International Journal of
Sociology and Anthropology

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Sociol. Anthropol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2006-988X
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJSA
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 305

Full Length Research Paper

Possible selves of a hashtag: Moving from the theory of speech acts to cultural objects to interpret hashtags

Gevisa La Rocca
  • Gevisa La Rocca
  • Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Enna “Kore”, Italy.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 12 December 2019
  •  Accepted: 06 February 2020
  •  Published: 29 February 2020

References

Athique A (2018). The dynamics and potential of big data. Media, Culture and Society 40(1):59-74.
Crossref

 

Austin JL (1962). How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University.

 
 

Boyd D (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In a networked Self pp. 47-66.

 
 

Boyd D, Golder S, Lotan G (2010). Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter System Sciences. (Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences) HICSS-43. IEEE pp. 1-10.
Crossref

 
 

Boyd D, Crawford K (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication and Society 15(5):662-679.
Crossref

 
 

Bolter JD, Grusin R (1999). Remediation. Understanding The Media. Cambridge: The MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Press.

 
 

Bourdieu P (1979). La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

 
 

Bruns A, Moe H (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K Weller, A Bruns, J Burgess, M Mahrt, C Puschmann (Eds.). Twitter and society pp 15-28.

 
 

Bruns A, Burgess J (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N Rambukkana (Ed.). Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, pp 13-28. New York: Peter Lang.

 
 

Bruns A, Moon B, Paul A, Muench FV (2016). Towards a typology of hashtag publics: a large scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics. Communication Research and Practice 2(1):20-46.
Crossref

 
 

Bucher T, Helmond A (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J Burgess, A Marwick, T Poell (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, pp. 233-253. London, England: SAGE.
Crossref

 
 

Cardoso G (2008). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial wellbeing. Communication Research 30(6):625-648.
Crossref

 
 

Colleoni E (2013). Beyond the Differences: The Use of Empty Signifiers as Organizing Device in the #occupy Movement. Workshop Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics, University of Milan.

 
 

Couldry N (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge: Polity.

 
 

Couldry N, Hepp A (2017). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Context, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory 23(3):191-202.
Crossref

 
 

Deacon D, Stanyer J (2014). Mediatization: key concept or conceptual bandwagon. Media. Culture and Society 36(7):1032-1044.
Crossref

 
 

Deacon D, Stanyer J (2015). 'Mediatization and'or 'Mediatization of'? A response to Hepp et al. Media. Culture and Society 37(3):655-657.
Crossref

 
 

Döveling K, Harju AA, Sommer D (2018). From Mediatized Emotion to Digital Affect Cultures: New Technologies and Global Flow of Emotion. Social Media + Society 4:1-11.
Crossref

 
 

Garfinkel H (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

 
 

Gibson JJ (1979). The theory of affordances. In JJ Gibson (Ed.). The ecological approach to visual perception. classic edition. Psychology Press pp. 119-136. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

 
 

Goffman E (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essay on Face to Face Behavior. New York: Double Day Anchor Books

 
 

Griswold W (1997). Cultures and Societies in a Changing World. London: Sage.

 
 

Gruzd A, Wellman B, Takhteyev Y (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist 55(10):1294-1318.
Crossref

 
 

Hjarvard S (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. New York: Routledge.
Crossref

 
 

Hutchby I (2001a). Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.

 
 

Hutchby I (2001b). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2):441-456.
Crossref

 
 

Hutchby I, Barnett S (2005). Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone Conversation. Discourse Studies 7(2):147-171.
Crossref

 
 

Jenkins H (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York, NY: New York University Press.

 
 

Innis HA (1951). The Bias of Communication. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.

 
 

La Rocca G (2012). From the Alphabet to the Web: How Time, Space, and Thought Have Changed. Sage Open pp. 1-8.
Crossref

 
 

La Rocca G (2017). Cantami, o diva. La bazzecola del dicunt in rete. Sociologia Della Comunicazione 53:56-74.
Crossref

 
 

Licoppe C, Smoreda Z (2005). Are Social Networks Technologically Embedded? How Networks Are Changing Today with Changes in Communication Technology. Social Networks 27(4):317-335.
Crossref

 
 

Litt E (2012). Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56:330-345.
Crossref

 
 

Lunt P, Livingstone S (2016). Is 'mediatization' the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture and Society 38(3):462-470.
Crossref

 
 

Mannheim K (1952). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

 
 

Markus H, Nurius P (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist 41(9):954-969.
Crossref

 
 

Marwick AE, Boyd D (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the immagined audience. New Media and Society 13(1):114-133.
Crossref

 
 

Matheson D (2018). The performance of publicness in social media: tracing patterns in tweets after a disaster. Media, Culture and Society 40(4):584-599.
Crossref

 
 

Mcveigh-Schultz J, Baym NK (2015). Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, Couple. Social Media + Society 1(2):2056305115604649.
Crossref

 
 

Meyrowitz J (1985). No Sense of Place. New York: Oxford University Press.

 
 

Nagy P, Neff G (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media+Society 1(2):2056305115603385.
Crossref

 
 

Ong WJ (1982). Orality and Literacy. The Tecnologizing of the Ward. New York: Methuem.
Crossref

 
 

Papacharissi Z (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication and Society 19(3):307-324.
Crossref

 
 

Rambukkana N (Ed.) (2015). Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. New York: Peter Lang
Crossref

 
 

Rathnayake C, Suthers DD (2018). Twitter Issue Response Hashtags as Affordances for Momentary Connectedness. Social Media+ Society pp. 1-14.
Crossref

 
 

Searle JR (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref

 
 

Searle JR (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

 
 

Searle JR (2010). Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crossref

 
 

Sewell WH jr (2009), Una teoria della struttura: dualità, «agency», trasformazione pp. 83-113.

 
 

Smith B (2003). John Searle: From speech acts to social reality. John Searle pp. 1-33.
Crossref

 
 

Suthers DD (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1(3):315-337.
Crossref

 
 

Suthers DD, Dwyer N, Medina R, Vatrapu R (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5(1):5-42.
Crossref

 
 

Tettegah SY (2016). (Ed.). Emotions, Technology, and Social Media. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

 
 

Turkle S (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

 
 

Weick KE (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.

 
 

Wells AJ (2002). Gibson' s affordances and Turing' s theory of computation. Ecological Psychology 14(3):140-180.
Crossref