International Journal of
Physical Sciences

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Phys. Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1992-1950
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJPS
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2572

Full Length Research Paper

Theoretical models for prediction of methane production from anaerobic digestion: A critical review

Mohamed Mahmoud ALI
  • Mohamed Mahmoud ALI
  • Laboratoire de Recherche Appliquée aux Energies Renouvelables (LRAER), UNA, Mauritanie.
  • Google Scholar
Nourou DIA
  • Nourou DIA
  • Laboratoire de Recherche Appliquée aux Energies Renouvelables (LRAER), UNA, Mauritanie.
  • Google Scholar
Boudy BILAL
  • Boudy BILAL
  • Ecole Supérieur Polytechnique (ESP), Mauritanie.
  • Google Scholar
Mamoudou NDONGO
  • Mamoudou NDONGO
  • Laboratoire de Recherche Appliquée aux Energies Renouvelables (LRAER), UNA, Mauritanie.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 23 May 2018
  •  Accepted: 06 July 2018
  •  Published: 16 July 2018

References

Altas L (2009). Inhibitory effect of heavy metals on methane-producing anaerobic granular sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials 162:1551-1556.
Crossref

 

Antwi P, Li J, Boadi PO, Meng J, Shi E, Deng K, Bondinuba FK (2017). Estimation of biogas and methane yields in an UASB treating potato starch processing waste water with back propagation artificial neural network. Bioresource Technology 228:106-115.
Crossref

 

Chen YR, Hashimoto AG (1978). Kinetics of methane Fermentation. Biotechnlogy and Bioengineering Symposium 18:269-282.

 

Executive Board-CDM, (2008). Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small-scale CDM project activity categories, version 08, 14 p

 

Gioannis GD, Muntoni A, Cappai G, Milia S (2009). Landfill gas generation after mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste. Estimation of gasgeneration rate constants. Waste Management 29:1026-1034.
Crossref

 

Jagadish HP, Malourdu AR, Muralidhara PL, Desai SM, Mahadeva Raju GK (2012). Kinetics of Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth Using Poultry Litter as Inoculum. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 3:94-98.

 

Kafle GK, Chen L (2016). Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Waste Management 48:492-502.
Crossref

 

Kurtgoz Y, Karagoz M, Deniz E (2018). Biogas engine performance estimation using ANN. Engineering Science and Technology 20:1563-1570.

 

La Farge (1995). Biogas: processes of methane fermentation. Elsevier Masson. ISBN : 2-225-84257-4.

 

Lesteur M, Murel VB, Conzalez CC, Steyer JP (2010). Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: A review. Process Biochemistry 45:431-440.
Crossref

 

Li L, Kong X, Yang F, Sun Y (2012). Biogas Production Potential and Kinetics of Microwave and Conventional Thermal Pretreatment of Grass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 166:1183-1191.
Crossref

 

Lo HM, Kurniawan TA, Sillanpää ME, Pai TY, Chiang CF, Chao KP, Liu MH, Chuang SH, Banks CJ, Wang SC, Lin KC, Lin CY, Liu WF, Cheng PH, Chen CK, Chiu HY, Wu HY (2010). Modelling biogas production from organic fraction of MSW co-digested with MSWI ashes in anaerobic bioreactors. Bio resources Technology. Bio resources Technology 101:6329-6335.
Crossref

 

Manjula DG, Mahanta P (2014). Comparison of kinetic models for biogas production rate from Saw Dust. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3:248-254.
Crossref

 

Maghanaki MM, Ghobadian B, Najafi G, Galogah RJ (2013). Potential of biogas production in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 28:702-714.
Crossref

 

Nielfa R, Cano R, Fdz-Polanco M (2015). Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge. Biotechnology Reports 5:14-21.
Crossref

 

Nair VV, Dhar H, Kumar S, Thalla AK, Mukherjee S, Wong JW (2016). Artificial neural network based modeling to evaluate methane yield from biogas in a laboratory-scale anaerobic bioreactor. Bioreactor, Bioresource Technology 217:90-99.
Crossref

 

Okolie NP, Onifade AK, Oladunmoye MK, Adegunloye DV (2018). Comparative study of commercial gas with biogas produced from co-digestion of corn cob, rice chaff, goat and dog dungs. International Journal of Physical Sciences 13:98-105.
Crossref

 

Pavlostathis S, Giraldo GE (1991). Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review, Critical Reviews in Environmental Control 21:411-490.
Crossref

 

Raposo F, Fernández‐Cegrí V, De la Rubia MA, Borja R, Béline F, Cavinato C, Demirer G, Fernández B, Fernández‐Polanco M, Frigon JC, Ganesh R, Kaparaju P, Koubova J, Méndez R, Menin G, Peene A, Scherer P, Torrijos M, Uellendahl H, Wierinck I, de Wilde V (2011). Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international interlaboratory study. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 86:1088-1098.
Crossref

 

Roopnarain A, Adeleke R (2017). Current status, hurdles and future prospects of biogas digestion technology in Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 67:1162-1179.
Crossref

 

Vedrenne F (2007). Study of anaerobic degradation processes and methane production during slurry storage. Thèse Science de l'environnement, ENSA de Rennes, 232 p [in French].

 

Vijay V, Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Smith SJ (2016). The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss. PloS one 11(7):e0159668.
Crossref

 

Ware A, Power N (2017). Modelling methane production kinetics of complex poultry slaughterhouse wastes using sigmoidal growth functions. Renewable Energy 104:50-59.
Crossref