Alfieri L, Brooks, PJ, Aldrich NJ, Tenenbaum HR (2011). Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning? J. Educ. Psychol. 103(1):1–18.
Crossref

Altun M (2010). Matematik ÖÄŸretimi (EÄŸitim Fakülteleri ve Sınıf ÖÄŸretmenleri Ä°çin). Bursa: Aktüel Alfa Akademi Yayınevi.

Anderson JR (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.n.

Ausubel DP (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Gruene and Stratton.

Ausubel DP (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Crossref

Ayer AJ (1936). Language, Truth and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baki A (2006). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Matematik EÄŸitimi. Trabzon: Derya Kitapevi.

Battista MT (1994). Teacher beliefs and the reform movement in mathematics education. The Phi Delta Kappan 75(6):462-470.

Berg BL (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences (4th Ed.). Boston: Allynand Bacon.

Bernstein DA, Penner LA, Clarke-Stewart A, Roy EJ, Wickens CD (2003). Psychology (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Bloom BS (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In L.W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak, (Eds.). Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. pp. 1-8. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Boaler J, Humphreys C (2005). Connecting Mathematical Ideas: Middle School Cases of Teachingand Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Brown AL (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.). Advances in instructional psychology (1). pp. 77-165. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brousseau G (1987). Les differents roles du maitre. Colloque des P.E.N., Angers

Bruner JS (1961). The act of discovery. Harv. Educ. Rev. 31:21–32.

Bruner JS (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. New York: Norton.

Castronova JA (2002). Discovery learning for the 21st century: Article manuscript. Action Research Exchange 1(1).

view (accessed 2012, October, 22).

Creswell JW (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

ÇakıroÄŸlu E, ÇakıroÄŸlu J (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. Eur. J. Teacher Educ. 26(2):253-264.
Crossref

Davis RB (1990). Discovery Learning and Constructivism. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph, (4). Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. pp. 93-106+195-210.

Dreyfus T, Tsamir P (2004). Ben's Consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 23(3):271-300.
Crossref

English L (1995). Cognitive psychology and mathematics education. In L. D. English & G.S. Halford, Mathematics Education: Models and Processes. pp. 1-20. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah: NJ.

Fairclough N (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman

Feiman-Nemser S (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record 103(6):1013-1055.
Crossref

Freudenthal H (1973). Mathematics as an Educational Task. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

Glasersfeld von E (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.) Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 3-18). Hillslade, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Granello DH (2001). Promoting Cognitive Complexity in Graduate Written Work: Using Bloom's Taxonomy as a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Literature Reviews. Counselor Educ. Supervision 40:292-307.
Crossref

Hammer D (1997). Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching. Cognition and Instruction 15(4):485-529.
Crossref

Herman P, Gomez L M (2009). Taking guided learning theory to school. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? pp. 62–81. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

Hershkowitz R, Schwarz BB, Dreyfus T (2001). Abstraction in Context: Epistemic Actions. J. Res. Mathematics Educ. 32 (2):195-222.

Hiebert J, Carpenter TP (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In Hiebert, J Carpenter T P & Grouws D A (Eds.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. pp. 65-97. New York, NY, England: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Inhelder B, Sinclair H, Bovet M (1974). Learning and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jacobsen D, Eggen P, Kauchaj D, Dulaney C (1985). Methods For Teaching: A Skills Approach. (2nd. Ed). Colombus, Ohio: Belland Howell.
Crossref

Jaworski B (2006). Theory and Practice in Mathematics Teaching Development: Critical Inquiry As A Mode of Learnıng in Teaching. J. Mathematics Teacher Educ. 9:187–211.
Crossref

Jonassen D H (2000). Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational technology research and development 48(4):63-85.
Crossref

Kilpatrick J (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Montreal (1):3-27.

Kilgour M (2006). Improving the Creative Process: Analysis of the Effects of Divergent Thinking Techniques and Domain Spesific Knowledge on Creativity. Int. J. Bus. Society 7(2):79-107.

Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Bertram BM (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: affective domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc.

Krathwohl DR (2002). A Revision of Bloom'sTaxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice 41(4):212-218.
Crossref

Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark R E (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2):75-86.
Crossref

Lampert M (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal 27(1):29-63.
Crossref

Lampert M (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale UniversityPress.

Lesh R, Doerr HM, Carmona G, Hjalmarson M (2003). Beyond Constructivism. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 5(2&3):211–233.
Crossref

Lin FL, Cooney TJ (2001). Making sense of mathematics teacher education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Crossref

Mayer ER (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Sci. 26:49–63.
Crossref

Mayer R (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. Am. Psychol. 59:14–19.
Crossref

MEB (2010). Ä°lköÄŸretim matematik dersi (6-8.sınıf) öÄŸretim programı. 

Mumford MD, Baughman W A, Maher M A, Costanza D P, Supinski E P (1997). Process-Based Measures of Creative Problem-Solving Skills: IV. Category Combination. Creativity Res. J. 10(1):59-71.
Crossref

Noddings N (1990). Constructivism in Mathematics Teaching. In R B Davis, C A Maher, N Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist Views on the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. p.7–18. (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph Number 4).

OECD (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework. Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2009). PISA 2006 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.
Crossref

Ohlsson S, Lehtinen E (1997). Abstraction and the acquisition of complex ideas. Int. J. Educ. Res. 27:37–48.
Crossref

Ojose B (2008). Applying Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development to Mathematics Instruction. Mathematics Educator 18(1):26-30.

Patton MQ (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Polya G (1957). How to solve it. New York: Anchor Books.

Richards J (1991). Mathematical Discussion. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.). Radical Constructivism in Mathematical Education. pp.13-51. Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Crossref

Seddon GM (1978). The Properties of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain. Rev. Educ. Res. 48(2):303-323.
Crossref

SenemoÄŸlu N (2005). GeliÅŸim, ÖÄŸrenme ve ÖÄŸretim. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.

Simon MA (1995). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy From a Constructivist Perspective. J. Res. Mathematics Educ. 26(2):114-145.
Crossref

Simpson EJ (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.

Steffe LP, Wiegel H (1992). On reforming practice in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 23:445-465.
Crossref

Stigler JW, Hiebert J (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.

Svinicki MD (1998). Theoretical Foundation for Discovery Learning. Advances in Physiol. Educ. 20(1):S4-S7.

Yıldırım A, ÅžimÅŸek H (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel AraÅŸtırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.