International Journal of
Livestock Production

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Livest. Prod.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-2448
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJLP
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 292

Full Length Research Paper

In situ conservation of boran cattle through community/cooperative bull scheme based breeding program in Borana, Ethiopia

Tamirat Tessema
  • Tamirat Tessema
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, P. O. Box 85, Yabello, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Dereje Teshome
  • Dereje Teshome
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, P. O. Box 85, Yabello, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Sisay Kumsa
  • Sisay Kumsa
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, P. O. Box 85, Yabello, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 16 August 2021
  •  Accepted: 12 May 2022
  •  Published: 31 May 2022

 ABSTRACT

A community based breeding program was performed in the years 2012 to 2017 in Dubluk district of Borana Zone, with the objective to improve some productive traits and conserve Boran cattle breed through disseminating improved Boran sires to pastoral community of the district. Relevant performance data were collected to check the performance of the program to achieve the required goal. The data collected were number of females exposed that were tested for pregnancy, number of females exposed diagnosed as pregnant, number of females diagnosed as pregnant which failed to calve, total number of calves born, number of live calves born, number of calves dead, pregnancy rate (PR), abortion rate (AR), calving rate (CR), and calve death loss based on calves born (CDLBCB). Descriptive statistic procedure of SAS was used to summarize the collected data. Accordingly, PR, AR, CR, and CDLBCB were 89.18, 5.29, 94.71, and 3.28%, respectively. The results obtained indicated that community based breeding program can be a best method to improve and conserve Boran cattle breed through disseminating improved sires. As a result, extending the mentioned method to a larger area by establishing a community ranch will help to keep the Boran breed safe and maintain it for the community's benefit.

Key words: Boran Cattle, Breeding Scheme, Community, Conservation, in situ, Ethiopia.


 INTRODUCTION

Cattle are undoubtedly the most important livestock species in the Borana range land system both for economic and social functions (Coppock, 1994). Boran cattle breed is originated in arid and semi-arid agro-ecologies of Southern Ethiopia. Beyond its home country, the breed is widely distributed in many parts of Africa, including Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Somalia, Zambia, Zaire and other countries of the world including USA and Australia.  The  breed  is  known  for  its  large  size,  high degree of heat tolerance, and resistance to ticks, roughage feeds and water shortage (Albero and Hailemariam, 1982). It is also considered by FAO as one of the five breeds that should be given priority for further development and conservation (Philipsson, 1992).

Due to their better meat quality, the Boran cattle were reported as an excellent beef animal both for local and foreign market (Albero and Hailemariam, 1982). The potential of Boran  cattle for meat production under ranch conditions is also considerable (Trail et al., 1985). They are predominantly serving as dam line in most small holder dairy cross breeding program (Haile Mariam et al., 1993). However, the breed has been subjected to little artificial selection either for increased milk or meat production, particularly in its breeding area. Further, there is a growing concern of genetic erosion of the breed due to blood dilution which has been caused by restocking of other local breeds in response to death of the productive Boran breed (“Qorti sub type”) due to shortage of feed caused by recurrent drought, bush encroachment, crop farm land expansion (Hurst et al., 2012, Coppock et al., 2011; Desta and Coppock, 2004; Tache, 2000). These calls for urgent action to carrying out conservation program while improving the breed for beef as well as milk production.

Dida Tiyura ranch has been engaged for over the last two decades in improvement, multiplication and distribution of bulls for the communities, and is the only remaining ranch for Boran cattle genetic improvement. The dissemination strategy is in such way that a bull is sold to selected pastoralists on individual basis. Individual ownership and use of bulls could lead to underutilization of bulls for breeding purpose given that a pastoralist owns few breeding cows. Individual ownership (unlike collective ownership) made it easy for pastoralist to sell the bulls for quick-profit benefits rather than long term genetic improvement. Further, there is no feedback on the status of the distributed bulls. Moreover, there have been loose institutional links between pastoral bureaus, multiplication ranch and research centre. Therefore, there is a need to redesign the dissemination strategies, participation and create a link between different stakeholders so as to bring sustainable genetic improvement. Those villages breeding programs carried out by the communities with involvement of various stakeholders, often at the subsistence level (Sölkner et al., 1998), can easily be adapted and contribute sustainably to the improvement of productivity of local breeds. Therefore, this improvement program was designed with the objective to conserve Boran cattle breed through disseminating improved Boran sires to the local communities and to evaluate pregnancy, calving and mortality rate of Boran cattle breed under cooperative/communal use of breeding bulls for mating.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study sites

The study was conducted at Danbela Wachu ranch in Dubluk district of Borana Zone, Southern Oromia (Figure 1). The area has semi-arid climate with bimodal rainfall distribution during the major wet season, from mid-March to May and the short rainy season extending from September to November. A cool dry period occurs from June to August while warm dry season extends from December to February (Coppock, 1994). The area is characterized by extensive pastoral production system (Teshome et al., 2022).

Village/community based breeding program

Village based breeding program is placed on the existing system rather than transforming the existing system into capital or labor intensive and biological or environmental sensitive. It involved less sophisticated methods of measuring and evaluation of animals. Basically, it is carried out by local community under unchangeable environment (low feed resource and disease prevalence) where record keeping is difficult and low flow of information exists. Under low input system of pastoralism, the use of good bulls of native breed is the only method of improving milk and meat productivity. Community based breeding programs (CBBP) is a strategy promoted for smallholder livestock keepers to improve the productive performance of their breed (Wurzinger et al., 2021).

Improved bull dissemination schemes

From lists of community based breeding program available, community/cooperative bull scheme was chosen after a stern discussion was made between stake holders. The objectives of implementing “Bull” scheme are to establish and conserve cattle breed in communal areas, facilitate the establishment of effective community management institutions and develop livestock production, marketing skills and opportunities in pastoral areas (Bester et al., 2003). As soon as the decision was made on the appropriate community based breeding program to be used, pastoralists were organized into groups based on utilization of common grazing areas. As it is described by Mueller et al. (2015) as every community based breeding program is related to low-input systems with livestock keepers within geographical boundaries having a common interest to work together for improvement of their genetic resource. Group of cattle owners has been joint owners of the improved bull and was responsible for giving care and maintenance requirement of a particular bull given to them. Depending on the number of breeding cows and availability of large size communal grazing land, Bokosa, Goro Dada and Qersa Denbi Pastoral Association were selected for this program. Stud mating was practiced (bringing the cows for mating and returned back to their respective base stocks after the end of each breeding season) for four solid years (2012 to 2017) but in 2014/2015 the data was not collected due to extended drought.

Approaches

Stakeholder participation

Since participation of stakeholders in the designing and implementation of development projects is the key to the success of such projects (Wurzinger et al., 2021; Haile et al., 2020), particularly in traditional societies with diverse production objectives, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, Yabello regional laboratory and zonal and district level Pastoral development office played their fair share for the success of the program.

Site and community selection/group formation

Selection of the community was designed according to the needs of the pastoralists and the technical and logistical management at the level of pastoralists (Gizaw et al., 2009; Haile et al., 2008; Wurzinger et al., 2008; Mueller, 2006). Selection of cattle owners was performed based on ease of access, pastoralists who possessed communal grazing land, willingness to follow appropriate management practices (feeding, housing and health) and willingness to use controlled breeding (use of selected bulls for breeding  and  culling  of  undesirable  animals  from   the  breeding herd). Participant pastoralists were selected and organized with an active involvement of local leaders/elders/key informants and development agents.

Training of the community and its role

The capacity of the cooperative/community in managing and understanding the breeding program was enhanced through relevant trainings (Mapiye et al., 2007). Training related to breeding, feeding and health management was given for technicians (development agent, health technician) those were participated in the breeding program. In turn, they provided assistance to the community regarding handling the breeding strategy; besides, the community was trained by Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Centre researchers on how to keep simple but important records that help to make decisions in the breeding Program.

Cooperative/communal use of breeding bulls for mating

Three pastoral associations (Bokosa, Goro Dada and Qersa Denbi) were organized into groups based on communally possessed grazing areas (Danbela Wachu Ranch). Mating was designed to meet the objective of 1:25 sires to dam ratio during mating season in the years 2012/2013, 2013/2014, 2015/2016 and 2016/2017. Stud mating was practiced (bring the cows for mating). However, due to a serious drought occurred in the year 2014/2015, mating was not practiced.

Operational aspects and herd management

A linked nucleus-village breeding scheme (Gizaw et al., 2011) was used to facilitate rapid genetic progress and strengthen conservation of the breed. In this perspective, bulls supplied to participant pastoralists were those that possessed greater genetic potential compared to bulls that were available in the herd of study sites. For each mating season, selection of dam breeding groups conducted with active involvement of member pastoralists. All the bulls supplied and the cows/heifers that were brought by pastoralists and passed first round screening were ear tagged for each subsequent mating; screening for brucellosis by Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT) was carried out before mating and schedule was arranged, except for the first year (2012/2013).

Due to shortage of good performing sires and the interest of the community to a particular bull, natural mating ranged from 1:33 to 1:50 sire to dam ratio. Breeding dams were kept with their assigned bull until calving based on the condition of the ranch for a given mating year. While bulls remained in the ranch for their entire productive life, withdrawal of dams were performed immediately after parturition. Once mating was commenced, basic animal health care; such as vaccination and deworming of animals in the monitored village herds, were performed by participant herd owners. Follow ups and feedbacks on status of breeding herd were practiced by development agents at community level in consultation with district livestock department and research team of Yabello Pastoral and Dry-Land Agriculture Research Centre.

Data management and statistical analysis

Data  collected  included  number  of  females  exposed  that   were pregnancy tested, number of females exposed diagnosed as pregnant, number of females diagnosed as pregnant which failed to calve, number of calves born, number of live calves born, and number of calves dead (Table 1). Descriptive statistic procedure of SAS V.9.2 (2002) was used to organize the collected data and conduct Chi-square test (χ2) to check differences between mating years for a given reproductive trait. The following equations were used to calculate a given reproductive performance:

Where: PR (%) = Pregnancy rate, NFEDP= Number of females exposed diagnosed as pregnant, and NFEPT= Number of females exposed that were pregnancy tested.

Where: AR (%) = Abortion Rate, NFEDP = Number of females exposed diagnosed as pregnant and NIA=Number of incidence of abortion.

Where: CR (%) = Calving rate, and NCB= Number of calves born.

Where: CDLBCB (%) = Calve death loss, based on calves dead, NCD = Number of calves dead, and NLCB= Number of live calves born.


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pregnancy rate (PR) of breeding herd per mating year is presented in Table 2. The overall pregnancy rate in cows mated in the given breeding years was 89.9%. Pregnancy rate showed considerable variation (χ2<0.001) among breeding years, ranging from 68.56 to 96.40%. This result is consistent with that of the study conducted by Cruz et al. (1976), where PR of various tropical breeds was significantly affected by mating year. However, the PR  (75.40%) reported by the mentioned authors for Boran breed in Zambia is lower than the PR obtained in the present study. The lower PR observed in 2016/2017 compared with those of the remaining mating years was due to a serious drought, which resulted in scarcity of green fodder resulted to early withdrawal of breeding herd from the community ranch.

Table 3 presents calving (CR) and abortion rate (AR) of Boran cows over different breeding season, together with the overall performance of the breeding herds across the given breeding years. Out of the 1286 dams detected pregnant, 94.71% calved live calves and the rest (5.29%) aborted. Comparing CR and AR in association to the given  breeding  years,  the  mentioned  parameters were found significantly different (χ2<0.001). The difference observed was mainly due to higher rate of abortion occurred in the 2012/2013 breeding year, which was attributed by >30 head of cows were found infected with Brucella abortus. The current CR is inconsistent with the  CR of 70, 75 and 85% for local cows in dry, wet and humid region research stations, respectively, reported by Galal et al. (1981) for local zebu and F1crossbredcows. However, the value reported for humid regions coincided with 85.68% observed in the first breeding year of the current study (2012/2013). Several studies revealed management of the breeding herd is the most important key to confirm reproductive performance. In view of that, the CR observed in the current study is in agreement with the one observed by Azage (1989), who reported CR under a single-sire mating system can be improved to above 80%, but is in contrast with the CR (45%) under pastoral management conditions reported by Coppock (1994). On the other hand, the current AR is within the research findings of 4% reported by Sabine (2004) for Boran cattle.

Mortality data based on 1258 calves born over a 4-year period is presented in Table 4. Of all calves born during a given breeding season; 96.82% were born alive and survived to 45 days and 3.18% were born alive but died before the mentioned period. Of all beef calves born during a given breeding season; 93.60% were born alive and survived to 45 days, and 3.40% were born alive but died before the mentioned period. Percentages of calves that were  born  alive  and  survived  to  45 days and born alive but died before the mentioned period were not similar (χ2<0.01) across years. The current result is within the range of earlier findings of pre-weaning calf mortality rates of 3.4% for Boran and their Friesian crossbred animals in the Abernossa ranch (Haile-Mariam et al., 1993) and 5.6% in crossbred animals bred using bull in and around Fitche town, North Shoa Zone of Oromia region (Tesfaye et al., 2017), in the central high land of Ethiopia. However, it is lower than the one reported by Homann and Rooyen (2007), who cited a smallholder herd mortality rate of 18%, with disease accounting for 60% of herd mortality for smallholder cattle in Masvingo district (Mavedzenge et al., 2006).


 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Community/cooperative bull scheme is one of the best suited breeding programs for conserving Boran Qorti breed. Generally, values for parameters such as pregnancy rate (PR), abortion rate (AR), calving rate (CR), and calve death loss based on calves born (CDLBCB) considered under the current study indicated as the selected breeding scheme has got paramount importance in conserving Boran Breed. Overall, the reproductive performance of Boran cattle under the community breeding scheme was found to be relatively encouraging. Thus the government should support and focus   on   conserving   cattle  breeds   those   that  have important economic values to the community and the country by enlightening pastoralists on improved management practices of rearing cattle and also advocate the importance of community/cooperative bull scheme to pastoral community to the broader area. Generally, to succeed in today’s cattle business it is vital to understand the comparative position of pastoralists cattle production operation, to be aware of broader industry trends and issues, and to make use of available resources designed to aid management decisions towards the wellbeing of pastoral community.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Albero M, Haile-Mariam S (1982). The indigenous cattle of Ethiopia: Part I. World Animal Review 41:2-10.

 

Azage T (1989). Reproductive development and function in Zebu and crossbred cattle in Ethiopia. PhD thesis, Graduate School of Tropical Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia, P 327.

 
 

Bester J, Matjuda lE, Rust JM, Fourie HJ (2003). The Nguni: case study In: FAO Community-based management of animal genetic resources. Rome: UNDP, GTZ, CTA, FAO pp. 45-68.

 
 

Coppock DL, Desta S, Tezera S, Gebru G (2011). Capacity building helps pastoral women transform impoverished communities in Ethiopia. Science 334(6061):1394-1398.
Crossref

 
 

Coppock DL (1994). The Borana plateau of Southern Ethiopia synthesis of pastoral research, development and change, 1980-91. ILCA (International Livestock Center for Africa), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia P 418.

 
 

Cruz VO, Koger M, Warnick AC, Frankie DE (1976). Heritability of reproductive characters in Brahman cattle .Memoria, Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal 11:25-26.

 
 

Desta S, Coppock DL (2004). 'Pastoralism Under Pressure: Tracking System Change in Southern Ethiopia'. Human Ecology 32(4):465-486. 
Crossref

 
 

Galal ESE, Beyene K, Azage T (1981). A study on the reproduction of local zebu and F1crossbreedcows. II. Age at first calving and calf production. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 3:87-95.

 
 

Gizaw S, Getachew T, Haile A, Dessie T (2011). Congruence between selection of breeding rams based on breeding values for production traits and farmers ram choice criteria. Animal 5(7):995-1001.
Crossref

 
 

Gizaw S, Komen H, van Arendonk JA (2009). Optimal village breeding schemes under smallholder sheep farming systems. Livestock Science 124(1-3):82-88.
Crossref

 
 

Haile A, Getachew T, Mirkena T, Duguma G, Gizaw S, Wurzinger M, Soelkner J, Mwai O, Dessie T, Abebe A, Abate Z, Jembere T, Rekik M, Lobo RNB, Mwacharo JM, Terfa ZG,Kassie GT, Mueller JP, Rischkowsky B (2020). Community-based sheep breeding programs generated substantial genetic gains and socioeconomic benefits. Animal 14(7):1362-1370.
Crossref

 
 

Haile-Mariam A, Tibbo M, Duguma G, Mirkena T, Wurzinger M, Sölkner J (2008). Community based sheep breeding: a new approach to genetic improvement. 16th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Proceedings.

 
 

Haile-Mariam M, Banjaw k, Gebre-Meskel T, Ketema H (1993). Productivity of Boran cattle and their Friesian crosses at Abernosa ranch, Rift valley of Ethiopia. I. Reproductive performance and pre-weaning mortality. Tropical Animal Health and Production 25(4):239-248.
Crossref

 
 

Homann S, Rooyen A (2007). Unexploited agricultural growth: The case of crop-livestock production systems in Zimbabwe. Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: Proceedings of the AAAE Conference pp. 503-506.

 
 

Hurst M, Jensen N, Pedersen S, Shama A, Zambriski J (2012). Changing climate adaptation strategies of Boran pastoralists in southern Ethiopia.

 
 

Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Muchenje V, Dzama K., Marufu MC, Raats JG (2007). Potential for value-addition of Nguni cattle products in the communal areas of South Africa: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2(10):488-495.

 
 

Mavedzenge BZ, Mahenehene J, Murimbarimba F, Scoones I, Wolmer W, Hotel C (2006). Changes in the livestock sector in Zimbabwe following land reform: the case of Masvingo province. Institute for Development Studies, Brighton, available from: http://www. ids. ac. uk/index. cfm.

 
 

Mueller JP, Rischkowsky B, Haile A, Philipsson J, Mwai O, Besbes B, Valle ZA., Tibbo M, Mirkena T, Duguma, G., Sölkner J. Wurzinger M (2015). Community-based livestock breeding Programs: essentials and examples. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 132(2):155-168.
Crossref

 
 

Mueller JP (2006). Breeding and conservation programs with local communities. FAOWAAP Expert meeting "Sustainable Utlilization of Animal Genetic Resources", Ferentillo, Italy, 2-4 July 2006. Technical communication No PA 489 p.

 
 

Philipsson J (1992). Practical issue for the conservation and improvement of breeds: A global review of the genetic resources of Cattle. Expert consultation on the management of global animal genetic resources. 3-4 April. 1992. FAO animal production and health paper 104, Rome, pp. 129-155.
Crossref

 
 

Sabine H (2004). Indigenous Knowledge of Borana Pastoralists in Natural Resource Management: A Case Study From Southern Ethiopia: Justus Liebig University Giessen.

 
 

SAS Institute. (2002). SAS/STAT System Guide for Personal Computers, Version 9.0 Edition SAS Institute lnc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.

 
 

Sölkner J, Nakimbugwe H, Valle ZA (1998). Analysis of determinants for success and failure of village breeding programmes. In Proceedings of the 6th World Congress On Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 25:273-281.

 
 

Tache B (2000). Pastoralism Under Stress: Resources, Institutions and Poverty Among the Borana Oromo in Southern Ethiopia. Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås.

 
 

Tesfaye D, Tirsit K, Yitagesu B (2017). Major Reproductive Disorder and Performances of Small Holder Dairy Farms in and around Fitche Town, North Shoa zone of Oromia Regional State, Centeral Ethioipia. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility 8(1):10-17.
Crossref

 
 

Teshome D, Sori T, Banti T, Kinfe G, Wieland B, Alemayehu G (2022). Prevalence and risk factors of Brucella spp . in goats in Borana pastoral area. Small Ruminant Research 206:106594. 
Crossref

 
 

Trail JCM, Gregory KE, Marples HJS, Kagonge J (1985). Comparison of Bostauras-Bos indicus breed crosses with strait breed Bos indicus breeds of cattle for maternal and individual traits. Journal of Animal Science 60(5):1165-1174.
Crossref

 
 

Wurzinger M, Gutiérrez GA., Sölkner J, Probst L (2021). Community-Based Livestock Breeding: Coordinated Action or Relational Process? Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8:443.
Crossref

 
 

Wurzinger M, Willam A, Delgado J, Nürnberg M, Valle-Zarate A., Stemmer A., Ugarte G, Sölkner J (2008). Design of a village breeding programme for a llama population in the High Andes of Bolivia. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125(5):311-319.
Crossref

 

 

 




          */?>