African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5255

Full Length Research Paper

Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacteria isolated from fomites in some day care centres in Ile-Ife, Nigeria

Eunice Damilola Wilkie
  • Eunice Damilola Wilkie
  • Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Science Education, Anchor University. Lagos State, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Anthonia Olufunke Oluduro
  • Anthonia Olufunke Oluduro
  • Department of Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Osun State, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Toyosi Teniola Sotala
  • Toyosi Teniola Sotala
  • Department of Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Osun State, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 03 July 2021
  •  Accepted: 11 February 2022
  •  Published: 30 April 2022

 ABSTRACT

This study was conducted by carrying out the isolation, identification and determination of the sensitivity profile to antibiotics in bacteria isolated from fomites in some day care centres in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. A total of one hundred and twenty-four fomites were collected from selected seventeen day care centers within Ile-Ife. These were cultured on nutrient agar plates incubated at 37°C for 24 h using streak plate technique. Preliminary identification of bacterial isolates was performed using cultural, colonial and morphological characteristics of isolates on the agar plates such as relative size, colour, texture, consistency, pigment, elevation, edge and shape. Bacterial isolates were further characterized by physiological characteristics through biochemical reactions of the bacterial isolates to some reagents and media with reference to the Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Isolates were further identified with Microbact identification test kit. The antibiotype of the isolates was determined by the Kirby-Bauer’s disk diffusion technique. Detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase was done phenotypically by the double disc synergy test. Resistance to antibiotics varied greatly among the isolates. Resistance to cefuroxime, augmentin, cephalexin and ampicillin was notably high in Bacillus sp, Staphylococcus sp, Corynebacterium sp and Staphylococcus aureus from fomites. Meanwhile, all Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to meropenem, ciprofloxacin, augmentin, trimethroprim, gentamycin, cotrimoxazole, chloramphenicol and ofloxacin. Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) was generally high among the Gram positive isolates with diversity of MAR patterns.

 

Key wordsFomites, bacteria, disk diffusion technique, antibiotic resistance.


 INTRODUCTION

Day care can be defined as a facility, personal or relative(s) home, which provide care for infants and toddlers and preschoolers (Shahidul and Nasreen, 2015). Day care is also taking care of a child or multiple children at a time by nannies or babysitters, teachers, or other providers. Microorganisms are ubiquitous. They are found on the floor where the children play, toys, air, etc. Most of these microorganisms are Proteus sp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus sp. Bacillus sp. and Streptococcusfaecalis (Olaitan and Adeleke, 2006). Fomites are non-living materials or surfaces which could harbor or spread fecal pathogens (Timothy et al., 2013). Inanimate objects (fomites) are known to transmit human pathogens via direct, surface-to-mouth, contacts, or indirectly, by contaminated fingers and oral transmission (Akinrotoye et al., 2018). The fomites includes baby toys, beddings, door handles, showers, toilet, hand lockers especially those found in day care, and restrooms (Bright et al., 2010). It is believed that inanimate objects are carriers of microorganisms emanating within the surrounding environment. These ubiquitous microorganisms could pose a bio-transfer potential that has the potential to be transferred to another substratum where growth is possible, for example on food, inanimate objects or on the human body (Joanna, 2012). The spread of infectious diseases through hand contact has been an area of major concern that should be looked into drastically for possible solutions. Surveys of the day care center environment have found contamination on the surfaces of toys, food areas, and diaper changing areas. The organisms thus picked from fomites can be transferred to another child as the fomites have shown to play a role in the transmission of organisms. This study therefore seek to isolate and determine the antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacteria of public health importance associated with fomites in selected day care centers located in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples were collected from 17 different Day care centers in Ile-Ife, Osun State. Sterile cotton swabs pre moistened with sterile normal saline was rotated around the baby toys, diaper changing tables, chairs, tables, mats, door handles and bed sheets. Preliminary identification of bacterial isolates was performed using cultural, colonial and morphological characteristics of isolates on the agar plates such as relative size, colour, texture, consistency, pigment, elevation, edge and shape (Olutiola et al., 2018). Bacterial isolates were further characterized by physiological characteristics through biochemical reactions of the bacterial isolates to some reagents and media with reference to the Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Isolates were identified to specie level using Microbact identification test kits (Oxoid).

 

Antibiotic susceptibility test

 

Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was done using the Kirby-Bauer’s disk diffusion method as described by Bauer et al. (1966) and interpreted according to the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standard (CLSI, 2013). An 18-24 h old broth culture of the inoculum was standardized (adjusted to 0.5 McFarland Standard - x 108 cfu/ml). The prepared standardized inoculum was seeded on the Mueller-Hinton susceptibility agar plates (Lab M, UK) with the aid of sterile swab stick and allowed to dry for 5-10 min. The Gram positive and Gram positive antibiotic disks (combined (Biomark Laboratories, India) containing varying and specific concentrations viz; gentamycin (10 µg), augmentin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cephalexin (1.5 µg), cefuroxime (10 µg), erythromycin (5 µg), vancomycin (30 µg) cotrimoxazole (25 µg), ampicillin (10µg), tetracycline (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cefuroxime (10 µg) and ceftazidime (10 µg) and combined (Abtek) containing varying and specific concentrations which include gentamycin (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), tetracycline (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg) cefixime (5 µg) ciprofloxacin (5 µg), trimethoprim (5 µg), nitrofurantoin (300 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), augmentin (30 µg), Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg ) and ceftazidime (30 µg)) were used.


 RESULTS

Frequency and percentage distribution of the bacterial isolated from fomites, in day care centers in Ile-Ife

 

Table 1 shows the overall distribution of bacteria isolated from fomites in day care centers. The distribution of the isolates recovered includes: Staphylococcus aureus 7 (5.30 %), Staphylococcus sp 18 (13.64%), Bacillus sp 54 (40.90%), Corynebacterium xerosis 29 (21.97%), Corynebacterium kutsceri 19 (14.39%), Enterobacter clocae 1 (0.76 %), Enterobacter agglomerans 1 (0.76%), other Enterobacteriacae 1 (0.76%), Providencia rettgeri 1 (0.76%) and Proteus sp 1 (0.76%).

 

 

Antibiotic susceptibility profile of the bacterial isolates cultured from fomites in day care centers in Ile-Ife

 

Table 2 shows the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the bacterial isolates cultured from fomites. Resistance of bacterial isolates to antibiotics varies greatly. Staphylococcus aureus was resistant to ampicillin (85.7%), augmentin (85.7%), ceftazidime (57.14%), vancomycin (57.14%) and cephalexin (71.43%). However, the organism was sensitive to gentamycin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), cotrimoxazole (85.7%) and tetracycline (85.7%). Meanwhile, Staphylococcus sp was resistant to ampicillin (88.89%), augmentin (83.3%), ceftazidime (72.22%), cefuroxime (77.78%) and vancomycin (72.22%). However, Staphylococcus sp was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (100%), gentamycin (94.44%), cotrimoxazole (61.11%) and tetracycline (50%). Bacillus sp was resistant to cefuroxime (98.15%), ampicillin (98.15%) and augmentin (98.15%). However, the organism was sensitive to gentamycin (94.44%), ciprofloxacin (94.44%), tetracycline (61.11%) and cotrimoxazole (72.22%). The resistance profile of Corynebacterium sp, is as follows: cefuroxime (91.67%), ampicillin (95.83%), ceftaxidime (87.50%) and augmentin (87.50%). However, the organisms were susceptible to gentamycin (79.17%), ciprofloxacin (85.41%) and cotrimoxazole (68.75%). All Enterobacteriaceae were 100% susceptible to cotrimoxazole, gentamycin, cefotaxime, ofloxacin, augmentin, meropenem and ciprofloxacin.

 

 

 

Multiple antibiotic resistance profile of bacterial isolates from fomites in day care centers in Ile-Ife

 

The multiple antibiotic resistance patterns were calculated using the MAR index formular. The isolates with MAR index values higher than 0.2 were considered as multiple resistant. The classes of antibiotics used to investigate multiple resistance patterns include penicillins, macrolides, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, amino-glycosides, fluoroquinolones, beta lactams, glycopeptides and cephalosporins. The MAR (index) obtained from bacterial isolates from fomites in day care centers were observed to range from 0.18 to 1.0. The highest observed multiple resistant phenotype was found to exhibit resistance to 9 classes of antibiotics in Bacillus sp. All Gram positive strains exhibited different antibiotic resistance profiles with “AUG, AMP, CP, CRX AND CPZ” appearing most frequent. While for Gram negative, Enterobacter agglomerans was seen to be resistance to tetracycline and trimethoprim. This is shown in Table 3.

 

 

 

Frequency of ESBL - producing gram negative bacteria

 

The prevalence of ESBL by the double disk synergy test (DDST) showed that 5 (80%) from fomites were ESBL producing strains (Table 4).

 


 DISCUSSION

Children, especially children in day care centers aged three years and under, have shown to have a high frequency of infectious disease than children cared for elsewhere. This could be because of direct transmission between children, workers, contaminated fomites, contact or respiratory droplet transmission (Ibfelt et al., 2015). An increased prevalence of antibiotic resistant organisms among children attending child care compared with children cared for at home may be expected considering the more frequent use of antibiotics, the gathering of large numbers of susceptible children, and the increased prevalence of infectious diseases in child-care settings (Adedire et al., 2016). The frequency of bacteria isolated from fomites was also very high. It was found to be 132 (27.22%). This corroborates with Risan (2017) who reported that opportunistic pathogens such as bacteria, viruses and fungi can survive on inanimate surfaces for long periods of time and items such as watches, pens, toys, floor, door handles and mobile phones are permanent surfaces for transmission of these types of infections.

 

The prevalence of bacteria isolated from fomites in increasing order in this study is as follows. Bacillus sp 54 (40.90%), C. xerosis 29 (21.97%), C. kutsceri 19 (14.39%), Staphylococcus sp 18 (13.64%), S. aureus 7(5.30%), E. clocae, E. agglomerans, P. rettgerri and Proteus sp 1 (0.76%). Bacillus sp 54 (40.90%), was the highest bacteria recovered from the bacteria isolated from fomites in all the day care centers recruited for the study. This agrees with a study conducted by Ali et al. (2018) who reported Bacillus sp (66.66 %) to be the most commonly cultured bacteria from toys in child care centers, in Al-Rass city, Al-Qassim region. The reason for the high occurrence of bacillus sp in this study can be attributed to the fact that these microorganisms are spore forming organisms, rugged opportunistic bacilli and could be found easily in the environments. They are capable of forming endospores, which make them resistant to extreme conditions such as pressure, extreme heat or cold, drought, starvation, biocides, and UV irradiation (Gopal et al., 2015).

 

In this study, the frequency of gram-positive isolates was higher than gram-negative isolates. This is consistent with earlier studies conducted by Ayalew et al. (2019). The various bacteria such as Bacillus sp, Staphylococus aureus, Staphylococus sp, Klebsiella sp, Proteus sp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia sp, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter sp isolated in this study are similar to the bacteria isolated by Adedire et al. (2016); except for Corynebacterium sp, which was found to be isolated in this study. No Vibrio sp was isolated in this study. The absence of this bacteria in this study corroborate with the findings of Adedire et al. (2016). The high occurrence of Gram positive bacteria over Gram negative bacteria agrees with the findings of Al-Harbi et al. (2017) who reported 80% of Gram positive bacteria and 20% Gram negative bacteria isolated from frequently used fomites in Kuwait. Staphylococcus aureus isolated from fomites was susceptible to gentamycin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), cotrimoxazole (85.7%) and tetracycline (85.7%) but resistance to ampicillin (85.7%), augmentin (85.7%); while Bacillus sp were 98.15% resistant to ampicillin, cefuroxime and augmentin. The results however agrees with the report of Afolabi et al. (2018) who reported 100% resistivity of Staphylococcus aureus to augmentin isolated from fomites in crèche. Corynebacterium sp were 87.50% and 95.83% to augmentin and ampicillin respectively. All Enterobacteriaceae isolated from fomites were susceptible to augmentin (100%), cefotaxime (100), nitrofurantoin (80%), ofloxacin (100%), gentamycin (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), meropenem (100%), cotrimoxazole (100%) and chloramphenicol (100%). However; they were resistant to trimethoprim (40%) and tetracycline (20%). This result is different to the findings of Adedire et al. (2016).

 

The MAR index expressed by the Gram positive isolates was very high in all sampled locations and more than the 0.2 threshold value which is the set value for distinguishing low and high risk contamination (Krumperman, 1983).


 CONCLUSION

Considering the various findings, the result of this study confirms that fomites in day care centers could serve as media for transmission of the disease. The micro-organisms pose health risk for immunocompromised children. These environments must improve the suitable hygiene procedures for protecting the children by ensuring that the workers observe stringent guidelines on proper washing and regular disinfecting of toys and beddings. The study concluded that the incidence of multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria isolated from fomites was high. Hence, this calls for great concern considering its implications in the day care centers studied.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest



 REFERENCES

Adedire SA, Oluduro AO, Bakare MK (2016). Antibiotics Susceptibility Profile of Bacteria Isolates From Selected Baby Day Care Centers in Ondo, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Microbiology 30(2):3382-3388.

 

Akinrotoye KP, Bankole MO, Akinola SO (2018). Occurrence of Pathogenic Bacteria on Public Surfaces within community schools in Abeokuta Environs Ogun State. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 6(3):47-52.

 

Ali S, Al-Harbi MM, Rahman SR (2018). Bacterial Isolates, Present on Surface of Toys in Child Care Centers, in Al-Rass City, Al-Qassim Reigon. K. S. A. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 5(5):409-414.

 

Ayalew W, Mulu W, Biadglene F (2019). Bacterial contamination and antibiogram of isolates from health care workers' fomites at Felege Hiwot ReferralHospital, northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Development 33(2):129-141.

 

Bright KR, Boone SA, Gerba CP (2010). Occurrence of bacteria and viruses on elementary classroom surfaces and the potential role of elementary classroom hygiene in the spread of infectious diseases. Journal School Nursing 26(1):33-41.
Crossref

 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2013). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; eighteen informational supplements 23:62-64.

 

Gopal N, Hill C, Ross PR, Beresford TP, Fenelon MA, Cotter PD (2015).The Prevalence and Control of Bacillus and Related Spore-Forming Bacteria in the Dairy Industry. Frontiers in Microbiology 6:1418.
Crossref

 

Ibfelt T, Engelund EH, Schultz AC, Andersen LP (2015). Effect of cleaning and disinfection of toys on infectious diseases and micro-organisms in day care nurseries. Journal Hospital Infection 89(2):109- 115.
Crossref

 

Joanna V (2012). School of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Mancheste, the Microbial Contamination of Mobile Communication Devices. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education 13(1):59-61.
Crossref

 

Krumperman PH (1983). Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Applied Environmental Microbiology 46(1):165-170.
Crossref

 

Olaitan JO, Adeleke EO (2006). Bacterial in Day Care Environment. The Internet Journal of Microbiology 3(1):5.
Crossref

 

Olutiola PO, Famurewa O, Sonntag HG. (2018). An Introduction to microbiology, a pratical approach. Tertiary Text Book Series pp. 157-177.

 

Risan MH (2017). Isolation and Identification of Bacteria from under Fingernails. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(8):3584-3590.
Crossref

 

Shahidul I, Nasreen AK (2015). Child Day Care Center in Bangladesh: Problems and Prospects. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research 3(3):2347-3878.

 

Timothy RJ, Luke HM, Yayi G, Sara JM, Kosek M, Yori PP, Pinedo SR, Schwab KJ (2013). Fecal Indicator Bacteria Contamination of Fomites and Household Demand for Surface Disinfection Products: A Case Study from Peru. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 89(5):869-872.
Crossref

 




          */?>