Journal of
Fine and Studio Art

  • Abbreviation: J. Studio Fine Art
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-6524
  • DOI: 10.5897/JFSA
  • Start Year: 2010
  • Published Articles: 14

Full Length Research Paper

Bharatanatyam and Mathematics: Teaching Geometry Through Dance

Iyengar Mukunda Kalpana
  • Iyengar Mukunda Kalpana
  • San Antonio Writing Project (Department of Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching) University of Texas at San Antonio, United States.
  • Google Scholar

  •  Received: 18 August 2015
  •  Accepted: 18 September 2015
  •  Published: 31 October 2015


Bharatanatyam is a highly codified and schematized Asian Indian style of classical dance that accommodates the different kinds of learners. This dance is culturally relevant to Asian Indian American students, but the findings are applicable to students from other demographics that are interested in learning math through dance. Many Asian Indian students learn Bharatanatyam for cultural maintenance and preservation. Dance is also a beneficial medium to teach basic geometric shapes to young children because dance is an engaging art curriculum that can be used in schools.  This mixed methods study informed by categorical content analysis is designed to recommend a framework for exploring how Asian Indian students can learn basic geometric shapes through Bharatanatyam. The study investigates dance movements called adavus, cultural relevance, and integration of elements from dance and geometry and the implementation of alternate strategies such as dance instruction to teach and learn basic geometric shapes. The data analysis revealed the benefits of dance and math integration.


Key words: Asian Indian students, Bharatanatyam, geometry, learning styles, teaching and learning.


For centuries dance has been regarded as an aesthetic experience, an entertaining work of art, and a vehicle for gratification. History also demonstrates that dance (synchronized kinesthetic art) has been utilized in other areas such as psychology, counseling, and medicine (Chodorow, 2013; Bracilovic, 2009; Meekums, 2015). For example, dance has been used in treating depression, teaching languages and mathematics. Lazonov (1981)’s experimentation with ballet dancers and opera singers to teach young children how to read is a classic example of practical use of dance. His ‘suggestopedia’ made learning a pleasurable, natural process (Hansen, 2005). This clearly demonstrates that dance has utilitarian purpose because, in addition to its aesthetic appeal, it has established therapeutic, cognitive and instructional benefits. It is established that “Incorporating music, art, role-playing and games into the curriculum” made the lessons engaging to learners (Cook, et al, 2013; Dale, 1946, 1996; Prichard and Taylor, 1981, 22). The systematic body movement through dancing is used to support learning. In this paper, I explore the integration of dance and the teaching of mathematics, specifically basic  geometric shapes using the Asian Indian dance called Bharatanatyam.



Bharatnatyam is orchestrated body movements that are synchronized to Carnatic music. Unlike other western dance styles, Bharatnatyam dances are performed to describe the stories sung using vocal and instrumental music. The Asian Indian dance called Bharatanatyam is more than coordinated and stylized movements. It is a semiotic medium, which incorporates schematized body movement, music, and paralinguistic features to tell stories from the Hindu epics (e.g., Ramayana and Mahabharata). This highly codified style of dance originated in the state of Tamil Nadu in South India in the 4th century (Banerjee 2013; Sangeetha and Ragothaman, 2014). The term, Bharatanatyam is a compound word from the Sanskrit language meaning: bha /expression+ ra/music+ tha/rhythm+ and natya/dance). It was sage Bharata muni that created this transmediated practice of storytelling. Later, in the 20th century, Rukmini Devi Arundal introduced Bharatnatyam to the west (Samson, 2010).

In Bharatanatyam, there is a tacit element of instruction - the dancer/teacher guides the audiences through codified bodily movements and schematized expression (Ramanath, 2009). One example is the Jathi interpreted by Savitha Shastry, dance master of the Kalakshetra school of Bharatnatyam (see video link (see appendix A for permission from the author). Here, the dancer creates rigorous geometric movements that correspond to the shapes taught in mathematics class. The following section discusses the video and mathematics instruction including how dance can be used to teach math.



This dance is called Jathi, which is a series of steps (referred to as adavus in Bahratanatyam) strung together in a meaningful way.


Geometric shapes

The various geometrical shapes that are formed with the first line comprising “Tha Dhi Thaka Thakadi Thajum” are - triangle, right angle, line segment, diagonal, half circle, circle, diamond, and obtuse and acute angles. Similar and many other figures emerge as the dance progresses. The visual, spatial, and aesthetic elements are visible in this Jathi. Bharatnatyam enables the learner to use the aesthetic elements while learning the basic geometric shapes   (see   appendix   D   for   shapes).  Dietiker  and Brakoniecki (2014) point out that aesthetic dimension of mathematics learning experiences is not addressed in schools and it needs attention. During the author’s observations of young adults learning Bharatanatyam, she realized that dance could be used to teach children valuable skills including basic geometric shapes such as line, square, rectangle, and triangle. Geometry is taught using textbooks and worksheets at school to help students master the concepts precisely. These linguistic materials help children learn and practice math concepts.  However, the visual and kinesthetic learners in our classrooms may depend on other modalities to learn math and according to Dietiker and Brakoniecki (2014, 33) “...There are many questions that remain unanswered about how diagrams are used by texts, teachers, and students. Possibly, some of the potential confusion of reading diagrams…may be overcome by explicitly supporting the different ways students read geometrically”. Hence, dance may be an engaging and appropriate medium, to help students, especially students who are visual and kinesthetic learners, learn basic geometric shapes.

Bharatnatyam is also an expressive dance form that uses semiotics, storytelling, music, culture, religion, mathematics, philosophy, and history and this dance is used to help children of Asian Indian origin to become culturally grounded. Apart from learning to express through dance, children also learn the various concepts that are required to understand mathematics through dance (Jiesamfoek 2012; Klingenberg, 2012; McCarthy-Brown 2014). Further, Rodenfeld (2013, 213) recognizes the skill set needed in both of these disciplines of math and dance, “choreograph, decide, collaborate, experiment, tinker, revise, play, apply, represent, analyze, discover. Most of these words can be used to describe mathematical problem solving as well as a choreographic process.” Subsequently, integration of math and dance may be cognitively beneficial to children who are familiar with math and dance concepts because “cognition is the emergent outcome of dynamic and adaptive sensorimotor interactions with the social and physical environment” (Semin and Smith, 2013, 125). Before analyzing the effects of integrating math and dance, we should examine how math is taught in schools.


Mathematics instruction in school

Several researchers note how traditionally mathematics has been taught predominantly using the lecture method. This approach is teacher-centered with a passive, sedentary learner who works in isolation to solve problems through rote memorization (Dunn and Dunn, 2012; Galeet, 2012; Westreich, 2012; Yang and Dai 2011).  Such traditional methods privilege only one channel or mode of understanding – the linguistic. These methods do not  accommodate  the  variety  of learners in classrooms today. It is not my intention to disparage rote-memorization because dance media (e.g., Bharatanatyam) is also learned through memorization; however, dance uses different modalities to teach various concepts to learners. 

Among students there is a feeling that math is a hard subject. Teachers often report that children either get it or do not (Cornell, 1999; Duru, 2010). Further, Dietiker and Brakoniecki (2014, 6) clarify “it is not surprising that learning mathematics appears to many students as a game where the rules seem arbitrary and hidden.” Traditional methods disengage students who learn differently using alternate methods of learning (Ultanir, 2012, 198). Therefore, teachers must look for innovative teaching strategies to help struggling students in their math classes. Further, alternate teaching methods may produce higher engagement in students (Werner, 1978; Zakaria, 2013). Westreich (2002) recommends dance to teach math because dance is an engaging modality and it may help students visualize a problem. In addition, dance may be an appealing vehicle to help visual and kinesthetic learners to understand the basic geometric shapes such as square, rectangle, triangle, and diamond.

Dietiker (2014, 1) argues, “Students are expected to develop sophisticated ways to interpret diagrams using context and convention.” For some students, such deduction of figures may be difficult or impossible unless an alternate method of teaching is employed. Teachers have recognized the benefits of teaching math using interactive and engaging methods (Dale, 1946, 1996; Klingenberg, 2012; and Redmond, 2011). For example, “SHINE’s curriculum uses kinesthetic learning to help our students better understand and retain material. More importantly, it helps excite our students about math, and changes their attitudes about their own potential” (Shine for Girls, 2014, 1). SHINE for Girls is a program designed by Shah, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology researcher to help girls to excel in STEM fields. The founder and director of SHINE is a dance professional, who combines math and dance to teach girls about math concepts. Therefore, Bharatanatyam may be an engaging alternate method for students who have the prior knowledge and experience of this dance to learn the basic geometric shapes.


There is copious research on the topic of integration of mathematics and dance (Werner, 1978; Brillon, 2014; and Rosenfeld, 2013), but there were no studies that looked at teaching geometry utilizing Bharatanatyam. Research has shown that dance can be integrated in teaching math while teachers explore “a meaningful way to encourage [students] to consider alternatives to traditional teaching” (Cook et al.,  2013,  598).  Also,  new approaches to problems of teaching number theory through embodied movement and dance is sought after (Dale, 1946, 1996; Devichi and Munier, 2013). In addition, Rosenfeld (2013, 211) claims that dance facilitates math learning including concepts such as, "congruence, symmetry, transformation, angles and degrees, attributes, pattern recognition, symbols, and mapping on a coordinate grid.”

Zuckerbros (2011) describes a 6th grade teacher’s approach to guiding her students to choreograph a dance. Through her strategy, the teacher encouraged her students to learn elements of geometry and write the directions to recreate the dance. Rosenfeld (2013), a trained percussive dancer, uses dance to teach her elementary students to learn to create different shapes. She helps her students understand how math is not just figurative depiction, but a thought process. Rosenfeld teaches her students to take responsibility while learning by creating an environment where students can experiment and later discover the shapes by themselves instead of depending on the teacher to dictate to them (Jiesamfoek, 2012; Tomlinson, 2011).

According to McCarthy-Brown (2014, 128), “dance is an expression of culture and through dance, cultural traditions are preserved, lived, shared, and explored.” Along with cultural preservation, it is also established that dance can be utilized to teach math; however, there is no specific study on Bharatanatyam and math. This mixed methods study examines the students’ understanding of learning the basic geometric shapes using Bharatanatyam. The study was conducted after procuring the approval from the Institutional Review Board from the University of Texas at San Antonio. All of the participants are recognized with numbers to protect their identities


Research Question

How can Bharatanatyam dance instruction be applied to mathematics teaching, specifically to teach basic geometric shapes?


Theoretical framework

This study draws from social constructivism (Steedman, 2000; Shoval, 2011; Young and Collin, 2004), theory of multiple intelligences (Gardner, 1988), and semiotics (Sipe, 1998). Social constructivism theorists "believe that much can be learned from investigating an individual's sense-making strategies as he or she attempts to understand mathematical ideas" (Lambdin and Westcott, 2007, 15).  The concept of integrating knowledge from one domain into another can be applied to dance learning because like math, dance utilizes the same concepts of sense making and comprehension of ideas (Brillon, 2014; Steedman, 2000; Westreich 2012). The learner builds knowledge based on her understanding of the world and the interaction with the materials presented.

Semiotics is the study of different sign systems. Semiotics includes semantic (meaning), syntactic (structure), and pragmatic (effect) characteristics (Barthes 1987). The semantic aspect comes from the word(s) and context, while the syntactic is the grammatical structures, and the pragmatic is the effect the signs have on the reader, listener, or watcher. Bharatanatyam uses the different sign systems such as music, dance, and expression to convey the same message, which is transmediation of the sign systems (Magee and Leeth, 2014). Transmediation is “the process of translating meaning from one sign system (such as language) to another such as pictures)” (Siegel 1995). This method of learning helps students construct knowledge not just by using text or language, but also through painting, dancing, singing, dialoging, and acting (Fauth 1990; Zakaria et al 2013). Transmediation helps promote different ways of knowing and not just the linguistic modes of representation (Siegel, 1995).

Transmediation is the connection between two sign systems that has to be created through critical thinking and it is a multiplicative process (Tembrioti and Tsangardou, 2014). Nodelman observes that words have a greater potential for conveying temporal information, whereas pictures have a greater potential for conveying spatial information (Sipe 1998, 100). Further, transmediation can produce a higher level of learning. Hence, teaching geometric shapes through dance may enable students to grasp the skill set quickly as compared to teaching using the traditional methods of lecturing and through board work (Jensen, 2000). 

Multiple intelligences accommodate students with different learning styles in our classrooms. Gardner identifies seven different kinds of learning styles and I am focusing on the four styles applicable for this study. Bharatnatyam dancers can be visual, spatial/kinesthetic, auditory, and logical/mathematical. Visual learners expect pictorial aids and other illustrations to help them learn. Spatial/kinesthetic learners understand the lesson if taught using bodily movement and heuristic learning activities. Auditory learners seek out aural instructions and logical/mathematical learners may look for information presented in a calculating and analytical fashion (Gardner 1999). Bhartanatyam uses all of these intelligences through movements (exit, entry, poses, and positioning on stage while dancing), music (tonal semiotics), and formations (simulation and coordination including stage movements). According to Poursabahian (2012, 25):

When a struggling student suddenly gets a certain adavu or kannakku (the math behind a complex set of adavus) because of an innovative instructional tweak on my part,  the  thrill  and  sense  of  satisfaction  is  beyond words. My shishyas [disciples] are like a long-term painting in progress. I create their dance personas one stroke at a time, until they are a visually pleasing canvas of vibrant colors.



The following section is a description of the participants’ information. The participants of this study were Asian Indian American students attending schools in three major cities in the southwest region of the United States.  The participants were recruited using a flyer at various dance schools in three major cities in the Southwest (see appendix B for the flyer). All of the participants are second generation Asian Indian Americans, who live and go to schools in the US. The study participants ranged from ages four to eighteen.

The study participants were classified as (a) students who have the first hand knowledge of Bharatanatyam and Carnatic music because either they or their siblings are learning the arts and they attend dance and music recitals and programs with their family periodically, (b) students who have no exposure to dance, and (c) students with cursory knowledge of dance. Some of the participants are attached to music or dance school that teaches using the guru-shisya approach of teaching (Banerjee, 2012). This dance requires students to learn from a teacher who is trained in a specific style of Indian music or dance. The schools of Bharatnatyam include Kalkshetra, Pandannluru, Melattur, Tanjavoor, and Vazhuvoor and these styles are region specific to the south Indian states of Karnataka, Andra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu.  Music schools are either Hindustani (North Indian) or Carnatic styles (South Indian). The participants in this study were from elementary to university level, who have exposure to dance and music through the dance and music schools and the regional organizations to which they belong.


Participants’ classification

Data was analyzed by classifying Bharatnatyam students as follows- (a) students with experience, (b) students with minimal exposure and (c) students without much exposure to Bharatanatyam. Table 1 illustrates the classification.



Data analysis

The author provided the study participants with a YouTube video of a Jathi performed by Savitha Shastry and asked them to watch and then identify the different geometrical shapes as presented in the dance. Dr. Iyengar emailed the YouTube clip using ‘safe share TV’ link and gave each one of the students three weeks time to respond to her email request. Due to lack of responses after three weeks of her initial request, the author resent the email and gave them a week’s extension for those who had not replied to her first request. After the fourth week, she received detailed descriptions from twenty participants. The data for this study comprised answers to three questions that the students answered (Table 2). The first two questions are brief responses and the third question is a narrative response, where students write about how they can or cannot learn basic geometric shapes using Bharatanatyam. Data were collected through written email responses and it was stored in a wiki created for this study.



Research design

The study utilized categorical content analysis, a type of mixed methods design where the researcher categorizes the text by analyzing units of text (Leiblich et al., 1998).  In addition, the parallel form of mixed methods using a conversion design in which qualitative data can be converted into quantitative data was utilized (Mertens, 2010). Categorical analysis is dividing the text into smaller units for analysis. Parallel form is collecting both qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously. The quantitative data was collected and analyzed to draw conclusions from the results (see step 4).

Categorical analysis is conducted using the following steps (Leiblich et al., 1998, 113-114): (1) Selection of the subtext, (2) Definition of the Content Categories, (3) Sorting the Material into Categories, and (4) Drawing Conclusions from the Results.

The Selection of Subtext is classifying text as a separate unit depending on the research question. For instance, this study is looking into teaching basic geometric shapes through dance and hence the narrative responses of the participants can be subdivided into shapes recognized and skills learned. All of the other information is ignored in the selected text. 

Definition of the Content is the different theories or themes that emerge in the text.

The categories are driven by a theory and in this study; the content is defined based on the different learning styles used to understand the basic geometric shapes in the dance jathi. For example, this study draws from Gardner’s (2009) multiple intelligences theory of learning. The categories are defined using the theory depending on the sub texts chosen for analyses.

Sorting the Materials into Categories is analyzing discrete sentences from the data set. This step calls for an external reader’s assistance so validity can be established. Leblich et al. (1998, 113-114) describe that “When two or more judges are involved in sorting contents into categories, this can be done independently, to allow the calculation of the interjudge reliability, or jointly, to create higher sensitivity to the text and its meaning to different readers.”

The author consulted a Pandannaluru style Bharatnatyam dance teacher to cross check the data analysis and offer comments. Except for the skill sets discussed in the paper, she consented to my findings to be accurate. She recommended that the author reword the skills sets identified in the limitations and implications section of the article. The author rephrased the categories later.

Finally, Drawing Conclusion from the  Results  involves  statistical  computations of the sentences and categories. For the purpose of this study, a figure (Figure 1[v1] ) is included with the number of geometrical shapes the study participants identified through watching the dance and a pie chart with percentages of figures identified by participants. The author will use “…the contents collected in each category …descriptively to formulate a picture of the content universe in certain groups of people or cultures” (Leblich et al., 1998, 114).



Data analysis

Data was analyzed using categorical content analysis supported by Leiblich et al. (1998). First, subtexts were selected from the participant responses. Then, the sub texts were categorized, and finally, a statistical procedure was applied. These four different steps were applied to all of the texts collected in this study, but the following section lists two examples (data) for each step. The participants are identified with numbers.


The selection of the subtext

No, geometry is much more complicated than what is in a dance and the steps. The steps and shapes made in a dance are simple, only scratching the surface of the complicated math involved in geometry (1)

I am concerned with the identification of shapes here, so I will select this section of the text for analysis - The steps and shapes made in the dance are simple (1)

I believe that I can use dance to learn Math concepts, specifically geometry, by using dance. The turning of the body with the two hands at a right angle can represent the circumference of a circle while the hand stretch outwardly can represent the radius of a circle. The placement of hands diagonally can represent a cut through a shape. The ending pose can represent the vertices (multiple vertex) of a pentagon (3)

I will select the subtext that discusses body movements to form a circle - The turning of the body with the two hands at a right angle can represent the circumference of a circle  while  the  hand  stretch

outwardly can represent the radius of a circle (3)

Definition of the Content: The text was categorized based on my perceptions of how the participants observed their learning using one or more of the multiple intelligences. The analysis is based on the responses to the questions I posed to the participants.

The placement of hands diagonally can represent a cut through a shape. The ending pose can represent the vertices (multiple vertex) of a pentagon. When I dance this, it is clear to me (5)

This dancer is both visual and kinesthetic learner. She needs to picture the shapes formed and she needs to perform the shapes herself through bodily movements to better understand the shapes.

Yes, I think we can do math using dance because every move they make they could measure it and add it up and get the total. I would prefer to do geometry using dancing because it is fun and I have to search what shapes Ms. Shastry is making while she is dancing (8)

This dancer is kinesthetic, spatial, and logical thinker. He prefers precision through observing the shapes. He also likes to seek out information while watching the visual representation of the shapes.


Sorting of the materials into categories

The texts were categorized based on Piaget’s framework of reasoning. The participants ranged from kindergarten (6 years) to college (18 years). The recognition of shapes correlated with their ages. For example, the participants in kinder to second grades were able to identify line, diagonal, and a few angles. Participants from third grades to eight grades identified all of the shapes that the kinder to third grade recognized and triangle, square, rectangle, circle, and parallelogram. The last set of students wrote down all of the previously mentioned shapes and the following shapes – trapezoid, diamond, acute and obtuse angles, rhombus, and hexagon.

Piaget’s frame suggests how children process information and how it is dependent upon one’s age. Piaget’s research also suggests three stages in children’s understanding of materials. The three cognitive developmental stages are – (1) pre-operational, (2) concrete operational, and (3) formal operational. According to Piaget (as cited in Ultanir, 2012, 46),

The pre-operational child between the ages of 2 and 7 years uses language and represents objects by images and words. The concrete operational child between the ages of 7 and 11 can classify objects according to several features. The formal operational young adult between the ages of 11 and up becomes concerned with the hypothetical, future, ideological problems. The data collected for this study aligns with Piaget’s stages and the following section lists examples from data that conforms to Piaget’s framework of reasoning.



Lines and diagonal…It is fun to learn math using dance that is not done in school (16).

This writer recognizes the basic shapes and mentions how they do not learn math in a fun way. They prefer learning math-utilizing dance. 

Angles and lines all over…Dance helps me memorize the angles and lines (19)

This participant also identified the basic shapes and acknowledged that dance aided them in memorization of the shapes. This participant is able to identify one important skill necessary for both dance and math – memorization of concepts.


Concrete operational

Circle, trapizoid, triangle, square, rectangleThat would be awesome to learn Math by dance. Math is boring because the teachers write on the board or talk all the time. If dance is used then we have to move and there will be excitement in class. I think, geometric shapes like I saw in this dance can be learn[ed] in an interesting way. It may be difficult for my classmates to understand our Indian dance, so other dance is better (10).

Here, the student seeks an alternate medium to learn Math. This student seems to suggest that math learning should be done in a fun way and not by using monotonous methods. This writer is able to recognize that there are other ways of learning math. He is also able to articulate the different ways dance engages him. This is a concrete operational concept.


Formal operational

Due to the fact that I started learning Bharatanatyam in the fifth grade, I had already learned the basic concepts of math. However, dance helped reinforce many of the concepts I had learned and even strengthened my math skills. Such as the music that goes with the common jathis, learning to count the beats in threes and fours helped with multiplication skills. In regards to geometry, math actually helped me become a better dancer. Bharatanatyam is about having straight lines. So when it came to having a good posture, I would look in a mirror and make my arms 180 degrees or make sure my poses looked straight like the shapes that we learned in school (6).

This is an advanced concept that can be understood by a student who has strong knowledge of both the disciplines of math and dance. The writer is able to articulate how skill sets acquired in one discipline   is   helpful   in  another  domain  if  the  proficiencies  are  complimentary to each other. The writer’s comparison to 180 degree and the poses she dances to can be perfected with the figures she learns at school is an example of integrated learning that Noweck (2011) discusses.

Being able to relate that aramandi is a diamond or that hand[s] joined  together to say namaste form an isosceles triangle can help students grasp the  different shapes and their abilities to transform much easier more so than when it is just a theory on a piece of paper. Since I am a very hand[s] on learner, dance has definitely helped reinforce those concepts (7).

This dancer has the ability to compare the figures accurately with the dance poses she performs. The writer also acknowledges that she is a kinesthetic learner so dance has helped her to visualize diamond and isosceles triangle. This may be a call for teachers to use different methods while teaching geometrical shapes.

Dance is an art form that strengthens the mind through repetition and concentration. In regards to teaching math concepts, many basic concepts of geometry found in the mudras and stances are repeated over and over in multiple dances so it gets better ingrained in the mind. The more someone is exposed to something the easier it is to remember and later understand, as is the case I found for myself in math (15).

The above description deals with the student’s focus on the retention aspect. Both math and dance require practice and repetitive working-out of problems and watching and performing the formations respectively. This writer is able to recognize the different shapes formed in different mudras or poses in Bharatanatyam.

The following table explains the first two steps involved in categorical analysis process of data. The texts from the participants are classified using Piaget’s stages of cognitive development and the researcher has recorded her inferences based on the participants’ interpretations of school practices and knowledge transfer (Table 3).



The only computation this study uses is the number of times each participant identifies a geometric shape in the dance. Five of the participants listed all of the shapes from simple to complex. However, five of the writers recorded rectangle as parallelogram. Only five were able to identify the shapes in the concrete operational level and five could do the formal operational thinking by including trapezoid, diamond, acute and obtuse angles, rhombus, and hexagon. Next, I tallied the geometrical shapes by recording all of them. Out of the total twenty participants, I was interested in finding out how many participants recognized all of the shapes. 


It was clear through data analysis that students appreciated the integration of math and dance in learning the basic geometric shapes. Students recognized the value of incorporating a cultural out-of-school activity to learn a content area (math) because these children were able to recognize the connection between the skill set common to math and dance. Several participants pointed out how teaching styles did not match with the learning needs of students, especially those who were experienced with culturally contextualized dance called Bharatnatyam.  The  study also enabled the researcher to  gauge the relationship between perceptive, kinesthetic, and visual spheres of learning and the heightened level of knowledge formation through the integration of dance and math. Along with traditional methods of learning math, Asian Indian children expressed their willingness to learn geometric shapes through math and dance integration. This integration was possible through socio-cultural learning (Vygotsky, 1978), multiple intelligences (Gardner 1999), and integrative learning (Nowcek 2011; Zuckerbros, 2011).  


A preliminary inquiry of Bharatnatyam students’ percep-tion of integrating mathematics and dance suggested that Asian Indian American students could learn math through culturally specific dance called Bharatnatyam. The participants described their willingness to learn through transmediation and not merely through linguistic modes of instruction. The study also revealed how Asian Indian students can reiterate math concepts through Bharatanatyam. According to one of the study participants, it is easier to visualize than just listen to material presented to her,

Being able to relate that aramandi is a diamond or that hand[s] joined together to say namaste form an isosceles triangle can help students grasp the different shapes and their abilities to transform much easier more so than when it is just a theory on a piece of paper. Since I am a very hand[s] on learner, dance has definitely helped reinforce those concepts” (15).



This study  was  conducted  out  of  school  with  students  from one cultural group that is marginalized in the US. This may create some biases in the participant selection, which may differentiate them from their classmates at school. The following biases are noteworthy- (a) The participants have parental and community support when they perform and they are provided with the tools necessary for success. (b) The participants’ parents are either professionals or have successful careers. Parents take their children to dance class for cultural preservation. (c) Most of the participants dance or watch their siblings and friends dance. (d) This current study favors students who have the deep firsthand knowledge of Bharatanatyam and they may have approached the study with a fair knowledge of the dance. In addition, Asian Indian students have a reputation of excelling in Science Technology Engineering Mathematics (STEM) fields. Therefore, this study’s findings cannot be generalized, but the study may be informative to researchers and teachers interested in the integration of dance and math disciplines.


The integration of math and dance encourages teachers to rethink their approaches to teaching content area (geometry) utilizing aesthetics (dance), especially for those students who engage in out-of-school cultural art activity. Schools should consider investigating a variety of ways how culturally relevant practices such as Bharatnatyam could be exploited so diverse students including the Asian Indian American can benefit. According to Moore and Linder (2012, 108), “…the arts are inherently connected to other domains of knowledge and therefore are disconnected at the expense of the intimacy between the arts and other domains.” The combination of   Bharatanatyam   concepts   that  support  math concepts as described through the analysis of the data in this study help with understanding of the integration of dance and math as informative and perceptive. Students who are bodily-kinesthetic, visual, and logical learners are able to master concepts or skills common to math and dance. Dancers must become proficient with patterns and different stage formations while performing and students of mathematics must master skill set used in problem solving such as congruence, symmetry, shapes, and angles. The following figure depicts the relationship between learning styles in math and dance (Figure 2). 



The limitations of the study are – (a) few participants, (b) the use of Bharatnatyam and no other dance styles, (c) the study’s duration, and (d) sequential mixed methods analysis design. A follow up study with more number of participants will yield better results. Other dance forms such as Flamenco, Hip-hop, and Ballet may be considered for comparison because the study was conducted in the US. This study was done within a short period of time and studying students engaged in learning math utilizing dance for a longer duration would also help in understanding the learning processes. Finally, a quantitative analysis of data with control groups may provide improved results. 


The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.


I thank Dr. Wendy  Oliver  (Providence  College)  and  Dr. Howard Smith (University of Texas at San Antonio) for their constructive criticism.


Banerjee S (2013). Adaptation of Bharatanatyam dance pedagogy for multicultural classrooms: Questions and relevance in North American university setting. Research in Dance Education 14(1):28-38.


Barthes R (1987). Mythologies. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.


Bracilovic A (2009). Essential dance medicine. New York, NY: Humana Press.


Brillon R (2014). Choreography math: Teaching geometric concepts through dance movement and design. Ph.D. diss., ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing. (accessed on August 10, 2015).


Cook SW, Yip T, Meadow S (2013). Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Lang. Cognit. Processes 27(4):594-610.


Chodorow J (2013). Dance therapy and depth psychology: The moving imagination. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis. (accessed June 5, 2015).


Cornell C (1999). I hate math! I couldn't learn it, and I can't teach it. Childhood Education 75(4):68-72., (accessed June 10, 2015).


Dale E (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York, NY: Dryden Press.


Dale E (1996). The cone of experience. In Classic writings on instructional technology, ed. D. P. Ely and T. Plomp, 169-180. Englewood, CA. Erlbaum.


Devichi C, Munier V (2013). About the concept of angle in elementary school: misconceptions and teaching sequences. J Math. Behav., 32(1):1-19 (accessed August 10, 2015).


Dunn R, Dunn K (2012). Thirty-five years of research on perceptual strengths: Essential strategies to promote learning. Clearing House: J. Educ. Strat. 78(6):273-276.


Duru A (2010). The experimental teaching in some of topics geometry. Educ. Res. Rev. 5(10):584-592.


Dietiker LC, Brakoniecki A (2014). Reading geometrically: The negotiation of the expected meaning of diagrams in geometry textbooks. Paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development, San Francisco, CA.


Gardner H (1988). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, Inc (accessed August 10, 2015).


Gardner H (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.


Galeet W (2012). Dance, mathematics, and rote memorization. J. Phys. Educ. Recreation Dance 73(6):12-15.


Hansen HG (2005). Looking in the lozanov mirror. Paper presented at the Shapes of Education Convention, Sofia, Bulgaria.


Jensen E (2000). Moving with the brain in mind. Educational Leadership 58(3):34-37.


Jiesamfoek H (2012). Dance and play. In Young children and the arts: Nurturing imagination and creativity, ed. C. Korn-Bursztyn, 195-207. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub.


Klingenberg OG (2012). Conceptual understanding of shape and space by Norwegi-reading: Norwegian students in elementary school. J. Vis. Impair. Blin. 106(8):453-465


Lazonov G (1981). Suggestology and outlines of suggestopedy. Mahwah, NJ: Gordon & Breach.


Leiblich A, Tuval-Mashiach R, Zilber T (1998). Narrative analysis: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.


Magee AP, Leeth JH (2014). Using transmediation in elementary preservice teacher education: A literacy and science collaborative. J Adol. Adult Lit. 58(4):327-336. df, (accessed on June 5, 2015).


Meekums B (2015). Dance movement therapy for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2(1):9CD009895., (accessed June 5, 2015).


Mertens DM (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.


Magee AP, Leeth JH (2014). Using transmediation in elementary preservice teacher education: A literacy and science collaborative. J Adol. Adult Lit. 58(4): 327-336. Retrieved from: (accessed August 10, 2015).


McCarthy-Brown N (2014). Decolonizing dance curriculum in higher education: One credit at a time. J Dance Educ. 14(4):125-129. Retrieved from:, (accessed on July, 20, 2015).


Moore C, Linder S (2012). Using dance to deepen students understanding of geometry. J Dance Educ. 12(3):104-108., (accessed on 6 June, 2015).


Noweck RS (2011). Agents of integration: Understanding transfer as a rhetorical act. National Council of Teachers of English Publication. Chicago, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.


Prichard A, Taylor J (1981). A demonstration of the concept of "hyperlearning." J Lear. Disabilities 14(1):19-47.


Poursabahian JP (2012). Teaching an ancient performing art in a modern context. J Physical Educ., Recreation, and Dance 83(1): 24-26.


Ramanath BS (2009). Body uncovered. Lecture Demonstration at the Multicultural Conference on Body Uncovered, San Antonio, TX.


Rosenfeld M (2013). Making math and making dance: A closer look at integration. Teach. Artist J 11(4):205-214., (accessed April 10, 2015).


Samson L (2010). Rukmini devi: A life. Delhi, India: Penguin Books.


Sangeetha S, Ragothaman Y (2014). Bhartanatyam and the worldwideweb: What's happening in the world of bhartanatyam? (accessed March15, 2015).


Siegel M (1995). More than Words: The Generative Power of transmediation for learning. Canadian J. Educ. / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 20(4):455-475.


SHINE FOR GIRLS. N.d. In Shine., (accessed March 20, 2015).


Sipe LR (1998). How picture books work: A semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children's Literature in Education 29(2):97-108.


Steedman P (2000). On the relations between seeing, interpreting and knowing. In Steier, Research and reflexivity, ed. F. Steier, 53-62, London: Sage.


Tembrioti L, Tsangaridou N (2014). Cultural awareness. Res. Dance Educ. 15(1):4-22.


Tomlinson B (2011). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., (accessed June 05, 2015).


Ultanir E (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Consructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. Int. J. Instruction 5(2):195-212.


Vygotsky LS (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.


Westreich, G. (2002). Dance, mathematics, and rote memorization. J. Physi. Educ. Recreation Dance 73(6):12-12+. Retrieved from


Yang W, Weiping, D (2011). "Rote Memorization of Vocabulary and Vocabulary Development." English Lang. Teach. 4(4):61-64.


Young R, Collin A (2004). Introduction: constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. J. Vocat. Behav. 64(3):373-388.


Zakaria E, Solfitri T, Yosoff D, Abidin Z (2013). Effect of cooperative learning on secondary school students' mathematics achievement. Creative Educ. 4(2):98-100.


Zuckerbros N (2011). From reader's theater to math dances: Bright ideas to differentiation happen. ERIC 120(5):31-35., (accessed June 2, 2015).