Journal of
Medicinal Plants Research

  • Abbreviation: J. Med. Plants Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0875
  • DOI: 10.5897/JMPR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 3749

Full Length Research Paper

Chemical composition, antibacterial and antimycoplasma activities of four Eugenia species growing in Brazil

Adrielli Tenfen
  • Adrielli Tenfen
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade do Itajaí, CEP: 88302-901, Itajaí, SC, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Ariela M. Boeder
  • Ariela M. Boeder
  • Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, CEP: 89030-001 Blumenau, SC, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Catarina C. Bella-Cruz
  • Catarina C. Bella-Cruz
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade do Itajaí, CEP: 88302-901, Itajaí, SC, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Alexandre Bella-Cruz
  • Alexandre Bella-Cruz
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade do Itajaí, CEP: 88302-901, Itajaí, SC, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Caio M. M. Córdova
  • Caio M. M. Córdova
  • Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, CEP: 89030-001 Blumenau, SC, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Valdir Cechinel-Filho
  • Valdir Cechinel-Filho
  • Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade do Itajaí, CEP: 88302-901, Itajaí, SC, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar

  •  Received: 14 August 2017
  •  Accepted: 25 September 2017
  •  Published: 17 October 2017


The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of four unexplored Eugenia species: Eugenia brevistyla, Eugenia handroana, Eugenia catharinae and Eugenia stigmatosa. Eight extracts and eighteen fractions were screened for their antibacterial activity against some selected bacteria including Mycoplasma. Phytochemical screening revealed that the plants were rich in terpenes and phenolic compounds. Antimicrobial evaluation revealed that E. handroana (FAEF-EH) and E. brevistyla (FAEF-EB) had the highest activity against Staphylococcus aureus with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 15.62 µg/ml Mycoplasma while FAEF-EH also presented the best activity with MIC of 62.5 µg/ml against Mycoplasma pneumonia M129. Some isolated compounds, betulinic acid and glutinol, also exhibited antibacterial property against some bacteria used in the study. All the four species studied presented promising antibacterial activity while the active principles are yet to be elucidated.

Key words: Eugenia handroana, Eugenia brevistyla, Eugenia catharinae, Eugenia stigmatosa, antibacterial activity, antimycoplasma activity.


The plants of the Eugenia genus (Myrtaceae) are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions (Fischer et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2013). They are known for their tasty fruits, and include some Brazilian plants as Eugenia uniflora ("Pitanga"), Eugenia involucrata (“Cereja-do-mato”), Eugenia jambolona (“jambolão”) and Eugenia edulis ("jaboticaba"). This genus comprises a large group of medicinal plants with therapeutic applications of their different medicinal properties, such as anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, diuretic, analgesic, antidiarrheal, anti-rheumatic, antibacterial, protection against stomach disorders, etc (Saha et al., 2002; Auricchio and Bacchi, 2003; Bag et al., 2012; Victoria et al., 2012; Famuyiwa and Adebajo, 2012; Garmus et al., 2014). Infections caused by numerous microorganisms are a constant public health problem, and bacterial infections are responsible for several diseases such as pneumonia, meningitis, and endocarditis (Souza et al., 2004). Infections caused by resistant microorganisms and those caused by "commensal" microorganisms, are increasing every year (Muraina et al., 2009). Mycoplasmas are bacteria that belong to the class Mycoplasma, and cause respiratory and urogenital diseases in human beings (Muraina et al., 2009). They are the smallest microorganisms that are capable of self-replication, lacking a cell wall and presenting variable susceptibility to antibiotics (Murray, 2007).
Considering the chemotaxonomy and the important activities already described for the Eugenia genus, the reported increase in antibiotic resistance, as well as the increase in infections caused by Mycoplasma, four Brazilian plants of the Eugenia species E. brevistyla, E. handroana, E. catharinae and E. stigmatosa have been evaluated for their chemical compositions and antimicrobial activity against selected bacteria including Mycoplasma.


Plant material
The place and season (year) of collection of each species are shown in Table 1.
Phytochemical analyses
Extraction procedures
Leaves (760 g) and stems (495 g) of E. brevistyla; leaves (2056 g) and stems (980 g) of E. handroana; leaves (785 g) and stems (104 g) of E. catharinae and leaves (295 g) and stems (150 g) of E. stigmatosa were extracted separately by macerating in methanol for 7 days at room temperature. The solutions were then filtered and concentrated in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure (50°C), furnishing the respective methanolic extracts. All the obtained extracts were successively partitioned with solvents of different polarities (dichloromethane or chloroform and ethyl acetate) to obtain the respective fractions (FDCM or FCHCl3 and FAE). All the yields are shown in Table 2.
Isolation of the chemical constituents
In order to isolate the major compounds, all the fractions were separately subjected to open silica gel column chromatography (CC) eluted with hexane: ethyl acetate gradient. Thin layer chromatography, used to monitor purity, was carried out on a pre-coated Merck Kieselgel 60 F254 plate (0.25 mm) eluted with hexane: ethyl acetate gradient and the spots were compared with the standards. The compounds were identified by conventional spectral data (NMR, IR, MS) and compared with standard samples and the literature. In some cases, the compounds were subjected to gas mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to confirm their identities. The isolated compounds and the yields are shown in Table 3. The molecular structures are shown in Figure 1. The RMN spectral dates were:
β amyrin: NMR 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): (ppm) 0.79 (s, 3H, H23), 0.83 (s, 6H, H30), 0.87 (s,3H,29), 0.94 (s, 6H, 24), 0.97; 0.99; 1.13 (s, 3x 3H; H26, H28,  H27); 1.77 (dd, J= 4.3; 13.5 Hβ), 1.88 (dd, J= 4.0; 14.0 Hβ), 1.93 (dd, J= 4.0; 13.7 Hβ), 3.21 (dd, J= 4.3; 10.9). NMR  13C (75 MHz, CDCl3, TMS):  (ppm) 15.5 (C25), 15.5 (C24), 16.8 (C26), 18.3 (C6), 23.5 (C11); 23.6 (C30), 25.9 (C27), 26.1 (C16), 26.9 (C15), 27.2 (C2), 28.1 (C23); 28.4 (C28), 31.0 (C20), 32.4 (7), 32.6 (C17), 33.3 (C29), 34.7 (C21), 36.9 (C10), 37.1 (C22), 38.5 (C4), 38.7 (C1), 39.8 (C8), 41.7 (C14), 46.8 (C19), 47.2 (C18), 47.6 (C9), 55.1 (C5), 79.0 (C3), 121.3 (C12), 145.2 (C13). The mixture of α-β amyrin was submitted to GC-MS, indicating the presence of 90% of β-amyrin and 10% of α-amyrin.
Nerolidol: Nerolidol, being an oil was identified by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The fragmentation with compound was characteristic of Nerolidol, with base peak 69 m/z and molecular ion of 204 m/z.
Betulinic acid: NMR  1H (300 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): (ppm) 0.66; 0.77; 0.90 e 0.96 (s, 5 X 3H; H23, H24, H25, H26, H27), 1.62 (s, 3H, H30), 2,97 (m, 1H, H3), 4.55 (sl, 1H, H29a), 4.68 (sl, 1H, H29b), 12.0 (sl 1H, H acid). NMR  13C (75 MHz, CDCl3, TMS):  (ppm) 14.6 (C27), 15.3 (C24), 16.0 (C25), 16.1 (C26), 18.2 (C6), 19.3 (C30), 20.8 (C11), 25.5 (C12), 27.3 (C2), 27.9 (C23), 29.6 (C21), 30.5 (C15), 32.1 (C16), 34.3 (C7), 37.0 (C22), 37.1 (C10), 38.3 (C13), 38.7 (C1), 38.8 (C4), 40.6 (C8), 42.4 (C14), 46.9 (C18), 49.2 (C19), 50.52 (C9), 55.3 (C5), 56.2 (C17), 78.9 (C3), 109.6 (C29), 150.5 (C20), 179.3 (C28).
Glutinol: NMR  1H (300 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 5.63 (1H, br d, J = 5,7 Hz, H-6), 3.46 (1H, d, J = 32,7Hz, H-3) 1.16 (3H, s, H-28), 1.14 (3H, s, H-23), 1.09 (3H, s H-26), 1.04 (3H, s, H-24), 1.00 (3H, s, H-27), 0.99 (3H, s, H-30), 0.95 (3H, s, H-29), 0.85 (3H, s, H-25). NMR  13C (75 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): (ppm)  16.2 (C25), 18.2 (C2), 18.4 (C26),  19.6 (C27),  23.6 (C1),  25.4 (C-4),  27.8 (C7),  28.2 (C20),  28.9 (C23),  30.0 (C17),  30.3 (C12),  31.5  (C29),  32.0 (C15),  32.3 (C28),  33.1 (C21),  34.5 (C30),  34.6  (C11),  34.8 (C9),  35.0 (C19),  36.0 (C16),  37.8 (C13),  38.9 (C22),  39.3 (C4),  40.8 (C14),  43.0 (C8),  47.4 (C18),  49.6 (C10),  76.3 (C3), 122.0 (C6), 141.6 (C5).
Biological activity
Antimycoplasma activity
The antimollicute assays were collected from the Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology from FURB that provided the bacterial strains. Tests were evaluated against mollicutes strains (no-cell-wall bacteria) Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. capri (NCTC 10137). Mycoplasma genitalium (ATCC 33530), Mycoplasma hominis (ATCC 23114), Mycoplasma subs capricolum (ATCC 27343), Mycoplasma pneumonia 129 (ATCC 13883), and Mycoplasma pneumonia FH (ATCC 13883) and were also assessed. For the growth of bacterial strain, broth MLA was used for M. hominis, SP4 broth for M. mycoides subsp. capri and M. genitalium, M. subs capricolum, M. pneumonia 129 and M. pneumonia FH (Velleca et al., 1980).
The crude extracts and fractions from E. handroana, E. brevistyla, E. catharinae and E. stigmatosa were evaluated by determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The microdilution broth assay was performed in sterile 96-well microplates, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2012) for cell-wall bacteria and Bebear and Roberteson (1996) for mollicutes.
The samples were properly prepared and transferred to each microplate well  with  the  appropriate  culture  medium,  in  order to obtain a two-fold serial dilution of the original extract in a 10% medium/dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution, obtaining sample concentrations ranging between 1000 to 7.81 μg.mL-1. The inoculum containing 104 to 105 microorganisms per ml were then added to each well. A number of wells were reserved in each plate to test for sterility control (no inoculum added), positive control (gentamycin or ciprofloxacin), inoculum viability (no extract added), and the DMSO inhibitory effect. The microplates were incubated at 37°C ± 1°C for 24 or 48 h (depending on the bacterium). Thereafter, growth of mollicutes strains was detected by observing the colour change in the medium. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the samples able to inhibit bacterial growth.
Antibacterial activity with cell wall bacterial and fungal
The antibacterial assays were conducted at the Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology from UNIVALI that provided the bacterial strains. The determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was performed by broth microdilution. The method consisted in preparing successive dilutions of the tested extracts (1000 µg/mL up to 2 µg/mL) in culture media Mueller-Hinton broth for the bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli) and Sabouraud broth for the yeast (Candida albicans). The media  were  inoculated with the microorganism under study, incubated and later verified the lowest concentration that inhibited its growth. 


Chromatographic fractionation of leaves and stems fractions of the four studied plants led to isolation and identification of the compounds shown in Tables 2 and 3. For the evaluation of the antibacterial activity, a criterion established by Holetz et al. (2002) was used. Samples with MIC values lower than 10 μg ml-1 were considered to have excellent antibacterial activity; between 10 and 100 μg ml-1 were considered good; values between 100 and 500 μg ml-1 were considered to be of moderate activity; values between 500 and 1000 μg ml-1 of low activity, and for MIC values higher than 1000 μg ml-1, samples were considered inactive for the extracts and fractions. The isolated compounds were considered inactive with MIC higher than 100 μg ml-1. The results for MIC of all the samples are shown in Table 4 (Mycoplasma strains) and Table 5 (cell wall bacterial and fungal strains).
Of all samples tested, the highest activity was observed against Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus, a Gram-positive bacterium is responsible for a large number of infections ranging from simple infections, such as acne or cellulitis to severe infections like pneumonia, meningitis, endocarditis, toxic shock syndrome, and sepsis. This is particularly true for the infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which is most often resistant to multiple antibiotic classes and is responsible for the majority of infections (Boucher et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2013; Bolt et al., 2017).
The FAE-F of E. handroana (FAEF-EH) and the FAE-F of E. brevistyla (FAEF-EB) exhibited pronounced antibacterial activity against S. aureus (MIC, 15.62 μg ml-1). From the FAEF-EH, a mixture of α and β-amyrin which is known to have an important anti-bacterial activity against S. aureus (Jain et al., 2001) was isolated. Other fractions such as the EBMC-EB, FAEC-EB, EBMF-EB, FAEC-EH and EBMF-EH showed good results against S. aureus (MIC, 31.25 μg ml-1). The results observed for E. handroana and E. brevistyla were the most promising. Antibacterial activity against S. aureus by other species of Eugenia such as E. caryophyllata and E. brasiliensis had been reported (Magina et al., 2012; Prakash et al., 2012). It is interesting to note that the fractions with higher polarity (ethyl acetate) showed better activity. On the other hand, the Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli were not sensitive to the extracts and fractions until 1000 μg ml-1.
Antifungal evaluation against Candida albicans showed that the extract and fractions from the stem of E. stigmatosa had the best activity with MIC of 125 μg ml-1 for the EBM-C and 250 μg ml-1 for FAEC- ES. The EMBC of E. catharinae also inhibited fungal growth at MIC = 250 μg ml-1. Some Eugenia species as E. calycina (Ferreira et al., 2014), E. caryophyllata (Mansourian et al., 2014), and E. jambolana (Satish et al., 2008) have been reported to have antifungal activity.
Among the tested samples, the highest activity against the Mycoplasma was observed in the FAEF-EH fraction against M. pneumoniae M129 (62.5 µg ml-1). However, despite this pronounced activity, for the other species of Mycoplasma, the samples that presented the best activity were nonpolar fractions. FCHCl3F-EB and FDCMC-EC showed MIC of 125 µg ml-1 against some samples tested. It is likely that highest presence of nonpolar compounds such as fatty acids and triterpenes in high quantity favored the action against the Mycoplasma strains.
Previous study by Tenfen et al. (2017) has attributed antimycoplasma activity of E. platysema to the presence of triterpenes. Another study by Zatelli et al. (2015) attributed anti-Mycoplasma activity of E. hiemalis to the essential oil component of the species. The isolated compounds in this study such as nerolidol (3) and the mixture of α,β amyrin (1,2) were inactive against the Mycoplasma strains. On the other hand, the compounds betulinic acid (4) and glutinol (5) showed encouraging activity against some strains tested.
Betulinic acid (4), was considered inactive against strains of S. aureus, E. coli and C. albicans (MIC > 128 µg ml-1) (Woldemichae et al., 2003), and considered active against some strains of Mycoplasma tested in this study, especially against M. pneumoniae FH, with MIC of12.5 µg ml-1, demonstrating selectivity for this species. The M. pneumoniae FH is responsible for important diseases such as pneumonias, mainly in immunocompromised patients. It has a genetic structure different from the other species being considered more sensitive. On the other hand, glutinol (5) demonstrates antiviral, antifungal activity and potent anti-inflammatory activity as previously described (Madureira et al., 2003). Although  some  studies  correlate  the  presence  of   this compound with antibacterial activity, there are no studies with this compound isolated against strains of Mycoplasma.
It is well-known that nerolidol (3) exhibits moderate antibacterial activity against S. aureus. However, its mechanism of action is related to intracellular K + leakage through the interaction of the carbonic chain of the molecule with the bacterial cell wall (Inoue et al., 2004). Since Mycoplasma do not have cell walls, they are naturally resistant to molecules that act by this mechanism of action (MIC > 1000 µg ml-1). Several studies attribute antibacterial activity for α,β-amyrin (1,2) against S. aureus, E. coli and C. albicans, however the mechanisms of action has not yet been elucidated. Regarding the general antimicrobial effects, all the four species studied presented interesting antibacterial and antifungal activity. It is important to emphasize that this is the first work done to evaluate the chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of E. handroana, E. brevistyla, E. catharinae and E. stigmatosa. It is also the first study to evaluate the anti-Mycoplasma activity of α,β amyrin, nerolidol,  betulinic acid, and glutinol.
The results found in this study are important because some of the microorganisms used in the study are responsible for various diseases, such as pneumonia, mastitis, skin and soft tissues infections, osteomyelitis, endocarditis,  vaginitis,  urethritis,  and  pyelonephritis in humans (Boucher et al., 2010; Cordova et al., 2010). Reports of resistance of cell wall bacteria and Mycoplasma to conventional treatments have also increased (Yechouron et al., 1992; Ma et al., 2017) and studies are in progress to determine other active principles present in the most promising species such as E. brevistyla and E. handroana.


The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.


Auricchio MT, Bacchi EM (2003). Leaves of Eugenia uniflora L. (pitanga: pharmacochemical, chemical and pharmacological properties Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz 62(1):55-61.


Bag A, Bhattacharyy SK, Pal NK, Chattopadhyay RR (2012). In vitro antibacterial potential of Eugenia jambolana seed extracts against multidrug-resistant human bacterial pathogens. Microbiol. Res.167:352-357.


Bebear C, Robertson JA (1996). Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration. Mol. Diagn. Proced. Mycoplasmol. 2:189-199.


Bolt HL, Eggimann GA, Jahoda CA, Zuckermann RN, Sharples GJ, Cobb SL (2017). Exploring the links between peptoid antibacterial activity and toxicity. Med. Chem. Comm. 8(5):886-896.


Boucher H, Millet LG, Razonable RR (2010). Serious Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50:183-197.


Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2012). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests f or Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard – Ninth Edittion. CLSI document M97-A9. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Available at: 



Cordova SM, Benfatti CS, Magina MDA, Guedes A, Cordova CMM (2010). Análise da atividade antimicrobiana de extratos isolados de plantas nativas da flora brasileira frente a cepas de Mycoplasma arginini, M. hominis e Ureaplasma urealyticum. Ver. Bras. Anal. Clin. 42(4):241-244.


Famuyiwa F, Adebajo A (2012). Larvicidal properties of Eugenia uniflora leaves. Agric. Biol. J. North. Am. 3:400-405.


Ferreira FPS, Morais SR, Bara MTF, Conceição EC, Paula JR, Carvalho TC, Vaz BG, Costa HB, Romão W, Rezende MH (2014). Eugenia calycina Cambess extracts and their fractions: Their antimicrobial activity and the identification of major polar compounds using electrospray ionization FT-ICR mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 99:89-96.


Fischer DC, Limberger RP, Henriques AT, Moreno PR (2005). Essential Oils from Leaves of two Eugenia brasiliensis Specimens from Southeastern Brazil. J. Essent. Oil. Res.17:499-500.


Garmus TT, Paviani LC, Queiroga CL, Magalhães PM, Cabral PA (2014). Extraction of phenolic compounds from pitanga (Eugenia uniflora L.) leaves by sequential extraction in fixed bed extractor using supercritical CO2, ethanol and water as solvents. J. Supercrit Fluids. 82:44-14.


Holetz FB, Penssini GL, Sanches NR, Cortez DAG, Nakamura CV, Dias-Filho BP (2002). Screening of some plants used in the Brazilian folk medicine for the treatment of infectious diseases. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 97:1027-1031.


Jain SC, Singha B, Jain R (2001). Antimicrobial activity of triterpenoids from Heliotropium ellipticum. Fitoterapia 72:666-668.


Inoue Y, Shiraishi A, Hada T, Hirose K, Hamashima H, Shimada J (2004). The antibacterial effects of terpene alcohols on Staphylococcus aureus and their mode of action. FEMS Mic Lett. 237:325-331.


Lin JC, Aung G, Thomas A, Jahng M, Johns S, Fierer J (2013). The use of ceftaroline fosamil in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis and deep-seated MRSA infections: A retrospective case series of 10 patients. Inf. Chem.19:42-49.


Ma L, Wu J, Wang S, Yang H, Liang D, Lu Z (2017). Synergistic antibacterial effect of Bi2S3 nanospheres combined with ineffective antibiotic gentamicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Inorg. Biochem.168:38-45.


Madureira AM, Ascenso JR, Valdeira L, Duarte A, Frase JP, Freitas G, Ferreira MJ (2003). Evaluation of the antiviral and antimicrobial activities of triterpenes isolated from Euphorbia segetalis. Nat. Prod. Res.17:375-80.


Magina MDA, Dalmarco EM, Dalmarco JM, Colla G, Pizzolatti MG, Brighente IMC (2012). Bioactive triterpenes and phenolics of leaves of Eugenia brasiliensis. Quim. Nova. 35:1184-1188.


Mansourian A, Boojarpour N, Ashnagar S, Beitollahi JM, Shamshiri AR (2014). The comparative study of antifungal activity of Syzygium aromaticum, Punica granatum and nystatin on Candida albicans; An in vitro study. J. Mycol. Med. 24:163-168.


Muraina IA, Picard J, Eloff JN (2009). Development of a reproducible method to determine minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of plant extract against a slow-growing mycoplasmas organism. Phytomedicine16:262-264.


Murray PR (2007). Manual of Clinical Microbiology, nine ed., ASM Press, Washington. Available at: 



Prakash D, Sreenivasa-Murthy BV, Rayappa C, Ramesh K, Gopinath N, Kumar S, Varuvelil GJ (2012). Antibacterial efficacy of Syzygium aromaticum extracts on multi-drug resistant Streptococcus mutans isolated from dental plaque samples. J. Biochem. Technol. 3(5):S155-S157.


Saha S, Subrahmanyam EVS, Kodangala C, Mandal SC, Shastry C (2002). Evaluation of antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of extract and fractions of Eugenia jambolana root bark and isolation of phytoconstituents. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 23:651-661.


Satish S, Raghavendra MP, Raveesha K (2008). Evaluation of the antibacterial potential of some plants against human pathogenic bacteria. Biol. Res. 2:44-48.


Souza GC, Hass AP, Von-Poser GL, Schapoval EE, Elisabetsky E (2004). Ethnopharmacological studies of antimicrobial remedies in the south of Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 90:135-143.


Tenfen A, Siebert DA, Cordova CMM, Micke GM, Alberton MDA (2017a). Determination of phenolic profile by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and antibacterial activity of Eugenia platysema against mollicutes strains. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 7(5):7-11 Available at: 



Velleca WM, Bird BR, Forrester FT (1980). Laboratory diagnosis of mycoplasma infections. US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control, 137.


Victoria FN, Lenardão EJ, Savegnago L,Perin G, Jacob RG, Alves D, da Silva WP, da Motta Ade S, Nascente P da S (2012). Essential oil of the leaves of Eugenia uniflora L.: Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Food Chem. Toxicol. 50:2668-2674.


Yechouron A, Lefebvre J, Robson HG, Rose DL, Tully JD (1992). Fatal Septicemia Due to Mycoplasma arginini: A New Human Zoonosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:434-438.


Woldemichae GM, Sing MP, Maiese WM, Timmermann NZ (2003). Constituents of Antibacterial Extract of Caesalpinia paraguariensis Burk. Z. Naturfosrch. C.58:70-75.


Zaki MA, Balachandran P, Khan S, Wang M, Mohammed R, Hetta MH, Muhammad I (2013). Cytotoxicity and modulation of cancer-related signaling by (Z)- and (E)-3,4,3',5'-tetramethoxystilbene isolated from Eugenia rigida. J. Nat. Prod. 76(4):679-684.


Zatelli GA, Zimath PL, Tenfen A, Cordova CMM, Scharf DR, Simionatto EL, Alberton MD, Falkenberg M (2015). Antimycoplasmic activity and seasonal variation of essential oil of Eugenia hiemalis Cambess. (Myrtaceae). Nat. Prod. Res. 1:1-4.