or breaks the project outcome utilizing his human resources.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Theoretical framework of study

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Model of this study proven through partial least square (PLS) regression (using smart PLS 2.0 N3 Software).

Table 1 .
Frequency table for independent variable: Performance monitoring of human resources to measure quality of performance management.

Table 2 .
Frequency table for dependent variable: Result of project.

Table 3 .
Descriptive statistics of variables.

Table 4 .
Pearson correlation among performance monitoring and result of project.

Table 5 .
Reliability of the instrument.