International Journal of
Physical Sciences

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Phys. Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1992-1950
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJPS
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2496

Full Length Research Paper

Natural radioactivity level of clay, ceramic, and stone cooking dishes in Saudi Arabia

Alharbi W. R.
  • Alharbi W. R.
  • Department of Physics, Faculty Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 29 June 2016
  •  Accepted: 27 September 2016
  •  Published: 30 September 2016

 ABSTRACT

Standards and guidelines are needed in the manufacture of household cooking dishes from clay, ceramic, and stone in Saudi Arabia. The radioactivity levels due to the presence of 40K, 232Th, and 226Ra in these materials were determined using gamma spectrometry equipped with high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. The activity concentrations of 226Ra ranged from 5.75 Bq kg−1 (Yemen stone sample) to 192.35 Bq kg−1 (China ceramic sample), those of 232Th ranged from 6.17 Bq kg−1 (Yemen stone sample) to 192.41 Bq kg−1 (China ceramic sample), and those of 40K ranged from 43.92 Bq kg−1 (clay sample manufactured in Bahrah, Saudi Arabia) to 656.96 Bq kg−1 (ceramic sample from Romania). Radiological indices were measured for all samples to ascertain the potential radiation health hazards. The average concentrations for 226Ra and 232Th and the absorbed dose rate (DR) in clay and ceramic dishes exceeded the permissible global limits, with the exception of clay samples from Makkah, Saudi Arabia. The 226Ra and 232Th concentrations in all cooking dishes manufactured from stone were within safety limits. However, most of the average values obtained for the activity concentration of 40K exceeded the recommended limit. The radium equivalent (Raeq), annual gonadal dose equivalent (AEDE), external hazard index (Hex), and gamma activity index (Iγ) were found to be below the internationally accepted safe limit, except in a ceramic sample imported from China. The sample also had an annual effective dose (AEDE) that slightly above unity. The concentrations of a total of 33 chemical elements were estimated by using an ARL QUANT’X energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. In most samples, the elements’ concentrations exceeded the reference level values. In conclusion, care must be taken when using cooking dishes manufactured from clay, ceramic, and stone.

Key words: Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analyzer, gamma spectrometry, radiation hazard, household cooking dishes, natural radioactivity.


 INTRODUCTION

Daily exposure to the natural radionuclides 232Th, 226Ra, and 40K is undesirable. They cause an  internal  exposure risk resulting from radon and its decay products and an external exposure risk due to their gamma emission (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation [UNSCEAR], 2000; Amin and Naji, 2013). Chronic exposure to low doses of natural radioactivity can cause adverse health effects (Najam et al., 2015). The most serious involve increased probability of cancer and birth defects (Faisal et al., 2014).

Most household cooking dishes manufactured from clay, ceramic, and stone contain various concentrations of the natural radionuclides 226Ra, 232Th and 40K. The precise concentrations depend on the chemical composition of the material, which is related to the geological conditions and geophysical characteristics of their origin (Salas et al., 2006). The materials may contain radionuclides from both natural sources and waste products in addition to some minerals from certain slags. The present study centers on radiological baseline information of the Jeddah region in particular and Saudi Arabia in general.

Many ways exist for analyzing trace elements in a material, including portable energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometry with radioisotope excitation. This method is useful and significantly reduces the number of samples needed for analysis (El-Taher, 2012; Sitko et al., 2004).

The aims of the present study were to analyze household cooking dishes manufactured from clay, ceramic, and stone (1) to determine the natural radionuclide levels using high-resolution gamma-ray (HPGe) spectrometry to evaluate the radiological risks and human exposure, and (2) to specify the concentrations of elements using EDXRF spectrometry.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling and sample preparation

A total of 20 samples of household cooking dishes used in Saudi Arabia were collected from local stores. Four samples were manufactured in Saudi Arabia, and the other 16 samples were imported from different foreign countries (Table 1). Each sample dish was crushed and sieved through a 1-mm mesh size to ensure homogeneity of the samples for testing. Weighted samples were placed in standard polyethylene beakers (650 cm3 volume). The beakers were completely sealed and left for 4 to 5 weeks prior to gamma spectrometric analysis to attain secular equilibrium between radium, thorium, and their progenies products to ensure that radon gas was restricted to the beaker and the decay products remained in the sample (Hassan et al., 2010; Alharbi, 2013; Guidotti et al., 2015). For elemental analysis using EDXRF spectrometry (ARL QUANT’X EDXRF, Thermo Electron Corp., Middleton, WI), the dry samples (at room temperature) were crushed to a fine powder in an agate mortar, then sifted through a 0.25-mm sieve. The powder was then manually pressed into the sample holder, following the procedures described by Hartyàni et al. (2000).

 

 

Measurement of specific activity with gamma spectrometry

The specific activities of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in  the  samples  were measured using a gamma spectrometry system with a high-purity germanium (HPGe) coaxial detector with a relative efficiency of 25% and a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 2.0 keV at 1332 keV of 60Co (Darko et al., 2012; Rajeshwari et al., 2014). The system was calibrated for energy and absolute efficiency, and all measurements were conducted for 10 h. The 232Th concentration was determined from the average concentrations of 212Pb (238.6 keV), 212Bi (727.25keV), 212Tl (583.1 keV), and 228Ac (911.1 and 338.4 keV) in the samples, while the 214Pb (351.9 and 295.09 keV) and 214Bi (609.3, 1120.27, and 1764.5 keV) decay products were used to determine the average concentrations of 226Ra. The average concentrations of 40K and 137Cs were determined through 1460.3 keV and 661.66 keV energy photopeaks, respectively. The radioactivity concentration C of these radionuclides was calculated using the following formula (Beretka and Mathew, 1985):

C (Bq kg−1) = AaPrw                                                                     (1)

where Aa is the intensity of gamma-line in a radionuclide (counts per second), ε is the efficiency for each gamma-ray line observed for the same number of channels for the sample or the background, Pr is the absolute transition probability of the gamma-ray decay, and w is the weight in kilograms of the sample.


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the household cooking dishes were determined by using a HPGe detector, and the results are summarized in Table 2. The highest  average  activity  concentrations  of  226Ra and 232Th were found in ceramic sample D16 (from China), with values of 192.35 and 192.41 Bq kg−1, respectively. The lowest average activity concentrations of 226Ra and 232Th were found in stone sample D20 (from Yemen), with values of 4.12 and 4.85 Bq kg−1, respectively. Ceramic sample D11 (from Romania) had the highest average activity concentrations of 40K, 656.96 Bq kg−1, and the lowest 40K value was found in clay sample D8 manufactured in Bahrah, Saudi Arabia, with value of 43.92 Bq kg−1. Ten samples (D2, D3, D5, D9, D11, D13, D14, D15, D16 and D19) exceeded the recommended limit of 40K recommended limit of 40K (UNSCEAR, 2008; Sahar and Naji, 2013) as shown in Figure 1. The highest activity concentration of 137Cs was 3.17 Bq kg−1 from stone sample D17. Cesium 137 was not detected in four samples (Table 2): clay sample D1 imported from Egypt and stone samples D18, D19, and D20 imported from Indonesia, China, and Yemen, respectively. Table 2 shows that the concentrations of 226Ra and 232Th in clay and ceramic household cooking dishes exceeded world average values [(UNSCEAR], 2008; Marocchi et al., 2011; Mehra and Bala, 2014), with the exception of clay sample D7 manufactured in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. None of the stone samples exceeded the recommended limit for 226Ra and 232Th as shown in Figures 2 and 3.

 

 

 

 

 

Radium equivalent activity, Raeq

To evaluate the potential health effects of gamma radiation associated with using cooking dishes made from clay, ceramic, and stone, the radium equivalent activity index (Raeq) was determined by using the following expression (Beretka and Mathew, 1985):

Raeq (Bq kg−1) = 𝐶Ra + 1.43𝐶Th + 0.077𝐶k                             (2)

where CRa, CTh, and CK are the activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in becquerels per kilogram, respectively. The range of measured Raeq was 48.79–198.04 Bq kg−1 in clay samples, 144.31–502.74 Bq kg−1 in ceramic samples, and 22.56–97.85 Bq kg−1 in stone samples. All Raeq values for the cooking dish samples were lower than the safety limit value of 370 Bq kg−1, except for ceramic sample D16 from China (Ademola, 2009; Saleh and Abu Shayeb, 2014). The Raeq values are listed in Table 3.

 

 

Absorbed dose rate, in air DR (nGy h−1)

Calculating the gamma absorbed dose rate in air is important because  it  is  the  first  step  in  evaluating  the health risk associated with the studied samples. The absorbed dose rate in air, DR (nGy h−1), was determined by using the specific activity concentrations (Bq kg−1) and the conversion factors of 0.427, 0.623, and 0.043 nGy h−1 per Bq kg−1 of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively, according to UNSCEAR (2008). The total dose rate DR was then calculated by the following equation (Tufail et al., 1992):

DR (nGy h−1) = 0.427CRa + 0.623CTh +0.043CK                                         (3)

where CRa, CTh, and CK are the activity concentrations (Bq kg−1) of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively, in the samples listed in Table 2. The calculated values of DR are shown in Table 3. The highest DR was 224.17 nG h−1 in ceramic sample D16, which was from China, and the lowest value of DR was 10.71 nG h−1 in stone sample D20, which was from Yemen. All DR values were over the international recommended limit (57 nGy h−1) (UNSCEAR, 2000; Sowole, 2014), except for clay sample D7, which was manufactured in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, and all stone samples.

Annual gonadal dose equivalent (AGDE)

The annual gonadal dose equivalent (AGDE) associated with the specific activities of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in household cooking dishes manufactured from clay, ceramic, and stone materials was calculated using the following formula (Augustine et al., 2014):

AGDE (μSv y1) = 3.09CRa + 4.18CTh + 0.314CK                                         (4)

The obtained AGDE values are listed in Table 3. The AGDE values varied from 0.08 to 1.54 mSv y−1. The obtained values in all samples are higher than the world average of (300 µSv y−1) (UNSCEAR, 2000) except in clay sample D7 and in all stone samples.

Annual effective dose (AEDEindoor or Eair)

The estimated annual effective dose equivalent received by an individual was calculated by using a conversion factor of 0.7 Sv Gy−1, which is used to convert the absorbed rate to member effective dose equivalent with an outdoor occupancy of 20 and 80 % for indoors (UNSCEAR, 1993; Ajayi, 2009). The annual effective doses in (mSv y−1) were determined from the following formula (Beretka and Mathew 1985):

Eair = DR (nGy.h−1) × 8760 (h.y−1) × 0.7(× (103 mSv / nGy 109))× 0.8                  (5)

Equation (5) can be simplified to the following:

AEDEindoor (mSv.y−1) = DR × 4.905 × 10−3                                                       (6)

Eair is the effective dose rate in air, AEDEindoor. The values of DR are given in Equation 3 for all investigated samples. The estimated annual effective dose rates in air are given in Table 3. None of the values obtained for the annual effective dose exceeded 1 mSv y−1, except for sample D16. The individual effective dose limits for normal exposure in the general public is defined by the ICRP (2007).

External hazard index, Hex

To limit the external gamma radiation dose from household cooking dishes to less than 1.5 mSv y−1, the external hazard index Hex was calculated by using the following equation (Lu et al., 2012):

𝐻ex = (𝐶Ra/370) + (𝐶Th/259) + (𝐶K/4810)                                                             (7)

where 𝐶Ra, 𝐶Th, and 𝐶K are the activity concentrations (Bq kg−1) of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively. For the safe use of household cooking dishes and a negligible radiation hazard, the values of 𝐻ex should be lower than unity and the maximum value of Raeq must be less than 370 Bq kg−1. The calculated values of 𝐻ex for the studied materials ranged from 0.04 to 1.36 (Table 3). The 𝐻ex values for all investigated samples, except for sample D17, were less than unity (Xhixha et al., 2013).

Activity index, Iγ

To estimate the radiation hazard associated with 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, the radioactivity level index Iγ was calculated by the following equation (NEA-OECD 1979; Szabó et al. 2013):

Iγ = (1/300)CRa + (1/200)CTh+ (1/3000)CK                                                       (8)

Where CRa, CTh, and CK are the specific activities (Bq kg−1) of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively. Iγ varied from 0.05 in sample D7 from Makkah, Saudi Arabia, to 1.76 in ceramic sample D16 from China (Table 3). The values for all investigated samples were below unity, corresponding to an annual dose range of 0.3 to 1 mSv y−1, except those for sample D16.

Concentrations of chemical elements using EDXRF

Table 4 shows the average concentrations of 33 elements (in wt/wt%), which were determined by using an EDXRF spectrometer (Yu et al., 2002; Rácz et al., 2016) to test whether elements were above toxicity reference levels (Noli and Tsamos, 2016). Silicon, Sn, In, and Fe were detected in all investigated samples, with Si being predominant and ranging from 19.50% (D18 from Indonesia) to 80.22% (D9 from Turkey). Iron concentrations varied from 14.69% (D1) to 0.868% (D20). Tin and In concentrations fell within the range of 0.0079% (D18) to 0.162% (D3) and 0.0077% (D18) to 0.0530% (D11), respectively, which exceeded the Sn and In concentrations in soil calculated by Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee (2007). Egyptian clay sample D1 contained the highest amount of Fe (14.69%) and Yemeni stone sample D20 contained the lowest concentration (0.868%). The Fe concentrations in the samples exceeded the mean concentration (37,200 mg/kg) obtained by Towett et al. (2013), with the exception of samples D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D18, and D20.

 

 

Fourteen samples contained Ba exceeding the concentrations reported by Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee (2007), and one sample was within the reference limit. Elements Th and U were detected in samples D11, D12, D14, D16, and D20 and in samples D5, D9, D10, D13, D14, D16, and D20, respectively, but not in the remaining samples. Potassium was found in all samples, except for D8, D11, D17, and D18. The K concentrations varied between 0.86% (D12) and 6.45% (D9), and except for samples D6 and D12, they exceeded the values reported by Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee (2007). Calcium concentrations ranged from 1.16% (stone sample D20 from Yemen) to 33.16% (ceramic sample D10 from Vietnam). All samples contained Ca, except for samples D3, D5, D9, D14, and D16, and some (D4, D6, D8, D11, D12, D13, D17, and D20) contained Ca below the mean concentration (69,600 mg/kg) calculated by Towett et al. (2013). The Mg level in the present study varied between 6.07% (60,700 mg/kg) in the clay sample D5 from Morocco and 32.18% (321,800 mg/kg) in the stone sample D17 from Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Both of these values were considerably higher than 17700 mg/kg, the mean Mg concentration reported by Towett et al. (2013). Similarly, Al was found at the highest value of 24.68% (246,800 mg/kg) for clay sample D3 imported from Spain and the lowest concentration in ceramic sample D16 with a value of 1.56% (15,600 mg/kg). Seventeen samples contained Al, all of which exceed the mean concentration of Al in soil, with the exception of D16. Sodium was detected in six samples (D4, D12, D13, D17, D18, and D20), which exceeded the mean Na concentration of 16,000 mg/kg in soil reported by Towett et al. (2013). In the current study, the Na concentration ranged from 45.69% (456,900 mg/kg) in clay sample D4 imported from Yemen to 12.97% (129,700 mg/kg) in stone sample D17 locally made in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Zirconium (Zr), Mo, Rh, Ru, Sb, Nb, Zn and Ni were found in  some  samples.  In  comparison with the concentrations of these metals reported by Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee (2007), Zr, Mo, Rh, Ru, Sb, Nb, Zn and Ni were higher. The elements Cl, Pd, Cu, Rb, Pb, Cr, P, Y, S, Hf, and Bi were not detected in almost all samples. The concentrations of additional elements analyzed in the present study including Cl, Pd, Cu, Rb, Pb, Cr, P, Y, S, Hf, and Bi were also higher than the ranges reported by Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee (2007). The content of Sr in the analyzed samples was higher than the range of 147 to 375 mg/kg obtained by Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee (2007) except in sample D4 and D5. The maximum and minimum amounts were observed in sample D19, with a value of 0.303% (3030 mg/kg), and sample D4, with a value of 0.020% (200 mg/kg), respectively. Titanium was detected in 14 samples, with the concentration varying from 0.236% (2360 mg/kg) in sample D18 to 3.17% (31,700 mg/kg) in sample D8. In comparison with the range 2900–15,480 mg/kg (Kabata-Pendias and Mukherjee, 2007), some samples in the current study had higher concentrations. In conclusion, attention must be paid to commercial marks and manufacturing country for the materials used in household cooking dishes.

 

 

 

 


 CONCLUSION

Twenty samples of household cooking dishes in Saudi Arabia were analyzed for 33 chemical elements using ARL QUANT’X EDXRF. In addition, the natural radioactivity levels due to the presence of 40K, 232Th, and 226Ra were determined using gamma spectrometry (HPGe). The concentrations of most elements exceeded the reference levels. The activity concentrations ranged between 14.52–62.71 Bq kg−1 in clay samples, 34.51–170.88 Bq kg−1 in ceramic samples, and 4.12–22.83 Bq kg−1 in stone samples for 226Ra; 18.80–103.13 Bq kg−1 in clay samples, 46.79–164.17 Bq kg−1 in ceramic samples, and 4.85–28.31 Bq kg−1 in stone samples for 232Th; and 43.92–562.69 Bq kg−1 in clay samples, 132.53–656.96 Bq kg−1 in ceramic samples, and 73.57–523.10 Bq kg−1 in stone samples for 40K. The highest value of 137Cs was 3.17 Bq kg−1, which was found in a stone sample manufactured in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. All values for the radionuclides measured in the investigated samples were less than the world reference limit, with the exception of the ceramic sample from China. All values for the absorbed dose rate significantly exceeded the average value, except those associated with all stone samples and with the clay sample from Makkah, Saudi Arabia. The results indicate that these materials do not pose any significant radiological risk and they are safe for use in household cooking dishes.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Ademola JA (2009). Natural radioactivity and hazard assessment of imported ceramic tiles in Nigeria. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 12(3):161–165.

 

Ajayi OS (2009). Measurement of activity concentrations of 40K, 226Ra and 232Th for assessment of radiation hazards from soils of the southwestern region of Nigeria. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 48:323-332.
Crossref

 

Alharbi WR (2013). Natural radioactivity and dose assessment for brands of chemical and organic fertilizers used in Saudi Arabia. J. Mod. Phys. 4(1):344-348.
Crossref

 

Amin SA, Naji M (2013). Natural radioactivity in different commercial ceramic samples used in Yemeni buildings. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 86:37–41.
Crossref

 

Augustine KA, Bello AK, Adejumobi AC (2014). Determination of natural radioactivity and hazard in soil samples in and around gold mining area in Itagunmodi, south-western, Nigeria. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 7:249-255.
Crossref

 

Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985). Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys. 48:87-95.
Crossref

 

Darko EO, Kpeglo DO, Akaho EHK, Chandorf CS, Adu PAS, Faanu A, Abankwah E, Lawluvi H, Awudu AR (2012). Radiation doses and hazards from processing of crude oil at the Tema oil refinery in Ghana. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 148(3):318-328.
Crossref

 

El-Taher A (2012). Elemental analysis of granite by instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) and X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70:350-354.
Crossref

 

Faisal BMR, Haydar MA, Ali MI, Paul D, Majumder RK, Uddin MJ (2014). Assessment of natural radioactivity and associated radiation hazards in topsoil of Savar Industrial Area, Dhaka, Bangladesh. J. Nucl. Part. Phys. 4(4):129-136.

 

Guidotti L, Carini F, Rossi R, Gatti M, Cenci RM, Beone GM (2015). Gamma-spectrometric measurement of radioactivity in agricultural soils of the Lombardia region, northern Italy. J. Environ. Radioact. 142:36-44.
Crossref

 

Hartyàni Z, Dávid E, Szabó S, Szilágyi V, Horváth T, Hargitai Tóth Á (2000). Determination of the trace elements distribution of polluted soils in Hungary by X-ray methods. Microchem. J. 67(1–3):195–200.
Crossref

 

Hassan NM, Ishikawa T, Hosoda M, Sorimachi A, Tokonami S, Fukushi M, Sahoo SK (2010). Assessment of the natural radioactivity using two techniques for the measurement of radionuclide concentration in building materials used in Japan. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 283:15-21.
Crossref

 

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37:1-332.

 

Kabata-Pendias A, Mukherjee AB (2007). Trace Elements from Soils to Human. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Crossref

 

Lu X, Yang G, Ren C (2012). Natural radioactivity and radiological hazards of building materials in Xianyang, China. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 81(7):780-784.
Crossref

 

Marocchi M, Righi S, Bargossi GM, Gasparotto G (2011). Natural radionuclides content and radiological hazard of commercial ornamental stones: An integrated radiometric and mineralogical-petrographic study. Radiat. Meas. 46:538-545.
Crossref

 

Mehra R, Bala P (2014). Assessment of radiation hazards due to the concentration of natural radionuclides in the environment. Environ. Earth Sci. 71:901–909.
Crossref

 

Najam A, Younis SA, Kithah FH (2015). Natural radioactivity in soil samples in Nineveh Province and the associated radiation hazards. Int. J. Phys. 3(3):126-132.

 

Noli F, Tsamos P (2016). Concentration of heavy metals and trace elements in soils, waters and vegetables and assessment of health risk in the vicinity of a lignite-fired power plant. Sci. Total Environ. 563–564:377-385.
Crossref

 

Nuclear Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (NEA-OECD) (1979). Exposure to radiation from natural radioactivity in building materials. Report by NEA Group of Experts. OECD, Paris, France.

 

Rácz L, Solti S, Gresits I, Tölgyesi S, Benedek D, Valentínyi N, Mizsey P (2016). Measurement of rarely investigated trace elements As, P, Sr, Zr, Rb and Y in waste tires. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 60(2):78-84.

 

Rajeshwari T, Rajesh S, Kerur BR, Anilkumar S, Krishnan N, Pant AD (2014). Natural radioactivity studies of Bidar soil samples using gamma spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 300:61-65.
Crossref

 

Sahar AA, Naji M (2013). Natural radioactivity in different commercial ceramic samples used in Yemeni buildings. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 86:37–41.
Crossref

 

Salas HT, Nalini HA Jr, Mendes JC (2006). Radioactivity dosage evaluation of Brazilian ornamental granitic rocks based on chemical data, with mineralogical and lithological characterization. Environ. Geol. 49:520–526.
Crossref

 

Saleh H, Abu Shayeb M (2014). Natural radioactivity distribution of southern part of Jordan (Ma′an) soil. Ann. Nucl. Energy 65:184-189.
Crossref

 

Sitko R, Zawisza B, Jurczyk J, Buhl F, Zielonka U (2004). Determination of high Zn and Pb concentrations in polluted soils using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 13(1):91-96.

 

Sowole O (2014). Assessment of radiological hazard indices from surface soil to individuals from major markets at Sagamu Ogun state, Nigeria. Sci. World J. 9(3):1-4.

 

Szabó Z, Völgyesi P, Nagy HÉ, Szabó C, Kis Z, Csorba O (2013). Radioactivity of natural and artificial building materials—A comparative study. J. Environ. Radioact. 118:64-74.
Crossref

 

Towett EK, Shepherd KD, Cadisch G (2013). Quantification of total element concentrations in soils using total X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (TXRF). Sci. Total Environ. 463–464:374–388.
Crossref

 

Tufail M, Ahmad N, Almakky S, Zafar MS, Khan HA (1992). Natural radioactivity in the ceramics used in dwellings as construction material. Sci. Total Environ. 127:243-253.
Crossref

 

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (1993). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York.

 

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to general assembly, Annex B exposure from natural radiation sources. United Nations, New York.

 

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2008). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to general assembly, Annexes C,D and E B. sources and effects of ionization radiation, New York.

 

Xhixha G, Ahmeti A, Bezzon GP, Bitri M, Broggini C, Buso GP, Caciolli A, Callegari I, Cfarku F, Colonna T, Fiorentini G, Guastaldi E, Mantovani F, Massa G, Menegazzo R, Mou L, Prifti D, Rossi Alvarez C, Sadiraj Kuqi DH, Shyti M, Tushe L, Xhixha Kaçeli M, Zyfi A (2013). First characterization of natural radioactivity in building materials manufactured in Albania. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 155(2):217-223.
Crossref

 

Yu KN, Yeung ZLL, Lee LYL, Stokes MJ, Kwok RCW (2002). Determination of multi-element profiles of soil using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 57:279-284.
Crossref

 




          */?>