ABSTRACT
Two locally prevailing hetyerocystous cyanobacterial isolates, collected from alluvial clay soil and identified as Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena variabilis, were tested (either singly or mixed) for their potency to colonize the roots of wheat seedlings. N. muscorum formed close association with root hairs, whereas A. variabilis showed loose binding. The mixture of both cyanobacterial strains formed weak association with the roots of wheat seedlings. The tight colonization of N. muscorum led to accumulation of Chl "a" in the roots, as well as showed a beneficial influence on stimulating nitrogenase activity. Such tight association by N. muscorum significantly increased the growth parameters of wheat seedlings. Dry weight of the inoculated plant seedlings roots augmented by more than 3-fold of the control, wherever the shoots were promoted by more than 36% as compared to the control has no inoculation. However, the loose attachment shown by A. variabilis contributed to the weak association of the mixture of both cyanobacterial agents.
Key words: Nostoc muscorum, Anabaena variabilis, Triticum variabilis, cyanobacterial isolates.
It is known that the extensive application of mineral fertilizer is very costly and environmentally hazardous. So, application of biofertilizer is considered one of the most alternative solutions used to reduce soil pollution and agricultural expenses. In the recent years, several attentions have been drawn to use cyanobacterium that exists in the different soils as a biofertilizer for its capability for N2-fixation and organic compounds assimilation (Prasanna et al., 2004). Efficiency of cyanobacteria to form such successful beneficial collaboration by invading the plant roots is of a considerable agronomic importance, particularly for cereal production (Singh et al., 2011; Prasanna et al., 2013b). Likewise, some of cyanobacteria showed an effective role in stimulating soil fertility by producing plant growth enhancing substances, consequently increasing nutrients availability and plant uptake (Sergeeva et al., 2002; Prasanna and Kaushik (2006).
Aref and EL-Kassas (2006) pointed out that inoculation of the soil by genera Nostoc and/or Anabaena of cyanobacteria significantly augmented maize yield. A significant increase in chlorophyll content, dry weight, many enzymes activities as a result of cyanobacterial inoculation of wheat roots were reported by (Babu et al., 2015).
A significant promotion in dry weight, total nitrogen, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, carotenoids and pigments occurred in wheat plants treated with cyanobacterial biofertilizer (Dhar et al., 2015). Cyanobacteria also play an effective role in carbon and nitrogen cycling, wherever it enhance the production of ammonia and indolic compounds. They also reported that analysis of harvest stage of rice elucidated a remarkable augmentation in soil biomass carbon, nitrogen availability, grain yield and 1000 grain weight.
Smith and Crews (2014) showed that cyanobacteria may have a beneficial effect on inhibition plant diseases by reducing the herbivore or pathogen host population. Therefore, the present work aimed to estimate the potential of two locally isolated cyanobacterial strains in Egypt, namely Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena variabilis for developing association with wheat roots, as well as their effect on plant growth and nitrogenase activity for possibilities of utilizing it as a wide biofertilizer application.
Isolation and cultivation of Cyanobacteria
Cyanobacterial isolates were collected from the surface layer (0 to 20 cm) of an alluvial clay soil (pH 7.5, EC 2.5 dSm-1 and OM 1.07%). The isolated cyanobacteria were purified and identified to be N. muscorum and A. variabilis, following the technique described by Holt et al. (1994).
The axenic cultures were maintained in BG-11 medium (Allen and Stainer, 1968), and kept under constant conditions with continuous light (3000 lux) provided by four 18 W fluorescent tubes, and at a temperature of 26±2°C.
Root colonization assay of cyanobacterial isolates
Wheat seeds (Triticum vulgare L.) were germinated for three days and seedlings were placed in glass jars, each containing 50 ml of BG-11 medium containing 0.5% agar. To evaluate the root colonization ability of each cyanobacterial isolate in wheat seedlings, the prepared glass jars were divided into four groups as follows:
Applied treatments:
1. Control without inoculation "C".
2. Inoculation with N. muscorum "N".
3. Inoculation with A. variabilis "A".
4. Inoculation with a mixture of "N" + "A".
The experimental jars were inoculated with 4 ml of 15 day-old cyanobacterial culture of each strain. Each treatment was performed in three replicates and incubated in the presence of continuous light (at intensity of 3000 lux) and at temperature of 26±2°C. Medium in the jars was maintained at a constant volume via compensation wherever needed. Colonization was tested, after 15 days, by having transverse root sectors made by the microtome technique. The roots transverse sectors were examined under the light microscope by magnification power of 100x.
Nitrogenase activity and chlorophyll "a" content determination
Acetylene reduction technique was used to assay nitrogenase activity (Hardy et al., 1973) for cyanobacterial association with the roots of wheat seedlings. Whole plants (15 day-old) were placed, with their roots immersed in 5 ml medium, in sealed glass vessels each containing 17 ml of 10% (v/v) acetylene in air and incubated on an orbital shaker at a light intensity rate of 3000 lux for 60 min.
Wheat roots were extracted using methanol in the dark at 4°C, and content of chlorophyll "a" (Chl "a") was determined spectrophotometrically at 663 nm, according to MacKinney (1941). Moreover, growth of wheat seedlings were estimated in terms of shoot and root dry weights, which were then statistically analyzed, according to Gomez and Gomez (1984).
Statistical analysis
Complete randomize design was applied on the experiment, the LSD of 0.05% was calculated through analysis of variance (ANOVA) to make a comparison among the means of the obtained data of the tested treatments.
Colonization of cyanobacteria with the roots of 15 days old wheat seedlings
Figures 1a, b, 2a and b show that, N. muscorum and A. variabilis had ability to colonize the roots of wheat seedlings. In the case of the mixture of both cyanobacterial strains, little colonization was observed, due certainly to contribution of N. muscorum strain. Such observations were detected in comparison with the control treatment without cyanobacterial inoculation, which showed no colonization occurred (Figure 1a). The attachment of cyanobacteria was characterized by long filaments loosely packed together, growing between root hairs. In the case of Anabaena, individual filaments were observed on the surface and around the roots in freshly cut transverse sections (Figure 2b) as they were not intimately associated with root epidermis. On the other hand, Nostoc formed tight associations, where packed filaments were observed on wheat roots. The cyanobacterial packages made an intimate contact with the root surface. In contrast, the strain forming a loose attachment (Anabaena) was not characterized by abundant sticky mucilage production.
Fadl-Allah et al. (2011) explained the process of colonization for the cyanobacteria forming a tight association with wheat roots, by the first stage of colonization of N. muscorum which might occur via migration of hormogonia. The hormogonia developed into long filamentous, and the long filaments were developed at the seriate stage, which consisted of filaments tightly packed in a mucilaginous sheath. They added that, in addition to forming a tight association, N. muscorum also appeared to penetrate some root cells as cyanobacterial mass.
Cyanobacterial inoculation affecting growth of wheat seedlings
Data listed in the Table 1 reveal that, inoculation with cyanobacterial isolates significantly increased the measures of both roots and shoots of wheat seedlings, as compared to the un-inoculated seedlings. However, inoculation with N. muscorum was superior to A. variabilis and/or to their mixture in promoting the tested growth criteria of the plants, that is, length and fresh and dry weights.
Results of the current study denoted that, inoculation of wheat plant roots with N. muscorum improved wheat seedlings growth, this agreed with previous findings reported by Gantar (2000) and Babu et al. (2015). In addition to its ability to fix N2 and supply such essential nutrient to plants, cyanobacteria have been shown to produce compounds that stimulate the growth of plants.
In an earlier study by Prasanna et al. (2008, 2013a), it was proven that cyanobacteria had the ability to produce phytohormone "IAA". Nanjappan et al. (2007) evaluated the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as a biofertilizer for wheat. Gantar (2000) and Prasanna et al. (2012) showed that, the N2 fixed by Nostoc sp. strain in association with wheat was taken up by the plants and supported their growth.
Effect of cyanobacterial inoculation on chlorophyll "a" content and nitrogeanase activity in roots of wheat seedlings
Chlorophyll "a" was not detected in roots grown either in absence of cyanobacteria, generally, or in the presence of A. variabilis, that was unable to form tight associations. The tight associations appeared by N. muscorum had a high Chl "a" concentration (450 μg Chl "a" g-1 root dry wt.), as compared to A. variabilis which had a loose association with wheat plant roots.
Nitrogenase activity was not also detected in the roots grown either in the absence of cyanobacteria, or presence of A. variabilis. The tight associations of N. muscorum occurred a high nitrogenase activity (1.6 nmol C2H4 h-1), as compared to A. variabilis which had a loose association with wheat roots.
Earlier studies have shown that the heterocystous cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. strain 2S9B was unusual among characterized cyanobacteria in its ability to form tight associations with wheat roots and to penetrate both root epidermis and cortical intracellular and intercellular spaces. Nostoc sp. strain 2S9B could easily co-exist within wheat tissue, making it a promising organism for achieving a biological association between a N2-fixing bacterium and wheat. Gantar and Elhai (1999) and Prasanna et al. (2013b) tested four heterocystous cyanobacteria, belonging to the genera, Anabaena and Nostoc for their ability to form associations with the roots of wheat seedlings under using hydroponics. The cyanobacterial strains formed close associations with wheat plants, and were able to enter through root hairs and penetrate the epidermal layer of wheat roots. Moreover, there was a significant higher indole acetic acid production and chlorophyll accumulation observed in the colonized roots.
The present study showed that the ability of cyanobacterium N. muscorum strain to form tight association and colonization with wheat roots, enhanced nitrogenase activity consequently, plant growth through its potential role as a nitrogen fixer bacteria. So, it may be utilized as a biofertilizer and contribute in promoting the amount of nitrogen fertilizer needed by wheat crop. However, further studies must be undertaken to confirm the effect of this strain (N. muscorum) on other plants under Egyptian Conditions.
The author has not declared any conflict of interests.
REFERENCES
Allen MM, Stanier RY (1968). Selective isolation of blue-green cyanobacteria from water and soil. J. Gen. Microbiol. 51:203-209.
Crossref
|
|
Aref Elham M, EL-Kassas AR (2006). Cyanobacteria inoculation as nitrogen source may substitute partially mineral nitrogen in maize production. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 31(8):5367-5378.
|
|
Babu S, Prasanna R, Bidyarani N, Singh R (2015). Analysing the colonisation of inoculated cyanobacteria in wheat plants using biochemical and molecular tools. J. Appl Phycol. 27:327-338.
Crossref
|
|
Dhar DW, Prasanna R, Pabbi S, Vishwakarma R (2015). Significance of Cyanobacteria as Inoculants in Agriculture. Algal Biorefinery, An Integrated Approach. pp. 339-374.
Crossref
|
|
Fadl-Allah EM, El-komy HM, Al-Harbi NA, Sholkamy EN (2011). In vitro creation of artificial nitrogen fixing cyanobacterium (Nostoc muscorum) association with wheat. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5:302-310.
|
|
Gantar M (2000). Mechanical damage of root provides enhanced colonization of wheat endorhizosphere by N2-fixng cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. strain 2S9B. Biol. Fertil. Soils 32:250-255.
Crossref
|
|
Gantar M, Elhai J (1999). Colonization of wheat para-nodules by the N2-fixing cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. strain 2S9B. New Phytol. 141:373-379.
Crossref
|
|
Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, USA.
|
|
Hardy RWF, Holsten RD, Burn RC (1973). The acetylene- ethylene assay for N2-fixation: Laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 43:1185-1207.
Crossref
|
|
Holt KG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST (1994). Oxygenic phototrophic bacteria. In. Bergy's Manual of Determinative Bacteriol, Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore. Pp. 377-415.
|
|
Mackinney G (1941). Absorbion of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. Biolog. Chem. 140:315-322.
|
|
Nanjappan K, Radha P, Nain L, Brahama DK (2007). Evaluation of potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacterial as inoculants for wheat. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43:23-30.
Crossref
|
|
Prasanna R, Babu S, Rana A, Kabi SR, Chaudhary V, Gupta V, Umar A, Shivay YS, Nain L, Pal RK (2013b). Evaluating the establishment and agronomic proficiency of cyanobacterial consortia as organic options in wheat-rice cropping sequence. Exp. Agric. 49:416-434.
Crossref
|
|
Prasanna R, Joshi M, Rana A, Shivay YS, Nain L (2012). Influence of co-inoculation of bacteria– cyanobacteria on crop yield and C-N sequestration in soil under rice crop. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28:1223-1235.
Crossref
|
|
Prasanna R, Kaushik BD (2006). Cyanobacteria in soil health and sustainable agriculture. Health Environ. 3:91-105.
|
|
Prasanna R, Pabby A, Saxena S, Singh PK (2004) Modulation of pigment profiles of Calothrix elenkenii in response to environmental changes. J. Plant Physiol. 161:1125-1132.
Crossref
|
|
Prasanna R, Sharma E, Sharma P, Kumar A, Kumar R, Gupta V, Pal R, Shivay Y, Nain L (2013a). Soil fertility and establishment potential of inoculated cyanobacteria in rice crop grown under non-flooded conditions. Paddy Water Environ. 11:175-183.
Crossref
|
|
Prasanna R, Tripathi R, Gupta V, Middha S, Joshi M, Ancha R, Kaushik BD (2008). Evaluation of fungicidal activity of extracellular filtrates of cyanobacteria-possible role of hydrolytic enzymes. J. Basic Microbiol. 48:186-194.
Crossref
|
|
Sergeeva E, Liaimer A, Bergman B (2002). Evidence for production of the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid by cyanobacteria. Planta 215:229-238.
Crossref
|
|
Singh JS, Pandey VC, Singh DP (2011). Efficient soil microorganisms: A new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 140:339-353.
Crossref
|
|
Smith VH, Crews T (2014). Applying ecological principles of crop cultivation in large scale algal biomass production. Algal Res. 4:23-34.
Crossref
|