Journal of
Entomology and Nematology

  • Abbreviation: J. Entomol. Nematol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2006-9855
  • DOI: 10.5897/JEN
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 135

Full Length Research Paper

Faunal survey of the termites of the genus Macrotermes (Isoptera: Termitidae) of Ethiopia

Daniel Getahun Debelo
  • Daniel Getahun Debelo
  • Department of Applied Biology, Adama Science and Technology University, P. O. Box 1888, Adama, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 28 August 2018
  •  Accepted: 22 October 2018
  •  Published: 31 October 2018

 ABSTRACT

To date Macrotermes subhyalinus and Macrotermes herus are the only two species of termites of the genus Macrotermes recorded in Ethiopia. The description given to them in terms of distribution and their mound morphology is contrary to the literature and the species checklist is not exhaustive. This paper compares mound distribution and dimensions in Western, Central, and Southern Ethiopia and provides species checklist based on external mound morphology. Four termite hotspot districts were selected from each region as replicates and an area of 100 x 100 m was delineated. All mounds in the area were counted to determine their density. Five mounds were randomly selected and their dimensions measured. External morphology of mounds was studied to determine the species. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in density and height among the mounds of the three regions in the order Southern > Central > Western. In Southern and western region, mound density was 16.7 ± 1.53 (mean ± standard error) and 5.3 ± 4.16, while mound height was 2.9 ± 1.69 and 0.3 ± 0.24 m, respectively. The checklist included seven species: M. herus from Western; M. subhyalinus, M. natalensis and M. herus from Central; M. michaelseni, M. jeanneli, M. natalensis, M. falciger, and Macrotermes SpA (an unidentified sp.) from Southern Ethiopia. Except M. subhyalinus and M. herus, the other species were recorded for the first time in Ethiopia to our knowledge.

 

Key words: Closed mounds, low mounds, Macrotermes termites, mound morphology, open chimney mounds.


 INTRODUCTION

Globally over 3,000 species of termites are known (Munthali et al., 1999) that are grouped under seven families and 281 genera (Grohmann et al., 2010; Logan et al., 1990; Pearce, 1999). Africa is the richest continent in termite diversity, accounting for one-third of the species recorded worldwide (UNEP, 2000).
 
The numbers of tropical termite species are high and many of them are undescribed or poorly described because of their taxonomic difficulty and lack of sufficient termite taxonomists. Very few specialists are able to identify tropical termite species and many of the economically  important  groups  lack  proper   taxonomic revision, resulting in a large number of incorrect, doubtful or incomplete identifications (UNEP, 2000). Lack of their taxonomic understanding has been a major impediment to the study and management of these termites. Identification in termites is very difficult for many reasons, and for many genera identification key has not been worked out. Termite identification is generally based on the alates’ or the major soldiers’ caste morphological characters. However, this conventional method is not always reliable, especially when the similarities between species are very close (Abdurahman et al., 2010).
 
In Ethiopia, 63 termite species belonging to  25  genera have been recorded representing about 6.3% of the African termite diversity, a low estimate given the vast range and the suitability of the climate. This could be due to the limited systematic studies carried out so far and the lack of national termite inventory (Debelo and Degaga, 2014). All the identification works done regarding the Ethiopian fauna were based on the fauna of other parts of Africa. The limitations clearly show some of the challenges in studying the Ethiopian termite fauna (Abdurahman et al., 2010).
 
A key trend in termite research is the use of molecular genetics tools to study species identification and distribution, differentiation of populations, colony social structure, and feeding behavior (Grace, 2006). Mound architecture is also useful in species identification (Dangerfield et al., 1998), especially for Macrotermes species which build spectacular epigeal mounds. The genus is found throughout the Afro-tropical Zoogeographic region and Indo-Malayan zoogeographical regions and so far 12 species have been described in the Afro-tropical Zoogeographic region. In Africa, they build large mounds which are a characteristic feature of many grasslands and savanna woodlands (Debelo and Degaga, 2014).
 
In Ethiopia, the genus Macrotermes is represented by two species Macrotermes subhyalinus (Rambur) and M. herus (Sjöstedt) (Abdurahman 1990; Abdurahman et al., 2010). Abdurahman (1990) stated that the mounds of Macrotermes termites found in western Ethiopia differ significantly in size and shape from those found in the Maki-Batu (Batu formerly Ziway) area of Central Ethiopia. In both areas, the mounds have no external openings. In Western Ethiopia, the mounds are typically dome-shaped whereas in Maki-Batu, the mounds are conical. M. subhyalinus is a well-described, serious pest species in Ethiopia and it builds closed, dome-shaped mounds.
 
According to this description, the closed dome-shaped mounds found in Western Ethiopia belong to M. subhyalinus. However, it is not known whether the closed conical mounds found in the Maki-Batu area of Central Ethiopia with different nest architecture belong to M. subhyalinus or M. herus. The study did not indicate whether the M. subhyalinus which builds dome-shaped mounds in Western Ethiopia builds conical mounds in the Maki-Batu area or whether these conical mounds belong to M. herus. However, many authors (Harris, 1956; Bagine et al., 1989, 1994; Turner, 2000, 2001; Abebe, 2002; Pomeroy, 2005; Brandl et al., 2007; Korb, 2011) reported that M. subhyalinus builds mounds with external openings.
 
The closed dome-shaped mounds of the M. subhyalinus reported earlier in Ethiopia does not agree with the wide available literatures which state that the species builds mounds with external openings. Wood (1986) reported that he collected Macrotermes termites from low open mounds from Batu town and 10 km south of the town but did not specify  the  species.  Debelo  and Degaga (2014) also recognized and reported the existence of two types of mound of Macrotermes (closed mounds and open mounds) in the area which may prove the mounds are built by two distinct species. Therefore, this calls certainly for a critical revision/taxonomic study of this genus. Thus, the aim of this study is to collect data on external morphology of mounds built by Macrotermes termites from the three termite hotspot regions of Ethiopia and to determine the species based on the mound architecture.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study areas
 
The external morphology of termite mounds was examined in three termite hotspot regions of Ethiopia: Western Ethiopia (Western Wallaga Zone), Central Ethiopia (Central Rift Valley - Eastern Shawa Zone), and Southern Ethiopia (Borana Zone), all found in Oromia National State (Figure 1). Four districts were selected as replicates from each area based on their accessibility and termite document (Table 1).
 
Western Ethiopia
 
In Western Ethiopia, the study was conducted in the Western Wallaga Zone of Oromia National State. Four districts, Qilxu Karra, Mana Sibu, Ayira, and Yubdo were selected from the zone. West Wallaga Zone comprises low land ranging from 1100 - 1700 m above sea level which covers 19.1%, midland ranging from 1800 - 2200 m above sea level which covers 78.4%, and highland ranging from 2300 - 2850 m above sea level, and this covers 2.5% of the zone. The major rainy season is during the months of June to September which is the case for many Ethiopian highlands. The annual rainfall in the zone varies from 1100 to 2450 mm, and the annual temperature varies from 18 to 32°C. The soil type of the region is generally nitosols (Temesgen, 2014). The vegetation of the study area falls in moist evergreen montane rainforest. The main plant species that predominates the relic forest patches are Albizia schimperiana, Bersama abyssinica, Cordia africana, Croton macrostachyus, Syzygium guineense and Sapium ellipticum (Etana Tolosa, 2007).
 
Central Ethiopia
 
The study was conducted in four districts, Dugda, Adami Tullu-Jiddo Kombolcha, Adama, and Arsi Negelle, all located in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia (CRVE). The first three districts are found in Eastern Shawa zone, whereas the last one is found in West Arsi zone. The area has a semi-arid and arid climate and has a bimodal rainfall patterns. Most of the rainfall occurs between July and September. There is some additional rainfall between February and the end of April, but this usually varies. The mean minimum and maximum of annual temperature recorded at Batu town (capital of Adami Tullu-Jiddo Kombolcha) are 14.0 and 27.2°C, respectively with an annual rainfall of 742.4 mm (Debelo and Degaga, 3014).
 
The soils of the area generally range from sandy loam, loam to sandy clay loam, with some clay loam and a few clay soils. In addition to salt crust (white and deep shiny black salt crust), the soils are characterized by numerous gray-to-gray brown termite mounds (Kefyalew et al., 2008). The vegetation in the CRVE is characterized by acacia open-woodland and savanna (Huib and Herco, 2006).
 
 
Southern Ethiopia
 
Borana zone is located in Southern Ethiopia and the study sites covered four districts of the zone, Surupha, Yaballo, Mio, and Moyale. High density of  tall and huge epigeal mounds of Macrotermes termites showing different architecture make peculiar feature of the landscape of the semi-arid of Southern Ethiopia starting from a small town known as Finchawa (capital of Dugda Dawa district, Borana Zone) extending to semi-arid areas of Guji zone, Somalia National State to the west, and Kenya to the south.
 
The geology of the area is composed of shales, sandstone, and limestone that largely resulted from oceanic activity. The climate is semi-arid, with an average annual rainfall ranging between 350 and 900 mm. The precipitation is bimodal with 60% occurring between March and May and 27% from September to November. Annual mean temperatures vary between 19 and 24°C. Vegetation is dominated by savannah vegetation containing a mixture of perennial herbaceous and woody plants. Physiographically, Borana zone is characterized mainly by lowlands and hills. The area is characterized by droughts, occurring every five to ten years (Tilahun et al., 2012).
 
Determination of mound density and dimensions
 
Four districts were selected from each region as replicates based on previous report as termite hotspot and accessibility. In each district, an area of 100 m x 100 m was delineated and all the mounds in the area were counted to determine mound density/ha. Five mounds were randomly selected along the diagonal of the area and their dimensions (height and basal diameter) were measured.
 
Examination of external mound morphology
 
The external morphology (shape and presence or absence of opening) of all mounds found in the area of 100 m x 100 m mentioned above were investigated, recorded, and their pictures were taken to determine the species building the mounds based on mound morphology. Mounds found outside the area were also purposively investigated to collect similar information when they were found to be different from those inside the area.
 
Termite identification
 
Identification of species based on external mound morphology was done qualitatively. The approach used was a thorough literature survey, the internet search, and termite webs.
 
Data analysis
 
Mound density and mound dimensions were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SAS (SAS Institute Inc., 2014). Mean separation was done using Least Significant Difference test (LSD) at 5% probability level.

 


 RESULTS

Mound density and mound dimensions
 
There were significant differences (P < 0.05) among the mounds of the three regions in their density, height and basal diameter. The mounds in Southern Ethiopia showed the highest values in all the parameters followed by the Central while the mounds in the Western part of the country showed the least values (Table 2).
 
Termite species identified based on mound morphology
 
In total, six species and one unknown species of Macrotermes were recorded based on mound morphology (Table 3).
 
Western Ethiopia
 
Only one type of mounds was recorded from Western Ethiopia. They were low and had dome to more flattened shapes with no external openings (Figure 2).
 
Central Ethiopia
 
In the Central Rift Valley of Central Ethiopia, four  distinct types of mound in their external morphology were recorded. Of these mounds, three were closed while one had openings on its surface. Of the closed mounds one was conical and it belongs to M. natalensis (Haviland) (Figure 3); the second type was medium dome-shaped belonging to M. herus (Figure 4), and the third was huge dome-shaped common in Central Ethiopia, especially in and around Adama district and these were probably built by M. herus and/or M. fulciger or unknown species (Figure 5). The fourth type of mound was low and amorphous with a variable number of humps with openings and the mounds were built by M. subhyalinus (Figure 6).
 
 
 
 
Southern Ethiopia
 
A high density of tall mounds makes spectacular feature of the landscape of the Borana Zone and semi-arid areas of Guji Zone in Southern Ethiopia. The mounds were found in high density starting near Finchawa (a small town of the less humid of Dugda Dawa district) found at 25 km south of Bule Hora town, further south to Moyale district and then north of Kenya. Mounds were not found in the more humid of Bule Hora district and towards north in Gedeo Zone. In Southern Ethiopia, mounds of variable morphology which can be divided into two categories  as open and closed chimney were recorded. The open chimney mounds with only one large opening in the chimney (pillar) belong to Macrotermes jeanneli. Most of M. jeanneli mounds had a single central chimney but occasionally two  or three  were  observed  on  the  same mound (Figures 7 to 9). The openings at the tip of the mounds are seen clearly from young mounds.  The lip of the opening is typically asymmetrical with one edge prominently raised above the rest (Figure 7) and the base is broad formed from successive breaks of the vertical chimney and outwash pediment (Figure 8).
 
Four different types of closed mounds built by M. michaelseni, M. natalensis, M. falciger, and other unknown species were recorded from Southern Ethiopia.
 
The mounds of M. michaelseni were typically tall and they were found sparsely among mounds of M. jeanneli. The mounds had a conical base topped by closed prominent spire (Figure 10). Medium-sized closed steep-sided conical chimney mounds were rarely recorded and it is believed that these mounds were built by M. natalensis or a different species unknown (Figure 11). Huge closed conical to dome-shaped mounds were very common  especially  in  Moyale  district  belonging  to  M. falciger (Figure 12A) and rarely old mounds were found colonized by other species. The spur on the mound (Figure 12B) is a young M. jeanneli nest. Peculiar tall and cylindrical closed chimney mounds were recorded from white soil in Melbana, Mio district (Figure 13). This type of mounds was not found on the very nearby red soil on which the typical mounds of M. jeanneli mounds were recorded. These mounds are believed to belong to unknown Macrotermes species (Macrotermes SpA).
 
 
 
 


 DISCUSSION

Mound density and dimension
 
There were significant differences (P < 0.05) among the mounds of the three regions in their density, height, and basal diameter in the order: Southern > Central > Western Ethiopia. The variation in height is due to the specific termite species found in each region building their own specific mound size. In Western Ethiopia, only mounds of M. herus were recorded. The species builds low mounds of about 50 cm high and 1 – 2 m in diameter (Darlington, 1988). In Southern Ethiopia, the mounds were giant built by species like M. jeanneli and M. michaelseni.
 
Of the three regions lowest mound density was recorded in Western Ethiopia and this might be attributed to the control of termites practiced by mound destruction and poisoning because of severe termite damage to crops. Huge campaigns were conducted in the 1980s by the government and NGOs by participating farmers, and currently individual subsistence farmers in the area also use mound poisoning and mound digging to control the Macrotermes termites. Another reason for the lowest mound density of the Western Ethiopia could be the presence of only one species, M. herus, unlike in the other two regions where a number of different species were recorded, particularly in Southern Ethiopia. Besides, Debelo and Degaga (2014) reported that mound density can be governed by different general factors: soil type, topography and soil's water drainage capacity, and termite distribution and abundance can be related to temperature and rainfall (these change with latitude) and salt tolerance.
 
Termite species identified
 
Western Ethiopia
 
Current reports by Abdurahman (1990), Abebe (2000) and Abdurahman et al. (2010) showed that there are only two species of the genus Macrotermes, Macrotermes subhyalinus and M. herus in Ethiopia. M. subhyalinus is a well-known, well described, wide spread, dominant and one of the serious termite pests in the country, particularly in Mendi area (Western Wallaga) and thus is locally known as ‘Mendi termite’ (Abdurahman, 1990; Abduraman et al., 2010). In western Ethiopia, the mounds of M. subhyalinus are typically dome-shaped without external openings (Abdurahman, 1990). Cowie and Wood (1989) also reported that M. subhyalinus is present almost everywhere in Western Wallaga. It is also documented that there are only two types of mound architecture of the genus Macrotermes in Ethiopia. Macrotermes mounds found in Western Ethiopia and Maki-Batu (located in Central Ethiopia) area differ significantly both in size and shape and no external openings are found on both mounds. In western Ethiopia, the mounds are typically dome-shaped whereas in Maki-Batu, the mounds are conical. According to the reports, in the former region M. subhyalinus builds closed and dome-shaped mounds (Abdurahman, 1990). However, they did not indicate whether the M. subhyalinus which builds dome-shaped mounds in Western Ethiopia builds a different mound architecture (conical mounds), which are found in the Maki-Batu area or whether these conical mounds belong to M. herus. Apart from its presence in Ethiopia, little description is given about M. herus.
 
 
 
However, in the current study, only short closed flattened-dome mounds were recorded from Western Ethiopia.  Morphological characterization of these mounds revealed that the mounds belong to M. herus and thus it is the only species of the Macrotermes found in the region and the absence of M. subhyalinus. M. herus builds mounds with circular or oval in plan with a low, rounded dome-shape with no external openings (except the flight holes built once a year to permit the nuptial flights of the alates). There is no specialized ventilation system in the mound, unlike those of other Macrotermes species. The mounds are about 50 cm high and 1 – 2 m in diameter and are usually kept clear of vegetation if the nest is active. There is no clear break of slope between mound and pediment. New building is applied to the surface in flat plaques, not as raised knobs (Darlington, 1988). Older surfaces are crumbly and coarse-textured, giving the mound a neglected appearance (Darlington, 2011).
 
Available documents (Harris, 1956; Bagine et al., 1989; Turner, 2000, 2001; Brandl et al., 2007; Korb, 2011) state  that M. subhyalinus builds short open mounds with multi spires. This type of mounds were not recorded from Western Ethiopia in the current study and this indicated the absence of M. subhyalinus in this part of the country which is contrary to the existing publication on the distribution and mound morphology of the species in the country.
 
With further study and gain of new information, species may be re-identified and earlier name may be changed. For instance, Darlington (1982) stated that early papers published by the ICIPE termite group all used the name M. subhayalinus for all Macrotermes termites in the Kajiado district of Kenya. However, two mound types were distinguished at an early stage, and observations on the flight of alates from them indicated that where they occurred sympatrically they were reproductively isolated. Subsequently, the Kajiado termites (closed mound type) were re-identified as M. michaelseni (formerly M. mossambicus). Darlington (1984) also reported in one of her publications in 1977 that M. michaelseni nests were described under the name M. subhayalinus. Darlington (1984) also once considered that M. subhayalinus builds morphologically two major different types of mounds in different areas in Kenya, the Bissel type near the town of Bissel with many holes in the Kajiado District, and the Marigat type with only one large opening raised to a considerable height above the ground in the Baringo District. However, later on, the Marigat type of mound was re-identified to belong to M. jeannelli, not to M. subhayalinus (Pearce, 1999; Darlington, Personal Communication).
 
Central Ethiopia
 
Closed conical, closed dome-shaped mounds and low mounds with a variable number of external openings were recorded from the region.
 
Closed conical mounds: The closed conical mounds recorded during the present study  from  Central  Ethiopia had only a conical base without a spire; a spire on a conical base is a peculiar feature of mounds of Macrotermes michaelseni (earlier described). These mounds were probably built by Macrotermes natalensis. M. natalensis builds closed-mound type conical in external appearance (Harris, 1956; Korb, 2011; Turner, 2000, 2001, 2011). Meyer (2001) and Turner (2011) reported that both M. michaelseni and M. natalensis build closed-chimney mounds, in which M. michaelseni builds taller mounds, with a conical base topped by a prominent spire that rises 2-3 m tall, whereas M. natalensis mounds are shorter, typically 1- 2 m in height and usually consisting of the conical base only.
 
Low open mounds: In Bora, Dugda, Adami Tullu Jido Kombolcha districts and in the rest of the northern districts of East Shawa Zone, the mounds were closed, relatively medium in size with some mounds with conical shapes and others with dome-shaped. However, from west of Adami Tullu town at about 8 km south of Batu town in Adami Tullu Jiddo Kombolcha district, low mounds each with a number of external prominent open humps (multi-chimneys) appear replacing the conical and dome mounds to the south in Arsi Negelle district. These were generally the only mound type found in the semi-arid part of the Arsi Negelle district. The number of mounds decreases and finally disappears in the more humid southern part of the district. The openings of the mounds were roughly circular in cross-section leading down into the mound. Wood (1986) reported that he collected Macrotemes termites from low open mounds with turrets at 10 km of south of Batu town around Adami Tullu. Debelo and Degaga (2014) also reported the existence of such mounds in the area though all the authors did not specify the species which built the mounds and also the species which built the other closed conical mounds in the area. Cowie et al. (1990) reported that they observed various mound types of Macrotemes in Ethiopia and that they eventually to belong to different species. According to these authors, the mounds include single-chimney (perhaps belonging to Bellicositermes jeanneli by Grasse (1937) (only seen in southern Sidamo, a former administrative region which covers current Borana and Guji zones of Oromia National State, and Hararghe, lower, and open multi-turreted mounds (possibly M. subhyalinus sensu strict).
 
These newly recorded low mounds with a variable number of open humps in the current study, were found only in the two districts of the Central Rift Valley of Central Ethiopia and they were built by M. subhyalinus. This new record is contrary to the available documents about the species in the country which describe that it builds closed conical and dome mounds and it is widely distributed especially in western part of the country. The mound architecture of the species recorded in the current study is in agreement with the mounds of the Bissel type of  M. subhyalinus  studied  by   Darlington   (1984)   from Kenya. The species builds chimneys mounds with large diameter openings (Harris, 1956; Bagine et al., 1989; Turner, 2000, 2001; Brandl et al., 2007; Korb, 2011) with multi-spires, relatively flat hillocks with several openings or numerous ventilation shafts (Pomeroy, 2005; Korb, 2011). Ventilation shafts are numerous on large, unshaded mounds of M. subhyalinus, confirming the main purpose of the shafts, which may however limit the maximum size of mounds (Pomeroy, 2005).
 
In M. subhyalinus, ambient air seems to enter through peripheral, rimless, basal openings. It flows through the mound and leaves it through several exit tunnels with well-defined rims which are usually central and on top of the mound. In contrast to this, M. jeanneli has no openings at the peripheral nest base but has only a single central chimney, which can reach a height of several meters and through which air leaves the mound. Air probably enters the mound mainly via relatively distant foraging holes (Korb, 2011). Although, both species build open mounds, M. jeanneli builds tall chimney mounds while M. subhyalinus low mounds with multi spires (Darlington, 1982).
 
Closed dome mounds: The closed dome mounds (possibly M. herus or M. falciger or species unknown) recorded in Central Ethiopia were by far larger in size than the mounds of M. herus recorded in Western Ethiopia. The difference between the two mounds in the two regions may be due to species difference or the same species building different mound architecture in different environments (if the mounds belong to M. herus).
 
Differences in time of swarm of alates may also indicate species differences. Macrotermes termites in Western Ethiopia and Central Ethiopia showed variation in their time of swarm. In western Wallaga, swarming occurs in the evening at about 1: 00 pm and in the CRVE, it occurs in the morning at about 9:30 am which lasts for about half an hour (personal observation). This difference in time of swarm of the termites of the two areas can also be considered as evidence that these termites belong to different species.
 
Southern Ethiopia
 
Two categories of mounds, open mounds and closed mounds were recorded from Southern Ethiopia based on the presence and absence of openings on the mounds. Mound structure varies between species of Macrotermes, but their structures fall within two broad categories, known as open-chimney and closed-chimney mounds. In both designations, the chimney refers to the largest tunnel in an extensive reticulum of large-caliber vertically-biased tunnels that permeate the mound. In open-chimney mounds, this central tunnel opens at the top of the mound. In closed-chimney mounds, the top is capped (Grohmann, 2010; Turner, 2011). Various mound types of Macrotemes in Southern Ethiopia were documented and this depicts that termite fauna of the region was more varied than the other areas. However, the closed, low flattened dome mounds of M. herus recorded in western Ethiopia and the lower, open multi-turreted mounds of M. subhyalinus and closed, domed and conical mounds of the Central Ethiopia were not observed in Southern Ethiopia. Southern Ethiopia is savanna grassland and has semi-arid climate and these might have contributed for the existence of the more species of termites than the other areas.
 
Open chimney mounds: These tall hollow and open cylindrical chimney mounds were built by M. jeanneli. In this study the tallest mound measuring 8 m high was recorded from Yaballo town, ever recorded in the country. The architecture of these mounds, including the typical asymmetrical shape at the tip of the opening is the same with those mounds of the M. jeaneli (the Marigat type) studied by Darlington (1984) in Kenya. However, in her study, Darlington (1984) considered the Marigat type of mounds as one type of mounds built by M. subhyalinus, but later on the mounds were identified to belong to M. jeanneli. The very distinctive mounds of M. jeannelli at Marigat in the Kerio valley (Kenya) are surrounded by a very tall hollow pillar which may be from 2 to 5 m or more high. There is a large opening at the tip of the pillar 10-25 cm in diameter, and no other opening anywhere on the mound. The lip of the opening is usually sharp and sometimes asymmetrical with one edge raised up to 25 cm above the rest. The vast majority of mounds have only one pillar, but very occasionally two or three may be present on the same mound (Darlington, 1984).
 
Cowie et al. (1990) reported the occurrence of tall chimney mounds in parts of Ethiopia adjacent to areas of northern Kenya (which is currently Borana Zone) though they could not specify the species. M. jeaneli is a fungus growing termite that occurs in arid regions of Eastern Africa and builds impressive mounds with only one high, towering chimney. Both M. jeanneli and M. subhyalinus build open mounds, the former builds tall chimney mounds with one opening at the tip while the later builds low mounds with multi spires with multi openings (Darlington, 1982; Leuthold et al., 2004; Brandl et al., 2007). However, Tilahun et al. (2012) considered both the open chimney mounds of M. jeanneli and closed chimney mounds they recorded from Derito in Yaballo district and Melbana in Miyo district (formerly part of Dire district), respectively as M. subhyalinus. In the current study these open and closed chimney mounds were identified to belong to M. jeanneli and a Macrotermes of an unknown species (Macrotermes spA), respectively.
 
As the M. jeanneli termites build their mounds to their maximum height, the pillars fall under their own weight coupled with being washed with rain and also broken by animals. Under this condition, the basal diameter of the mound increases and the termites continue rebuilding the mounds pillars. The central structures are surrounded by an outwash pediment which often has pieces of broken pillar lying on it (Darlington, 1984). Sometimes the mounds are dangerous as they fall on livestock when they scratch their bodies on them and children who look after livestock when they play by climbing on the mounds (personal communication with local people).
 
Closed mounds: In total, four different closed mounds were recorded in Southern Ethiopia built by four different species.  Three types of mound were of chimney type and fourth type is huge closed mounds without chimney.
 
Closed chimney mounds: Three different types of closed chimney mounds were recorded in the area. These were mounds of M. michaelseni, M. natalensis, and an unknown species (designated as Macrotermes spA).
 
Macrotermes michaelseni and Macrotermes natalensis: The study recorded mounds of M. michaelseni and M. natalensis species from Southern Ethiopia and this is the first record of the species from the country. The former species was recorded from Southern Ethiopia while the latter was recorded from both Southern and in particular from Central Ethiopia. Darlington (1982) recorded mounds M. michaelseni from the semi-arid bushed grassland in the Kajiado area (altitude 1700 m) in the Rift Valley province of Kenya which builds a highly centralized subterranean nest with a closed system of air passages in an epigeal mound above it.
 
M. michaelseni occurs in East Africa and Southern Africa where it builds conspicuous closed mounds which can reach a height of several meters (Korb, 2011). M. michaelseni builds taller mounds, with a conical base topped by a prominent cylindrical spire that commonly rises to about twice the height of the base (2-3 m tall with a broad outwash pediment), but in contrast to the central chimney in M. jeanneli, the mound is closed and does not open to the outside. Internally the mound is permeated by a network of tunnels (Turner, 2000; Korb, 2011). Within this type, though, there is considerable diversity of shape. Most commonly, the variation comes in how distinct the spire is compared to the conical base. In many mounds, the spire is nearly cylindrical, and contrasts strongly with the sloping walls of the conical base. In other mounds, the base merges more or less imperceptibly into the spire, so that the mound’s overall shape is that of a skewed cone (Turner, 2000).
 
Closed steep conical mounds without spire belonging to M. natalensis were also recorded from the area. M. natalensis builds conical closed-chimney mounds (Harris, 1956; Korb, 2011; Turner, 2000, 2001, 2011) and typically 1- 2 m in height (Meyer, 2001; Turner, 2011).
 
The third type of closed chimney mounds was peculiar high and cylindrical mounds recorded from white soil in Melbana, Miyo district. This type of mounds was not found on the very nearby red soil where M. jeanneli and M. michaelseni were common. Morphologically, the mounds were quite different from those of M. michaelseni and M. natalensis. The mounds probably belong to a Macrotermes of an unknown species (Macrotermes spA). However, Darlington (personal communication) suggested that the mounds might be built by M. michaelseni or by a different species.
 
Huge closed non-chimney mounds
 
The fourth type of closed mounds in Southern Ethiopia was huge and dome-shaped recorded around Moyale town, a border town between south Ethiopia and north Kenya. These mounds were probably built by M. falciger. M. falciger builds characteristically large termitaria (Malaisse, 1978); Its mature nests are huge dome-shaped mounds; and its mounds are found in north Kenya bordering Ethiopia at low altitude (Darlington, personal communication).
 
The different types of mound belonging to different species of the Macrotermes recorded from Central and Southern Ethiopia were absent from Western Ethiopia. On the other hand, low closed dome to generally flattened mounds of M. herus were recorded only from Western Ethiopia.  Mounds of M. subhyalinus were recorded only from Central Ethiopia, especially in Arsi Negelle district while mounds of M. jeanneli and M. michaelseni were recorded only from Southern Ethiopia. From the current study, it can be seen that the distribution of a termite species is mainly limited to a given geographical region of the country. This could be due to the geographical isolation of the three regions from each other. The Western region which is relatively lowland is isolated from the Central region (Central Rift Valley) by the highlands found between them while the Central and Southern (lowland and semi-arid) are isolated from each other by the highlands which start around north of Shashemene city and go further south to Sidama, Gedeo, and Western Guji zones. In line with this, Cowie et al. (1989) stated that the Ethiopian highlands, bisected by the Rift Valley, are surrounded by the Sahelian deserts and savannas of Sudan, Somalia and northern Kenya, and to the northeast by the Red Sea. These act as barriers to dispersal to and from the highlands; the Rift Valley may act as a partial barrier to dispersal within them. The large number of endemic and local bird species reflects this situation (Cowie et al., 1989).


 CONCLUSION

To date, only two species of the genus Macrotermes, M. subhyalinus and M. herus are reported in Ethiopia. M. subhyalinus   was   earlier   considered   building    closed conical and dome mounds. However, this study showed that the species builds low mounds with turrets and is absent in Western part of the country, but found only in Adami Tullu Jido Kombolcha district and Arsi Negelle district of the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. M. herus builds low, closed and flattened dome-shaped mounds and it was the only Macrotermes species recorded from Western Ethiopia in the current study.
 
This paper has added M. jeanneli, M. michaelseni, M. natalensis, M. falciger, and another unidentified species (Macrotermes spA) to the two existing species, M. subhyalinus and M. herus, to the checklist of the genus Macrotermes. Conical mounds of medium size of M. natalensis, relatively low closed dome mounds of M. herus, and huge closed and relatively dome-shaped mounds which might belong to M. herus or M. falciger were recorded from Central Ethiopia. Contrary to the other regions, highly diversified mounds and higher number of species were recorded from Southern Ethiopia. M. jenneli, M. michaelseni M. falciger, and M. natalensis, and an unidentified species (Macrotermes spA) were recorded from the region. The list is not definitive but merely a statement of the status quo. Use of molecular analysis is vital to supplement the species identification conducted using mound morphology.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The author has not declared any conflict of interests.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author is very grateful to J. P. Darlington for sharing her research experience especially on Macrotermes termites and providing important reference materials. Special thanks also go to Adama Science and Technology University, field assistants, and the communities around the study sites for their cooperation during the field work.



 REFERENCES

Abdurahman A (1990). Foraging Activity and Control of Termites in Western Ethiopia, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London. 277pp. Available at: 

View

 

Abdurahman A, Abraham T, Mohammed D (2010). Importance and Management of Termites in Ethiopia. Pest Management Journal of Ethiopia 14:1-20.

 
 

Abebe H (2002). Potential of entomopathogenic fungi for the control of Macrotermes subhyalinus (Isoptera: Termitidae). PhD Thesis. Universität Hannover. 161p.

 
 

Bagine RK, Brandel R, Kaib M (1994). Species delimitation in Macrotermes (Isoptera: Macrotermitidae): Evidence from epicuticular hydrocarbons, morphology, and ecology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87(5):498-506.
Crossref

 
 

Bagine RKN, Darlington JPEC, Kat P, Riche JM (1989). Nest Structure, Population Structure and Genetic Differentiation of some Morphologically Similar Species of Macrotermes in Kenya. Sociobiology 15:125-132.

 
 

Brandl R, Hyodo F, von Korff-Schmising M, Maekawa K, Miura T, Takematsu Y, Matsumoto T, Abe T, Bagine R, Kaib M (2007). Divergence times in the termite genus Macrotermes (Isoptera: Termitidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45(1):239-250.
Crossref

 
 

Cowie RH, Wood TG (1989). Damage to Crops, Forestry and Rangeland by Fungus-Growing Termites (Termitidae: Macrotermitinae) in Ethiopia. Sociobiology 15(2):139-153.

 
 

Cowie RH, Wood TG, Sands BWA, Black HIJ (1990). A checklist of the termites of Ethiopia with a review of their biology, distribution and pest status. African Journal of Ecology 28:21-33.
Crossref

 
 

Dangerfield JM, McCarthy TS, Ellery WN (1998). The Mound-Building Macrotermes michaelseni as an Ecosystem Engineer. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14:507-520.
Crossref

 
 

Darlington JPEC (1982). The underground passages and storage pits used in foraging by a nest of the termite Macrotermes michaelseni in Kajiado, Kenya. Journal of Zoology 198(2):237-247.
Crossref

 
 

Darlington JPEC (1984). Two types of mound built by the termite Macrotermes subhyalinus in Kenya. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 5(6):481-492.
Crossref

 
 

Darlington JPEC (1988). The structure of mature mounds of the termite Macrotermes herus in Kenya. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 9(3):339-345.
Crossref

 
 

Darlington JPEC (2011). Trace fossils interpreted in relation to the extant termite fauna at Laetoli, Tanzania. In Paleontology and geology of Laetoli: Human evolution in context. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 555-565. Available at: 

View
Crossref

 
 

Debelo DG, Degaga EG (2014). Termite species composition in the central rift valley of Ethiopia. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 5(3):123-134.

 
 

Etana T (2007). Use and conservation of traditional medicinal plants by indigenous people in Gimbi Woreda, Western Wellega, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University. Available at: 

View

 
 

Grace JK (2006). Termite trends worldwide. Canadian Wood Preservation Association Proceedings. pp. 27-38.

 
 

Grohmann C (2010). Termite mediated heterogeneity of soil and vegetation patterns in a semi‐arid savanna ecosystem in Namibia. PhD dissertation. University of Wurzburg, Germany. 122p

 
 

Grohmann C, Oldeland J, Stoyan D, Linsenmair KE (2010). Multi-Scale Pattern Analysis of a Mound-Building Termite Species. Insectes Sociaux 57(4):367-494.
Crossref

 
 

Harris WV (1956). Termite mound building. Insectes Sociaux 3(2):261-268.
Crossref

 
 

Huib H, Herco J (2006). Agricultural Development in the Central Ethiopian Rift Valley: A Desk-study on Water-related Issues and Knowledge to Support a Policy Dialogue. Note 375: Plant Research International B.V., Wageningen, the Netherlands). 32pp. Available at: 

View

 
 

Kefyalew A, Gebrekidan H, Kibebew K (2008). Characterization and classification of irrigated soils and irrigation waters of major water supply sources in Meki-Ogolcha area in East Showa Zone Of Oromia, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Available at: 

View

 
 

Korb J (2011). Termite Mound Architecture, from Function to Construction. In: David EB, Yves RNL (eds.), Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis. Sringer Dordrecht. pp. 349-374.

 
 

Leuthold RH, Triet H, Schildger B (2004). Husbandry and breeding of African giant termites (Macrotermes jeanneli) at Berne Animal Park. Zoologische Garten 74(1):26-37.

 
 

Logan JWM, Cowie RH, Wood TG (1990). Termite (Isoptera) control in agriculture and forestry by non-chemical methods: a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80(3):309-330.
Crossref

 
 

Malaisse F (1978). High termitaria. In Biogeography and ecology of Southern Africa. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 1279-1300. Available at: 

View
Crossref

 
 

Meyer VW (2001). Intracolonial demography, biomass and food consumption of Macrotermes natalensis (Haviland)(Isoptera: Termitidae) colonies in the northern Kruger National Park, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).

 
 

Munthali DC, Logan JWM, Wood TG, Nyirenda GKC (1999). Termite distribution and damage to crops on smallholder farms in southern Malawi. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 19(1):43-49.
Crossref

 
 

Pearce MJ (1999). Termites: Biology and Pest management. CAB International London. Region of Sudan. Tropical Pest Management 36:296-304.

 
 

Pomeroy D (2005). Dispersion and Activity Patterns of Three Populations of Large Termite Mounds in Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History 94(2):319-341.
Crossref

 
 

SAS Institute Inc. (2003). SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers, Version 9.0 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. USA.

 
 

Temesgen F (2014). White mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis, distribution and severity status in East and West Wollega Zones, western Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal 3(3):1-10.
Crossref

 
 

Tilahun A, Kebede F, Yamoah C, Erens H, Mujinya BB, Verdoodt A, Van Ranst E (1012). Quantifying the masses of Macrotermes subhyalinus mounds and evaluating their use as a soil amendment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 157:54-59.
Crossref

 
 

Turner JS (2000). Architecture and morphogenesis in the mound of Macrotermes michaelseni (Sjöstedt) (Isoptera: Termitidae, Macrotermitinae) in northern Namibia. Cimbebasia 16:143-175.

 
 

Turner JS (2001). On the Mound of Macrotermes michaelseni as an Organ of Respiratory Gas Exchange. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, University of Chicago 74(6):798-822.

 
 

Turner JS (2011). Termites as models of swarm cognition. Swarm Intelligence 5(1):19-43.
Crossref

 
 

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2000). Finding Alternatives to Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPS) for Termite Management. Prepared by members of the UNEP/FAO/Global IPM Facility Expert Group on Termite Biology and Management - established in 2000 to support international activities on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) covered by the Stockholm Convention. Available at: 

View

 
 

Wood TG (1986). Assessment of Termite Damage in Ethiopia and Recommendations for Short-term Control and Development of Long-term Pest Management Practices. Report prepared for the World Bank 58 p.

 

 




          */?>