Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 1998

Full Length Research Paper

Constructing models in teaching of chemical bonds: Ionic bond, covalent bond, double and triple bonds, hydrogen bond and molecular geometry

Musa Uce
  • Musa Uce
  • Marmara University, Ataturk Faculty of Education, Department of Chemistry Education, Goztepe, Kadikoy, Istanbul- Turkey
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 23 September 2014
  •  Accepted: 02 February 2015
  •  Published: 23 February 2015

References

Ayas A (2002). Students' level of understanding of five basic chemistry concepts. BoÄŸaziçi University J. Educ. 18:19-32.

 

Butts B, Smith R (1987). HSC chemistry students' understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds. Res. Sci. Educ. 1:192–201.
Crossref

 

Cartıer J, Rudolph J, Stewart J (2001). The nature and structure of scientific models. The National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science (NCISLA), Working Paper.

 

Coll RK, Taylor N (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 19:171–191
Crossref

 

Erdik E, Sarıkaya Y (2000). Temel Üniversite Kimyası, Gazi Kitap evi, Ankara.

 

Friedler Y, Tamır P (1990). Life in science laboratory classroom at secondary level. The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge.

 

Furio C, Calatayud ML (1996). Difficulties with the geometry and polarity of molecules. J. Chemical Educ. 72(1):36-41.
Crossref

 

Gupta HO, Brahm P (1999). A Novel Multi Purpose Model Set for Teaching General Chemistry. J. Chemical Educ. 76(2):204-205.
Crossref

 

Harrison A.G. and Treagust D.F. (1998). Modelling in science lessons: are there better ways to learn with models? School Sci. Math. 98(8):420-429.
Crossref

 

Harrison AG, Treagust DF (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Sci. Educ. 84(3):352-381.
Crossref

 

Ingham A, Gilbert JK (1991). The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level. J. Sci. Educ. (13):193-202.

 

Lam-Leung SY, Albert WML (1993) Skeletal Models for Organic Molecules Constructed Easily and Inexpensively. J. Chemical Educ. 70(10):788-789.
Crossref

 

Morgil Ä°, Yılmaz A, SeferoÄŸlu Z (2002). Stereokimya Konusunda Farklı ÖÄŸretim Yöntemlerinin ÖÄŸrenci BaÅŸarısı Üzerine Etkisi. UFBMEK-5 Orta DoÄŸu Teknik Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi 16 - 18 Eylül, 174-177 ODTÜ 06531-ANKARA.

 

Mortimer CE (1997). Modern Üniversite Kimyası, ÇaÄŸlayan basım evi, Ä°stanbul.

 

Nicoll G (2001). A report of undergraduates bonding misconceptions. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 23(7):707-730.
Crossref

 

Özmen H, Ayas A, CoÅŸtu B (2002). Fen bilgisi öÄŸretmen adaylarının maddenin tanecikli yapısı hakkındaki anlama seviyelerinin ve yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada EÄŸitim Bilimleri, 2(2):507-529.

 

Özkan H (2000). Kimya Egitiminde Molekül Modeli Kullanimi. Y.L.T. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

 

Özmen H (2007). Üniversite öÄŸrencilerinin kimyasal baÄŸlanma konusunu anlama ve yanılgılarını gidermelerine bilgisayar destekli öÄŸretimin etkisi. Milli EÄŸitim Dergisi,175:185-197.

 

Peterson R, Treagust DF, Garnett P (1989). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade-11 and 12 students' concepts of covalent bonding and structure folloving a course of instruction. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 26:301-314.
Crossref

 

Petrucci RH, Harwood WS, Herring FG (2005). Genel Kimya I, Palme yayıncılık, Ankara.

 

Raymond F, Peterson R, Treagust DF (1989). Grade- 12 students' misconception of covalent bonding and structure. J. Chemical Educ. 66(6):459-460.
Crossref

 

Sarıkaya Y (1997). Fizikokimya, Gazi kitabevi, Ankara.

 

Ünal S, Özmen H, DemircioÄŸlu G, Ayas A (2002). Lise öÄŸrencilerinin kimyasal baÄŸlarla ilgili anlama düzeylerinin ve yanılgılarının belirlenmesine yönelik bir çalışma. ODTÜ EÄŸitim Fakültesi V. Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik EÄŸitimi Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, s. 846-852, Ankara.

 

Ünal G (2006). Fen eÄŸitimi ve modeller. Milli EÄŸitim Dergisi.171:188-195.

 

Ürek RÖ, Tarhan L (2005). Kovalent baÄŸlar konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesinde yapılandırmacılıga dayalı bir aktif öÄŸrenme uygulaması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28:168-177.

 

Yılmaz A, Morgil Ä° (2001). Üniversite ögrencilerinin kimyasal baÄŸlar konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20:172 -178.