Aldridge S, Rowley J (1998). Measuring customer satisfaction in higher education. Qual. Assurance Educ. 6(4):197–204.
Crossref

Athiyaman A (1997). Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: the case of university education. Euro. J. Market. 31(7):528–540.
Crossref

Brochado A (2009). Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education. Qual. Assurance Educ. 17(2):174–190.
Crossref

Cheung ACK, Yuen TWW, Yuen CYM, Cheng YC (2011). Strategies and policies for Hong Kong's higher education in Asian markets. Intl J. Edu. Manage. 25(2):144-163.
Crossref

De Jager JW, Gbadamosi G (2009). 'Specific remedy for specific problem': measuring service quality in South African higher education. Higher Educ. 60(3):251–267.
Crossref

Finney TG, Finney RZ (2010). Are students their universities' customers? An exploratory study. Educ. Train. 52(4): 276–291.
Crossref

Firdaus A (2006a). The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. Intl. J. Consumer Stu. 30(6):569–581.
Crossref

Firdaus A (2006b). Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 29(1):71–89.
Crossref

Hemsley-Brown J, Oplatka I (2006). Universities in a competitive global marketplace. Int J. Public Sector Manage 19(4):316–338.
Crossref

Ivy J (2008). A new higher education marketing mix: the 7 P's for MBA marketing. Intl. J. Educ. Manage. 22(4):288–299.
Crossref

Khan H, Matley H (2009). Implementing service excellence in higher education. Educ. Train. 51(8/9):769–780.
Crossref

Maringe F (2011). The students as consumer: affordances and constraints in a transforming higher education environment. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketization of higher education and the student as consumer (pp.142–154). London and NY: Routledge: Taylor & Francis.

Martilla JA, James JC (1977). Importance-performance analysis. J. Market. 41(1):77–79
Crossref

Moogan YJ, Baron S, Bainbridge S (2001). Timings and trade-offs in the marketing of higher education courses: a conjoint approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(3):179–187.
Crossref

Nordensvard J (2011). The consumer metaphor versus the citizen metaphor: different sets of roles for students. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketization of higher education and the student as consumer London and NY: Routledge: Taylor Francis pp.157–169.

Oldfield B, Baron S (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Qual. Assurance Educ. 8(2):85–95.
Crossref

Oliveira-Brochado A, Marques RC (2007). Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education. FEP Working Papers, December. pp.258

Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of services quality. J. Retailing. 64(1):12-40.

Senthilkumar N, Arulraj A (2011). SQM-HEI- determination of service quality measurement of higher education in India. J. Modelling Manage. 6(1):60-78.
Crossref

Telford R, Masson R (2005). The congruence of quality values in higher education. Qual. Assurance Educ. 13(2):107–119.
Crossref

UGC (1956). Report of the Expert Committee Appointed by the University Grants Commission to Review the Maintenance Grants Norms for Delhi Colleges, University Grants Commission, New Delhi.

Wright C, O'Neil M (2002). Service quality evaluation in the higher education sector: an empirical investigation of students' perceptions. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. 21(1):23–39.
Crossref

ABET (2006). Accreditation policy and procedure manual (effective for evaluation during the 2006 -2007) accreditation cycle) Baltimore: ABET.

AICTE (1994), Report of the High Power Committee for Mobilization of Additional Resources for Technical Education, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi.

AICTE (2004). Manual of Accreditation, New Delhi: AICTE

Carnoy M (1999). Globalisation and Educational Reform: What Planners Need to Know, Report International Institute of Educational Planning, Paris. Pp. 63

Government of India (1992), Programme of Action on the National Education Policy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi.

Government of India (1997), Approach Paper to the Ninth Five-year Plan:1997-2002, Planning Commission, New Delhi.

Government of India (1997-2002). Ninth Five-year Plan:1997-2002, Planning Commission, New Delhi.

Government of India (2000). Mid-term appraisal of Ninth Five-year Plan:1997-2002, Planning Commission, New Delhi.

Government of India (2001). Approach Paper to the Tenth Five-year Plan: 2002-2007, Planning Commission, New Delhi.

Government of India (2002-2007). Tenth Five-year Plan: 2002-2007, Planning Commission, New Delhi.

Johan de Jager a,1, Gbolahan Gbadamosi Predicting students' satisfaction through service quality in higher education The International Journal of Management Education.

NSSO (1998), Attending an Educational Institution in India: Its Level, Nature and Cost, NSS 52nd Round, July 1995-June 1996, NSSO, Government of India.

UGC (2000), Report of the Committee Constituted by UGC for 'Formulation of Revised Fee Structure in the central and Deemed Universities in India', University Grants Commission, New Delhi.

UNESCO (1998). Higher education in the Twenty-first Century: Vision and Action, Final Report, World Conference on Higher Education, UNESCO, Paris, October, Pp. 5-9

UNESCO (1999). Statistical Year Book, UNESCO, Paris.

UNESCO (2000). World Education Report:, UNESCO, Paris.

University Grants Commission – February 2012, Higher Education in India at a Glance.