African Journal of
Plant Science

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Plant Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0824
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJPS
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 784

Full Length Research Paper

Evaluation of maize germplasm for resistance to maize chlorotic mottle virus and sugarcane mosaic virus: The casual agents of maize lethal necrosis disease

Kiruki Grace Gacheri
  • Kiruki Grace Gacheri
  • Department of Plant science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Kuria Paul
  • Kuria Paul
  • Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Biotechnology Research Institute, Kabete P. O. Box 14733-00800 Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Nzuve Felister Mbute
  • Nzuve Felister Mbute
  • Department of Plant science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Cheboi Juliana Jepkemoi
  • Cheboi Juliana Jepkemoi
  • Department of Plant science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 12 May 2022
  •  Accepted: 14 July 2022
  •  Published: 30 September 2022

 ABSTRACT

In Kenya, at national policy level to the individual household level, food security is synonymous to maize productivity and availability. However, the productivity of maize is affected majorly by maize lethal necrosis disease (MLND) that was first reported in Kenya in 2011. MLND results from co-infection between maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV) and any cereal-infecting viruses in Potyviridae family particularly sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV). Majority of maize germplasm are susceptible to MLND. This study was therefore carried out to identify potential germplasm for breeding for MLND resistance. A total of 38 maize germplasm (5 temperate lines with inherent resistance to maize-infecting viral diseases, 32 assorted tropical lines and one Kenyan hybrid) were artificially inoculated with MCMV and SCMV in the green house at the University of Nairobi Field Station and screened for two seasons between April 2020 and October 2021. Based on the Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) and final severity score, germplasm KS23-6, 18, KS23-5 and 19 were identified as the most promising sources of MCMV resistance with disease severity scores of 2, 2.3, 2.3 and 3, respectively while germplasm 50, 19, and 22 were identified as source of SCMV resistance with scores of 2.0, 2.3 and 3, respectively. These germplasms could serve as potential donors for introgression of the resistance genes into locally adapted maize background to combat yield losses due to MLND.

 

Key words: Maize lethal necrosis disease, sugarcane mosaic virus, maize chlorotic mottle virus, resistance, maize germplasm.


 INTRODUCTION

Maize (Zea mays) contributes significantly to food security in Kenya; with 90% of the country population depending on maize as the main staple food and source of income (Eunice et al., 2021). Per capita consumption of maize in Kenya is between 98 to 100 kg (Onono et al., 2013). Maize occupies 2.1 million ha which is 40% of the total crop area and the annual yield was 3.39 million tons in 2016 (Mwatuni et al., 2020) and 3.8 million tons in 2021 (FAOSTAT, 2022). Maize production suffers from abiotic and biotic stress. Abiotic stresses include low rainfall and infertile soils (Simtowe et al., 2020) while biotic stress include diseases and insect pest such as aphids, thrips and fall armyworm (De Groote et al., 2020). Diseases such as Gray leaf spot, Common smut, Northern leaf blight, Maize streak virus and Head smut are endemic in major maize growing regions (Charles et al., 2019). Emergence of maize lethal necrosis disease (MLND) in 2011 saw the most devastating effect on maize production in Kenya (Wangai et al., 2011; Marenya et al., 2018; Jafari et al., 2020; Redinbaugh and Stewart, 2018; Wamaitha et al., 2018). MLND is commonly caused by synergistic interaction between maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV) and sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) (Adams et al., 2014; Mwatuni et al., 2020). In addition, other potyviruses such as maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV), wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) (Mahuku et al., 2015; Masanga et al., 2020), and Johnson grass mosaic virus (JGMV) (Stewart et al., 2017) can associate with MCMV to induce MLND. Symptoms associated with MLND and its causative viruses include chlorotic specks on young leaves, leave necrosis, shortening of internodes, premature dying of the husks and few grains filling at maturity stage (Mahuku et al., 2015).

 

MCMV is the only member in genus Machlomovirus of the family Tombusviridae (Zhang et al., 2011). It has been reported in Peru (Nault et al., 1978), USA, Argentina, Brazil (Braidwood et al., 2018), and China (Wang et al., 2017). In Kenya, MCMV was first reported in Bomet (Wangai et al., 2012) and later in all maize growing regions of the country. Presence of MCMV in the region resulted in the outbreak of devastating MLND leading to almost 100% yield losses of maize (Lukanda et al., 2014; Adams et al., 2012). MCMV is transmitted by onion thrips (Thrips tabaci), maize thrips (Frankliniella williamsi) (Mwando et al., 2018), and at least six beetle species (Isabirye and Rwomushana, 2016) and through seed but at very low rate (Kimani et al., 2021; Jensen, 1991).

 

SCMV is more prevalent worldwide (Masanga et al., 2020) and was first reported in USA in 1963 (Janson and Ellet, 1963). A study by Louie (1980) confirmed presence of SCMV in 20 of 33 districts surveyed in Kenya. It belongs to Potyvirus genus of Potyviridae family (Redinaugh and Stewart, 2018). SCMV is transmitted by aphids (Redinaugh and Stewart, 2018).

 

Management strategies for MLND include crop nutrition, weed control (Fatma et al., 2016), crop rotation (Frank et al., 2016), and use of certified seeds (Mwatuni et al., 2020). However, it is difficult to manage MLND using these strategies due to nature of its spread (Mudde et al., 2018). Breeding for resistance is the most effective and sustainable method to manage MLND (Beyeni et al., 2017; Awata et al., 2021). This study focused on identifying germplasm that are resistant to maize lethal necrosis disease causative viruses (MCMV and SCMV) that can be used as donor in breeding programs.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant, experimental site and layout

 

A total of 38 maize germplasm (5 temperate lines with inherent resistance to maize-infecting viral diseases 32 assorted tropical lines and 1 Kenyan hybrid) were evaluated (Table 1). The experiment was conducted in a net house at the University of Nairobi, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences’ field station. The station is situated in Kabete, which lies at a longitude of 36° 44" East and latitude of 1° 15" South and about 1940 m above the sea level. The area experiences a bimodal rainfall averaging 1000 mm of rainfall per annum. The site’s daily maximum temperature ranges between 13 and 27°C (Wasonga et al., 2015). Maize germplasms were screened for their responses to MCMV and SCMV for two seasons in 2020 and 2021. Completely randomized design (CRD) was used to set up the experiments with three replications. Three maize seeds per pot were  planted in black polythene pots measuring 30 cm diameter and 30 cm height. Di-ammonium Phosphate (DAP) was applied at planting 5 g per pot. Watering was done four times a week.

 

Preparation of the virus inoculum and leaf inoculation

 

At three leave stage, maize seedlings were singly inoculated with MCMV and SCMV, respectively as described by Karanja et al. (2018) and Sitta et al. (2017). The inoculum was prepared from maize leaves showing classical MCMV and SCMV symptoms derived from virus collection at Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO), Biotechnology center. Inoculation solution (0.1 M phosphate buffer) was constituted by dissolving 10.8 g of potassium phosphate monobasic, 4.8 g potassium phosphate dibasic, 1.26 g Na2SO3  and 1 g of Carborandum in 1 L of sterile distilled water (Sitta et al., 2017). Reagents were from SIGMA® Life Science. For each of the virus isolate, 200 g of infected leaves were obtained, homogenized and dissolved in 1 L of  the inoculum buffer. The inoculum was applied on the leaves by hand rubbing. A second inoculation was done one week later (Tembo et al., 2021).

 

Data collection/rating

 

Data was collected on disease severity as described by International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Disease severity was based on visual subjective five-point scale of 1-5, where 5 represent very severe symptoms, 4 severe symptoms, 3 moderate symptoms, 2 mild symptoms and 1 no symptoms (Figure 1) (Karanja et al., 2018; Sitta et al., 2017). Data was collected for six weeks after the first inoculation.

 

Data analysis

 

Analysis of variance was done to determine variability between germplasm and between different weeks using GenStat 15th edition. The scores obtained on disease severity from the screen house over the  6  weeks  were  converted  into AUDPC  values  using  the formula:

 

 


 RESULTS

Response of maize germplasm to infection with MCMV

 

All the inoculated  germplasm developed  symptoms but disease severity differed significantly at P < 0.01 (Figure 2 and Table 2). Susceptible germplasm showed disease symptoms one week after the first inoculation. Leaf symptoms began as chlorotic strips running parallel to the veins that later joined to produce elongated chlorotic blotches (Figure 2B and C).

A t-test (p<0.05) confirmed there was no significant difference between season one and two for resistant germplasm and susceptible germplasm hence average of season one and season two was done for the resistance germplasm and susceptible germplasm. MCMV final severity scores of the 38 germplasm ranged from 2 to 4.3, the AUDPC ranged from 52.8 to 122.8 (Table 2). Five germplasm had a severity score of below 3. They include germplasm Ks23-6 with a score of 2, germplasm 18, 9, 60, and Ks23-5 with a final score of 2.3 while 19 had a score of 3. Germplasm OH 28, 58, 14,122 and 58 had the highest scores of 4 or above (Table 2 and Figure 3). Germplasm 18 had the lowest AUDPC of 52.8 followed by Ks23-6 with 58.5, while 58 had the highest AUDPC of 122.8 (Table 2).

 

 

Response of maize germplasm to infection with SCMV

 

Infection was observed in all the plants inoculated with SCMV. Germplasm differed significantly at (p< 0.001) for resistance to SCMV.

 

Disease severity also differed over time at (P<0.01). The susceptible germplasm showed symptoms one week from the first inoculation. Final SCMV score ranged from 2.0 to 5 (Figure 4). Only two germplasm had a score of <2.5, that is, germplasm 50 with a score of 2.0 and germplasm 19 with 2.3. The germplasm 7, 22, and 48 had scores of 3 while germplasm 58 had the highest final score of 5.

 

Germplasm 19 and 7 showed low scores to both viruses. Germplasm 19 had a final severity score of 2.3 and AUDPC of 74.7 for SCMV trail and final severity score of 3.0 and AUDPC of 79.9 for MCMV trail while germplasm 7 had a final severity score of 3.0 and AUDPC of 79.9 for SCMV trail and final severity score of  2.7  and

AUDPC of 66.7 for MCMV trail (Table 2, Figure 5).

 

 

 


 DISCUSSION

Maize lethal necrosis disease is as a result of combined effect of MCMV and SCMV leading to yield losses of up to 100% (Gowda et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2016). Exposing plants to disease has been used to test and select germplasm for the presence of genes for resistance (Gowda et al., 2015). Previous work has reported that most elite inbred lines and commercial hybrids are susceptible to MCMV and MLND (Sitonik et al., 2019). This study partly agree with those previous report because among the studied germplasm, there was none that was immune to infection with either SCMV or MCMV. However there were significant differences in severity among different germplasm (Table 2). Earlier reports of work by Sitta et al. (2018), Karanja et al. (2018); Tembo et al. (2021) and Awata et al. (2021) where different germplasm were screened for MCMV, SCMV and MLND also reported development of symptoms on all screened germplasm but with different disease severity.

 

This study involved screening of 38 maize germplasm that are genetically diverse. Final severity/infection and AUDPC values were used as indicators of response of test germplasm to SCMV and MCMV (Tembo et al., 2021). There was significant difference between germplasm and between different scoring  time/weeks at P<0.01; hence, the need for scoring at different time interval due to virus dynamics with time. High severity scores were recorded among the susceptible germplasm as the  weeks  progressed leading to high AUDPC. According to Karanja et al. (2020) and Sitta et al. (2017), germplasm can be classified as susceptible with a score 4 or above, tolerant with a score of 3 and resistance with a score of 2.

 

More than 80% of the studied germplasm were susceptible to SCMV and MCMV with scores of > 3.0, this puts emphasis on risk posed by MLND on maize production and food security in the country. Germplasm 58, 28, 14, 122 and OH28 were the most susceptible to MCMV with a final score of ≥ 4 across the two seasons. Germplasm OH28, 112, 122 and 58 were the most susceptible to SCMV with severity score of ≥ 4 with the highest AUDPC of > 100. Three germplasms (OH28, 58, 122) were very susceptible to both viruses with the highest final score and AUDPC (Table 2), while germplasm 19 and 7 showed levels of resistance to both viruses. Paraschivu et al. (2013) reported a correspondence between germplasm AUDPC and susceptibility pointing that the most susceptible wheat germplasm  had  higher AUDPC values. This report  is  in agreements with the studies by Sitta et al. (2017) and Gowda et al. (2015) that reported high susceptibility of studied germplasm to MLND and causal agents.

Five germplasm showed tolerance to MCMV with a final score of < 3 across the six weeks and lowest AUDPC ranging from 58.5 to 61.1. Ks23-6 had the lowest score of 2 while germplasm 18,9,60, Ks23-5 had a score of 2.3 and germplasm 19 had a score 3.0. Evaluation of germplasm in response to SCMV suggest that germplasm 50 and19 are resistant with scores of below 2.5 while germplasm 7, 22 and 48 had a score of 3 meaning they are moderately tolerant. This study found that germplasm 7 and 19 may be having genes resistance to both SCMV and MCMV with low severity scores and AUDPC in both trails (Table 2).

 

This study suggests that germplasm 18, 9, 60 and 19 may be carrying genes for MCMV resistant while germplasm 50 and 19 may be carrying genes resistant to SCMV. In addition, this study has confirmed that KS23-6 and KS23-5 are resistant to MCMV.  KS23-6 and KS23-5 were identified as strong sources for MLND resistance and were developed by Kasetsart University in Thailand after crossing 26 inbred lines (Jones et al., 2018; Awata et al., 2021). Disease resistance is a mechanism developed by plants through evolution to survive attack by parasites. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosome six at 157 MB influences resistance to MCMV, as reported by Johns et al. (2018). It is inherited to the F2 population recessively. Two major genes Scmv1 and Scmv2 that confer resistance to Sugar cane mosaic virus have been mapped in various studies (Xia et al., 1999; Ingvardsen et al., 2010; Leng et al., 2017; Tao et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2009). More study on germplasm 18,9,60 needs to be carried out to confirm the presence of QTL that confers resistance to MCMV and for germplasm 50, 19, 22 and 48 to confirm presence of Scmv1 and Scmv2 responsible for SCMV resistance.


 CONCLUSION

The results from this study show that the germplasm studied here are variable in response to MCMV and SCMV. The germplasm identified as tolerant in this research study could serve as potential donors to improve the adapted maize to combat MLND in the country. This will restore maize productivity and improve small scale farmer livelihood. Further studies should be done on the mode of inheritance of SCMV and MCMV resistance QTLs.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Adams I, Harju V, Hodges T, Hany U, Skelton A, Rai S, Deka M, Smith J, Fox A, Uzayisenga B, Ngaboyisonga C, Uwumukiza B, Rutikanga A, Rutherford M, Ricthis B, Phiri N, Boonham N (2014). First report of maize lethal necrosis disease in Rwanda. New Disease Reports 29(1):22-22.
Crossref

 

Adams IP, Miano DW, Kinyua ZM, Wangai A, Kimani E, Phiri N, Reeder R, Harju V, Glover R, Hany U, Souza-Richards R, Deb Nath P, Nixon T, Fox A, Barnes A, Smith J, Skelton A, Thwaites R, Mumford R, Boonham N (2012). Use of next-generation sequencing for the identification and characterization of Maize chlorotic mottle virus and Sugarcane mosaic virus causing maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Plant Pathology 62(4):741-749.
Crossref

 

Awata LA, Ifie BE, Danquah E, Jumbo MB, Suresh LM, Gowda M, Marchelo-Dragga PW, Olsen MS, Shorinola O, Yao NK, Boddupalli PM, Tongoona PB (2021). Introgression of maize lethal necrosis resistance quantitative trait loci into susceptible maize populations and validation of the resistance under Field conditions in Naivasha, Kenya. Frontiers in Plant Science 12 p.
Crossref

 

Braidwood L, Quito-Avila DF, Cabanas D, Bressan A, Wangai A, Baulcombe DC. (2018). Maize chlorotic mottle virus exhibits low divergence between differentiated regional sub-populations. Scientific Reports 8(1).
Crossref

 

Charles AK, Muiru WM, Miano DW, Kimenju JW (2019). Distribution of common maize diseases and molecular characterization of maize streak virus in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science 11(4):47.
Crossref

 

De Groote H, Kimenju SC, Munyua B, Palmas S, Kassie M, Bruce A (2020). Spread and impact of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) in maize production areas of Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystms & Environment 292:106804.
Crossref

 

Isabirye EB, Rwomushana I (2016). Current and future potential distribution of maize chlorotic mottle virus and risk of maize lethal necrosis disease in Africa. Journal of Crop Protection 5(2):215-228.
Crossref

 

Eunice J, Miano DW, Mutitu E, Macharia I (2021). Status of maize lethal necrosis disease seed production system in Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture 7(1).
Crossref

 

Faostat (2022). Home | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

View

 

Fatma HK, Tileye F, Patrick AN (2016). Insights of maize lethal necrotic disease: A major constraint to maize production in East Africa. African Journal of Microbiology Research 10(9):271-279.
Crossref

 

Frank K, Robert G, Brian EI (2016). Status of maize lethal necrosis in eastern Uganda. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11(8):652-660.
Crossref

 

Gowda M, Das B, Makumbi D, Babu R, Semagn K, Mahuku G, Olsen MS, Bright JM, Beyene Y, Prasanna BM (2015). Genome-wide association and genomic prediction of resistance to maize lethal necrosis disease in tropical maize germplasm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128(10):1957-1968.
Crossref

 

Jafari JH, Thiel M, Abdel-Rahman EM, Richard K, Landmann T, Subramanian S, Hahn M (2020). Investigation of maize lethal necrosis (MLN) severity and cropping systems mapping in agro-ecological maize systems in Bomet, Kenya utilizing Rapid Eye and landsat-8 imagery. Geology, Ecology and Landscapes P 116.

 

Janson BF, Ellett CW (1963). A new Corn disease in Ohio. Plant Disease Reporter 47(12):1107-1108.

 

Jensen SG (1991). Seed transmission of maize chlorotic mottle virus. Plant Disease 75(5):497.
Crossref

 

Jones MW, Penning BW, Jamann TM, Glaubitz JC, Romay C, Buckler ES, Redinbaugh MG (2018). Diverse chromosomal locations of quantitative trait loci for tolerance to maize chlorotic mottle virus in five maize populations. Phytopathology 108(6):748-758.
Crossref

 

Kimani EN, Kiarie SM, Micheni C, Muriki LG, Miano D W, Macharia I, Munkvold GP, Muiru WM, Prasanna BM, Wangai A (2021). Maize seed contamination and seed transmission of maize chlorotic mottle virus in Kenya. Plant Health Progress, PHP-02-21-0018.
Crossref

 

Louie R (1980). Sugarcane mosaic virus in Kenya. Plant Disease 64(10):944.
Crossref

 

Lukanda M, Owati A, Ogunsanya P, Valimunzigha K, Katsongo K, Ndemere H, Kumar PL (2014). First report of maize chlorotic mottle virus infecting maize in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Plant Disease 98(10):1448-1448.
Crossref

 

Mahuku G, Lockhart BE, Wanjala B, Jones MW, Kimunye JN, Stewart LR, Cassone BJ, Sevgan S, Nyasani JO, Kusia E, Kumar PL, Niblett CL, Kiggundu A, Asea G, Pappu HR, Wangai A, Prasanna BM, Redinbaugh MG (2015). Maize lethal necrosis (MLN), an emerging threat to maize-based food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Phytopathology 105(7):956-965.
Crossref

 

Marenya PP, Erenstein O, Prasanna B, Makumbi D, Jumbo M, Beyene Y (2018). Maize lethal necrosis disease: Evaluating agronomic and genetic control strategies for Ethiopia and Kenya. Agricultural Systems 162:220-228.
Crossref

 

Masanga J, Runo S, Mwatuni F, Micheni CM, Kuria P, Angwenyi S, Omanya G, Braidwood L (2020). Chapter 5: Maize lethal necrosis, an emerging threat to maize production and food security in sub- Saharan Africa. Emerging Plant Diseases and Global Food Security pp. 81-100.
Crossref

 

Mudde B, Olubayo FM, Miano DW, Asea G, Kilalo DC, Kiggundu A, Bomet DK, Adriko J (2018). Distribution, incidence and severity of maize lethal necrosis disease in major maize growing agro-ecological zones of Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Science 10(6):72.
Crossref

 

Mwando NL, Tamiru A, Nyasani JO, Obonyo MA, Caulfield JC, Bruce TJ, Subramanian S (2018). Maize chlorotic mottle virus induces changes in host plant volatiles that attract vector thrips species. Journal of Chemical Ecology 44(7-8):681-689.
Crossref

 

Mwatuni FM, Nyende AB, Njuguna J, Xiong Z, Machuka E, Stomeo F (2020). Occurrence, genetic diversity, and recombination of maize lethal necrosis disease-causing viruses in Kenya. Virus Research 286:198081.
Crossref

 

Paraschivu M, Cotuna O, Paraschivu M (2013). The use of the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) to assess the epidemics of Septoria tritici in winter wheat. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 45(1).

 

Redinbaugh MG, Stewart LR (2018). Maize lethal necrosis: An emerging, synergistic viral disease. Annual Review of Virology 5(1):301-322.
Crossref

 

Sitonik CA, Suresh LM, Beyene Y, Olsen MS, Makumbi D, Oliver K, Das B, Bright JM, Mugo S, Crossa J, Tarekegne A (2019). Genetic architecture of maize chlorotic mottle virus and maize lethal necrosis through GWAS, linkage analysis and genomic prediction in tropical maize germplasm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132(8):2381-2399.
Crossref

 

Stewart LR, Willie K, Wijeratne S, Redinbaugh MG, Massawe D, Niblett CL, Kiggundu A, Asiimwe T (2017). Johnson grass mosaic virus contributes to maize lethal necrosis in East Africa. Plant Disease 101(8):1455-1462.
Crossref

 

Tembo M, Mwansa K, Kambukwe K, Ndeke V, Nguni D, Chibwe L, Magorokosho C, Suresh LM (2021). Screening of maize germplasm for resistance to maize lethal necrosis disease in Zambia. African Journal of Biotechnology 20(1):25-32.
Crossref

 

Wamaitha MJ, Nigam D, Maina S, Stomeo F, Wangai A, Njuguna JN, Holton TA, Wanjala BW, Wamalwa M, Lucas T, Djikeng A, Garcia-Ruiz H (2018). Metagenomics analysis of viruses associated with maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Virology Journal 15(1).
Crossref

 

Wang Q, Zhang C, Wang C, Qian Y, Li Z, Hong J, Zhou X (2017). Further characterization of maize chlorotic mottle virus and its synergistic interaction with sugarcane mosaic virus in maize. Scientific Reports 7(1).
Crossref

 

Wangai AW, Redinbaugh MG, Kinyua ZM, Miano DW, Leley PK, Kasina M, Mahuku G, Scheets K, Jeffers D (2012). First report of maize chlorotic mottle virus and maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Plant Disease 96(10):1582-1582.
Crossref

 

Wasonga D, Ambuko J, Cheminingwa G, Odeny D, Crampton B (2015). Morphological characterization and selection of spider plant (Cleome gynandra) accessions from Kenya and South Africa. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7(4):36-44.
Crossref

 

Zhang Y, Zhao W, Li M, Chen H, Zhu S, Fan Z (2011). Real-time TaqMan RT-PCR for detection of maize chlorotic mottle virus in maize seeds. Journal of Virological Methods 171(1):292-294.
Crossref

 




          */?>