Full Length Research Paper
Abstract
This paper presents the report of a follow-up study conducted to investigate the degree of consistency in staff and students’ Sensitivity (expressions of preference for and willingness to engage in) to each of three approaches to curbing academic dishonesty in the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Data for the study were derived from a researcher-designed questionnaire patterned after Hinman’s (2000) ‘Police‘ , ‘virtues‘ and ‘prevention‘ approaches to curbing academic dishonesty which required respondents to preferentially rank (in terms of degree of preference for and then in terms of degree of willingness to engage in) each of the three approaches. Respondents’ preferential rankings of each approach (whether High, Medium or Low) were matched with their indications of willingness to Engage in utilizing the approach (High, Medium or Low) to enable the categorisation of the respondents in relation to three Sensitivity models of Committed, Cautious and Carefree. The findings of the study, among others, showed both staff and students to be generally Committed to the ‘Virtues’ approach and Carefree to the ‘Prevention’ approach; while male staff and students were typically more Committed to the curbing approaches than their female counterparts. They also suggested the need for integration of the ‘Virtues’ approach for which more staff and students expressed willingness to engage in into the traditional method of dealing with academic dishonesty in Nigerian universities.
Key words: Academic dishonesty, curbing approaches, sensitivity models.
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0