International Journal of
Physical Sciences

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Phys. Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1992-1950
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJPS
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2572

Full Length Research Paper

Indoor ionizing radiation measurement in different departments of the Federal University of Technology Owerri

Chinaza C. Abara
  • Chinaza C. Abara
  • Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Dominic D. O. Eya
  • Dominic D. O. Eya
  • Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Mbamara. U.S.
  • Mbamara. U.S.
  • Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Chijioke M. Amakom
  • Chijioke M. Amakom
  • Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 24 April 2022
  •  Accepted: 15 September 2022
  •  Published: 28 February 2023

 ABSTRACT

The indoor background ionizing radiation of various offices of the various departments in Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO) was estimated in this study. This was conducted using a well calibrated digital Geiger - Muller Counter (GCA - 04W). The highest value measured was 0.0873 ± 0.1432 µSv/h while the lowest value was 0.0006 ± 0.0001 µSv/h with an average value of 0.0052 ± 0.0013 µSv/h. The average value of the estimated absorbed dose rate for all the departments and annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) was 4.549 ± 12.047 nGy/h and 22.313 ± 59.092 µSv/y, respectively. For the Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR), the average value for the departments was found to be 0.061 ± 0.162. The results of this study show that the level of BIR in all the departments was lower than the world average. In general, it can be concluded that FUTO is relatively safe from the health hazards posed by BIR.

Key words: Background ionizing radiation, radiological risk, absorbed dose rate, annual effective dose equivalent, excess life cancer risk.


 INTRODUCTION

The major sources of ionizing radiation in our environment are cosmogenic, anthropogenic and primordial sources (Omogunloye et al., 2021). Of all these sources, the primordial radiation sources are of the major concern, since the radiation from cosmogenic and anthropogenic sources are negligible. Primodial radiation levels are dependent on local geological conditions and geographical location of the area (Akortia et al., 2021). Ionizing radiation can be beneficial and harmful, depending on the levels of  exposure. When  the  level  of exposure to ionizing radiation exceeds certain limits within the environment, it becomes harmful and could cause certain health disorders such as acute leukemia, lung cancer, pancreas, hepatic, skin and kidney cancers, cataracts, and sterility (Vaiserman et al., 2018). To safeguard the health of the public from the adverse effects of exposure to background ionizing radiation (BIR), it has become necessary to survey the BIR levels within the environment. Recently, there were studies that have been  directed towards  investigating  BIR levels in various areas. Eke and Emelue (2020) evaluated the BIR levels in Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO). Agbalagba (2017) investigated the outdoor gamma radiation exposure dose rate for eastern Nigeria. Etuk et al. (2017) similarly investigated the BIR levels in Ikot-Ekpene, Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria. Agbalagba (2020) also assessed the BIR levels, excess life cancer risk (ELCR) and gamma dose rates in Effurun and Warri, Delta State, Nigeria. Other studies related to BIR levels can be found in the literature (Agbalagba and Anekwe, 2021; Ekong et al., 2019).

In the present study, the BIR levels of fifty departments/centres within FUTO, Imo State, Nigeria will be measured using a Geiger Muller Counter. The health hazard indices such as absorbed dose rate, AEDE and ELCR were also estimated. The resulting indices will then be compared to the world average so as to make an inference on the radiological risk due to the BIR exposure.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

FUTO is located in Owerri west local government area of Imo State, Nigeria.  It  is  located  within  the  coordinates  N5°23.5615’  and  E 6°59.1758’. The institution is bounded by communities such as Eziobodo, Ihiagwa, Obinze, and Umuchima. It covers a land area of approximately 4580 ha and has a population of approximately forty five thousand, which includes the staff and students (Eke and Emelue, 2020). Owerri is bordered by the Otamiri River to the east and the Nworie River to the south. Its environment has a good number of markets, industries, banks, restaurants, and hotels. It also has some important educational institutions in its environs which include Imo State Polytechnic, Umuagwo; Federal Polytechnic, Nekede; Imo State University, Owerri; Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education; and so many secondary schools. A geographical map of FUTO is as shown in Figure 1.

Background radiation measurements

The background ionizing radiation level in this work was measured using a well calibrated digital Geiger – Muller Counter GCA – 04W. This instrument measures the Natural Background Radiation rates in count per minutes (CPM) and count per seconds (CPS). The digital detector can detect alpha, beta and gamma radiations. The main element in this detector is the probe or tube with a gas-filled chamber. The wall of the GM tube is a thin metal cylinder (cathode) surrounding a center electrode (anode). It has a thin mica window in the front; it allows the passage of detection of alpha particles. The tube is filled with Neon, Argon and Halogen gas.

The indoor background radiation of five offices in each of the fifty departments sampled in FUTO was measured. The instrument was always checked to ensure the battery of about 9 V was always active for accurate reading. The counter was set to mSv and readings  were  taken  after  1 min. The Geiger–Muller counter was held at about 1 m above the ground level at an open space. Measurements were taken at three different parts of each office. Two successive readings were taken at each point and the mean value was calculated and recorded. Each count was converted to micro-Sievert per hour (μSv/h). The measured data for the background ionizing radiation (BIR) was used to calculate the absorbed dose rate (D), the annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) and the excess life cancer risk (ELCR).


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

BIR measurements

Table 1 shows the BIR measurements for this study and the estimated radiological hazard indices. The BIR measurements within the offices were all  below the world average of 0.013 mRh−1. The average value reported for the study was 0.0052 ± 0.0139 µSv/h. The highest BIR exposure was observed in the Department of Food Science and Technology and this could be from the building materials within the offices or the surrounding environment. This suggests that, the level of radionuclides in the Food Science Department was relatively higher than in other departments studied.

Absorbed dose rate

The absorbed dose rate (D), was calculated using the conversion factor

The following conversion factor was also used:

Generally, the absorbed dose rate due to BIR was found to be low suggesting low level radiation hazard in the studied environment. In the Department of Food science and Technology, the absorbed dose rate was found to be higher than the world average and should be a source of concern, this can be observed in Figure 2.  In general, the mean value obtained in this study is lower than the world population weighted average gamma dose rate value of 59 nGyh−1 (UNSCEAR, 2000). The absorbed dose rate is also lower than what was obtained by Agbalagba (2017) in the Warri environment.

Annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE)

AEDE was computed from the absorbed dose rates. Dose conversion  factor  of 0.7 Sv Gy-1 and an occupancy factor for indoor exposure of 0.8 were used in the computation. The annual effective dose was calculated from:

The mean AEDE indicates low radiological risk from the BIR, since it is just about 5.4% of the world average. Nevertheless, it was observed that the highest value from Food Science and Technology Department is about 91% of the world average, which is a source of long-term concern as shown in Figure 3.

Excess life cancer risk (ELCR)

ELCR was computed using the following equation:

where LE is the life expectancy which was taken as 55 years for Nigeria as given by World Bank records (2020). RF is the fatal risk factor which is taken as 0.05 Sv-1 (Charles, 2008). The ELCR in three departments (Crop science, Financial Management Technology and Centre for Energy and Power Systems Research and Food Science Technology) was found to be higher than the world average value (Figure 4). Because the area under investigation is an official area and not a residential area, the likelihood of the occupants developing cancer from BIR is very low.


 CONCLUSION

BIR was measured in various departments within Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO). From the BIR measurements, the hazard indices-absorbed dose rate, AEDE and ELCR were calculated and the results in general showed a low level of BIR. Only the department of Food Science and Technology seems to pose significant radiological risk from BIR. In general, it can be concluded that FUTO is relatively safe from the radiological hazards due to BIR. It is recommended that the levels of ionizing radiation should be monitored in other parts of the university. Further studies should be carried out to determine the sources of the high levels of BIR within some parts of the school.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Agbalagba EO, Nenuwe ON, Ononugbo CP. (2020). GIS mapping of BIR levels around fossil fuel and gas dispensing stations and assessment of their radiological risk implications. Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 4(2):4979-91.
Crossref

 

Agbalagba O El (2017) Assessment of excess lifetime cancer risk from gamma radiation levels in Effurun and Warri city of Delta state, Nigeria. Journal of Taibah University for Science 11(3):367-380, 
Crossref

 

Agbalagba OE, Anekwe LU (2021). Radiometric mapping of terrestrial gamma radiation and evaluation of radiological health risk on the residents in Nigeria state commercial and capital cities. Environmental Forensics 22(1-2):75-90.
Crossref

 

Akortia E, Glover ET, Nyarku M., Dawood A, Essel P, Sarfo EO, Gbeddy G (2021). Geological interactions and radio-chemical risks of primordial radionuclides 40K, 226Ra, and 232Th in soil and groundwater from potential radioactive waste disposal site in Ghana. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 328(2):577-589.
Crossref

 

Charles MW (2008). ICRP Publication 103: Recommendations of the ICRP.
Crossref

 

Eke BC, Emelue HU (2020). Measurement of background ionizing radiation in the federal university of technolo eigerrri, Nigeria using calibrated digit eigerger counter. International Journal of Physics Research and Applicationsl 3:70-74.
Crossref

 

Ekong G, Akpa T, Umaru I, Lumbi W, Akpanowo M, Benson N (2019). Assessment of radiological hazard indices from exposures to background ionizing radiation measurements in South-South Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 7(2):40-47.
Crossref

 

Etuk SE, Essiett AA, Agbasi OE (2017). Measurement of outdoor ambient radioactive radiation and evaluation of radiation indices and Excess Life Cancer Risk within Uyo, Unity Park, Uyo, Nigeria. Journal of Geography, Environmental and Earth Science International 9 (4):1-9. 
Crossref

 

Omogunloye OY, Adepoju AT, Kururimam P (2021). Assessment of Radiation Risk from Background Radiation Exposures in Selected Hospitals within Makurdi Metropolis, North-Central, Nigeria. European Journal of Applied Physics 3(4):43-47.
Crossref

 

United Nationals, Sources and Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UnitedNations Scientific Committee on the effect of atomic radiation,Report to the General Assemble, Annex B exposure from natural radiation sources, United Nations, New York.

 

Vaiserman A, Koliada A, Zabuga O, Socol Y (2018). Health impacts of low-dose ionizing radiation: current scientific debates and regulatory issues. Dose-Response 16(3).
Crossref

 




          */?>