African Journal of
Plant Science

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Plant Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0824
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJPS
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 683

Full Length Research Paper

Family Neuradaceae J. G. Agardh in Saudi Arabia

Behery, M. K.
  • Behery, M. K.
  • Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P. O. Box 1982, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 03 December 2018
  •  Accepted: 28 January 2019
  •  Published: 28 February 2019

 ABSTRACT

Morphological characters, seed coat sculpturing (SEM) of seed, leaf, pollen grains and also a key aspects were revisited to revise relationships between dissimilar taxa of the genus Neurada in Saudi Arabia. The present revision shows the occurrence of three distinctive varieties (var. procambens, var. al-eisawii and var. stellate); the last two varieties considered a new registration in Flora of Saudi Arabia.

 

Key words: Morphological characters, Neuradaceae, Saudi Arabia.


 INTRODUCTION

Neurada L. is a desert monotypic plant labeled from Aegypto-Arabia. It has a very wide circulation from North Africa, East Mediterranean region, Sahara, Sudan to Indian desert. Neurada L. among subfamily Neuradaceae of the family Rosaceae (Thorne, 1983). Later, Takhtajan (1980), Cronquist (1981) and Dahlgren (1983) divided Neurada into two genera (Neuradopsis and Grielum) which comprised subfamily Neuradaceae.
 
According to Zohary (1966) two varieties Neurada procumbens L. var. procumbens and var. stellate were recognized. Neurada al-eisawii was described by Barsotti et al. (2000) as a new species from the Southern desert of Jordan. He described the new species by some morphological characters in the fruit in insertion to the plant habit.
 
In Egypt Neuradaceae  is  recognized  as  a  monotypic family (Tackholm, 1956, 1974; Boulos,1995, 1999; El Hadidi and Fayed, 1994-1995). According to a study carried out by Turki (2007), three distinctive varieties were found from Egyptian Neuradaceae.
 
In Saudi Arabia, N. procumbens is comprised in the family Neuradaceae as a monotypic genus (Migahed, 1974; Mandaville, 1990; Chaudhary, 1999).
 
Family Neuradaceae
 
Family Neuradaceae is a densely pubescent, prostrate and annual herb. Leaves alternate stipulate, sinuate to pinnately lobed. Flowers are usually solitary, bisexual, 5-merous, perigynous to epigynous, the receptacle discoid and  woody  in  fruit.  Sepals  are  valvate and petals free, and pentamerous. It has ten free stamens, and gynaecium of 3-10 carpels immersed in the receptacle. Fruits are discoid, woody, spiny with winged bound formed from the enlargement of sepals in fruit, the seeds develop inside the stiff discoid pericarp, the radicles and  the plumules perforate the pericarp and grow down and up correspondingly and the old spiny hypanthium often continue as a collar curved the base of the new plants. Furthermore, Neurada seeds are likely heteromorphic, with both spinose and spineless sides, which involve the vertical scattering of seeds and diaspores, and the exact site in which they lie in the soil (Hegazy et al., 2014).
 
This family is symbolized by its connate carpels inside the calyx tube.  
 
Neurada are wide-ranging in distribution in Saudi Arabia, it is found in all sandy soil of the Kingdom.
 
For all the field excursions during the spring of consecutive years 2014 -2015, Neurada samples were found which clearly differ from N. procumbens in pattern and structures of fruit (Figure 1).
 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

This work was done on fresh plant material collected from the natural habitations  in  Saudi  Arabia  (Al-Oassim,  Al  Kharj,  (NJw); Nafud, (NF) and Nuairiya, Dammam and  Dahran  (E),  and  kept  in College of Science of Herbarium, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University.
 
Morphologically, fruits and leaf characters were examined on fresh material. Photographs was taken for SEM on leaf, and seed and pollens grains were examined from fresh resources by escalating them on stubs and covered with a tinny coating of gold using Fei, Inspect S50, Czech Republic SEM at the electron microscopic unit, Institute For Research And Medical Consultation (IRMC). Terms of pollen conferring to El-Ghazaly (1991).


 RESULTS

N. procumbens L. var. procumbens
 
Annual herb 15-40 cm, densely grey-tomentose; stem prostrate; leaves 0.5-3.1 x0.3-1.5 cm, oblong-ovate, sinuate-pinnatified; sepals 2-2.5 x 1-1.5 mm, ovate-triangular, acute; petals 1 x 1 mm, white, cream or pinkish; fruit 1-2.3 mm diam. With 2-8 mm spines. Figure 1. (1 a, b).
 
N. procumbens var. al-eisawii (Barsotti, Borzatti & Garbari) Turki, comb. nova
 
Syn.:  Neurada  al-eisawii   Barsotti,  Borzatti  &   Garbari, Bot. Chron. 13: 113 (2000) Holotypus: Giabal El Guzlan, Barsotti 368.4.98.1 (PI).
 
Leaves: greenish white; 1.7-2.2 cm long; 1.0-1.9 cm wide; petiole 0.9-1.2 cm; flowers with white petals; fruit with external obvious branched spines (Figure 1, 2a, b).
 
N. procumbens var. stellata M. & D. Zohary in Zohary & Angelis, de, Palest. J. Bot. Jerusalem, ser. 5,: 249 (1952)
 
Leaves: greenish white;1.9-2.4 cm long, 1.0-1.3 cm wide; petiole 1.0 -1.4 cm; flowers with white petals; fruit boundaries intensely 5- lobed; each lobe with 3 spines, (unbranched spine) (Figure 1,  a3, b3).
 
Morphological feature
 
The following key is suggested for delimiting the taxa studied on the basis of morphological characters of fruits.
 
Leaf hair: leaf of all studied taxa was covered with densely unicellular branched hair (Figure 2a1, a2 and a3).  
 
Seed coat sculpturing
 
The seed coat sculpturing (SEM) of the studied taxa was investigated. The spermodern patterns were reticulate with granules (Figure 2b1, b2, b3, d2 and d3).
 
Pollen grains                                                                                                          
 
In polar view, the pollen grain of the revised taxa are tricolpate, triangular, isopolar, exine microreticulate, with asymmetrical carinate profile; lumina subcircular polygonal and Homobrochate (Figure 2 (c1, c2, c3 and d1).
 


 DISCUSSION

The morphological features of the taxa N. procumbens indicate diversity. In the field, they can be differentiated by stem pattern, plant stature, extent of leaves and fruit type. Borzatti De Loewenstern and Garbari (2002) stated no noteworthy changes in the karyotype morphology of N. procumbens var. stellata and N. al-eisawii. Turki (2007) revealed the presence of three distinct varieties on Egyption specimens depending on fruit characters and stated that anatomical and pollen types seem to be irrelevant. The specimens collected from Saudi Arabia almost close by in the dimensions of the leaves and pedicels extent from that designated by Turki from Egypt. Seed cote of N. procumbens var. procumbens and var. al-eisawii have the same sculpture and also the same kind and density of granules (solitary granules) while var. stellate carries out a densely two types of granules, (single and double granules). Pollen types appear to be irrelevant in typifying the deliberate taxa.
 
Consequently, fitting to identify Neurada al-eisawii as a variety under N. procumbens instead of a distinct species is suggested. Therefore, the three deliberate Saudi Arabian taxa may be deliberated as three dissimilar varieties of N. procumbens.
 
This result agrees with the investigation by Turki (2007) and contradicts that by Barsotti et al. (2000) of Neurada al-eisawii as a new species.
 
N. procumbens var. al-eisawii and var. stellate are considered new registration in Flora of Saudi Arabia.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was carried out through a project financed by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Imam Abdul Rahman bin Faisal University, project No. 2014146.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The author has not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Barsotti G, Borzatti de Loewenstern A, Garbari F (2000). Neurada al-eisawii (Neuradaceae), a new species from the southern desert of Jordan. Botanika Chronika 13:111-115.

 

Borzatti de Loewenstern A, Garbari F (2002). Karyological aspects of the genus Neurada (Neuradaceae J. G. Agardh). – Caryologia 55(4):361-365.
Crossref

 
 

Boulos L (1995). Flora of Egypt Checklist. Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo; First edition.

 
 

Boulos L (1999). Flora of Egypt, Vol 1. (Azollaceae-Oxalidaceae). – Cairo. 
Crossref

 
 

Cronquist A (1981). An Evolution and classification of flowering plants. Second edition. The New York Botanical garden, New York, USA. Available at: 

View

 
 

Chaudhary SA (1999). Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (vol. 1) Ministry of Agriculture and Water. National Agriculture and Water Research Center Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh.

 
 

Dahlgren RM (1983). General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic Journal of Botany 3:119-149.
Crossref

 
 

El-Ghazaly GA (1991). Pollen flora of Qatar. Scientific and applied research center, Doha: Qatar University.

 
 

El Hadidi MN, Fayed AA (1994-95). Materials for Excursion Flora of Egypt. Taeckholmia 15:57.

 
 

Hegazy AK, Alatar AA, Khan MA, Lovett-Doust J (2014). Interaction Between "Safe Sites" and "Safe Sides" for Germination of Neurada procumbens (Neuradaceae) in the Middle East. Folia Geobotanica. 49. 
Crossref

 
 

Mandaville JP (1990). Flora of eastern Saudi Arabia. London: Kegan Paul International jointly with the National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, Riyadh. 130-155.

 
 

Tackholm V (1956). Students, Flora of Egypt. Cairo University. p. 649.

 
 

Tackholm V (1974). Students, Flora of Egypt, ed. 2. Cairo University, p. 888.

 
 

Takhtajan AL (1980). Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Botanical Review 46(3):225-359.
Crossref

 
 

Thorne RF (1983). Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nordic Journal of Botany 3:85-117.
Crossref

 
 

Turki ZA (2007). Neuradaceae J.G. Agardh in Egypt. Flora Mediterranea 17:137-142.

 
 

Zohary M (1966). Flora of Palestine. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Jerusalem 346 p.

 

 




          */?>